Compare Dyson V15s Detect Submarine Wet Dry Vacuum vs Kenmore AquaLite 3-in-1 Cordless Wet Dry Vacuum

The bundle is repeatedly praised for including multiple floorheads and specialty tools, but several reviews say the docking/storage options do not neatly accommodate everything.

Reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle: an extra brushroll, cleaning tools/brushes (including hair-cutting features in one unboxing), and a starter cleaning solution.

Most reviewers like the premium Dyson look and finish, but a few call out plasticky feel on the Submarine head or aesthetic mismatches with some docking accessories.

The particle sensor and Auto mode are widely praised for adjusting power and visualizing what is being picked up; a few users also relied on the Dyson app/manual for fuller guidance.

A minor but real complaint appears about airflow blowing back toward the user when cleaning under very low furniture.

On area rugs, it generally cleans well, but light debris on thicker rugs can be pushed around unless you adjust technique or settings.

The product is positioned primarily for sealed hard floors; one source suggests it can vacuum low-pile rugs, but wet cleaning on rugs/carpet is not recommended.

Most reviewers find initial assembly straightforward, but several say the Submarine instructions are too visual or confusing and may require looking up the full manual or app.

Setup is described as straightforward, with key parts (like the handle) snapping/clicking into place and minimal assembly friction.

Some reviews mention alerts or shutoff behavior when airflow is obstructed or performance cannot be maintained, which helps protect the vacuum but can interrupt a job.

Battery performance is a strong point overall, with long Eco/low runtimes and a removable battery; charging is often cited around 4.5 hours and Boost/Turbo drains quickly.

No summary yet.

The bagless bin size is described as adequate and the emptying mechanism is mostly hygienic, though hair and clumps can occasionally stick and require a quick manual pull.

The main vacuum feels sturdy and well-built in most reviews, while the Submarine head and some docking solutions get more mixed feedback (plasticky feel or leakage concerns).

Build impressions are generally positive (e.g., aluminum components called out as lightweight/solid), but longer-term durability confidence is mixed based on some reported failures over time.

High-pile carpet results are more mixed: some reviews report strong pickup while lab testing shows lower scores and higher push resistance on thick carpet.

Low-pile carpet performance is typically excellent, with strong pickup even on embedded debris and hair.

Clogging is not a constant problem, but some reviewers report blockages with large debris (like pine needles) or residue buildup that needs manual clearing and head cleaning.

Compared with other cordless vacuums and most mop-vacs, it is usually rated superior at dry vacuuming; the wet function is seen as convenient but not best-in-class versus dedicated wet cleaners.

In direct comparisons (notably vs. Shark HydroVac), reviewers often characterize Kenmore as the more advanced pick due to edge reach, tank size, and brushroll drying features.

The LCD and mode controls are well-liked for showing runtime and particle info, but many reviews criticize the trigger-hold design for comfort during longer cleans.

The display and alerts are considered helpful (battery %, tank full/empty, tangle, air-dry), but more than one reviewer says the screen is dim or hard to read.

The vacuum converts into a handheld easily, which reviewers like for furniture, stairs, and quick spot cleaning.

Cordless convenience is consistently highlighted, especially for quick daily cleanups and moving between rooms without a cord.

Cordless operation is repeatedly described as a major convenience for whole-home cleaning, reducing outlet-hopping and saving time versus separate vacuuming and mopping steps.

Dedicated crevice tools are effective for edges and tight spots, but the built-in/integrated crevice solution and the Submarine head can be less effective in deep grooves or corners.

Dyson's cyclone-based design is credited with maintaining strong suction and solid overall dust handling.

The laser illumination is one of the most praised features, repeatedly described as revealing hidden dust and improving confidence on hard floors.

Multiple reviews note the lack of a clear dirty-water level indicator, making it harder to tell when the dirty compartment needs emptying.

No summary yet.

The Submarine roller can remove dried-on stains, but results vary: some tests show quick removal while others needed multiple passes and more water on older, set-in messes.

Dried-on mess removal is reported as good—one reviewer shows it lifting a nasty dried spot “pretty good,” especially when using a higher mopping setting.

Overall usability is rated good thanks to strong cleaning and smart feedback, but trigger ergonomics, weight, and post-mop cleanup are recurring drawbacks.

Ease-of-use is a standout theme: automatic dispensing (no trigger), clear mode switching, and convenient docking/self-cleaning workflows reduce hands-on effort.

