P1
BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld Vacuum
P2
Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum
Average score
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.2
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0
Accessories and Tools
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.9
The tool set was a strength, especially the built-in crevice tool and motorized pet brush for pet hair and small areas.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3
The tool set was broadly useful, especially the crevice and motorized pet tools, although some reviewers found the package sparse or the dusting tool limited.
Aesthetic design and finish
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2
Reviewers who commented on appearance liked the sleek or nice-looking design.
Airflow blowback
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
2.0
Airflow blowback was a weakness because side vents could blow nearby messes around.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.5
One review noted debris escaping after shutdown, creating a blowback or fallout caveat.
Area Rug Handling
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.8
Area-rug handling was strong in the direct rug test, with the motorized attachment lifting dirt well.
Assembly and Setup
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Setup and instructions were reviewed positively, with the manual described as clear and not overwhelming.
P2Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yetBattery and Charging
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.0
Battery evidence was mixed: reviewers liked the battery indicator, but one review noted the battery cannot be replaced.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.6
Charging feedback leaned negative because recharge times were long and batteries were not swappable, even though charge indicators were helpful.
Bin and Bag
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
3.8
Bin feedback was split between praise for the bottom-opening or roomy compartment and concern over the small dust bowl capacity.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.8
Dust cup feedback was mixed: several reviewers liked the roomy or generous bin, while others found capacity average or frequent emptying necessary.
Build quality and durability
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Build quality received positive evidence from a reviewer who found it higher quality than expected.
P2Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yetCarpet — Low-Pile Pickup
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.8
Low-pile carpet hair pickup was strong in the review that tested it directly.
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2
Medium-carpet pickup was good overall with the motorized tool, though some tests still required additional passes.
Clogging and debris prevention
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
5.0
The straight airflow path was praised for letting larger debris pass without getting stuck.
Comparative performance
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
In the roundup, the Black & Decker furbuster nearly took the top spot, showing strong comparative performance.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Comparative remarks were mostly favorable versus other handhelds, although raw suction lagged behind at least one regular cordless model.
Controls and UI
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
Controls were considered simple, with one-button operation and basic functions that were not overly complex.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.6
Controls were consistently simple, with easy buttons, intuitive operation, and an easy-to-hold handle.
Cordless convenience
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
5.0
Cordless convenience was a clear strength, with reviewers emphasizing easy grab-and-go use and cordless convenience.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.8
Cordless convenience was a major advantage for quick use around the home, in cars, and in hard-to-reach areas.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Crevice and groove pickup was positive, with reviewers using it for floor planks and hard-to-reach dust.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Crevice pickup was praised for concentrated suction in tight or hard-to-reach spaces.
Cyclone performance
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
5.0
The dual-cyclonic system was praised for strong pickup without trouble.
Debris illumination
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
5.0
Debris illumination helped reveal tiny particles and improve the clean finish.
Ease of use
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.7
Ease of use was consistently strong, with reviews calling operation intuitive, lightweight, and not overly complex.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.6
Ease of use was consistently strong, with reviewers calling it simple, quick, and convenient for everyday messes.
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Edge and baseboard cleaning evidence was positive, with one reviewer using it successfully on corners, baseboards, and windowsills.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0
Baseboard and edge cleaning worked well in testing, although hair buildup in the brush created a caveat.
Emptying and Mess Control
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.2
Emptying was mostly easy and convenient, but one pet-hair test noted occasional manual hair removal from the bin.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0
Emptying was often easy and touchless, but some reviewers warned about debris scatter or fiddly bin mechanics.
Filtration / Dust Containment
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
3.5
Filtration evidence was mixed: the washable filter was a plus, but one roundup said Bissell had the better filter.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.1
Washable filters were seen as easy to clean and helpful for keeping the vacuum working well.
Floorhead design
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
The powered floorhead design was praised for helping pull dirt from fibers and making the unit feel like a mini vacuum.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.2
Floorhead design was mixed: the motorized tool size helped some jobs, but edge contact, mat glide, and scatter limited others.
Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.2
Hard-floor sealing was weak in one tile test where the motorized tool scattered debris.
Hair-removal channel issues
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
2.5
Hair removal from the brush/head area was a caveat because one reviewer said hair had to be cleaned out periodically.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.4
Hair management was not perfect: some tools collected hair on bristles or blocked the nozzle.
Hair Pickup — Carpets
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
3.5
Carpet pet-hair pickup was mixed: one reviewer found it weak on cat hair in carpeting, while another said dog hair pickup was quick.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.8
Carpet hair pickup was good overall, but stubborn or wiry hair sometimes required multiple passes or resisted pickup.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
5.0
Tangle resistance was viewed positively, with praise for the anti-tangle brush and a test where hair did not stick to the head.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
5.0
Hair-wrap resistance was a standout, with multiple reviewers reporting little to no hair left wrapped on the brushroll.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Hard-floor pickup was positive in one review, which found the regular setting strong enough for hardwood and tile-floor debris.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.0
Small hard-floor debris pickup was positive when using the crevice tool.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.0
Large hard-floor debris intake was supported by the same successful tile-floor cat-litter pickup evidence.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.8
Large-debris pickup was mixed, ranging from poor fruit-loop pickup to strong single-pass rice and large-debris results in other tests.
