Compare beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset vs HyperX Cloud III

P1 beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset
P2 HyperX Cloud III

Comparison Takeaways

beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset

Where It Has the Edge

  • Bluetooth is 4.4 vs 1.2. Bluetooth pairing and day-to-day stability are described as reliable, with quick connections and no major dropouts reported in...
  • Detachable cable convenience is 4.5 vs 1.5. Detachable cables make it easier to swap devices and replace worn parts. Multiple reviews note that some features...
  • Software/setup simplicity is 4.6 vs 2.4. Setup is generally described as straightforward and plug-and-play. The main complexity comes from choosing the connection type, since...
  • Preset EQ profile quality is 4.2 vs 2.3. Preset profiles are generally described as effective but subtle, offering practical tweaks for genres like shooters or action...

HyperX Cloud III

Where It Has the Edge

  • Volume output is 4.7 vs 2.6. Volume headroom is strong, with reviewers repeatedly saying the headset gets very loud.
  • Sidetone adjustment quality is 4.0 vs 2.7. One review positively notes working mic monitoring or sidetone through Ngenuity.
  • Clamping force comfort is 5.0 vs 4.2. Clamping force is repeatedly described as just right—secure without excess pressure.
  • Design and Aesthetics is 4.6 vs 3.9. Design feedback is strongly positive, with reviewers calling it sleek, premium, or visually appealing.
Average score
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
1.0

No review describes true ANC. Noise reduction is achieved through the closed-back seal (passive isolation) and an ambient/augmented mode, not active cancellation.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.0

A review explicitly notes that the wireless model lacks active noise cancellation.

Android compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.5

Android compatibility looks inconsistent from the single directly relevant review, working on one Android device but not another.

App
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

Wireless-focused reviews describe a companion app that manages presets, EQ, button behavior, sidetone toggles, and power settings. Other reviews describe a no-software experience, implying feature depth may vary by model or connection path.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.8

Ngenuity app support exists and can be useful, but the experience varies by platform and setup.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Wireless-focused reviews describe the low-latency dongle as subjectively delivering negligible lag between on-screen action and audio cues.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review says audio cues stay in sync with on-screen action, supporting good AV sync on the wireless link.

Bass performance
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.6

Bass is the most divisive tuning element. Several reviews describe it as subdued or under-emphasized unless EQ/presets are used, while another review characterizes bass as strong; expectations and EQ use appear to drive the experience.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.9

Bass tuning is divisive. Some reviews describe deep, impactful, or boosted bass, while others say the low end lacks punch or warmth.

Battery
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

Battery life is repeatedly framed as a strength: multiple reviews cite 50 hours, and one reviewer reports real-world estimates closer to roughly 68–71 hours at moderate volume.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.9

Battery life is one of the standout features, with repeated reports in the roughly 100 to 120 hour range and very slow drain.

Bluetooth
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Bluetooth pairing and day-to-day stability are described as reliable, with quick connections and no major dropouts reported in the wireless-focused reviews.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.2

Wireless reviews repeatedly criticize the lack of Bluetooth connectivity.

Build quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.9

Build impressions are split: several reviewers call the construction sturdy and dependable (often noting metal elements), while others describe the shell as lightweight or plasticky for the price.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

Build quality is a major recurring strength, with repeated praise for sturdy materials, durability, and robust construction.

Button control usability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

The single wheel/button control scheme is viewed as intuitive (volume, mute, mode toggles), but some reviewers dislike that it feels clicky or that button/wheel noises can carry through the headset or mic.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

On-headset controls are generally well received, with easy access, useful mute and volume placement, and good dial feel.

Cable quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

Cables are often praised as thick/braided and durable, but one reviewer reports audible cable rub/microphonics in the earcups when the cable brushes clothing.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.7

Cable impressions are mixed: some reviews praise low microphonics or only minor noise, while another hears noticeable cable noise.

Carry case quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.3

Wireless bundles include a pouch or bag, but usefulness is mixed because the bag offers little real protection.

Charging
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Fast charging is called out as convenient, with a commonly cited example of about 15 minutes of charge yielding around five hours of use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

The wireless model charges over USB-C.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Clamp force is commonly described as just right for staying secure without squishing, though a minority note it can feel a little tight over extended wear.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
5.0

Clamping force is repeatedly described as just right—secure without excess pressure.

