Compare Dyson V15s Detect Submarine Wet Dry Vacuum vs Miele Duoflex Vacuum Cleaner, HX1

The bundle is repeatedly praised for including multiple floorheads and specialty tools, but several reviews say the docking/storage options do not neatly accommodate everything.

Attachment bundles vary by model, but reviewers consistently praise the useful core tools (crevice, dusting, upholstery) and especially the motorized Electro Compact brush for pet hair on furniture and stairs. Minor gripes include wanting a specialty/jointed reach tool or better dock storage for larger tools.

Most reviewers like the premium Dyson look and finish, but a few call out plasticky feel on the Submarine head or aesthetic mismatches with some docking accessories.

Design is consistently praised as sleek and premium, with textured finishes and multiple color options that look good on display. Fit and finish are positioned as a Miele hallmark across sources.

The particle sensor and Auto mode are widely praised for adjusting power and visualizing what is being picked up; a few users also relied on the Dyson app/manual for fuller guidance.

A minor but real complaint appears about airflow blowing back toward the user when cleaning under very low furniture.

On area rugs, it generally cleans well, but light debris on thicker rugs can be pushed around unless you adjust technique or settings.

On rugs, reviewers note the head senses resistance and ramps up (often strongly enough to tug lighter rugs), improving agitation and pickup. Rug transitions and auto-adjust behavior are generally described as quick and effective.

Most reviewers find initial assembly straightforward, but several say the Submarine instructions are too visual or confusing and may require looking up the full manual or app.

Unboxing and setup are generally described as straightforward, with printed guides and a standard wall-mount bracket installation. Some packaging/documentation quirks were noted, but assembly is not viewed as complicated.

Some reviews mention alerts or shutoff behavior when airflow is obstructed or performance cannot be maintained, which helps protect the vacuum but can interrupt a job.

Battery performance is a strong point overall, with long Eco/low runtimes and a removable battery; charging is often cited around 4.5 hours and Boost/Turbo drains quickly.

Charging is typically around 3.5 hours, with wall-mount storage available; some reviewers wish for a true dock-and-charge behavior rather than plugging into a small port. A key limitation repeated across sources is that the battery is not swappable.

The bagless bin size is described as adequate and the emptying mechanism is mostly hygienic, though hair and clumps can occasionally stick and require a quick manual pull.

The 0.3L bin is consistently described as very small, which can interrupt longer sessions and fills fast with hair. It fits the quick-pickup use case but is repeatedly flagged as the biggest capacity limitation.

The main vacuum feels sturdy and well-built in most reviews, while the Submarine head and some docking solutions get more mixed feedback (plasticky feel or leakage concerns).

Build quality gets high marks: reviewers describe it as sturdy, robust, and not plasticky, with parts that click together cleanly. The overall feel is repeatedly framed as high-end compared with many cordless sticks.

High-pile carpet results are more mixed: some reviews report strong pickup while lab testing shows lower scores and higher push resistance on thick carpet.

High-pile and plush carpets are handled well for a cordless stick, though reviewers sometimes needed extra runs and noted that runtime can drop faster as the vacuum increases power on thicker carpet. Pickup remains strong, but session length can become the limiter.

Low-pile carpet performance is typically excellent, with strong pickup even on embedded debris and hair.

Low-pile carpets and flatter rugs are cleaned very effectively, often in one pass for dust and hair, with boost rarely required. Larger pieces may take additional passes depending on how easily they scatter.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong, including good pet-hair removal and fast clearing of fine debris. A few stubborn situations (like high-friction entry matting) can still hold onto smaller hairs.

Clogging is not a constant problem, but some reviewers report blockages with large debris (like pine needles) or residue buildup that needs manual clearing and head cleaning.

Compared with other cordless vacuums and most mop-vacs, it is usually rated superior at dry vacuuming; the wet function is seen as convenient but not best-in-class versus dedicated wet cleaners.

Comparisons often place it near Dyson on core cleaning results, with some reviewers preferring Miele’s easier filter maintenance and premium feel. Tradeoffs versus key rivals include less tech (like illumination), brushroll tangling, and a smaller bin.

The LCD and mode controls are well-liked for showing runtime and particle info, but many reviews criticize the trigger-hold design for comfort during longer cleans.

Controls are intentionally simple: generally a power button plus a boost/high button, paired with a basic battery indicator. Reviewers like the straightforward operation but note the lack of a screen or more detailed status/controls compared with some rivals.

The vacuum converts into a handheld easily, which reviewers like for furniture, stairs, and quick spot cleaning.

