Compare Eureka Mighty Mite Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum

The included tools are basic and often described as cheap or limited, but many users still find the crevice and combo tools effective for above-floor jobs.

The included accessory set (crevice, dusting, stair, and other tools depending on package) is viewed as genuinely useful for whole-home cleaning. Reviewers like having the right attachment ready for corners, upholstery, and quick spot jobs.

The self-righting design is a standout feature: multiple reviewers emphasize that if the canister topples, it can right itself and keep going. This reduces interruptions that are common with typical canister vacuums.

The bright, utilitarian look is divisive: several reviewers call it no-frills or dated, while others like the simple, compact design and color options.

The design is often described as sleek and modern, with some reviewers enjoying the see-through head and distinctive ball form factor. It tends to fit visually in modern homes.

Area rugs are generally handled well if they are low/medium pile, but thicker rugs can expose the limitations of straight suction and a basic floor head.

On thick or small area rugs, suction can cause the head to stick or lift the rug, making it harder to push and pull. Power-relief or suction-bleed features help sometimes, but not universally.

Assembly is typically minimal and quick, though multiple reviewers emphasize fitting wand sections tightly to avoid pop-offs or perceived performance issues.

The bagged system is appreciated for cleaner disposal than many bagless vacuums, though some sources note imperfect self-sealing and potential fine dust inside the canister when using basic paper bags.

The vacuum uses a bagless dust bin around 1.6L, and several owners like the larger capacity versus older models. Reviews also note you should respect the fill line to avoid losing suction or encouraging clogs.

Build quality impressions range from surprisingly solid for the price to cheapened plastics and flimsy accessories. The core canister is often described as sturdy enough if used with reasonable care.

Build quality is consistently praised, with comments about tight fitment, sturdy materials, and a well-engineered feel. Cord rewind and component alignment are often called out as smooth and refined.

High-pile carpet is the consistent weakness: multiple tests show poor deep dirt removal and lower pickup, with reviewers commonly advising to avoid shag or wall-to-wall plush carpet as the primary use case.

High-pile carpet pickup is strong overall, including pet hair, though some tests show reduced performance with cereal-like debris. For most common messes, reviewers report fast, effective cleaning.

Low-pile carpet pickup is typically average-to-strong for a straight-suction canister, with several tests showing high pickup rates when the setup is sealed and the right floor setting is used.

Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in structured tests, often nearing perfect collection across multiple debris types. This is one of the areas where it most clearly earns its reputation for strong performance.

Medium-pile carpet performance is described as workable but not the product's core strength, improving when the floor tool settings and technique are dialed in.

Clogging risk is usually manageable, but several reviewers warn that bends in the wand/handle area or imperfect seals can trap debris and require occasional clearing.

Clogging is not a frequent complaint in normal use, and parts are designed to come apart for clearing. However, multiple tests show the main head can struggle with cereal or similarly bulky debris, which can contribute to frustrating pick-up and occasional blockages.

Comparisons are mixed: some tests say it performs like far pricier vacuums on hard floors and short carpet, while other sources position it as a budget compromise that loses to better canisters on carpet, filtration, and convenience features.

Comparisons often place it near the top of its class, including strong carpet results versus typical canisters and competitiveness with some upright vacuums. The main comparative weakness is bulky hard-floor debris pickup with the standard head.

Controls are simple, with suction adjustment often handled via a hose slip ring or relief valve rather than powered settings. Some users find small design details (like an unmarked power button) less intuitive.

Controls are generally straightforward, including handle-based adjustments for surface transitions and suction control. One common gripe is that certain handle triggers must be held continuously, and power-relief features may not fully solve sticking on very thick rugs.

Cord length around 20 feet is often considered usable but not generous, and some reviewers explicitly call it short relative to premium canisters.

Reach is a strength, helped by a long cord and wand/hose combination that reduces replugging and makes stairs easier. Multiple sources cite total reach in the low-to-mid 30-foot range.

Cord management is a common complaint because there is typically no retractable cord; users wind the cord manually on hooks or around the body.

Cord management is a favorite feature thanks to smooth, reliable automatic rewind. Reviewers often call out the retractable cord as making daily use feel more polished.

Crevice and tight-area pickup is consistently praised, especially when using the hose and crevice tool for corners, baseboards, and nooks.

Crevice performance is a highlight when using the crevice tool and concentrated suction, helping reach nooks, grooves, and furniture gaps. Reviewers specifically praise corner and crevice reach compared with older vacuums.

Cyclone performance is repeatedly credited for maintaining airflow and capturing fine dust. Reviewers call out Dyson’s multi-cyclonic or radial cyclone approach as a key reason it performs well on embedded debris.

Handling is a major strength once you adapt: the ball base and articulation help it track behind you and turn tightly. The main downsides are canister drag when you overreach and the tendency to bump walls or cut corners in narrow hallways.