Edge pickup during vacuuming is often excellent, while edge performance in mop mode is more mixed and can miss right along walls.

Edge cleaning is a consistent strength—multiple reviewers say it gets closer to walls/baseboards than at least one key competitor and cleans right up to the edge.

The ejector-style emptying system reduces contact with dust, though occasional clumps or hair can stay behind and need a quick manual assist.

Emptying is generally straightforward, but reviewers still emphasize rinsing/cleaning the dirty tank to prevent buildup; at least one comparison suggests Kenmore’s tank is simpler to fully clean than a rival’s design.

Maintenance alerts for the filter are appreciated, including prompts to wash or service filters during ownership.

Filtration and dust containment are consistently rated strong, with a sealed system and good particle control; HEPA-level filtration is mentioned more often for certain versions or upgrades.

One source specifically calls out HEPA filtration and a separated dirty tank; users also mention a filter that needs periodic washing and thorough drying before reinstalling.

Floors usually dry quickly after Submarine passes, often described as only slightly damp and drying in minutes.

Dock-based air drying is frequently highlighted: the base blows air onto the brushroll for hours after cleaning, and one tester reported the mop head was dry by the next morning.

Fresh spill cleanup is generally quick for small liquid-only messes, but larger spills or liquid mixed with solids can overwhelm the Submarine head.

Fresh liquid pickup is repeatedly shown as strong, with reviewers calling wet spill cleanup easy and impressively effective in real-time tests.

Carpet hair pickup is generally very strong, with reviewers pulling out visible hair and lint from rugs and carpeting.

Hair pickup on hard floors is consistently strong with the dry heads, while the wet head is best treated as a mop rather than a hair-collection tool.

Anti-tangle performance is usually a strength (especially with the hair screw tool), but longer hair can still wrap on the main brush bar in some situations.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is consistently excellent, helped by the laser illumination and soft roller design for revealing and collecting powdery debris.

Fine debris pickup on hard floors is portrayed positively, including strong performance on coffee grounds in at least one test.

Dry vacuum heads handle larger debris well, but the Submarine wet head struggles with bigger pieces (like cereal) and can push debris around rather than capture it.

Large debris pickup on hard floors is described as excellent, with strong results on cereal, cabbage, and other chunky messes.

Reviewers view the concept as innovative: a flagship stick vacuum paired with a wet roller head, though several also describe the wet system as first-generation with compromises.

Kid appeal is mentioned in passing: the laser and on-screen feedback can make cleaning feel more engaging for families.

The floorhead is repeatedly described as thin/low-profile, intended to help reach under cabinets and low-clearance areas.

Maintenance is a key tradeoff: standard vacuum upkeep is manageable, but the Submarine head adds regular rinsing, drying, and occasional messy dirty-water emptying.

Despite self-cleaning, routine maintenance is still necessary—empty/rinse the dirty tank, periodically clean the filter and ensure it dries, and occasionally detail-clean gunk buildup.

Handling is generally strong thanks to swivel articulation and the ability to get under furniture, but some reviewers still find it heavy in-hand over longer sessions.

Handling is frequently praised: it “glides” easily, turns well once the big mess is handled, and feels easy to steer around corners.

Mopping is best described as maintenance-level: good for routine hard-floor refreshes and small spills, but it does not vacuum while mopping and struggles more with solids, edges, and large wet messes.

Mopping performance is praised on common household messes (muddy paw prints, sticky sauces, mayo/green liquid), often needing a couple passes for the toughest spots but leaving floors looking very clean.

Noise is generally acceptable: mop mode is often described as quiet, while Boost/Turbo vacuuming gets noticeably loud.

Noise is generally framed as reasonable/quiet by at least one hands-on unboxing, while another source cites around ~70 dB, suggesting a moderate sound level for the category.

Odor control is tied to the air-dry + self-clean routine: reviewers specifically note that keeping the roller from staying wet helps reduce the “stink” that can develop in wet cleaners.

Tool storage is a consistent frustration: you get many tools, but there is limited onboard or dock capacity to keep everything together.

At least one review notes thoughtful storage: the cleaning tool can click into a holder so it’s less likely to get misplaced, and the base is used as an organizing station.

Ongoing costs are usually moderate (filters and occasional roller replacement), but the Submarine roller can add a replacement/consumable consideration over time.

Longevity is a question mark: some feedback notes breakdowns within months, while other hands-on reviewers focus on strong early performance without reporting failures.