Reviewers like how quickly it converts into a handheld for couches, cars, stairs, and above-floor work, with the locking system making the switch feel seamless. This flexibility is a recurring reason it is used for frequent quick cleanups.

Cordless convenience is consistently highlighted, especially for quick daily cleanups and moving between rooms without a cord.

As a cordless stick, it is widely used for quick daily pickups and grab-and-go cleaning, especially when stored on a wall bracket. The convenience is tempered by shorter real-world runtime for some users and the small bin requiring frequent stops.

Dedicated crevice tools are effective for edges and tight spots, but the built-in/integrated crevice solution and the Submarine head can be less effective in deep grooves or corners.

Dyson's cyclone-based design is credited with maintaining strong suction and solid overall dust handling.

Several sources reference Miele Vortex/cyclonic design and describe an airflow path intended to keep performance strong, with reports of strong pickup and little dust sticking in the bin. Most detail is descriptive rather than lab-measured, but user impressions are positive.

The laser illumination is one of the most praised features, repeatedly described as revealing hidden dust and improving confidence on hard floors.

Multiple reviews note the lack of a clear dirty-water level indicator, making it harder to tell when the dirty compartment needs emptying.

The Submarine roller can remove dried-on stains, but results vary: some tests show quick removal while others needed multiple passes and more water on older, set-in messes.

Overall usability is rated good thanks to strong cleaning and smart feedback, but trigger ergonomics, weight, and post-mop cleanup are recurring drawbacks.

Ease-of-use is widely praised thanks to simple controls, a comfortable grip, quick configuration changes, and light handling that reduces arm fatigue. Small annoyances include occasional tight tool fit and the need to plug the charger into a small port rather than true dock-and-charge for some setups.

Edge pickup during vacuuming is often excellent, while edge performance in mop mode is more mixed and can miss right along walls.

Edge and corner performance is generally strong, with reviewers noting it can reach right up to skirting boards and into corners where hair collects. Some testing still left a few hairs at edges, but overall edge cleaning is above average.

The ejector-style emptying system reduces contact with dust, though occasional clumps or hair can stay behind and need a quick manual assist.

Emptying is usually quick via a release door and is often described as largely hands-free, but frequent emptying is common due to the small bin. If overfilled, hair can snag around the pre-filter and may require manual clearing.

Maintenance alerts for the filter are appreciated, including prompts to wash or service filters during ownership.

Filtration and dust containment are consistently rated strong, with a sealed system and good particle control; HEPA-level filtration is mentioned more often for certain versions or upgrades.

Filtration is described as a two-stage system with claims of up to 99.99% fine-dust retention; one review notes it is not officially HEPA-certified. Built-in filter-cleaning mechanisms reduce the need for washing and help maintain airflow over time.

Floors usually dry quickly after Submarine passes, often described as only slightly damp and drying in minutes.

The multi-surface electrobrush is praised for quick transitions and auto adjustment of suction/brush speed across floor types, plus good swivel/hinge behavior. Downsides noted include occasional pinging/scattering of larger debris and limited ability to fully avoid that with brush control.

Fresh spill cleanup is generally quick for small liquid-only messes, but larger spills or liquid mixed with solids can overwhelm the Submarine head.

Carpet hair pickup is generally very strong, with reviewers pulling out visible hair and lint from rugs and carpeting.

Hair pickup on carpets is a strength, with reviewers reporting near-complete removal of visible hair on many carpets and rugs. Some edge hairs and very fine hairs on tough matting can remain, but overall results are top-tier.

Hair pickup on hard floors is consistently strong with the dry heads, while the wet head is best treated as a mop rather than a hair-collection tool.

Hair pickup on hard floors is repeatedly described as excellent, with hair being pulled in from an inch or two away in some tests. It performs especially well for visible pet hair and dander on smooth surfaces.

Anti-tangle performance is usually a strength (especially with the hair screw tool), but longer hair can still wrap on the main brush bar in some situations.

A recurring weakness is hair-wrap: multiple reviewers say the main brushroll is not truly anti-tangle and can become wrapped quickly with long hair or pet hair. Cleaning is doable (often with easy brushroll removal), but it is a manual chore.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is consistently excellent, helped by the laser illumination and soft roller design for revealing and collecting powdery debris.

Fine dust performance is excellent: flour/sugar tests and general dust/dander cleanup are often cleared in a single pass with minimal residue. It is repeatedly positioned as strong for everyday dust and allergy-related fine particles.