Codec support
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.5

Codec support is only lightly documented in the provided reviews: SBC and LC3 are explicitly mentioned, while higher-end codecs are not confirmed.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Comfort during long use
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Comfort is usually rated very high thanks to plush velour/memory-foam pads and balanced weight, but at least one reviewer with larger ears reports long-day discomfort from shallow, round cups that press on the ears.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.4

Long-session comfort is one of the clearest strengths, though one review still found the pleather hot and sticky after hours.

Connectivity versatility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.0

One review specifically criticizes dongle-only connectivity as restrictive versus more flexible alternatives.

Console compatibility limitations
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.0

One review says the wireless connectivity model limits what devices and use cases the headset works well with.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.9

Aesthetics lean gamer-forward (notably orange accents). Some reviewers like the sophisticated two-tone look, while others find it not discreet enough for everyday public use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.6

Design feedback is strongly positive, with reviewers calling it sleek, premium, or visually appealing.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Detachable cables make it easier to swap devices and replace worn parts. Multiple reviews note that some features and controls are reduced or unavailable when using the analog 3.5mm path.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.5

Multiple wired reviews explicitly criticize the fixed cable and wanted a detachable option.

Detachable microphone convenience
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

The detachable boom mic is consistently framed as a practical win, letting you remove it for music or when using a dedicated external mic.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

The detachable mic design is viewed positively for flexibility and muting convenience.

Dongle
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

The low-latency dongle is highlighted as a strong option for gaming, with reports of easy pairing and very responsive feel in play.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.3

The headset relies on a USB dongle; some see that as appropriate for gaming, while others dislike being tied to it.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Pad material and plushness are praised, but cup depth/shape can be a comfort limiter for some users, with reports of ears touching drivers or being squeezed after long use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.7

Earpads are widely praised as plush, deep, and memory-foam cushioned.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.6

Cups are described as tilting to help achieve a seal, but not offering full swivel in at least one review.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.9

Limited swivel or rotation is a recurring complaint across both wired and wireless impressions.

Earpad replacement ease
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review notes the pads are removable and easy to swap for alternative options.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

EQ customization is considered useful and often recommended, particularly for adding low-end presence if the stock tuning feels restrained.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength on supported platforms, with custom profiles and 10-band adjustment repeatedly mentioned.

Fit/seal reliability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review explicitly praises the comfort and seal as a standout strength.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Multiple reviews characterize the tuning as balanced, neutral, or flat, emphasizing accuracy over exaggerated bass or treble boosts.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.5

The overall tuning is described as mostly balanced or neutral, though one reviewer felt it could sound flat or unexciting.

Game/Chat balance control
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.0

One review specifically complains that game-chat mix is missing.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Fit adjustment is described as straightforward with a wide range, making it easy to dial in height and seal even while wearing the headset.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.5

One review says the headband adjustment has tactile bumps but could be clearer or more refined.

Hinge durability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

Hinges/yokes are generally presented as solid and confidence-inspiring, with no durability failures reported in the provided reviews.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One detailed build review says the revised hinge and buckle design looks less likely to split than the older model.

Included accessories
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Included accessories are consistently described as practical for multi-device use, typically including a detachable mic and multiple cables; wireless-focused reviews also reference a low-latency dongle.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.9

Accessory bundles vary, but common inclusions are the microphone, dongle or adapter, charging cable, and sometimes a bag; one wired review also notes a missing pouch.

Instrument separation
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Separation and layering are described as strong, keeping dialogue, music, and effects distinct even in busy game mixes.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

One review found the presentation separated musical parts cleanly enough to appreciate individually.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review says the drivers still hold together well when the gain is pushed to max.

Microphone
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.6

Microphone quality is a standout strength across the review set, with repeated praise for clarity and overall performance.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Noise reduction on the mic is repeatedly praised for rejecting keyboard clacks and room noise. A platform caveat appears in one review, where background reduction was less effective in a console test compared with PC.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.4

Noise rejection is a major microphone strength, with multiple reviews noting reduced background noise from fans, keyboards, room noise, or other people.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Microphone quality is a standout across reviews, with clear, natural voice capture that works well for team chat and work calls. One reviewer notes it can sound quieter on PlayStation than on PC.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.7

Call and voice-chat performance is consistently strong, with clear voice chat, clean artifacts, and positive Teams-style feedback.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Midrange clarity is consistently a highlight, helping voices and key game cues cut through with definition and natural detail.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.8

Midrange is a weaker part of the tuning in the supporting reviews, with mids described as relatively weak, recessed, or in the background.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

Across reviews, the headset is positioned as broadly compatible (PC, PlayStation, and mobile), with feature access varying by connection type. Xbox support is the least consistent in the provided reviews.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

Across wired and wireless reviews, compatibility coverage is broad for PC, PlayStation, Switch, phones, mobile devices, and similar USB or 3.5mm connections.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

Multipoint is explicitly described as seamless in at least one review, letting the headset stay connected across devices without manual switching.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

Passive isolation is generally described as good for voices and incidental noise, helped by thick pads and a solid seal, but it is less effective against constant low-frequency hum like engines or appliances.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.2

Passive isolation is a recurring strength, with the earcups blocking ambient noise well even without ANC.

