Compare iRobot Roomba Combo i5 Robot Vacuum vs Roborock Qrevo Curv Vacuum and Mop

Comes with the charging base, drip tray, combo mop bin, and a washable microfiber pad. Reviews note virtual wall beacons can be useful, but they are not always included in the box.

The adaptive chassis lift/threshold capability is a standout differentiator, helping it clear taller transitions than many robots. A few reviewers suggest real-world limits can be below marketing claims, but it’s still viewed as meaningfully better than average.

Several reviewers describe the robot and dock as sleek and good-looking, with a finish that stays presentable after weeks of use.

Its curved, modern dock and polished styling are frequently described as more living-room-friendly than boxier competitors. Overall sentiment on design is strongly positive.

The app supports scheduling, room targeting, cleaning history, and voice assistants in multiple reviews, with some automation options mentioned. Feature depth is still described as more basic than higher-end iRobot models (limited zone controls and fewer advanced settings).

The app is consistently described as feature-rich, with strong automation options (room-by-room settings, scheduling, empty frequency, remop triggers, etc.). Overall sentiment is that the software is powerful without being overly hard to use.

Vacuuming on rugs is generally described as solid, including tassel rugs, but the robot can mop rugs unless you remove them or avoid using mopping mode in mixed-floor areas.

For mixed flooring, mop lifting and carpet detection are praised for keeping rugs dry while maintaining cleaning coverage; reviewers generally see it as well-suited to homes with area rugs.

Setup is usually described as straightforward (unbox, place dock, app pairing/QR setup). A couple of reviewers note the onboarding can feel slow and that dock placement needs a clear approach path.

Setup is described as straightforward: the dock is largely ready out of the box, pairing/mapping is quick, and most complexity comes from exploring app settings rather than assembly.

Battery life and efficiency are rated highly (including strong coverage per charge), making it a good fit for larger homes or multi-room schedules.

The standard dust bin is easy to remove and empty, and a separate combo bin swaps in for mopping. Filters are replaceable, and at least one review mentions an extra filter included.

Reviews commonly mention a disposable dust bag in the dock plus an onboard bin; overall feedback is that it reduces dust mess and feels appropriately sized for typical households.

Build quality impressions are strong, including comments about minimal scuffing after a month and solid fit/feel of the bin and modules.

Carpet performance is repeatedly described as strong for day-to-day upkeep, including visible straight-line cleaning patterns and effective pickup. Reviews frame it more as maintenance than heavy-duty deep extraction.

Carpet deep-clean performance is rated very strong in testing, placing it near the top tier among vacuum+mop hybrids.

Child lock is called out as a useful feature to prevent accidental button presses and allow app/voice-only control.

On-robot controls are simple (clean/spot/home), with most features in the app. Some reviews mention limited tuning (for example, cleaning passes instead of granular suction control) and one notes missing battery percentage in the app.

Controls are generally praised: reviewers cite an intuitive app, useful remote-control features (e.g., pin-and-go), and broad customization. Some note competitor apps can feel more confusing, making Roborock’s UI a relative bright spot.

One review criticizes dock cable routing because the cord exits from a single side and there is no easy built-in way to tidy the cable.

Corner cleaning gets frequent praise thanks to an extending side brush, improving reach into tight corners. One stress test notes the side brush can scatter debris in extreme scenarios, but overall corner performance is viewed as above average.

Crevice/groove pickup is noted as a relative weak spot: one review calls it average compared to the robot’s otherwise high-performing hard-floor and carpet results.

A dirty-water / dirt-detection sensor is credited with enabling remop/extra wash behavior, helping prevent spreading grime and improving hands-off cleaning.

Docking behavior is usually reported as reliable, including returning home and resuming after recharging. Auto-emptying is only available with the Plus base, not the standard dock.

Docking and auto-empty reliability are repeatedly praised: the robot returns consistently, empties well, and handles mop washing/drying and refills with little fuss.

Dock emptying noise is described as relatively quiet for the category, including one report around ~67 dB.

