Compare Tikom V500 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson V15s Detect Submarine Wet Dry Vacuum

Attachment set is described as modest but useful for basics (crevice and dusting/upholstery-style tools), with storage supported via a wall mount.

The bundle is repeatedly praised for including multiple floorheads and specialty tools, but several reviews say the docking/storage options do not neatly accommodate everything.

Most reviewers like the premium Dyson look and finish, but a few call out plasticky feel on the Submarine head or aesthetic mismatches with some docking accessories.

The particle sensor and Auto mode are widely praised for adjusting power and visualizing what is being picked up; a few users also relied on the Dyson app/manual for fuller guidance.

A minor but real complaint appears about airflow blowing back toward the user when cleaning under very low furniture.

One hands-on review reports good cleaning on a rug during real-world pickup demos, with easy movement and solid results on hair and debris.

On area rugs, it generally cleans well, but light debris on thicker rugs can be pushed around unless you adjust technique or settings.

No summary yet.

Most reviewers find initial assembly straightforward, but several say the Submarine instructions are too visual or confusing and may require looking up the full manual or app.

Some reviews mention alerts or shutoff behavior when airflow is obstructed or performance cannot be maintained, which helps protect the vacuum but can interrupt a job.

Battery system is viewed as competent for the price, including a detachable battery and clear battery readout; however, some reviewers still describe battery life as below average overall.

Battery performance is a strong point overall, with long Eco/low runtimes and a removable battery; charging is often cited around 4.5 hours and Boost/Turbo drains quickly.

Bin capacity is frequently highlighted as large for a cordless stick vacuum, enabling longer cleaning before emptying and supporting its value-focused positioning.

The bagless bin size is described as adequate and the emptying mechanism is mostly hygienic, though hair and clumps can occasionally stick and require a quick manual pull.

The main vacuum feels sturdy and well-built in most reviews, while the Submarine head and some docking solutions get more mixed feedback (plasticky feel or leakage concerns).

High-pile carpet results are more mixed: some reviews report strong pickup while lab testing shows lower scores and higher push resistance on thick carpet.

Surface-level pickup on low-pile carpet is generally strong for the price and commonly described as a good fit for mixed floors, though not designed for carpet-dominant homes.

Low-pile carpet performance is typically excellent, with strong pickup even on embedded debris and hair.

Medium-pile deep-clean performance is a noted weak point versus class averages, with lab-style results described as slightly below average for embedded sand removal.

Clogging is not a constant problem, but some reviewers report blockages with large debris (like pine needles) or residue buildup that needs manual clearing and head cleaning.

Compared with other cordless vacuums and most mop-vacs, it is usually rated superior at dry vacuuming; the wet function is seen as convenient but not best-in-class versus dedicated wet cleaners.

Controls are generally praised for practicality: a battery percentage/indicator display and simple mode switching are highlighted as user-friendly for daily use.

The LCD and mode controls are well-liked for showing runtime and particle info, but many reviews criticize the trigger-hold design for comfort during longer cleans.

The vacuum converts into a handheld easily, which reviewers like for furniture, stairs, and quick spot cleaning.

Cordless convenience is emphasized through quick grab-and-go usability, easy movement between rooms, and simple transitions from hard floors to carpet during everyday cleaning.

Cordless convenience is consistently highlighted, especially for quick daily cleanups and moving between rooms without a cord.

Crevice/groove performance is characterized as slightly below average in lab-style testing, aligning with weaker sealing/unsealed suction results.

Dedicated crevice tools are effective for edges and tight spots, but the built-in/integrated crevice solution and the Submarine head can be less effective in deep grooves or corners.

Dyson's cyclone-based design is credited with maintaining strong suction and solid overall dust handling.

The laser illumination is one of the most praised features, repeatedly described as revealing hidden dust and improving confidence on hard floors.

Multiple reviews note the lack of a clear dirty-water level indicator, making it harder to tell when the dirty compartment needs emptying.