Day-to-day use is easy for quick cleans and above-floor detailing, but ease-of-use scores drop when factoring in loudness, manual cord wrap, and occasional handle/wand fit issues.

Ease of use is rated high overall, especially once you adapt to the tag-along canister style. Minor usability knocks include canister drag when overreaching and occasional control quirks, but most still describe it as user-friendly.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is reported as very strong in testing-focused reviews, with tight-line pickup performing near best-in-class for its price.

Edge and baseboard cleaning tends to be above average but not perfect in formal tests. Using the crevice tool improves corner results, but the main floorhead may leave some debris along edges.

Bagged emptying is generally less messy than bagless bins, but sealing quality varies by bag type and some users still report a bit of dust escape when swapping bags.

Emptying is widely praised as hygienic and low-mess, using a lever or ejection design that pushes debris out of the bin. This reduces the need to reach into the bin to pull out stuck debris.

Filtration is a frequent weakness for the standard unit, with multiple tests reporting small particle escape and a lack of sealed HEPA performance. Some users attempt mitigation via aftermarket HEPA-style bags or more frequent filter care.

Filtration is a strong point: reviewers call it allergy-friendly, citing HEPA-style containment and a washable lifetime filter that helps capture fine dust. This is a recurring reason it is recommended for people sensitive to dust.

The floorhead is functional but basic: it can be effective on hard floors and low pile, yet may push larger debris, trap hair in bristles, or feel cheap compared to premium designs.

The floorhead is praised for being self-adjusting and for features that help transition between surfaces. The tradeoff noted in multiple tests is limited ability to roll over or ingest chunkier debris, sometimes requiring a hose-only approach.

Hair pickup on carpets is mixed: some testers report excellent results (especially on higher-pile pet-hair tests using bristles), while other reviews note hair can cling to the floor tool surface rather than being fully captured.

Carpet hair pickup is a standout, with testing showing very high pet hair removal and owners reporting easy cleanup of shedding. It is frequently recommended for homes with dogs or cats.

Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently reported as strong, especially for long hair and pet fur on smooth surfaces.

Tangle resistance is a highlight because there is no powered brushroll on the standard design, reducing hair-wrap headaches compared with many uprights and sticks.

Hair-wrap resistance is not absolute: hair can tangle in the turbine/brush area, but reviewers say clearing it is straightforward. Overall, it is manageable rather than fully tangle-proof.

Across hands-on tests, fine debris on hard floors is a standout strength, frequently reaching near-complete pickup in controlled testing.

Fine dust and smaller debris pickup on hard floors is generally good, with strong results on powders and granules in several tests. Overall hard-floor scores are pulled down mostly by performance on larger debris rather than fine particles.

Large debris pickup on hard floors is generally excellent, though multiple reviewers note the floor head can push larger pieces (like cereal or oats) before ingesting them.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is the most consistent complaint: cereal, Cheerios, and similar items may be pushed around or missed by the main head. Several reviewers report that switching to the hose or a different tool solves the problem.

Hose reach is usually described as adequate for stairs and above-floor cleaning, though some versions are noted as having a shorter hose than older models.

Hose and wand reach is repeatedly described as long, supporting above-floor tasks and helping avoid hauling the canister up stairs. It contributes meaningfully to whole-home coverage from a single outlet.

Kid-friendliness is mixed mainly due to weight: at least one reviewer suggests carrying or maneuvering the canister may be too much for small children (and some users with limited strength). Day-to-day use in-hand is easier than the full weight suggests.

The head’s low-profile design helps it slide under furniture and reach low-clearance areas. This is highlighted as a practical advantage in real homes with couches and tables.

Maintenance is generally simple (bag changes and basic filters), but several sources note quirks like finicky bag seating or higher-than-expected replacement frequency on certain guidance.

Maintenance is generally light: empty the bin, wash the filter periodically (with a required dry time), and check the brush area for tangles. Reviewers like that there are few routine replacement parts.

Handling is helped by the low weight and compact canister, making stairs and room-to-room transport easy. A few reviewers criticize tracking and maneuver behavior compared with modern canisters, especially if the wheels and hose resist smooth movement.

Noise is commonly rated as a major drawback, with several sources describing it as very loud or shrill and some measuring it in the high-decibel range.

At least one hands-on reviewer found it surprisingly quiet for the level of suction. Most sources do not provide detailed noise measurements, so expectations should be set as generally acceptable rather than whisper-quiet.

Some versions provide onboard spots for small tools (like a stowed crevice tool), but overall storage solutions are limited compared with higher-end canisters.

Onboard/clip storage for tools is convenient for quick swaps, and some reviewers mention side-mounted attachments. Storage capacity is not unlimited, but it covers common tools well.