In at least one standardized test, dried-on stain performance is described as more mid-pack than class-leading—good, but not the standout reason to buy.

Day-to-day operation is generally seen as easy thanks to straightforward app controls, quick bin removal, and washable pads. The biggest friction points are swapping bins/pads and pre-clearing clutter due to limited avoidance.

Day-to-day ownership is described as low-effort because the dock automates most chores; typical hands-on tasks are water refills/empties and occasional cleaning of the dock tray/consumables.

Edge coverage is frequently described as thorough, including tracing along walls and navigating around chair legs during systematic cleaning passes.

Edge coverage is repeatedly highlighted: an extending mop pad and sweep arm help it clean closer to walls and baseboards than many rivals. Reviewers still wish for true baseboard scrubbing, but edge pickup is considered a strength.

The standard version requires manual emptying, but reviewers often describe it as quick and easy. For a more hands-off experience, several recommend the Plus auto-empty setup.

The bagged emptying system is viewed as clean and convenient, with quiet emptying noted in at least one review and helpful indicators when water tanks need attention.

For carpet hair, reviews and pet-hair testing place it among the better performers, though some results suggest two passes may still be needed for the most thorough pickup.

Hard-floor hair pickup is described as excellent in pet-focused testing, with near-perfect results reported.

Dual rubber rollers are repeatedly praised for resisting tangles and making hair removal easy, though long strands can still occasionally wrap and need checking.

Hair‑wrap resistance is a major highlight: the split/DuoDivide-style roller design earns perfect or near-perfect tangle-test results in multiple discussions. One reviewer still noted minor hair accumulation in certain joints, but overall sentiment remains very strong.

Lab-style commentary and hands-on reviews indicate strong bare-floor pickup, including fine dust, helped by consistent pathing and the rubber rollers.

Testing-focused reviews describe excellent fine-dust pickup on hard floors, with strong results across small particulate debris.

Reviews describe effective pickup of larger debris such as crumbs and mixed household messes, including positive spot-cleaning results.

Large-debris intake is repeatedly described as excellent in testing, handling bigger particles without major issues.

Hot-water mop washing and heated/warm-air drying are consistently praised for hygiene and for keeping mop pads from staying damp between runs.

Its slim height is repeatedly cited as a benefit for reaching under furniture compared with taller lidar-turret designs.

Maintenance commonly includes filter cleaning/replacement, washing the mop pad, and occasional sensor/roller checks. Most reviewers consider upkeep manageable, though one mentions unclear sensor-clean prompts.

Maintenance is often framed as low thanks to automation, but owners still need to refill clean water, empty dirty water, replace bags/consumables, and occasionally clean the dock tray and brushes.

Mapping and pathing are standout strengths: after an initial run, it typically cleans in orderly rows, supports room-by-room jobs, and finishes faster than random-path Roombas according to comparative commentary.

Lidar mapping and route planning are described as fast and efficient, with organized straight-line coverage and solid room handling/multi-level mapping.

The mop pad does not automatically retract or lift, so users frequently swap bins and remove rugs or avoid mopping in mixed-surface areas.

Mop lifting is frequently cited as effective (often framed around a ~17mm lift), enabling it to vacuum carpets/rugs without soaking them.

Mopping is mostly described as light maintenance similar to a damp pad/Swiffer, not a deep scrub, and it may leave streaks. It is still viewed as useful for frequent quick refreshes of hard floors.

Mopping is broadly praised—dual spinning pads with adjustable wetness tackle everyday grime and paw prints well, and the extending mop pad improves edge coverage. A few reviewers still give the edge to the best-in-class moppers for heavy stains, but Curv is considered an excellent all‑around performer.

Noise feedback is mixed: some commentary places it around typical robovac loudness, while multiple hands-on reviewers call it very loud on hard floors (roller noise and bumping), leading many to run it when away.

Obstacle avoidance is repeatedly described as basic due to no front-facing camera/AI in these reviews, often involving bumper contact. Several reviews also note missing software no-go zones, so clutter and cords still need to be managed.

