Compare Dyson V15s Detect Submarine Wet Dry Vacuum vs Bissell CrossWave Vacuum Cleaner

The accessory set was widely praised as versatile and complete, with multiple cleaning heads and specialty tools for floors, crevices, hair, stairs, and upholstery.

Accessory feedback was mixed: one reviewer liked bonus brushes and solution, while others disliked the lack of extra rollers or cleaning brushes; HF3’s included tool was appreciated.

Design comments leaned positive on the colorful, quirky Dyson styling, though one reviewer felt the plastic mop head looked more toy-like than premium.

Design feedback was favorable but not central: reviewers called the HF3 stylish or nice-looking, with one less enthusiastic review qualifying the praise.

Smart features were praised for auto suction adjustment, battery efficiency, particle detection, and display feedback, though there was no app-centered praise.

Smart and automation evidence was mostly negative for the CrossWave Edge comparison, especially missing automatic solution dispensing.

Airflow blowback was a negative edge case, with one reviewer getting a blast of vent air when cleaning under low furniture.

Area rug handling was generally positive across rugs and mixed floor homes, including thick-pile and delicate rug examples.

Area-rug handling was mixed: some reviewers liked rug cleaning, but others found it less ideal than hard floors or harder to push on carpet.

Setup ranged from very easy to confusing: several reviewers assembled it quickly, while others needed manuals, videos, or clearer instructions for the Submarine head.

Assembly and setup were praised as simple, with reviewers saying the handle snapped together easily and the unit was straightforward to put together.

Battery and charging feedback was strong overall, with long runtime, useful countdowns, fade-free behavior, and removable-battery benefits.

The dry bin was viewed as adequate and generally usable, but some reviewers still had to reach in for stuck hair or debris.

Dirty-water collection drew positive comments when debris was easy to catch or dump, especially on HF3-style tanks with removable catches and wide openings.

Build quality was generally strong for the main vacuum, but some reviewers criticized plastic feel or dock/head design elements.

Build and engineering evidence was modestly positive, with reviewers calling the HF3 solid and the Bissell more engineered than a cheaper Hoover alternative.

High-pile and thicker carpet pickup was generally workable but less dominant, needing slower passes or more effort with larger lightweight debris.

Low-pile carpet pickup was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers describing carpets as nearly new, excellent, or crushed in tests.

Medium or conventional carpet pickup was praised in one hands-on review for pulling dust, bunnies, and grime from carpeting.

Debris handling through the mop head was a recurring weakness, especially with dry debris, liquid mixed with solids, cereal, small debris, or wand blockages.

Clog prevention evidence was limited but positive, with one HF3 comparison noting easy access to clean clogs.

Comparative performance was favorable against Dyson's V15 lineage, with the Submarine treated as comparable to or based on a top cordless platform.

Comparative performance was highly context-dependent: Bissell often won on power or ease, but several newer competitors beat it on features, value, or ergonomics.

The LCD and smart display were often praised, but the trigger operation and some particle-readout usefulness drew repeated complaints.

Controls were generally easy to understand, with useful triggers, modes, LEDs, and indicators, though limited modes hurt the CrossWave Edge in one comparison.

The handheld conversion was praised for sofa, mattress, and tight-spot cleaning.

Cord length was a positive in home-use reviews, where reviewers liked the 25-foot cord for cleaning a room without replugging.

The cable-free design was praised for portability around domestic cleaning tasks.

Cordless convenience was a clear HF3 strength, making the unit easier to maneuver and a grab-and-go option, though corded versions kept stronger power.

Crevice and groove pickup was mixed, with one review praising nooks-and-crannies cleaning but lab testing showing weak deep-crevice pickup from the mop head.

Crevice, corner, and grout pickup was weak overall; reviewers repeatedly said CrossWave struggled in corners and could not deep-clean grout lines by itself.

Cyclone performance received one positive assessment that the core dust-separation technology seemed to do the job.