Dry vacuum heads handle larger debris well, but the Submarine wet head struggles with bigger pieces (like cereal) and can push debris around rather than capture it.

Large-debris pickup is mixed: some reviewers found cereal/lentils can scatter on hard floors and require repositioning or extra passes, while others report solid pickup of everyday chunks and dried mud. Performance seems most consistent once debris is directly under the intake.

At least one reviewer explicitly notes there are no headlights, so it lacks the illuminated debris-finding features common on some competing cordless models.

Reviewers view the concept as innovative: a flagship stick vacuum paired with a wet roller head, though several also describe the wet system as first-generation with compromises.

Kid appeal is mentioned in passing: the laser and on-screen feedback can make cleaning feel more engaging for families.

The floorhead is described as notably low and able to lie flat (about 2.5 inches mentioned), which helps reach under furniture and into tighter spaces. Low profile is one of the practical design advantages called out across reviews.

Maintenance is a key tradeoff: standard vacuum upkeep is manageable, but the Submarine head adds regular rinsing, drying, and occasional messy dirty-water emptying.

Routine maintenance is generally viewed as easy thanks to twist/ComfortClean-style filter cleaning and included brushes for clearing pre-filters. The main ongoing work is detangling the brushroll and emptying the small bin more often, especially in pet homes.

Handling is generally strong thanks to swivel articulation and the ability to get under furniture, but some reviewers still find it heavy in-hand over longer sessions.

Handling is a strong point: reviewers describe it as comfortable, well-balanced, and easy to steer around obstacles, with less arm ache than many cordless models. Overhead handheld use can still feel noticeable for some, but overall maneuverability is rated highly.

Mopping is best described as maintenance-level: good for routine hard-floor refreshes and small spills, but it does not vacuum while mopping and struggles more with solids, edges, and large wet messes.

Noise is generally acceptable: mop mode is often described as quiet, while Boost/Turbo vacuuming gets noticeably loud.

Noise is often described as relatively quiet for a cordless stick, with one review measuring around mid-60 dB in normal use and higher readings closer to the high-70s on max. Overall, it trends quieter than many competing cordless vacuums in comparable power.

Tool storage is a consistent frustration: you get many tools, but there is limited onboard or dock capacity to keep everything together.

Onboard storage is helpful for keeping a couple of frequently used tools clipped to the vacuum, reducing trips back to a closet. Some note that larger motorized tools may not fit the holder and wish the wall dock offered more integrated accessory storage.

Ongoing costs are usually moderate (filters and occasional roller replacement), but the Submarine roller can add a replacement/consumable consideration over time.

Several reviewers expect strong longevity thanks to the solid construction and brand reputation, and one source highlights a long warranty structure. The main durability unknowns are typical wear items like the brushroll and battery over time.

Across sources, sentiment is strongly positive: reviewers repeatedly call the Duoflex HX1 one of the better-performing cordless sticks they have used, especially for pet homes. The recurring reservations are a small 0.3L bin, mixed real-world runtime on floors, and brushroll hair-wrap.

Packaging is described as protective and well-organized, with at least one review praising the recyclable materials and secure packing.

Packaging is often described as neat and protective, with some appreciation for reduced excessive plastics and recyclable cardboard. A few still observed some plastic components or double-boxing depending on region/model.

Reviewers with pets praise the dry-vac tools for hair and kibble, but note the Submarine mop head is not meant to pick up solid pet food while wet cleaning.

Multiple reviews frame this as a pet-focused stick: strong hair and dander pickup plus a motorized mini brush for upholstery and pet beds. The main pet-related drawback is hair wrapping on the main brushroll and the small bin filling quickly in furry homes.

Price is a common pain point: many call it expensive and best justified only if you will use both the top-tier vacuuming and occasional mopping.

Value perceptions hinge on priorities: many say performance and premium build justify the price, while others feel the feature set (small bin, no swappable battery, sometimes no lights) is limited for the cost versus Dyson/Shark alternatives.

Default/Eco runtimes are often around an hour or more depending on mode, with Auto mode shortening runtime when it ramps up power. Boost/Turbo runtime is consistently short, commonly under 10 minutes in testing.

Real-world floor cleaning commonly lands around 20–30 minutes on mixed surfaces for some testers, while low-power handheld use can approach the advertised longer figures. Auto adjustments on carpet can shorten runtime compared with hard-floor cleaning. Boost/high mode is best treated as a short burst: sources cite roughly 10–12 minutes on max with a motorized head, which can be limiting for whole-home deep cleans. Reviewers generally recommend using boost only on messier spots.