The Submarine roller can remove dried-on stains, but results vary: some tests show quick removal while others needed multiple passes and more water on older, set-in messes.

No summary yet.

Overall usability is rated good thanks to strong cleaning and smart feedback, but trigger ergonomics, weight, and post-mop cleanup are recurring drawbacks.

Edge pickup during vacuuming is often excellent, while edge performance in mop mode is more mixed and can miss right along walls.

Emptying is repeatedly described as easy and low-mess via a lever-style dump, with at least one review noting you can empty it without removing the wand.

The ejector-style emptying system reduces contact with dust, though occasional clumps or hair can stay behind and need a quick manual assist.

Maintenance alerts for the filter are appreciated, including prompts to wash or service filters during ownership.

Filtration is described as better than typical ultra-budget peers, though not perfect; lab-style commentary mentions some visible fog while still calling it unusually good for the price.

Filtration and dust containment are consistently rated strong, with a sealed system and good particle control; HEPA-level filtration is mentioned more often for certain versions or upgrades.

Floors usually dry quickly after Submarine passes, often described as only slightly damp and drying in minutes.

The floorhead design is repeatedly credited for strong general pickup and handling larger debris via front gates, while still having practical limits on very large debris.

Fresh spill cleanup is generally quick for small liquid-only messes, but larger spills or liquid mixed with solids can overwhelm the Submarine head.

Carpet hair pickup is generally very strong, with reviewers pulling out visible hair and lint from rugs and carpeting.

Hair pickup on hard floors is consistently strong with the dry heads, while the wet head is best treated as a mop rather than a hair-collection tool.

Anti-tangle performance is a major strength: multiple sources note excellent hair resistance, including near-perfect results in a standardized hair tangle test.

Anti-tangle performance is usually a strength (especially with the hair screw tool), but longer hair can still wrap on the main brush bar in some situations.

Reviews indicate strong everyday hard-floor cleaning, including fine dust pickup that competes well for the price, helped by a usable floorhead and overall pickup performance.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is consistently excellent, helped by the laser illumination and soft roller design for revealing and collecting powdery debris.

Hard-floor large-debris intake is better than many budget peers due to front gates on the floorhead, though there is a stated limit with very large debris on hard floors.

Dry vacuum heads handle larger debris well, but the Submarine wet head struggles with bigger pieces (like cereal) and can push debris around rather than capture it.

Headlights/LEDs are repeatedly called out as genuinely helpful for spotting debris, especially during quick passes on hard floors.

Reviewers view the concept as innovative: a flagship stick vacuum paired with a wet roller head, though several also describe the wet system as first-generation with compromises.

Kid appeal is mentioned in passing: the laser and on-screen feedback can make cleaning feel more engaging for families.

Maintenance is portrayed as straightforward: brushroll access, filter cleaning, and general disassembly are described as easy for routine upkeep.

Maintenance is a key tradeoff: standard vacuum upkeep is manageable, but the Submarine head adds regular rinsing, drying, and occasional messy dirty-water emptying.

Handling is widely praised: smooth swivel response and easy push make it effective in tight spaces and for fast room-to-room cleaning.

Handling is generally strong thanks to swivel articulation and the ability to get under furniture, but some reviewers still find it heavy in-hand over longer sessions.

Mopping is best described as maintenance-level: good for routine hard-floor refreshes and small spills, but it does not vacuum while mopping and struggles more with solids, edges, and large wet messes.

Noise is described as relatively quiet for a cordless, with lab-style measurement commentary placing it a bit better (quieter) than the category average.

Noise is generally acceptable: mop mode is often described as quiet, while Boost/Turbo vacuuming gets noticeably loud.

Tool storage is a consistent frustration: you get many tools, but there is limited onboard or dock capacity to keep everything together.

Ongoing costs are usually moderate (filters and occasional roller replacement), but the Submarine roller can add a replacement/consumable consideration over time.