Debris illumination was one of the most consistently loved features, repeatedly helping reviewers see hidden dust and make vacuuming more thorough.

Debris illumination was useful on models with LEDs, but one comparison found Shark’s LED placement better and another noted the Bissell Edge lacked a headlight.

Dirty-water sensing was a clear weakness in TechRadar's review because the display only showed clean-water level, not dirty-water buildup.

Dirty-water sensors were a recurring frustration when foam or water triggered shutoff before the tank seemed truly full.

Dried-on stain performance ranged from excellent one- or two-pass results to needing many extra passes or struggling with overnight sticky stains.

Dried-on stain performance was mixed: HydroSteam performed well, while original CrossWave-style units often needed extra passes or missed dried-on food.

Ease of use was mostly positive for maneuvering and day-to-day cleaning, but push resistance, many parts, and trigger fatigue created caveats.

Ease of use was generally strong for corded CrossWave and HF3 models, but weaker variants and maintenance-heavy use cases reduced the score in some reviews.

Edge and baseboard cleaning was mostly positive, but one lab review found the exposed roller could miss debris at wall contact.

Edge and baseboard evidence was mixed: some reviewers liked edge access or baseboard reach, while others criticized corner trouble or single-edge cleaning.

Mess control was polarized: dry-bin emptying could be easy, but the dirty-water compartment, mop debris, and cleanup were messy in several reviews.

Emptying and mess control were generally workable, with wide openings and debris catches helping, though some maintenance still remained.

Filtration and dust containment drew strong praise, with reviewers describing the filtration as excellent and the system as keeping fine flour or microscopic dust well contained.

Only one reviewer gave opinionated filtration evidence, saying the filter could help reduce household allergens.

Floor drying time was praised in two reviews, with quick drying and floors not left saturated after mopping.

Floor drying was mostly positive, with reviewers reporting no wet socks, dry-back passes, quick evaporation, and fairly dry floors, though heat loss limited deep cleaning.

Floorhead design was strong for dry heads and surface matching, but the separated vac-mop layout reduced the all-in-one feel.

Floorhead design drew mixed evidence: articulated smaller heads helped steering, while flat or closed-front designs hurt grout or large-debris handling.

The hard-floor seal was praised in one comparison because the soft brush could conform to larger debris without losing contact.

Fresh liquid pickup was useful for small spills and standalone liquids, but multiple reviews warned against large wet spills or wet-solid mixtures.

Fresh-liquid pickup was a strength, with reviewers praising spill cleanup, wet-mess pickup, and liquid recovery without obvious residue.

One reviewer noted hair could get trapped in crevices and need manual attention.

Carpet hair pickup was strong, lifting ingrained long hair and fur well in hands-on testing.

Carpet hair pickup evidence was limited but positive from one home test where the CrossWave pulled hair and dirt from carpet.

Hard-floor hair pickup was praised across tests, especially with the Fluffy Optic head and strong suction.

Hard-floor hair pickup was positive, especially with dog hair and bristled corded rollers, though the evidence focused on floor-level messes rather than upholstery.

Hair-wrap resistance was mixed: Dyson's anti-tangle tools worked well in some tests, but longer hair still wrapped or needed cutting free in others.

Hair-wrap resistance was positive where mentioned, with reviewers noting little wrap and praising tangle-free brushroll designs.

Hard-floor fine-dust pickup was excellent, especially with the Fluffy Optic head and laser revealing fine dust, sugar, hair, and corner debris.

Fine dust and dry hard-floor pickup were consistently positive where tested, with reviewers praising soft rollers and flawless dry pickup on hard floors.

Large hard-floor debris performance was mixed: dry vacuum heads often performed very well, but the mop head struggled with cereal, rice, and large pieces.

Large debris results were mixed: several models handled cereal, shells, or wet chunks well, while closed-front or weaker designs pushed or left some pieces behind.

Headlight performance was praised as better than typical LED headlights in one lab comparison.

