Compare Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum vs Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum

P1 Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
P2 Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum

Comparison Takeaways

Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum

Where It Has the Edge

  • Onboard tool storage is 4.6 vs 2.7. Storage is well thought out when using the dock, which can keep attachments together and reduce clutter.
  • Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake is 3.5 vs 2.5. On hard floors, it can handle fresh spills and even larger bits (for example grains or rice), but...
  • Battery and Charging is 3.9 vs 3.1. The charging base keeps it ready for quick use; however, one tester notes there is no clear full-charge...
  • Runtime is 3.7 vs 3.1. Reported runtime is short but usable for quick jobs, commonly cited around 11 to 14 minutes depending on...

Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum

Where It Has the Edge

  • Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup is 4.4 vs 1.3. Above-floor cleaning is a core strength for cars and upholstery, but some mention the nozzle can cling to...
  • Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup is 4.1 vs 1.5. On medium-pile carpet, the motorized tool generally lifts hair and small-to-medium debris well, sometimes needing extra passes at...
  • Clogging and debris prevention is 4.1 vs 2.2. Many testers say the airflow path resists clogs and passes debris well, but hair can still collect on...
  • Controls and UI is 4.6 vs 2.8. Controls are simple and intuitive, with easy on/off operation and basic indicator lights for charging or low battery.
Average score
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.3
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0
Accessories and Tools
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.8

The included crevice and brush tools plus an expandable nozzle cover common small-mess jobs, but one review notes the attachments can feel insecure and may fall out during use.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5

The included tools (motorized pet brush, crevice tool, and scrubbing or stiff brush) add real versatility, with the crevice tool repeatedly praised for tight spaces.

Aesthetic design and finish
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.2

The design is repeatedly described as slim and straightforward, with a clean look that can blend into a small-space setup.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5

Several reviewers describe a sleek look with a transparent dust cup and generally tidy finish.

Airflow blowback
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
2.2

Strong exhaust airflow is a recurring theme; one test says it can blow debris around on bare floors, and another notes powerful airflow that may push crumbs deeper into rugs.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.3

A small number of notes mention debris escaping after shutdown or scatter when using the wrong tool on hard floors, suggesting some backflow or blowback in certain scenarios.

Area Rug Handling
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2

On area rugs, reviews report good pickup of dust, grit, and hair with the motorized tool, though it can fill the bin quickly.

Battery and Charging
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.9

The charging base keeps it ready for quick use; however, one tester notes there is no clear full-charge indicator beyond a basic light.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.1

Battery is the most common limitation: typical runtime is short and charging can be slow, and the battery is not treated as easily swappable in the reviews.

Bin and Bag
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.2

Emptying is generally described as easy via a twist-off bin.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0

Bin capacity is generally considered generous for the handheld category (around 0.43–0.45L), though a few still call it small if you are doing bigger jobs.

Carpet — High-Pile Pickup
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
1.2

High-pile carpet pickup is reported as very weak for this style of handheld.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
1.8

Low-pile rugs and thin carpets are a weak point; reviews describe crumbs being pushed or pickup failing once debris starts to sit in the fibers.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
1.5

Medium-pile carpet performance is reported as poor, especially for hair and stubborn dirt.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.1

On medium-pile carpet, the motorized tool generally lifts hair and small-to-medium debris well, sometimes needing extra passes at edges or for stubborn material.

Clogging and debris prevention
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
2.2

Filter clogging is a known issue in one hands-on test, suggesting debris management depends on regular filter cleaning.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.1

Many testers say the airflow path resists clogs and passes debris well, but hair can still collect on brush bristles and occasionally block the nozzle.

Comparative performance
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
2.6

When compared directly, a more pet-focused Dustbuster with a motorized tool is reported to outperform it, especially on carpets and upholstery.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Controls and UI
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
2.8

Controls are minimal (typically just on/off) with no suction modes, and one review flags the lack of a true battery life indicator.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.6

Controls are simple and intuitive, with easy on/off operation and basic indicator lights for charging or low battery.

Cordless convenience
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.4

Cordless grab-and-go convenience is a major reason people like it, especially for small spaces and frequent messes.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.7

Being cordless is a major convenience for quick daily cleanups around the home and in the car.

Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.1

Tight-space cleanup is a strength: it can pull debris from cracks, shelf edges, and baseboard gaps, though it may leave some fine dust behind.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Cyclone performance
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3

The dual cyclonic airflow design is credited with steady pickup and helping maintain suction, with multiple reviewers noting it is less prone to clogging than simpler handhelds.

Ease of use
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.3

Ease of use is a highlight: minimal setup, one-hand operation, quick emptying, and a docked home base make it simple to reach for daily.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2

Operation is straightforward (single-button style) and the form factor is easy to maneuver, though the longer, slim body can be limiting in very cramped spaces.

Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.5

Edge and baseboard cleaning is rated favorably in one source, but another notes it does better on larger debris than lingering dust along edges.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Emptying and Mess Control
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.0

Keeping mess controlled is helped by straightforward emptying and a dock that can catch stray debris, but you still need to empty after quick cleanups to avoid leftovers.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2

One-button emptying is usually easy and touchless, but some reviewers found the mechanism a bit fiddly or warned it can scatter debris if you do not aim carefully.

Filtration / Dust Containment
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
2.4

Filtration is not positioned as HEPA-grade in one review; the washable filter is convenient but not aimed at allergy-level containment.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0

Filters are typically washable (foam or felt styles), but HEPA-level containment is not consistently claimed and some guidance suggests periodic replacement.

Floorhead design
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.0

The expandable, wide nozzle is highlighted as a practical design feature that increases cleaning path width for larger messes.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.8

Pet hair on hard floors can be a decent use case, with one test calling results favorable, but performance varies depending on surface and how embedded the hair is.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.4

The motorized pet brush is often described as self-cleaning or low-tangle, keeping hair off the roller, although non-motorized brushes can still collect hair on their bristles.

Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.0

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as imperfect; it can miss some dust even when it grabs larger debris well.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2

Fine dust and small particles on hard floors are handled well with the crevice tool and careful passes; powered tools can scatter on slick surfaces in some tests.

Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.5

On hard floors, it can handle fresh spills and even larger bits (for example grains or rice), but blowback can hurt real-world pickup in some situations.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.5

Large debris pickup is mixed: some tests report strong pickup, while others say oversized cereal-style pieces can be difficult.

Headlight and LED lights
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3

LED headlights are called out as helpful for spotting small debris in darker corners.

Maintenance requirements
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.3

Maintenance is modest but frequent: emptying after use and cleaning the washable filter matters, and filter clogging is reported to reduce performance.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.1

Maintenance is routine: frequent emptying, washable filters and bin components, and drying time after rinsing are common themes.

Noise level
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.2

Noise impressions are split: one source calls it pretty quiet, while another measured it as loud for a handheld (around mid-70 dB).

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.4

Noise is described as average-to-loud for a handheld, with measurements spanning roughly the high-60s to high-80s dB and occasional comments about a whine.

Onboard tool storage
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.6

Storage is well thought out when using the dock, which can keep attachments together and reduce clutter.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.7

There is typically no built-in attachment storage, and multiple reviewers note the lack of a dedicated place for tools or a dock.

Packaging quality
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.8

One review specifically praises recyclable, minimal packaging materials.

Pet-Ready Features
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5

Pet-focused performance is a highlight: the motorized pet tool pulls hair from couches, carpets, and car interiors, though embedded or wiry hair can require extra passes.

Price and Value
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.2

Value is generally framed as strong for the price when used as a quick-clean handheld, but less compelling if you expect carpet and upholstery performance.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.6

Value is generally rated highly for a mid-priced handheld, especially for pet households wanting strong everyday pickup.

Runtime
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.7

Reported runtime is short but usable for quick jobs, commonly cited around 11 to 14 minutes depending on the source.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.1

Measured runtime tends to land roughly in the 10–15 minute range across different tests and use cases.

Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.0

Storage is a recurring complaint: no included stand or dock in several packages, and some wish for a wall mount or more compact countertop storage.

Suction and Airflow
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.9

Suction feels strong for quick pickups on hard floors and countertops in one review, but another describes the unit as not very powerful overall, especially on soft surfaces.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3

Suction is widely described as strong for a handheld, especially for surface crumbs and hair, but it is less convincing on deeply worked-in dirt and some heavy debris.

Suitability for small spaces
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.8

Its slim profile and docked storage make it well-suited to small homes, apartments, and feeling unobtrusive on a counter or in a closet.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yet
Surface safety with attachments
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.6

The dusting or soft-bristle attachment is described as gentle on delicate surfaces, helping reduce the risk of scratches or streaks.

Tool-change simplicity
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
3.6

Tool changes are simple (slot-in style), though the lack of a firm locking mechanism can make attachments feel less secure for some users.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.4

Tool swaps are generally quick: attachments push or snap on and off without fuss.

Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
1.3

Upholstery pickup is repeatedly described as poor without a powered tool, especially for pet hair on soft chairs and fabric surfaces.

Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.4

Above-floor cleaning is a core strength for cars and upholstery, but some mention the nozzle can cling to fabric or requires the right angle for best results.

Weight
Product 1: Black+Decker Dustbuster Cordless Hand Vacuum
No score yet
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5

Weight is a consistent win: reviewers describe it as light in-hand and easy to use for quick cleanups and car detailing without arm fatigue.