Packaging is described as protective and well-organized, with at least one review praising the recyclable materials and secure packing.

Reviewers with pets praise the dry-vac tools for hair and kibble, but note the Submarine mop head is not meant to pick up solid pet food while wet cleaning.

Repeatedly framed as a standout under-$100 option with unusually strong overall performance for the price, often positioned as one of the best values in the ultra-budget cordless category.

Price is a common pain point: many call it expensive and best justified only if you will use both the top-tier vacuuming and occasional mopping.

Standard/default runtime is commonly cited around the low-30-minute range, which is acceptable for quick cleaning sessions but not ideal for larger homes in one pass. Boost/max runtime is described as modest, with lab-style results around the high-teens in minutes, reinforcing the tradeoff between price and sustained high-power cleaning.

Default/Eco runtimes are often around an hour or more depending on mode, with Auto mode shortening runtime when it ramps up power. Boost/Turbo runtime is consistently short, commonly under 10 minutes in testing.

Reviews repeatedly call out that there is no automated self-cleaning cycle or wash/dry base for the mop head, so post-mop cleanup is manual.

Several reviews mention the Submarine head feels self-propelled, making wet passes easier and faster.

The liquid system is simple and water-based; some reviews mention you can use a mild detergent, but there is typically only one wet mode and limited control over water flow.

With the handheld conversion and tools, stairs are generally easy to clean, especially on hard stair treads and edges.

One hands-on reviewer notes it does not stand upright on its own, but storage is addressed with an included wall mount that holds the vacuum and tools.

It stores like a typical Dyson stick via a wall dock, but it is not truly freestanding and alternative docks can be bulky; the extra heads/tools also add storage complexity.

Streaking is mixed: some report a streak-free shine, while others saw streaks or dirty-water drips, especially if the roller is paused mid-flow or the dirty channel gets too full.

Raw suction/airflow is repeatedly described as below average compared with higher-end models, which explains weaker deep-carpet results and slightly weaker crevice performance.

Across reviews, dry vacuuming is the standout: very strong suction and pickup on both hard floors and most carpets, though the high suction can make the head harder to push on thicker carpet.

For heavy-duty mopping or frequent large wet messes, reviews suggest it is not ideal; it is better as a light, regular maintenance mop paired with strong vacuuming.

It is often framed as a good fit for apartments or smaller homes that only want one cleaning device, since it can replace a separate vacuum plus a basic mop.

Support is mentioned less often, but Dyson customer service is described as a plus where it comes up.

The soft rollers and floorheads are generally seen as gentle on hard floors, and at least one reviewer specifically noted reduced worry about scratching tiles.

Tool changes and configuration swaps are described as simple (attachments, wand, and floorhead connect/disconnect easily), supporting quick transitions between tasks.

Dry heads and tools click on quickly, but swapping between vacuum and mop heads is required for wet cleaning and some users find the Submarine setup a bit fiddly.

Under-furniture reach is a recurring positive due to head articulation and the ability to lay flatter, though one review notes the vent can blow air toward your face in tight spaces.

Motorized tools for upholstery and above-floor tasks perform well, especially for pet hair and furniture cleaning.

Versatility is a core theme: multiple heads let it cover hard floors, carpets, above-floor cleaning, and basic mopping, but wet cleaning requires a separate pass and head swap.

The clean-water tank is small (often cited around 300 mL), so it suits maintenance mopping more than big jobs; the dirty-water compartment can be messy and may leak if overfilled or tilted.

Consistently described as lightweight in the hand, supporting quick cleanups and reducing fatigue; handle weight is cited as notably low for the category.

Weight is frequently noted: it is manageable for many as a stick vacuum, but the handheld configuration and long sessions can feel heavy or fatiguing for some users.

At least one review reports acceptable cleaning on a delicate wool rug, suggesting it can be used carefully on wool surfaces.