LED/headlight feedback was mixed: HydroSteam and Forbes evidence praised visibility, while one comparison said Shark’s lights were better and CrossWave Edge lacked headlights.

Heating evidence split by model: HydroSteam’s heat was praised, while the original CrossWave was faulted for lacking a heating element.

One review highlighted the product's versatility as the factor that sets it apart from other wet-dry mops.

Innovation evidence credited the original CrossWave with helping start the vacuum-mop category, but newer models have since added more advanced features.

Kid-friendliness was noted positively when the dust-revealing head made a child's room vacuuming more fun.

Low-profile capability was excellent in lab testing because the vacuum could fully lay flat.

Low-profile or slim design evidence was mixed: CrossWave’s skinny body helped bathrooms, but Edge-style lack of lay-flat capability hurt low-clearance cleaning.

Maintenance was mixed: dry-vac maintenance could be straightforward, but the mop head requires washing, drying, and manual cleanup after use.

Maintenance was one of the biggest tradeoffs: some parts were easy to rinse, but filters, tanks, brush drying, and post-use cleaning required frequent attention.

Maneuverability was mostly praised for swivel, lay-flat ability, easy gliding, and small head size, though some reviewers felt effort or fatigue on certain surfaces.

Maneuverability varied widely: HF3 and smaller units were easy to steer, but CrossWave Edge and carpet use were criticized as harder to push or less agile.

Mopping performance was useful for light cleaning, small spills, and general maintenance, but reviews agreed it is not a full true wet-dry or deep-clean replacement.

Mopping performance was broadly positive on hard floors, with reviewers praising clean, shiny floors and strong day-to-day results; grout and heavy-duty messes were exceptions.

Noise feedback was mixed: one lab result found mopping slightly quieter than average, while another reviewer found Boost mode very loud.

Noise was a repeated drawback: reviewers described the CrossWave as louder than expected, louder than rivals, or quite loud at measured levels.

Odor evidence was mixed: FreshStart/self-cleaning solution smelled good, but reviewers warned dirty parts can stink if not scrubbed.

Onboard tool storage was weak because one review found more accessories than mounting solutions.

Ownership-cost feedback was limited and mixed, mentioning optional spare batteries and likely mop-roller replacement costs.

Ownership cost evidence was mixed: solution and replacement costs can add up, though one review noted DIY solution could reduce expense.

One lab review saw promising long-term durability in the Submarine attachment's lightweight, sturdy plastic construction.

Durability evidence was limited and cautious, with one reviewer noting long-term value depends on whether the machine needs frequent replacement.

Overall impressions were positive but qualified: reviewers loved the vacuum and versatility, while the mop, maintenance, tanks, and price created tradeoffs.

Overall opinion ranged from very positive on the original, corded, HydroSteam, and HF3 models to poor for one CrossWave Edge-style comparison and one Walmart HF3 review.

Packaging was praised for secure, recyclable cardboard protection.

Pet-related feedback was positive: dog owners liked the mop option for paw prints and reviewers found pet hair pickup strong, though hair wrap still required attention in some tests.

Pet-related evidence was mostly positive, with reviewers praising dog-hair pickup and tangle resistance, while pet-specific tooling was framed as helpful for owners.

Value was one of the most divided areas: reviewers liked the added mop at Dyson-tier performance, but repeatedly flagged the high price or weak mop premium.

Value was split by model: the original CrossWave was praised as a budget pick, while newer or weaker variants were criticized when competitors offered more for less.

Runtime was a strength, with many reviewers reporting enough battery for homes, long mop runtime, or useful auto-mode endurance.

Runtime evidence was mixed by model: HF3 battery life was acceptable for normal rooms, while CrossWave Edge was criticized for having the lowest runtime in its comparison.

Sanitizing feedback was negative because the Submarine cannot steam-sterilize floors.

Sanitizing evidence was limited to HydroSteam, where reviewers linked extra heat and steam to better sanitizing power.

