Compare beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset vs HyperX Cloud III

P1 beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset
P2 HyperX Cloud III

Comparison Takeaways

beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear Gaming Headset

Where It Has the Edge

  • Preset EQ profile quality is 4.2 vs 1.5. Preset EQ profiles are viewed as effective but subtle, especially for shooters and action games.
  • Dongle is 4.7 vs 2.0. The low-latency dongle is praised for reliable pairing and gaming-focused wireless use.
  • Bluetooth is 4.7 vs 2.5. Bluetooth pairing is described as easy and reliable in wireless reviews, including instant pairing and easy Bluetooth use.
  • Portability/foldability is 4.2 vs 2.3. Portability is lightly positive in one review where the headset replaced the reviewer’s usual carry headphones.

HyperX Cloud III

Where It Has the Edge

  • Volume output is 4.0 vs 2.0. Volume was usually loud enough, but some PlayStation and out-of-box experiences were called lower or underwhelming.
  • Design and Aesthetics is 4.4 vs 3.8. Design was generally well liked, with reviewers praising the sleeker, premium, simple, or all-black look.
  • Build quality is 4.5 vs 3.9. Build quality was a strong point, repeatedly described as robust, premium-feeling, sturdy, solid, or excellent.
  • Comfort during long use is 4.6 vs 4.2. Comfort was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly praised for long sessions, soft padding, and an easy-to-forget fit.
Average score
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.0

The lack of active noise cancellation was specifically criticized as a noticeable omission at the wireless model’s price tier.

Android compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

One review treats Android and handheld compatibility as a useful bonus, but only in the broader context of analog/mobile support.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.5

Android compatibility was mixed-to-poor in the one direct review because unsupported Android devices behaved patchily.

App
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

The app is viewed as reasonably useful, mainly because it offers presets, EQ, button settings, sidetone options, and other practical controls.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.8

App evidence was mixed-to-negative: a few found it straightforward, while others reported detection issues, limited features, or unusable support.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.8

Low-latency performance is praised subjectively, with one reviewer noticing very little gap between on-screen action and audio.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

One review directly praised sync behavior, saying wireless audio cues stayed aligned with on-screen action.

Bass performance
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.7

Bass is the most split audio trait: some reviewers find it subdued without EQ, while others hear adequate, punchy, or even strong bass.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6

Bass evidence was split: some reviewers praised deep impact and oomph, while others found the low end lacking, flat, or not satisfying for music.

Battery
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
5.0

Battery life earns strong praise in wireless reviews, with reviewers calling it a standout or generous feature beyond long-session needs.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.8

Battery life was a standout strength, with many wireless reviews praising week-plus use, roughly 100-hour endurance, or 120-hour claims.

Bluetooth
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

Bluetooth pairing is described as easy and reliable in wireless reviews, including instant pairing and easy Bluetooth use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.5

Bluetooth evidence was sharply mixed because most wireless reviews criticized its absence, while one review praised a Bluetooth mode in its transcript.

Build quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.9

Build quality is generally solid, but reviewers split between sturdy/robust impressions and complaints about plasticky or less premium materials.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.5

Build quality was a strong point, repeatedly described as robust, premium-feeling, sturdy, solid, or excellent.

Button control usability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.8

Controls are praised for simple volume, mute, and mode access, but criticized when the wheel feels clicky or loses function over 3.5mm.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

On-headset controls were usually praised for ease and convenience, though some reviewers disliked the mute location or loud mute-button noise.

Cable quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

Cable impressions are mixed: the long/braided USB cable is praised, while one reviewer disliked cable noise from rubbing on clothing.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6

Cable impressions were mixed: some liked the braided, low-noise feel, while others complained about cable noise or unwieldy length.

Carry case quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.5

Carry case quality evidence was limited and negative, with one review saying the bag did not really protect the headset.

Charging
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Fast charging is treated as useful in wireless reviews, especially for quick top-ups before long sessions.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.0

Charging evidence was limited, with one reviewer criticizing the included charging cable length.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Clamp force is usually praised as secure and comfortable, though one long-use review found it a bit tight.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.6

Clamping force was widely described as comfortable, light-to-medium, or well balanced for stability without pressure.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Comfort is a major strength for most reviewers, but two reviews warn that the round/shallow cups can become uncomfortable over longer sessions.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.6

Comfort was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly praised for long sessions, soft padding, and an easy-to-forget fit.

Connectivity versatility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.6

Connectivity is versatile across USB, 3.5mm, Bluetooth, and dongle use, but reviews repeatedly note that some features depend on USB or platform.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.4

Connectivity versatility was polarized: wired models were flexible, but wireless dongle-only limits and missing wired/Bluetooth options hurt versatility.