Reviews repeatedly call out that there is no automated self-cleaning cycle or wash/dry base for the mop head, so post-mop cleanup is manual.

Several reviews mention the Submarine head feels self-propelled, making wet passes easier and faster.

The liquid system is simple and water-based; some reviews mention you can use a mild detergent, but there is typically only one wet mode and limited control over water flow.

With the handheld conversion and tools, stairs are generally easy to clean, especially on hard stair treads and edges.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier in handheld mode using the motorized mini brush, with reviewers reporting quick, thorough pickup of hair and debris on steps. This is one of the practical benefits of the convertible design.

It stores like a typical Dyson stick via a wall dock, but it is not truly freestanding and alternative docks can be bulky; the extra heads/tools also add storage complexity.

Streaking is mixed: some report a streak-free shine, while others saw streaks or dirty-water drips, especially if the roller is paused mid-flow or the dirty channel gets too full.

Across reviews, dry vacuuming is the standout: very strong suction and pickup on both hard floors and most carpets, though the high suction can make the head harder to push on thicker carpet.

Cleaning performance is a standout: reviewers report powerful suction and fast pickup on hard floors, rugs, carpets, and upholstery, with automatic power changes that react quickly. A few note that very large debris can scatter or require extra passes/placement.

For heavy-duty mopping or frequent large wet messes, reviews suggest it is not ideal; it is better as a light, regular maintenance mop paired with strong vacuuming.

It is often framed as a good fit for apartments or smaller homes that only want one cleaning device, since it can replace a separate vacuum plus a basic mop.

It is most compelling for apartments, smaller homes, or as a secondary vacuum for frequent maintenance cleans. Larger homes may find the combination of bin size, potential hair-wrap, and runtime limits makes it less ideal as the only vacuum.

Support is mentioned less often, but Dyson customer service is described as a plus where it comes up.

Support is bolstered by mention of an extensive warranty in one review and positive signals like proactively correcting documentation. While not all sources discuss service, overall confidence in Miele reliability is high.

The soft rollers and floorheads are generally seen as gentle on hard floors, and at least one reviewer specifically noted reduced worry about scratching tiles.

Attachments like soft dusting brushes and rubberized tool tips are praised for being gentle on delicate surfaces and trim. One review heard a mild scratching sound on hard floors (likely wheels), so caution is advised on very sensitive hardwood finishes.

Dry heads and tools click on quickly, but swapping between vacuum and mop heads is required for wet cleaning and some users find the Submarine setup a bit fiddly.

The SpeedLock/locking system earns frequent praise for making nozzle swaps and stick-to-handheld conversion fast and low-fuss. A couple of comments mention fit can be a bit tight at times, but overall it is viewed as a major usability win.

Under-furniture reach is a recurring positive due to head articulation and the ability to lay flatter, though one review notes the vent can blow air toward your face in tight spaces.

Reviewers report it can tuck well under cabinets, furniture, and plinths thanks to the flat, hinging head, helping pull out hidden dust bunnies. This is repeatedly highlighted as a real-world convenience for whole-room touch-ups.

Motorized tools for upholstery and above-floor tasks perform well, especially for pet hair and furniture cleaning.

Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are standout areas, especially with the motorized Electro Compact brush that reviewers say lifts embedded pet hair from sofas, pet beds, and car seats. Dusting tools also help with delicate items like shutters, keyboards, and cornicing.

Versatility is a core theme: multiple heads let it cover hard floors, carpets, above-floor cleaning, and basic mopping, but wet cleaning requires a separate pass and head swap.

The Duoflex is repeatedly used as a multi-tasker: floors, rugs, upholstery, stairs, car interiors, cobwebs, and even blinds/keyboards with the dusting tools. The multi-surface head reduces the need to swap floorheads, boosting day-to-day versatility.

The clean-water tank is small (often cited around 300 mL), so it suits maintenance mopping more than big jobs; the dirty-water compartment can be messy and may leak if overfilled or tilted.

Weight is frequently noted: it is manageable for many as a stick vacuum, but the handheld configuration and long sessions can feel heavy or fatiguing for some users.

At roughly 6.8–6.83lb (about 3.1kg), it is commonly described as lightweight for a cordless stick, helping with quick sessions and above-floor work. Some still find the weight noticeable when held overhead in handheld mode.

At least one review reports acceptable cleaning on a delicate wool rug, suggesting it can be used carefully on wool surfaces.