Compare Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum vs Kenmore 600 Series Canister Vacuum

The included accessory set (crevice, dusting, stair, and other tools depending on package) is viewed as genuinely useful for whole-home cleaning. Reviewers like having the right attachment ready for corners, upholstery, and quick spot jobs.

Multiple reviews emphasize the generous tool set (crevice, dusting, upholstery, powered pet tool) as a key advantage over competitors and cheaper Kenmore variants.

The self-righting design is a standout feature: multiple reviewers emphasize that if the canister topples, it can right itself and keep going. This reduces interruptions that are common with typical canister vacuums.

The design is often described as sleek and modern, with some reviewers enjoying the see-through head and distinctive ball form factor. It tends to fit visually in modern homes.

Several reviewers say the canister and attachments look nice or premium for the price, with no major complaints about finish.

A technician review reports debris falling back out of the nozzle and bouncing inside the head, suggesting occasional blowback depending on floorhead and debris type.

On thick or small area rugs, suction can cause the head to stick or lift the rug, making it harder to push and pull. Power-relief or suction-bleed features help sometimes, but not universally.

Height adjustments and the powered head help it work across rugs, including thicker pile, but reviewers still note drop-off as pile height increases.

Setup is described as straightforward in the unboxing-style reviews, with the vacuum assembling quickly before first use.

Bag-full indicators are mentioned positively as a practical cue for replacement and for keeping suction consistent.

The vacuum uses a bagless dust bin around 1.6L, and several owners like the larger capacity versus older models. Reviews also note you should respect the fill line to avoid losing suction or encouraging clogs.

Most reviewers find the bag system easy to access and replace, and the disposable bags help keep emptying clean. One review warns that seal design can affect containment even with a bag.

Build quality is consistently praised, with comments about tight fitment, sturdy materials, and a well-engineered feel. Cord rewind and component alignment are often called out as smooth and refined.

Build impressions range from solid to dated; one technician review flags known wear points (cord/powerhead design) and a mini-tool motor that stalled during use.

High-pile carpet pickup is strong overall, including pet hair, though some tests show reduced performance with cereal-like debris. For most common messes, reviewers report fast, effective cleaning.

High-pile performance is more inconsistent, with at least one lab-style review calling it subpar and suggesting reduced effectiveness on plush carpets.

Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in structured tests, often nearing perfect collection across multiple debris types. This is one of the areas where it most clearly earns its reputation for strong performance.

Low-pile carpet pickup scores well in lab-style testing and is described as strong in several reviews, especially with the powered head engaged.

Medium-pile carpet performance is a strong point in multiple reviews, including demonstrations where it collected all or nearly all test sand when paired with the powered head. A technician review still notes minor leftover hair/litter depending on passes.

Clogging is not a frequent complaint in normal use, and parts are designed to come apart for clearing. However, multiple tests show the main head can struggle with cereal or similarly bulky debris, which can contribute to frustrating pick-up and occasional blockages.

One reviewer reports debris bouncing inside the head and occasional spill-back, implying less robust debris control than newer canister designs.

Comparisons often place it near the top of its class, including strong carpet results versus typical canisters and competitiveness with some upright vacuums. The main comparative weakness is bulky hard-floor debris pickup with the standard head.

In head-to-head comparisons, reviewers often credit the Kenmore 600 for strong carpet pickup and a richer tool set versus some rivals, but concede that Miele-style designs can feel smoother to handle and sometimes quieter or more refined.

Controls are generally straightforward, including handle-based adjustments for surface transitions and suction control. One common gripe is that certain handle triggers must be held continuously, and power-relief features may not fully solve sticking on very thick rugs.

Handle-mounted buttons and adjustable power/brush modes are viewed as convenient, letting users switch between floor types without bending down.

Reach is a strength, helped by a long cord and wand/hose combination that reduces replugging and makes stairs easier. Multiple sources cite total reach in the low-to-mid 30-foot range.

Cord length is described as adequate to long depending on reviewer, but one technician review calls it surprisingly short for the category.

Cord management is a favorite feature thanks to smooth, reliable automatic rewind. Reviewers often call out the retractable cord as making daily use feel more polished.

Most reviewers like having a rewind cord, though feedback varies on execution: some praise the convenience while others note you must hold the button and that rewind speed can be slow.

Crevice performance is a highlight when using the crevice tool and concentrated suction, helping reach nooks, grooves, and furniture gaps. Reviewers specifically praise corner and crevice reach compared with older vacuums.