Obstacle avoidance is usually described as good for larger items and many everyday obstacles, but several reviewers call out missed small cables/cords. In cable-heavy rooms, it may snag or stop, so floor prep or no-go zones are recommended.

Overall sentiment is positive, highlighting dependable navigation and cleaning with a basic mop add-on. Recurring critiques focus on limited avoidance/no-go features and the simple, pad-based mopping.

Across the reviews, Qrevo Curv lands as a top-tier vacuum+mop with strong cleaning results, a highly automated dock, and smart navigation. Praise centers on edge/corner reach and pet-hair handling, while the most common knocks are premium pricing and imperfect cable avoidance.

Generally effective for pet households due to strong pet-hair pickup and the rubber roller design, but it lacks advanced pet accident detection and higher-end avoidance found on camera-based models.

Multiple reviews frame it as a great choice for pet owners thanks to strong hair pickup, anti-tangle brush design, and camera/app features (where enabled) for monitoring. Pet homes with lots of cords still need some floor prep.

Often positioned as a strong value within iRobot's lineup, especially on sale and versus cheaper random-navigation models. Some reviewers still suggest paying more for the Plus auto-empty base or stepping up to a J-series for additional features.

The price is repeatedly called premium (often framed around a ~$1,600 MSRP), and several reviewers recommend waiting for discounts. When on sale, value is described as far more compelling; a few reviewers question whether camera/chassis-lift extras are worth the upcharge versus cheaper variants or rivals.

Camera-based features (obstacle recognition, remote viewing/voice) bring privacy considerations. Reviews note the camera can be disabled/off by default, and a camera-free variant exists for buyers who prioritize privacy.

Reported runtimes often land around 70 to 90 minutes per charge, with noticeably faster drain when running extra passes. Reviews note it can dock, recharge, and resume for larger spaces.

The dock’s self-cleaning base/tray features reduce manual scrubbing, though reviewers still expect periodic cleaning to keep things fresh.

One reviewer emphasizes iRobot's strategy of improving capability via ongoing software updates. Concrete examples of major new features arriving via updates are not consistently documented across the reviews.

Reviews mention mopping with water or approved cleaning solutions, and one review notes that using unauthorized solutions may risk warranty coverage. Owners manually fill and empty the combo bin.

Most reviewers say detergent dosing is manual (add solution to the clean-water tank rather than a dedicated auto-dosing reservoir), while one review lists a detergent capacity/mixing capability. Net takeaway: plan for at least some manual solution handling.

At least one hands-on review reports streaking during mopping, suggesting results depend on pad wetness, floor type, and solution choice.

Several reviews report it avoids common snag points like rug tassels, but users still recommend pre-picking up cords and clutter because object detection is limited compared with camera-based models.

Adaptive lift helps it clear thresholds and some obstacles, but cable snags and occasional attempts to 'climb' awkward objects can still interrupt runs in some homes.

Even with reported airflow/CFM metrics below some competitors in one review, reviewers and test commentary describe strong real-world pickup helped by the dual rubber rollers and multi-stage cleaning system.

Vacuuming performance is described as strong in real homes and on carpets, helped by high rated suction. One evaluation calls out only average airflow/bench suction and weaker performance in tight crevices compared with its overall cleaning results.

Multiple reviewers frame it as a maintenance cleaner rather than a solution for heavy messes or deep mopping, especially compared with higher-end systems.

Multiple reviews highlight its ability to clean under beds and other low-clearance furniture where manual vacuums struggle.

Works as a vacuum-only robot or as a vacuum+mop once you swap in the combo bin and attach the pad, making it flexible for maintenance cleaning across surfaces.

The combo bin water capacity is described as modest (one measured review cites a low-200 ml range), which suits light maintenance mopping but may require attention for larger areas.

Reviews consistently mention separate clean/dirty water tanks plus onboard water handling that keeps pads wet. Tank refills/empties are a routine task, but capacity and adjustable water use are generally seen as practical for whole-home runs.