Compare Kenmore Intuition Bagged Upright Vacuum vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum

Accessories vary by model/package: multiple reviews highlight useful upholstery/pet tools and, in some versions, turbo tools. Value is higher when the kit includes more tools and extra bags, but quality/fit of tools is debated in at least one review.

Commonly described as coming with a practical set of basic tools (crevice and upholstery/wide upholstery tool; some variants add pet tools). Lift-Away makes these tools more useful for stairs and above-floor cleaning.

Design/finish gets some positive mentions (e.g., sleek styling, chrome/rose-gold accents on certain versions). At least one reviewer considers it more utilitarian/old-school or bulky in practice.

Assembly is typically described as quick and easy, with straightforward snap-in steps and minimal setup time reported by at least one hands-on review.

A bag-full/level indicator is mentioned as a helpful convenience feature that reduces guesswork and prompts timely bag replacement to keep performance steady.

Bagged operation is a defining feature. Many reviewers like the cleaner disposal and note synthetic bags can maintain suction reasonably well, but bag capacity and sealing details are debated, and you must keep bags stocked.

Bagless dust cup is generally considered easy to empty; some sources highlight an open/easy-to-clean canister design that supports long-term upkeep.

Build quality feedback is split. Some reviews describe a well-designed, feature-rich product for the price, while a technician-style review calls materials and mechanisms cheap/chintzy and not up to older Kenmore expectations.

High-pile/shag performance is described as strong by at least one test source, while other reviewers caution that very thick carpet can be harder to push due to no height adjustment and strong suction (mitigated by a suction release valve on some variants).

High-pile/shag performance is a recurring weak spot: fixed height and head geometry can struggle to get on top of larger debris or can be harder to push on thick carpet compared with uprights with height adjustment.

Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong in testing-style writeups, often above average for the upright category at its price.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly called out as a strength, including embedded sand/debris test outcomes described as top-tier.

Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning is often a highlight, with at least one lab-style comparison giving it top-tier embedded debris results in its price segment.

Often framed as outperforming many budget uprights and competing surprisingly well against pricier models in certain tests, but it generally trails modern premium heads on high-pile and specialized hard-floor pickup.

Controls are generally simple and include a brushroll on/off (or brush control) to transition between carpet and hard floors; lack of height adjustment is a repeated limitation for thick rugs/high pile and some large-debris situations.

Cord length is often listed as long (commonly cited as 30 ft), though at least one review suggests a shorter effective reach depending on how the cord is routed/managed. Overall, corded coverage is viewed as adequate to strong.

Cord length is generally reported as adequate/good for the class, with some comparisons noting premium or competing models can be longer; exact length varies by variant in sources.

Cord management gets mixed notes: some appreciate the overall reach, while others complain about hooks being stiff or the routing getting in the way of certain lift-off configurations.

Crevice/groove pickup is frequently highlighted as a strength relative to some competitors, supported by test commentary and the usefulness of the integrated wand for hard-to-reach debris.

Crevice/crack pickup is repeatedly described as a limitation versus newer designs; some tests show below-average removal in crevice-style trials, making the wand more important for edges/cracks.

Maneuverability is often described as better than expected for its size, helped by swivel steering and a relatively light chassis. Still, some note it can feel dense/hefty in hand or less ideal in tight, low-clearance spaces.

Edge/baseboard performance is variable: some sources say it cleans edges well head-on, but others note it can miss a small band near edges or struggle on parallel passes along walls.

No-touch / low-mess disposal is frequently cited as a major advantage. Several sources describe a bag release that reduces contact with dust and makes disposal quick and hygienic.

Filtration and dust containment are repeatedly praised: sealed system language, HEPA-oriented bags/filters, and reduced dust exposure during disposal are common. This is positioned as a strong fit for allergy concerns.

A key strength: sources describe a sealed system paired with HEPA filtration/Complete Seal-style containment, which improves dust/allergen containment compared with many budget uprights.

Hair pickup on carpets is good overall, but multiple reviews note that hair can remain on or wrap around the brushroll, reducing the 'clean it and forget it' experience for heavy-shedding homes.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally solid for typical pet hair, but some testing notes clumping and that not all hair makes it fully to the bin in tougher trials.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally described as effective for everyday pet hair, aided by strong suction and above-floor tools.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a consistent weak spot across several sources. Even when hair-focused branding is mentioned, reviewers still report wrap and that brushroll cleaning can be tedious.