A crevice tool is included and useful for deeper grooves, though one lab-style review found the main head adequate for many crevice situations unless you need a deep clean.

Cyclone performance is repeatedly credited for maintaining airflow and capturing fine dust. Reviewers call out Dyson’s multi-cyclonic or radial cyclone approach as a key reason it performs well on embedded debris.

Handling is a major strength once you adapt: the ball base and articulation help it track behind you and turn tightly. The main downsides are canister drag when you overreach and the tendency to bump walls or cut corners in narrow hallways.

Handling feedback is polarized: some reviewers like the pivoting head and find it easy enough to steer, while others describe the canister and hose as bulky, with limited swivel and clunky movement in tight areas.

Ease of use is rated high overall, especially once you adapt to the tag-along canister style. Minor usability knocks include canister drag when overreaching and occasional control quirks, but most still describe it as user-friendly.

Ease of use is generally rated well when focusing on controls and tool access, but maneuverability complaints can reduce the overall convenience in smaller rooms.

Edge and baseboard cleaning tends to be above average but not perfect in formal tests. Using the crevice tool improves corner results, but the main floorhead may leave some debris along edges.

Edge and baseboard cleaning can be a weak spot; one lab-style review observed the head pushing debris forward along walls, and a technician review also notes snowplowing with larger debris.

Emptying is widely praised as hygienic and low-mess, using a lever or ejection design that pushes debris out of the bin. This reduces the need to reach into the bin to pull out stuck debris.

Filtration is a strong point: reviewers call it allergy-friendly, citing HEPA-style containment and a washable lifetime filter that helps capture fine dust. This is a recurring reason it is recommended for people sensitive to dust.

Bagged filtration is praised for being sealed and allergy-friendly in several reviews, but one repair-focused reviewer criticizes gaps in the bag seal and notes visible dust exhaust on older-style designs.

The floorhead is praised for being self-adjusting and for features that help transition between surfaces. The tradeoff noted in multiple tests is limited ability to roll over or ingest chunkier debris, sometimes requiring a hose-only approach.

The powered floorhead with height adjustments is a strength, helping on carpets and rugs. However, two reviews note dated aerodynamics/steering and less refined edge behavior compared with newer competitors.

Carpet hair pickup is a standout, with testing showing very high pet hair removal and owners reporting easy cleanup of shedding. It is frequently recommended for homes with dogs or cats.

Carpet hair pickup is decent overall, though one technician review notes some pet hair remaining after passes during a mixed-debris test.

Hair-wrap resistance is not absolute: hair can tangle in the turbine/brush area, but reviewers say clearing it is straightforward. Overall, it is manageable rather than fully tangle-proof.

Hair wrap is a recurring downside: some reviewers say tangles are manageable, while a lab-style review and a technician review report frequent wrapping around the brush roll.

Fine dust and smaller debris pickup on hard floors is generally good, with strong results on powders and granules in several tests. Overall hard-floor scores are pulled down mostly by performance on larger debris rather than fine particles.

Hard-floor results are often strong, including a lab-style test that reported very high pickup. A technician review still notes some scatter depending on the head/tool used.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is the most consistent complaint: cereal, Cheerios, and similar items may be pushed around or missed by the main head. Several reviewers report that switching to the hose or a different tool solves the problem.

Large debris pickup on hard floors is generally good, but scattered litter and snowplowing can occur with the powerhead, especially near walls.

At least one review notes there are no LED headlights, which may matter if you rely on illumination to spot fine dust.

Hose and wand reach is repeatedly described as long, supporting above-floor tasks and helping avoid hauling the canister up stairs. It contributes meaningfully to whole-home coverage from a single outlet.

Reach is a consistent plus, with mentions of a longer hose and one lab-style review ranking it among the longest-reaching models tested.

Kid-friendliness is mixed mainly due to weight: at least one reviewer suggests carrying or maneuvering the canister may be too much for small children (and some users with limited strength). Day-to-day use in-hand is easier than the full weight suggests.

The head’s low-profile design helps it slide under furniture and reach low-clearance areas. This is highlighted as a practical advantage in real homes with couches and tables.

Maintenance is generally light: empty the bin, wash the filter periodically (with a required dry time), and check the brush area for tangles. Reviewers like that there are few routine replacement parts.

Maintenance is often described as easy, with quick access to the HEPA filter and bags; overall ownership upkeep is viewed as low-effort.

At least one hands-on reviewer found it surprisingly quiet for the level of suction. Most sources do not provide detailed noise measurements, so expectations should be set as generally acceptable rather than whisper-quiet.