Console compatibility limitations
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
2.8

Console support is a notable caveat: PlayStation is more workable than Xbox, and one review warns that analog console volume is too low.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.5

Console limitations centered on PC-only virtual surround/EQ behavior and reduced console-side adjustability.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.8

Design is polarizing, with some reviewers liking the subdued or two-tone look while another found it too gamer-styled for everyday use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.4

Design was generally well liked, with reviewers praising the sleeker, premium, simple, or all-black look.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.3

Detachable cable convenience is mixed because the removable cords help flexibility, but the short analog cable is criticized as less useful.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.9

Detachable-cable convenience was mostly a weakness, with several wired or wireless reviews wishing for removability or wired fallback.

Detachable microphone convenience
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

The detachable mic is consistently treated as useful, especially for streamlining the headset or positioning the boom exactly where needed.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.8

Detachable microphone convenience was mostly positive for flexibility, though one review warned the detachable mic could be misplaced.

Dongle
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

The low-latency dongle is praised for reliable pairing and gaming-focused wireless use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.0

Dongle reliance was a common concern because reviewers disliked patchy behavior, easy loss, and dependence on one connection method.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Padding is widely praised as plush and soft, but one reviewer with larger ears criticized the earcups as too small and shallow.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.1

Earcup padding was generally praised as plush, thick, soft, or spacious, though pleather warmth and spicy ears were noted.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

Earcup movement is limited but useful: reviewers note tilt rather than swivel, and the tilt helps fit and positioning.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.4

Swivel and rotation range was a repeated weakness, with reviewers wishing HyperX had added more swivel.

Earpad replacement ease
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

Earpad replacement ease was positive in video evidence, with removable cups or compatible universal pads mentioned approvingly.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.4

EQ support is mixed: wireless app EQ is useful, bass may need EQ, and the older wired review criticized the lack of software EQ.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.5

EQ customization was useful for tailoring sound, but reviewers criticized broken toggles, bad custom EQ behavior, missing onboard EQ, and poor presets.

Fit/seal reliability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Fit and seal are praised where discussed, with reviewers noting easy sealing, snug earpads, and stable fit.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.8

Fit and seal were strong in the few direct mentions, supporting comfort, glasses use, and noise blocking.

Footstep sound level scaling feature
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

The Shooter preset is praised for making gunshots and footsteps more distinct, helping competitive awareness.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Frequency response is praised by one reviewer as balanced and accurate, though other reviews criticize specific bass and treble tradeoffs.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.5

Frequency-response impressions leaned neutral or refined in some reviews, but distortion and a less exciting tonal balance appeared as caveats.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Headband adjustment is consistently praised as easy, practical, and broad enough for different head sizes.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.3

Headband adjustability was usable, but the evidence was mixed because one reviewer found notches somewhat flimsy.

Hinge durability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
5.0

Hinge durability evidence was positive where discussed, emphasizing the Cloud line’s tank-like construction reputation.

Included accessories
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.8

Included accessories were mixed-to-negative, especially where reviewers missed a pouch, velour pads, longer cable, or extra pads.

Instrument separation
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Instrument and effect separation is praised, with reviewers describing clear distinction between channels, instruments, dialogue, and game sounds.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

Layering and separation were positively noted in a few game and music examples, though this was not a major theme across the evidence.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

A few reviewers said the headset kept detail or held up well at higher gain/volume, supporting good maximum-volume behavior.

Microphone
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Microphone quality is one of the strongest themes, ranging from decent to exceptional, with several reviewers calling it unusually good for a headset.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.1

Microphone quality was one of the most commonly praised attributes, though a few reviews found it merely fine, flat, or lacking body.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.6

Mic noise reduction is repeatedly praised for suppressing typing, ambient sound, music, and surrounding noise while keeping the voice clear.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

Microphone noise reduction was a strength overall, with several reviewers saying background noise, keyboard sounds, or distractions were reduced well.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.6

Call and voice-chat usefulness is praised where discussed, including understandable chat, Zoom use, and positive reactions from other listeners.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.8

Call and chat voice quality was generally clear enough, though a few reviewers mentioned flat tone or low gain concerns.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Midrange clarity is a strength, with reviewers praising clear vocals, defined mids, and natural vocal reproduction.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.4

Midrange performance was usually clear enough for dialogue and vocals, but some reviewers heard recessed or weak mids that hurt music fullness.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.9

Multi-platform support is useful but uneven: one review calls it a good all-rounder, while another says it is really best for PC-first buyers.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6

Multi-platform compatibility was broad but imperfect: reviewers praised wide platform support while repeatedly noting dongle-only or Xbox gaps.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Multipoint is praised in one wireless review because it prevented the reviewer from needing to switch devices.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Passive isolation is consistently praised for reducing surrounding noise, though one review notes it does not handle droning noise like ANC.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.1

Passive isolation was consistently useful, with earcups and cushioning blocking or shutting out outside noise without active cancellation.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Portability is lightly positive in one review where the headset replaced the reviewer’s usual carry headphones.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
2.3

Portability was weak because the headset was described as bulky, non-folding, or less suited for travel.