Long-hair wrap is a consistent drawback across tests and reviews; owners should expect periodic brushroll clearing, especially with longer hair and heavy shedding households.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as decent but not class-leading; some sources report improved results with additional passes or technique, and a minority note dragging/pushing behavior in certain situations.

Fine debris on hard floors is generally good but not best-in-class; at least one test notes it can leave fine sand behind, requiring extra passes.

Large debris intake on hard floors is generally good for the class, with some mention of larger debris handling aided by the floorhead/gate design. A few reviewers note occasional snowplow/drag or a couple pieces left behind on hard floors.

Large debris on hard floors/rugs can be mixed: it can handle many everyday pieces, but multiple mentions note pushing/scattering crummy or larger particles in some scenarios without height adjustment or a more modern head design.

Headlights/LEDs are consistently noted as a helpful usability feature for spotting debris in dim areas, and reviewers generally treat them as a meaningful perk at this price level.

Hose length/behavior is inconsistent across sources. Some mention long reach, while a technician-style review calls the hose short, stiff, and prone to tipping/pulling the unit, which can hurt real-world above-floor ergonomics.

Hose/wand reach is a common nit: multiple writeups mention wishing the hose were longer or the wand had more reach, which can limit above-floor range compared with some alternatives.

Low-profile reach is a common limitation. Multiple sources note it can be tricky under low furniture, and the overall body shape/positioning can restrict access compared with more under-furniture-focused designs.

Maintenance is shaped by the bagged system (cleaner disposal) but complicated by brushroll hair wrap and, for some, finicky small mechanisms. Several reviewers flag brushroll cleaning as annoying or difficult.

Maintenance is straightforward (wash/replace filters, keep bin empty), but brushroll hair wrap and periodic clearing are repeatedly mentioned as the main ongoing chore.

Maneuverability is often a plus (notably swivel steering), though some testing notes it can feel stiffer than premium uprights and may require a bit more effort under strong suction conditions.

Noise impressions vary. Some sources call it quieter than certain competitors or surprisingly reasonable for performance, while at least one review describes it as loud during testing. Overall it lands around mid-pack rather than ultra-quiet.

Noise is frequently described as relatively quiet for an upright; at least one test set places it among the quietest in its comparison group.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned positively by some as convenient, but criticized by at least one reviewer who reports tools not locking well and being easy to knock off, implying variability by model and expectations.

Ongoing costs are a recurring tradeoff: bags (and some filters) add ownership expense over time. Multiple sources frame this as the main downside versus bagless convenience, even if disposal is cleaner.

No summary yet.

Value is generally described as strong for a bagged upright with these features, especially when priced under typical premium uprights. However, some reviewers argue the value depends heavily on sale pricing and expectations around build/tool refinement.

Repeatedly positioned as a standout value in the $100–$200-ish budget upright space, with performance and sealed filtration that often beat cheaper uprights and compete well for the price.

Stair cleaning benefits from the lift-off/lift-up pod concept, and several reviewers like the idea for above-floor work. A technician-style review warns the short/stiff hose and stability can make stairs feel awkward in practice.

Lift-Away is repeatedly called out as making stair cleaning and above-floor cleaning meaningfully easier than standard uprights, though hose/wand reach can be a limiting factor depending on variant.

Strong suction is a recurring theme, including measured airflow/suction reporting and subjective comments about a solid carpet seal and strong pickup. Some sources note strong head performance versus similarly priced uprights, though a few mention limits on hard floors or thick carpet push resistance tied to high suction.

Suction and airflow are frequently described as strong for the price and consistent over time when maintained; several comparisons treat suction power as a primary reason it remains popular.

Support expectations are helped by commonly cited multi-year warranty coverage and broad parts availability; durability is often described as adequate but plastic-heavy.

Tool-change is generally described as straightforward (quick-release wand/tools), though a few sources mention a learning curve for reseating the wand/bag mechanism or frustration with attachment retention.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally described as a strong use case thanks to included tools (e.g., upholstery brushes/turbo tools/pet tools on some kits) and the detachable pod, though tool fit/retention quality is disputed by at least one reviewer.

No summary yet.

No summary yet.

Versatility is a defining feature due to Lift-Away mode and above-floor usability; it’s commonly recommended for stairs, upholstery, and hard-to-reach areas relative to basic uprights.

Weight is commonly reported around the mid-teens (about 14 lb) in some reviews, but other sources describe it as heavier/dense or cite higher numbers for certain variants. Perceived carrying comfort can vary, especially on stairs.

Usually described as lightweight for an upright and easier to carry than many competitors, supporting its budget-all-purpose positioning.