Ongoing costs depend on bag and filter choices: some reviewers frame yearly costs as low with inexpensive bags, while others note higher replacement cadence and costs if following certain filter schedules or upgrading to higher-grade bags.

Ongoing costs are viewed favorably because it is bagless, uses a washable lifetime filter, and is corded so there is no battery to replace. Routine spend is mostly limited to occasional wear parts or repairs rather than consumables.

Longevity is often described as strong for the basic design, with multiple references to long-running older units, though newer accessories and plastics are sometimes viewed as less robust than prior generations.

Durability impressions are positive, with users citing long-lived older Dyson machines and expecting similar longevity here. The overall feel is described as sturdy and well-engineered rather than flimsy.

Overall opinion across sources is strongly positive, often calling it one of the best all-around canister options and a favorite for pet owners. The recurring reservations are weight, price, and weaker large-debris pickup on hard floors.

For shedding households, hard-floor performance and low-maintenance hair handling can be a win, but carpeted homes may need a turbo brush or a different vacuum type for better pet-hair agitation.

Multiple tests and owners highlight excellent pet-hair performance, especially on carpet, with the brush and suction working well together. It is frequently recommended specifically for pet homes.

Value is the central appeal. Most reviews call it a standout bargain for hard floors and lightweight convenience, tempered by loudness, basic accessories, and weak high-pile carpet performance.

Price is repeatedly framed as premium: some reviewers call it expensive, while others argue the performance and usability make it a solid value. Overall sentiment lands at worth it if you prioritize cleaning results and convenience features.

Some owners warn about potential scuffing or scratching on delicate hardwood from hard plastic wheels or tool edges, recommending extra care on premium finishes.

Stair cleaning is repeatedly called out as a strong use case because the canister is light to carry and the hose and tools are effective on steps.

Stair cleaning is well supported by the included stair tool and the long hose/wand reach. Reviewers find it easy to switch into stair mode without dragging the whole canister onto each step.

The compact canister and simple tool set store easily, though the lack of modern parking and onboard organization can make storage feel messier than premium canisters.

Despite being a full-size canister, reviewers say it can store well in a closet, and some mention it can be dismantled for tighter storage. There is no strong consensus on upright parking stability, but the footprint is generally manageable.

Most reviews describe strong, consistent suction on hard floors and for above-floor detailing, with lab-style tests showing excellent pickup. One major outlier flags weak suction overall, suggesting performance can vary by expectations, setup, or surface type.

Reviews consistently describe very strong suction and airflow, strong enough to deep-clean carpets and pull embedded dirt. A few note the power can be almost too aggressive on very thick rugs or when trying to pick up bulky items with the main head.

It can handle light-to-moderate duty and some professional-style spot use, but it is not ideal as a single do-everything vacuum for large, carpet-heavy homes.

For heavy-duty and larger-area cleaning, reviewers like the strong suction, continuous corded runtime, and long reach that reduces outlet changes. Several explicitly recommend it for bigger homes or office-like spaces if you can manage the weight.

Small-space suitability is excellent: compact storage, low weight, and simple operation make it popular for apartments and tight closets.

In small spaces, storage is workable and the low-clearance head helps under furniture, but maneuvering the trailing canister in tight hallways can be annoying. It tends to suit small homes best when you can keep the canister centered and rely on the long reach.

Support confidence is boosted by the availability of replacement parts and third-party accessories, even though experiences vary by retailer and generation.

Swapping tools is generally straightforward, but some users report the wand and head connections can separate because there are no robust locking mechanisms on certain kits.

Tool swaps are repeatedly described as quick and low-effort, with parts snapping into place for on-the-fly changes. This makes moving between floor cleaning and above-floor tasks feel seamless.

Under-furniture reach is repeatedly praised, helped by a low-clearance head and long overall reach. Reviewers note it can get farther under couches and tables than many canisters.

Above-floor pickup is frequently praised, especially for stairs, furniture edges, vents, and car interiors, helped by strong suction and lightweight wand handling.

Above-floor cleaning is a strong use case thanks to the long hose/wand reach and the included tools. Reviewers mention success on couches, vents, ceilings, vehicles, and other awkward areas.

Versatility is a strong point: multiple reviews highlight stairs, cars, furniture, and tight spaces, with some versions also featuring a blower port for non-floor tasks.

Versatility is repeatedly highlighted: it transitions across carpet and hard floors, and the wand plus tools extend cleaning to upholstery, corners, and high/low areas. Many reviewers frame it as a one-vacuum solution for varied jobs.

Nearly every source highlights the very low weight (roughly 8 to 9.5 pounds) as a key advantage versus heavier canisters and many cordless sticks.

Total weight is commonly noted as heavy for a canister (often cited around 17+ lb or roughly 8 kg). Many reviewers add that in-hand feel is lighter because you are mostly holding the wand, but stair carrying can still be a drawback.