Positional audio accuracy
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Positional audio is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising accurate direction, footstep detection, and spatial placement in games.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.8

Positional audio was mixed: several reviewers heard precise placement, while others struggled with directionality and in-game localization.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Preset EQ profiles are viewed as effective but subtle, especially for shooters and action games.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.5

Preset EQ evidence was strongly negative in the one direct review, which called the included presets junk.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Replaceable ear pads and other parts are praised as value-preserving, repair-friendly features.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.3

Replaceable earpads received positive evidence from reviews noting removable earcups or compatible replacement pads.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.1

Sidetone/augmented voice monitoring is mixed: convenient in wired USB use, but the wireless Sidetone mode is criticized for hiss.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.0

Sidetone and mic monitoring were highly inconsistent, ranging from useful or best-ever sidetone to non-working monitoring toggles.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

Setup simplicity is praised in wired reviews because the headset works without extra software and can be used out of the gate.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.1

Setup simplicity varied, ranging from easy plug-and-play to painful setup or USB sound-card issues.

Sound leakage
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Closed-back sound leakage control is praised in one review, especially for subway or shared-space listening.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.5

Sound leakage evidence was limited and mixed, with one review praising low leakage while another noted audible leakage outside the headset.

Sound quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.4

Overall sound quality is praised across reviews for clarity, richness, immersion, and balanced fundamentals, though bass and treble are common tradeoffs.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.9

Reviewers broadly found the Cloud III clear and enjoyable for gaming, but several described the sound as merely serviceable or flawed for music and higher-end listening.

Soundstage width
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.7

Soundstage is praised as wide, layered, and immersive, with strong depth for games and spatial scenes.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.0

Soundstage was a recurring limitation, with multiple reviewers calling it narrow, confined, or one-dimensional despite a few acceptable impressions.

Spatial audio
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Spatial presentation is praised in gaming, including PS5 3D audio, immersive soundscapes, and strong spatial awareness.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.3

Spatial audio was divisive: some praised precision and immersion, while others found DTS subtle, bad-sounding, or PC-limited.

Stability
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.2

Stability is praised where discussed, with reviewers saying the headset stays positioned securely during movement.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

Stability evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting the fit remained stable despite light clamping pressure.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.0

Transparency/augmented mode is useful in several reviews, but one wireless review strongly criticizes hiss in the mic transparency implementation.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.5

Treble impressions are mixed: one reviewer hears distracting harshness/distortion, while another finds the highs natural and non-fatiguing.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.6

Treble drew mixed reactions, ranging from crisp and detailed to bright, tinny, piercing, or overly high depending on the review and model.

USB-C
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.1

USB-C/USB use is generally the best-supported mode, unlocking features and better platform behavior, though that dependence limits analog use.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.4

USB-C support was viewed positively, especially when paired with included USB-A adapters and broader platform use.

Value for money
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
3.9

Value is mixed: reviewers praise the balance of comfort, mic, and sound, but several note pricing pressure or cheaper alternatives.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
3.9

Value opinions ranged from excellent budget value and home-run pricing to complaints that the wireless version needed more features for its price.

Volume output
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
2.0

Volume output is criticized on analog controller connections, where one reviewer found console volume too low for immersion.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

Volume was usually loud enough, but some PlayStation and out-of-box experiences were called lower or underwhelming.

Weight comfort
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.3

Low weight is consistently praised as helping comfort, with reviewers repeatedly describing the headset as light or not heavy.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.0

Weight comfort was mostly positive thanks to lightness, though a few reviewers found the wireless model heavier or fatiguing over time.

Wireless latency
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
4.5

Wireless latency is praised subjectively through the dongle, with reviewers noting low-latency claims and little perceived audio/video gap.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
4.9

Wireless latency was consistently praised where tested, with reviewers reporting low or nonexistent lag.

Xbox compatibility
Product 1: beyerdynamic MMX 150 Wireless Over-Ear...
1.5

Xbox compatibility is a serious limitation in one review, especially because USB was not recognized and analog volume was too low.

Product 2: HyperX Cloud III
1.5

Xbox compatibility was a clear weakness for wireless reviews, repeatedly called absent or disappointing.