Compare Eureka Blaze 3-in-1 Stick Vacuum vs Shark Rocket DuoClean Ultra-Light Corded Stick Vacuum HV382

The crevice tool and basic accessories are useful for small spaces, but the lack of a dedicated pet brush limits pet-hair work.

The attachment package is repeatedly praised as useful, versatile, and handy, with one negative review still calling attachments the Rocket’s saving grace.

The blue finish received light praise, with one reviewer specifically liking the color.

One review praises the vacuum’s modern, functional look and finish.

Fine dust blowback/exhaust was a concern in one detailed cleaning test.

Area-rug and small-rug results were generally positive for light debris and hair, though carpet rolling was less effortless than hard floors.

Area-rug handling is strong, with reviewers saying it transitions from rugs to floors easily and cleans rugs without trouble.

Assembly was consistently described as easy, with simple click-in or snap-in setup.

Setup is viewed as simple, with one reviewer assembling it in under 10 minutes and another calling the machine uncomplicated.

Reviewers liked the clear, roomy dust cup because fullness is visible, though emptying can require filter handling.

The dust cup is a recurring limitation because reviewers call it small, even though one review says the design is easier to empty.

Build impressions were mixed: one reviewer liked the solid clip fit, while another said it was not rugged but adequate.

Build quality receives positive but limited evidence, with one review saying the components fit well and feel sturdy for the price.

High-pile or shag use was discouraged, with the reviewer saying it is not what the vacuum is meant for.

High-pile evidence is limited but positive, with taller debris piles handled without snow-plowing.

Low-pile and general carpet pickup was often decent for surface debris, but not a substitute for brush-roll carpet cleaning.

Low-pile carpet pickup is decent to good, but lab evidence notes residual dust and only moderate pickup in one test.

Medium-pile carpet pickup is mixed in one lab review because the vacuum flung a few grains to the side.

Hair and debris can collect near or on the filter, creating a blockage point that needs attention.

Debris prevention evidence is strong but limited, with the open-face DuoClean head preventing snow-plowing of taller debris piles.

In comparison tests, the Eureka often beat budget rivals and stayed surprisingly close to a much more expensive cordless model.

Comparative performance is mostly strong, with reviewers saying it rivals uprights and outpicked finalists, though one review says other vacuums collect more dirt.

Controls are simple and easy to understand, centered on a basic on/off switch.

Controls are usable and handle-mounted, but one review says the settings can initially be confusing.

The handheld conversion was valued for cars, corners, and compact cleaning jobs.

The handheld conversion adds versatility, but handheld use can feel heavy in one review.

Cord length is mixed: it is longer than some cheap competitors and offers reach, but remains short versus traditional uprights.

Cord length is a strength, with reviewers praising the long reach and fewer outlet changes.

Cordless convenience is the main convenience weakness, with reviewers noting the cord limits reach and costs convenience points.

Cord storage and cable hooks were praised, though one reviewer still warned that the cord needs attention while cleaning.

Cord management is mixed: one owner likes the cord-release lever, while another says the wire is annoying.

Crevice pickup is mixed: one test found the capture nozzle hurt crevice pickup, while concentrated crevice-tool use worked well.

Hard-floor crevice pickup is praised, especially for pulling debris and flour from cracks and edges.

Debris illumination is praised through the LED lights, which reviewers say reveal floor debris and dark corners.

Ease of use is strong overall, driven by light weight, simple controls, easy rolling, and quick everyday handling.

Ease of use is consistently strong, with praise for effortless usability, accessible controls, and easy handling.

Edge cleaning performs well in lab testing, leaving only a negligible amount of debris behind.

Emptying is mixed: some found the dust cup easy, but others noted dirty hands, filter handling, and multiple steps.

Emptying is mostly easy, but one review notes hair and debris can catch inside the canister.

Filtration was a repeated weak spot because reviewers noted the absence of HEPA filtration and fine dust escaping.

Filtration evidence is mixed: two reviews warn that allergen filtration or HEPA is a weak point, while one review frames it as allergy-friendly.

The floorhead/capture-nozzle design helps larger debris and swivel movement, but it can trade off crevice performance.

The floorhead design earns praise for DuoClean’s open-face system and for staying planted during under-furniture cleaning.

Floorhead sealing is mixed: it sealed strongly in one carpet test but was criticized as too weak for hard-floor sand pickup.

Hard-floor sealing/scatter evidence is positive, with testing finding essentially no scatter from the front roller.

Hair can pile up at the filter area, creating a hair-removal and airflow-maintenance issue.

Hair-removal channel evidence is negative, with hair and debris catching around the canister’s internal disc.

Carpet hair pickup is mixed to weak: one review found surface pet hair okay, while others said the lack of brush agitation limits hair removal.

Carpet hair pickup is mixed-to-positive, ranging from most hair collected to no-problem pet-hair pickup and strong comparative hair results.

Hard-floor hair pickup was praised because the no-brush design avoids tangles and pulls hair into the channel.

Hard-floor hair pickup is positive, with pet hair described as no match and dirt, dust, and hair picked up efficiently.