Onboard/clip storage for tools is convenient for quick swaps, and some reviewers mention side-mounted attachments. Storage capacity is not unlimited, but it covers common tools well.

Onboard storage is frequently praised for keeping tools accessible without separate caddies, improving day-to-day convenience.

Ongoing costs are viewed favorably because it is bagless, uses a washable lifetime filter, and is corded so there is no battery to replace. Routine spend is mostly limited to occasional wear parts or repairs rather than consumables.

Durability impressions are positive, with users citing long-lived older Dyson machines and expecting similar longevity here. The overall feel is described as sturdy and well-engineered rather than flimsy.

Overall opinion across sources is strongly positive, often calling it one of the best all-around canister options and a favorite for pet owners. The recurring reservations are weight, price, and weaker large-debris pickup on hard floors.

Multiple tests and owners highlight excellent pet-hair performance, especially on carpet, with the brush and suction working well together. It is frequently recommended specifically for pet homes.

The included powered pet tool is a recurring highlight, but experiences vary: some reviewers say it is very effective, while others report stalling or hair wrapping around the brush roll.

Price is repeatedly framed as premium: some reviewers call it expensive, while others argue the performance and usability make it a solid value. Overall sentiment lands at worth it if you prioritize cleaning results and convenience features.

Value perceptions split: some call it a great buy for the included tools and performance, while a lab-style review and a technician review question its worth if you prioritize maneuverability or high-pile carpet performance.

Stair cleaning is well supported by the included stair tool and the long hose/wand reach. Reviewers find it easy to switch into stair mode without dragging the whole canister onto each step.

Stair use is described as workable, with the canister balancing aids helping prevent sliding, but powered mini-tools received mixed feedback (including stalling in one review).

Despite being a full-size canister, reviewers say it can store well in a closet, and some mention it can be dismantled for tighter storage. There is no strong consensus on upright parking stability, but the footprint is generally manageable.

Reviews consistently describe very strong suction and airflow, strong enough to deep-clean carpets and pull embedded dirt. A few note the power can be almost too aggressive on very thick rugs or when trying to pick up bulky items with the main head.

Reviews describe strong suction for a canister vac, including measured/bench-style readings in one review and excellent sand pickup on carpet in others. A separate lab-style review still notes it can feel underpowered on some carpet scenarios despite good pickup numbers.

For heavy-duty and larger-area cleaning, reviewers like the strong suction, continuous corded runtime, and long reach that reduces outlet changes. Several explicitly recommend it for bigger homes or office-like spaces if you can manage the weight.

In small spaces, storage is workable and the low-clearance head helps under furniture, but maneuvering the trailing canister in tight hallways can be annoying. It tends to suit small homes best when you can keep the canister centered and rely on the long reach.

The canister is described as fairly large/bulky, which can be less ideal for tight apartments, small closets, or frequent carry-and-store routines.

Parts availability is reported as good by a technician-style reviewer, suggesting it is serviceable, though they also caution repairs may not be cost-effective at lower price points.

A technician review cautions about hard plastic wheels/parts on delicate flooring and suggests extra care when using attachments around sensitive surfaces.

Tool swaps are repeatedly described as quick and low-effort, with parts snapping into place for on-the-fly changes. This makes moving between floor cleaning and above-floor tasks feel seamless.

Tool switching is generally straightforward, especially with pop-and-go style hard-floor transitions, though one technician-style review calls the mechanism a bit awkward compared with more modern designs.

Under-furniture reach is repeatedly praised, helped by a low-clearance head and long overall reach. Reviewers note it can get farther under couches and tables than many canisters.

Above-floor cleaning is a strong use case thanks to the long hose/wand reach and the included tools. Reviewers mention success on couches, vents, ceilings, vehicles, and other awkward areas.

Above-floor cleaning benefits from the long hose and included specialty tools; powered mini tools can help on upholstery, though hair wrapping or stalling is occasionally mentioned.

Versatility is repeatedly highlighted: it transitions across carpet and hard floors, and the wand plus tools extend cleaning to upholstery, corners, and high/low areas. Many reviewers frame it as a one-vacuum solution for varied jobs.

Total weight is commonly noted as heavy for a canister (often cited around 17+ lb or roughly 8 kg). Many reviewers add that in-hand feel is lighter because you are mostly holding the wand, but stair carrying can still be a drawback.

Multiple reviewers describe the unit as heavy or hefty compared with other canisters, which affects portability and in-hand feel during longer cleans.