Packaging is described as protective and well-organized, with at least one review praising the recyclable materials and secure packing.

Reviewers with pets praise the dry-vac tools for hair and kibble, but note the Submarine mop head is not meant to pick up solid pet food while wet cleaning.

Price is a common pain point: many call it expensive and best justified only if you will use both the top-tier vacuuming and occasional mopping.

Value is generally viewed as competitive in the mid-tier range—often cited around ~$270 on sale/coupon—with reviewers saying the feature set can justify costing more than lower-priced rivals.

Default/Eco runtimes are often around an hour or more depending on mode, with Auto mode shortening runtime when it ramps up power. Boost/Turbo runtime is consistently short, commonly under 10 minutes in testing.

Runtime is commonly referenced at around 35 minutes, framed as enough for many standard cleaning sessions but not necessarily for very large spaces on a single charge.

Reviews repeatedly call out that there is no automated self-cleaning cycle or wash/dry base for the mop head, so post-mop cleanup is manual.

Self-cleaning is consistently presented as a real convenience feature; users describe a short docked cycle that flushes the roller and reduces manual brushroll cleanup.

Several reviews mention the Submarine head feels self-propelled, making wet passes easier and faster.

The liquid system is simple and water-based; some reviews mention you can use a mild detergent, but there is typically only one wet mode and limited control over water flow.

The solution system is described as automatic (no trigger), with multiple modes that change how much solution is applied during cleaning.

With the handheld conversion and tools, stairs are generally easy to clean, especially on hard stair treads and edges.

It stores like a typical Dyson stick via a wall dock, but it is not truly freestanding and alternative docks can be bulky; the extra heads/tools also add storage complexity.

Streaking is mixed: some report a streak-free shine, while others saw streaks or dirty-water drips, especially if the roller is paused mid-flow or the dirty channel gets too full.

Across reviews, dry vacuuming is the standout: very strong suction and pickup on both hard floors and most carpets, though the high suction can make the head harder to push on thicker carpet.

Suction is portrayed as strong for a wet/dry floor cleaner, including a suction-only mode and at least one report of it pulling in debris from slightly off to the side.

For heavy-duty mopping or frequent large wet messes, reviews suggest it is not ideal; it is better as a light, regular maintenance mop paired with strong vacuuming.

It appears well-suited for routine household messes, but at least one source cautions it may not satisfy buyers who want maximum heavy-duty durability for daily-abuse use cases.

It is often framed as a good fit for apartments or smaller homes that only want one cleaning device, since it can replace a separate vacuum plus a basic mop.

Support is mentioned less often, but Dyson customer service is described as a plus where it comes up.

Reliability/support feedback is mixed: there are mentions of responsive service after a failure, but overall long-term confidence isn’t uniformly strong across sources.

The soft rollers and floorheads are generally seen as gentle on hard floors, and at least one reviewer specifically noted reduced worry about scratching tiles.

Dry heads and tools click on quickly, but swapping between vacuum and mop heads is required for wet cleaning and some users find the Submarine setup a bit fiddly.

Tool/part changes are described as simple—brushroll and guards come off via tabs/buttons, and reassembly is portrayed as quick and intuitive.

Under-furniture reach is a recurring positive due to head articulation and the ability to lay flatter, though one review notes the vent can blow air toward your face in tight spaces.

Motorized tools for upholstery and above-floor tasks perform well, especially for pet hair and furniture cleaning.

Versatility is a core theme: multiple heads let it cover hard floors, carpets, above-floor cleaning, and basic mopping, but wet cleaning requires a separate pass and head swap.

The ‘3-in-1’ concept comes through in use: vacuum + mop simultaneously, plus a self-clean routine; some also emphasize a suction-only mode for quicker jobs.

The clean-water tank is small (often cited around 300 mL), so it suits maintenance mopping more than big jobs; the dirty-water compartment can be messy and may leak if overfilled or tilted.

The two-tank setup (clean vs. dirty) is repeatedly discussed as practical and easy to remove; some comparisons suggest Kenmore’s tanks feel larger than Shark’s.

Weight is frequently noted: it is manageable for many as a stick vacuum, but the handheld configuration and long sessions can feel heavy or fatiguing for some users.

Weight feedback varies: one reviewer calls it light at about 9.5 lb, while another source lists it closer to ~13 lb; most still frame it as manageable rather than ultra-featherweight.

At least one review reports acceptable cleaning on a delicate wool rug, suggesting it can be used carefully on wool surfaces.