Headlight and LED lights
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
5.0
LED lights were praised as a standout aid for visibility.
Innovation compared to competitors
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
One reviewer found the motorized mini brush unusually distinctive among handheld vacuums.
Low-profile design
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2
The slim body helped it slide into tighter spaces and car areas.
Maintenance requirements
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
3.8
Maintenance was mixed but mostly manageable: one review praised easy cleaning, while another noted the filter still needed cleaning.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.2
Maintenance was manageable thanks to washable filters and simple cleaning, though regular drying time is still required.
Maneuverability and Handling
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Handling was positive in review testing, with the vacuum described as easy to hold and maneuver.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Handling was praised for being lightweight and easy to move around.
Noise level
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.3
Noise was generally viewed favorably, with one review calling it quieter than expected and another citing Quiet Mark, though it was still not silent.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.0
Noise was repeatedly acceptable but not quiet, with some reviewers calling it average and others noting a whine or louder-than-average operation.
Onboard tool storage
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
5.0
Onboard tool storage was a strength because the built-in crevice tool reduced the risk of losing an attachment.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.0
Onboard tool storage was a weakness because attachments had no dedicated storage location.
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries)
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.0
Ownership-cost evidence was favorable because filters were available and one reviewer highlighted the lack of disposable bags.
P2Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yetOverall durability/longevity
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
2.5
One review flagged battery non-replaceability as a longevity concern.
P2Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
No score yetOverall opinion
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
Overall opinion was strongly positive, with reviewers saying they were impressed, happy, and would buy it again.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Overall opinion was strongly positive across reviews, with the main caveats centered on runtime, charging, noise, and storage.
Packaging quality
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Packaging was rated positively because the cardboard packing held the vacuum securely.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.8
Packaging feedback was split between a sparse box with no manual and a recyclable delivery package that impressed the reviewer.
Pet-Ready Features
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.9
Pet-focused evidence was strongly positive: reviewers said the motorized pet brush and rubber bristles made pet-hair cleanup easy and effective.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.7
Pet-hair cleaning was the clearest strength, especially on couches, carpet, upholstery, and pet beds, with only a few tougher hair cases needing extra work.
Price and Value
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
Value evidence was positive, with reviewers praising power and bin design for the price and calling it a great value.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Value impressions were positive, with reviewers calling it affordable or well priced for the cleaning power.
Runtime
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
2.8
Runtime was a limitation, with one reviewer warning against long sessions and another noting slowdown around ten minutes.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
3.1
Runtime was the most common limitation, usually around 10 to 15 minutes and best suited to quick cleanups.
Scratch resistance
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
The soft brush was judged protective enough to reduce scratch and streak risk on vulnerable surfaces.
Stair Cleaning
P1Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Stair cleaning worked well in the one direct test, especially using the main unit and crevice tool on bare stairs.
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
The compact body earned positive storage feedback because it could fit in a cupboard.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.3
Storage was a recurring weak spot because reviewers wanted a wall mount, dock, charging cradle, or dedicated attachment storage.
Suction and Airflow
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
Reviewers consistently praised suction and power, from higher comparative power in the roundup to strong real-world pickup of dirt, dust, and debris.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3
Reviewers mostly praised strong suction and steady pickup, though a few tests described raw suction as average or low-end for larger jobs.
Suitability for heavy-duty use
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
2.5
Heavy-duty suitability was limited: reviewers framed it as better for smaller quick jobs and not long cleaning sessions.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.3
Reviewers consistently treated it as a quick-clean tool, not a deep-cleaning or long-session vacuum.
Suitability for small spaces
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
The compact size made it suitable for apartments, offices, and other space-limited environments.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.4
The crevice tool and slim body made the vacuum effective in corners, cushions, car areas, and other tight spaces.
Surface safety with attachments
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
5.0
The rubber pet attachment was described as gentle, supporting safe contact with delicate surfaces or pets.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Soft bristles were viewed as safe for vulnerable surfaces.
Tool-change simplicity
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
3.7
Tool changes were mixed: one reviewer found the crevice tool initially tricky, while another said the pet head came off easily.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.8
Tool changes were described as simple, with attachments going on and off easily while staying secure.
Under-Furniture Pickup
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.5
Under-furniture pickup was positive because the extendable end made it easy to get under and around furniture.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
2.2
Under-furniture reach was limited because the crevice tool was considered too short for low appliances.
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.4
Above-floor and upholstery pickup was strong, especially for couch cushions, dog beds, furniture, carpets, and upholstery pet hair.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.3
Upholstery and above-floor pickup were strong overall on couches, car seats, cushions, and soft surfaces, though one review noted nozzle cling.
Versatility
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.6
Versatility was a recurring strength across home, office, kitchen, pet, and general Dustbuster uses.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.1
Versatility was generally strong because of the included tools, but one reviewer felt it was more pet-focused than truly all-purpose.
Weight
P1
Product 1: BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld...
4.8
Weight was viewed positively, with reviewers calling it lightweight and easy to carry.
P2
Product 2: Shark UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld...
4.5
Weight was consistently praised; reviewers found it lightweight and easy to grab or carry.