The lack of an auto self-cleaning cycle was a repeated weakness, making mop-head cleanup more manual than competing wet-dry vacuums.

Self-cleaning was mixed: push-button systems were convenient and helped prevent buildup, but one reviewer called the new corded cycle just okay and another said HF3 self-clean disappointed.

The self-propelled mopping feel was praised as lightweight and easy to propel along.

Self-propel evidence was positive for HF3-style rollers that pulled the machine forward, while the Edge comparison criticized lack of assisted wheels.

Liquid delivery feedback was mixed: some liked the controlled water output, while others disliked the single wet mode and lack of water-flow adjustment.

Solution-system feedback was mixed: manual triggers gave control, but solution consumption, no dwell time, small tanks, and missing separate or automatic dosing were drawbacks.

Stair-cleaning feedback was favorable where the hair screw and smaller tools were used for stairs, furniture, and pet-related jobs.

Stair-related evidence focused on carryability rather than stair cleaning; the HF3’s low weight made it easier to carry upstairs.

The product does not provide steam cleaning, and one review treated that as a limitation versus hot, sterilizing mop methods.

Steam cleaning was praised on HydroSteam because heat improved dried-on stain removal and gave it added cleaning power.

Storage feedback was split: the compact attachment system helped in small spaces, but the vacuum is not freestanding and several reviews complained about attachment or dock storage.

Storage was considered a strength because reviewers found CrossWave units smaller, sleeker, and easier to store than bulkier alternatives.

Streaking and residue were recurring mop-head concerns, especially after pauses, large spills, dirty rollers, or uneven initial water flow.

Streaking and residue performance was generally strong, especially on wet messes, with several reviewers noting no puddles, no obvious streaks, or low mess.

Reviewers consistently praised the vacuuming side as powerful, with strong suction and airflow across general cleaning, carpets, hard floors, and hard-to-reach areas.

Suction and wet pickup were often praised, especially on corded CrossWave and HydroSteam models, though some comparison evidence said competitors or the HF3 felt stronger in certain situations.

Heavy-duty suitability was limited; reviews repeatedly framed the mop as better for light, regular cleaning than deep grime or full mop-and-bucket replacement.

Heavy-duty suitability was limited; reviewers saw CrossWave as useful for maintenance and deeper household messes, but not a replacement for professional or manual grout cleaning.

Small-space suitability was strong because reviewers saw the compact, multi-function design as a way to avoid owning multiple floor-cleaning devices.

Small-space suitability was strong where reviewers mentioned condos, bathrooms, tight spaces, or easy steering around furniture.

One reviewer specifically praised Dyson customer service as excellent and efficient for support and faulty-part replacement.

Surface safety feedback was positive from a reviewer who felt the head protected tile from scratches.

Tool changes were usually quick and easy, but several reviewers disliked the extra reconfiguring needed because vacuuming and mopping require separate heads.

Under-furniture pickup was praised in one review for the thin wand and flexible head joint.

Under-furniture performance was weak in the CrossWave Edge comparison because it lacked lay-flat capability.

Above-floor and upholstery pickup was praised, especially for sofa, dog-bed, mattress, shelf, and couch-corner use.

Versatility was a major strength because the machine combines high-end dry vacuuming with a mop head and broad attachment set.

Versatility was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly valuing the ability to vacuum, mop, handle hard floors, and sometimes address rugs in one machine.

Water tank feedback was mixed to negative: reviewers liked the reach of the small tank in some rooms, but repeatedly called the reservoirs small or spill-prone.

Tank feedback was mixed: larger corded tanks were appreciated, but small tanks on other models caused frequent refills, dumps, or faster formula use.

Weight feedback was mixed: some found it light and easy, while others reported hand, thumb, or forearm fatigue.

Weight was split: HF3 was repeatedly praised as very light, while HydroSteam and CrossWave Edge were considered heavier.

One reviewer successfully cleaned a delicate wool woven rug despite initial hesitation.