Packaging quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

One review says the wired box uses molded inserts that hold the headset securely.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.5

Portability is limited by the bulky design and lack of folding or rotating travel features.

Positional audio accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.4

Positional performance is mixed. Some reviews say cues are easy to place, while others found directionality only adequate or clearly weak.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Preset profiles are generally described as effective but subtle, offering practical tweaks for genres like shooters or action games rather than drastic changes.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.3

Preset quality is inconsistent: some reviews like having preset choices, while others call them junk or nonfunctional.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

Replaceable earpads/parts are repeatedly highlighted as a long-term value feature, making it easier to refresh comfort and maintain the headset over time.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

Multiple reviews mention that the pads can be swapped, including fit with replacement or universal pads.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
2.7

Mic-monitoring/sidetone-style modes are mixed: one reviewer reports a noticeable hiss when enabled, while others focus on its usefulness rather than its noise floor.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

One review positively notes working mic monitoring or sidetone through Ngenuity.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.6

Setup is generally described as straightforward and plug-and-play. The main complexity comes from choosing the connection type, since certain functions are reported to depend on USB power and/or the app.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.4

Setup and software impressions are mixed. Some reviews found setup easy or smooth, while others ran into detection or app issues.

Sound leakage
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review specifically credits the fit and seal with low sound leakage.

Sound quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Overall sound is described as detailed, clear, and immersive, with a more neutral/accurate tilt than bass-boosted consumer tuning, making it strong for competitive gaming and solid for general listening. Wired USB listening is sometimes described as a bit cleaner and less prone to interference than analog, and one review suggests wired USB can slightly tame problematic treble behavior.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.8

Sound quality trends positive for gaming and general media, but it is not universally loved; some reviews praise detail and overall presentation while others call it mediocre or flat.

Soundstage width
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Soundstage and positional imaging are repeatedly praised for being wide and precise, helping with directional cues like footsteps and gunfire.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.9

Soundstage is usually described as narrow or merely average rather than expansive.

Spatial audio
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6

Spatial audio is present and sometimes helpful, but reactions are mixed: some found it precise or more immersive, while others found DTS subtle or poor.

Stability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review says the light clamp still keeps the headset in place securely.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

An ambient/augmented listening mode is described as convincing and genuinely useful for hearing the room or holding a conversation without removing the headset. Several reviews note this functionality depends on connection/power, and it is not a full-featured headphone-style transparency experience in every setup.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.5

Treble is described as lively and detailed, but some reviewers report occasional harshness or distortion depending on source and settings.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

Treble generally comes through as clear and crisp, though one review also notes extra brightness in the highs.

USB-C
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

USB-C is central to the design for both charging/power and wired audio paths, and several reviews treat the USB connection as the primary way to unlock full functionality.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

USB-C support appears in the included adapter and cable arrangement.

Value for money
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.7

Value is mixed overall: several reviews say the headset is worth the money or very strong at $100, while others are less convinced at higher wireless pricing.

Volume output
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
2.6

Maximum loudness is usually adequate, but at least one review reports controller/analog output being too quiet for proper immersion on some consoles.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.7

Volume headroom is strong, with reviewers repeatedly saying the headset gets very loud.

Weight comfort
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

The headset is repeatedly described as feeling light on the head (low-to-mid 300g range cited in some reviews), which supports long-session comfort.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.1

Weight is generally seen as light or manageable, though one review still noted ear fatigue and another called it middling rather than ultralight.

Wireless latency
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.8

Low-latency wireless performance is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting little to no lag.

Xbox compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
1.5

Xbox results are inconsistent: at least one review reports USB not working on Xbox and low volume over controller analog, while other reviews claim Xbox compatibility. Treat Xbox support as connection-dependent and verify your intended setup.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.0

Wireless reviews consistently say Xbox support is missing.