Hair-wrap resistance is strong because reviewers noted hair did not tangle around a brush roll.

Hair-wrap resistance is mixed: one review praises hair being moved from the brush, while others report hair collecting or tangling.

Fine-dust and sand pickup is split: some hard-floor tests were above average, while another found sand too small for the head seal.

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is strong, with flour/crack pickup and fine-dust removal praised.

Large-debris intake is generally good for kibble and chips, but very large pieces like Cheerios can get pushed around.

Large-debris intake is mostly excellent, with multiple single-pass or few-pass wins, but one negative test found macaroni and rice pickup poor.

The lack of LED/headlights was called out as a feature that would make the vacuum more functional.

LED headlights are consistently praised for helping reveal debris, corners, and under-furniture areas.

Innovation evidence is limited but positive, with one review saying its LED feature was absent from the other tested models.

The vacuum can get to lower angles, but one comparison reviewer noted it is not as fluid as the pricier model.

Low-profile cleaning is a clear strength in one review because the vacuum lays almost flat under furniture.

Maintenance is manageable but recurring; reviewers mention cleaning, rinsing, drying, and periodically changing or clearing filters.

Maintenance is praised, especially easy roller access, washable filters, and quick brush cleaning.

Maneuverability is one of the most praised traits thanks to swivel steering and lightweight handling, though one reviewer found turning slightly weird.

Maneuverability is one of the strongest themes, with repeated praise for swivel steering, agility, tight-space handling, and natural glide.

Noise feedback was generally acceptable, though lab-style comparison suggested its lower decibel score may not feel meaningfully quieter.

Noise feedback is mixed: several reviewers say it is not too loud, while lab testing and one blog note it can be loud.

Onboard tool storage was specifically liked because the crevice tool stays with the vacuum.

Onboard tool storage is helpful, with two tools stored on the vacuum and attachments kept out of the way.

Ownership cost evidence is positive, with washable filters and time, energy, and money savings highlighted.

Long-term durability evidence is limited but positive, with one owner still calling it a favorite after roughly five to six years.

Overall opinion was positive for light-duty value and convenience, with repeated caveats about task dependence and carpet limits.

Overall opinion is generally positive, with several best-pick or favorite judgments, offset by one review calling it middling.

Packaging was described positively, with no concern about shipping damage in the unboxing review.

Pet readiness is mixed: it can pick up kibble and some hair, but reviewers criticized the missing pet brush and weak pet-hair extraction from fabric.

Pet-hair performance is well regarded, with reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively and the TruePet tool removes cat fur quickly.

Reviewers repeatedly framed the Blaze as strong value, with minor caveats that it can cost more than the cheapest rivals.

Value is mostly praised, especially versus cordless or higher-end picks, though one review argues lighter, cheaper, stronger alternatives exist.

Runtime evidence comes from the corded design, with one review praising uninterrupted use without battery depletion.

Self-propel feel is mixed: some reviewers enjoy the glide, while others say the pull fights them on backstrokes.

One reviewer recommended it for stairs and small rugs as part of its lightweight, small-area use case.

Stair-cleaning evidence is positive through the handheld mode, which one reviewer says is ideal for stairs and furniture.

Storage is a major strength because reviewers praised the tiny footprint, easy storage, and upright support.

Storage is a tradeoff: wall mounting and lower hanging help, but multiple reviewers dislike that it will not stand upright on its own.

Suction and airflow were often praised for the price, though some tests still wanted more power or a better seal.

Most reviewers praise the HV382’s suction and pickup power, especially for a compact corded stick vacuum, though one review found its suction weaker than competing options.

Reviewers did not see it as a heavy-duty carpet vacuum; it is better suited to light, occasional, or broom-replacement work.

Heavy-duty suitability is supported by one lab review that recommends it for heavier messes.

Small-space suitability is strong because reviewers described it as compact, dorm-friendly, and useful where a broom and dustpan would otherwise fit.

Small-space suitability is positive but limited, with one review recommending it for apartments and small homes.

Warranty support is mentioned positively, with the five-year limited warranty described as lengthy for the price point.

Ceiling or delicate above-floor use needs caution because the included crevice tool is not a soft brush attachment.

Tool changes are mostly easy, but one reviewer said the floor piece needed forceful tugs because it was wedged in.

Tool changes are a strength, with reviewers describing attachment swaps and handheld conversion as quick and easy.

Under-furniture pickup is workable because the low, angled reach surprised the reviewer positively.

Under-furniture pickup is praised, with reviewers reaching far under a sofa and easily getting under a coffee table.

Above-floor use is strong for cars, couches, cobwebs, and handheld cleaning, though attachments are basic.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is praised through the couch, chair, curtain, and attachment evidence.

Versatility is a standout because reviewers liked the upright, handheld, crevice-tool, couch, car, and small-area configurations.

Versatility is a major strength across reviews, with praise for cleaning many surfaces and above-floor areas.

Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it very lightweight and easy to carry or maneuver one-handed.

Weight is polarizing: many users call it lightweight, while lab reviews and handheld use note it is heavy for a stick vacuum.