Compare Miele Triflex HX2 Pro Cordless Stick Vacuum vs UWANT D100 Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner

The Pro bundle is repeatedly praised for including a broad set of tools/rollers (crevice, dusting, upholstery and surface-specific rollers), though some wish for additional powered mini tools or dedicated heads.

Most reviewers highlight a generous box for the price: docking base, at least one spare roller, spare filter(s) (often HEPA), a cleaning brush/tool, and a bottle of cleaning fluid/solution.

Design and finish are frequently described as premium and stylish, with a futuristic, high-end look and feel.

Multiple reviews call the D100 sleek/modern and compact-looking. The styling is generally viewed as functional and “nice looking,” rather than premium-luxury.

Automatic floor-type sensing/brush behavior is a notable feature, adjusting suction or brush action when moving between hard floors and carpet; responsiveness is sometimes slower than top rivals but generally effective.

Smart mode uses sensors to adjust power/water based on detected dirt; reviewers see it ramp up on heavier messes. There’s no recurring mention of an app, but the automation itself is appreciated for day-to-day cleaning.

At least one long-term user specifically praises minimal blowback or debris flicking behind the head compared with their prior vacuum.

A recurring downside is blowback/scatter on very light debris (e.g., cat hair or some cereal) before pickup, especially at the start of a pass. Most reviewers still consider it manageable with technique/mode choice.

On carpets/rugs the consensus is “limited”: it’s mainly for sealed hard floors, but a few reviewers say it can handle low-pile rugs or doormats in dry mode with modest results.

Initial setup/assembly is usually straightforward, but some reviewers report stiff parts and multiple steps when reconfiguring between modes.

Setup is repeatedly described as quick and tool-free: attach the handle, assemble the two-piece base, plug in, and charge. Several note the battery often arrives partially charged.

At least one tester reports the unit detecting a clog and warning the user to check the roller/pipe, preventing continued operation until addressed.

One reviewer notes it won’t run unless the head is lowered into the cleaning position, which helps prevent accidental spinning while upright.

Battery system is a strong point on Pro bundles thanks to a spare pack and multiple charging options; charge times around ~4 hours and occasional quirks mean you’ll want a charging routine, especially if you use higher power often.

Battery life is reported as “enough” for kitchens/entryways and smaller homes, but not long. Reported Smart runtimes range roughly from the low‑20 minutes to ~35 minutes; Turbo/Power mode is often ~16–18 minutes. Charging is widely criticized as slow in some tests (~6+ hours), though at least one reviewer reports closer to ~4 hours.

The 0.5L bin is widely considered small for the class; it can fill quickly during whole-home cleans, though a few reviewers find it adequate for average runs.

Build quality is repeatedly rated high, with sturdy parts and a premium feel; long-term durability is generally expected to be strong, but not extensively proven in the reviews.

Build quality is generally described as solid for the price, with praise for the stable lay-flat mechanism and waterproof/washable chassis/motor design (IPX-style). Minor negatives include occasional leakage reports and a small learning curve with docking alignment.

High-pile/thick carpet results are generally good but can become hard to push at higher suction, making mid modes more practical.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, clearing powders and everyday debris well; performance can depend on mode and may be less impressive than the very best competitors.

On medium-pile carpet, tests often report strong pickup (including pet hair) but sometimes requiring multiple passes for a truly clean finish.

Normal household messes don’t appear to clog it often, but thick mixtures (like flour plus liquid) can clog the tube and require rinsing/cleanout. The included cleaning tool and washable design help recovery.

Against competitors, reviewers agree it performs very well on cleaning tests, but several note that premium Dysons can outperform it while costing less in some markets.

In comparisons, the D100 is framed as a value leader rather than the absolute “best regardless of price.” Reviewers often contrast it with premium brands, noting it offers many flagship-style features for less money.

Controls are simple but polarizing: the slider and basic indicators are easy to understand, yet some find the interface less refined or a bit cumbersome to adjust precisely.

Controls are typically simple (power + mode) with a clear display and voice prompts. Users like having water-output and volume controls, but at least one tester couldn’t fully mute voice prompts and others mention a small learning curve for self-cleaning workflows.

Handheld conversion is a core strength and works well for stairs, cars and spot jobs, though it can feel heavy for extended above-shoulder cleaning.

Cordless freedom is a major benefit, especially paired with swappable batteries; frequent bin emptying can reduce the sense of convenience for some owners.

Cordless operation is a consistent quality-of-life win—no dragging a cord while mopping. The push-in dock/parking style also supports quick grab-and-go use.

Cyclone/Vortex-style separation is described as effective for maintaining pickup and containing fine dust; most commentary is qualitative rather than lab-measured.

Handling feedback is mixed: some find it easy to manoeuvre (especially in comfort/low-mounted mode), while others call it clumsy, less flexible when turning, or hard to push/pull on certain settings.

Dried coffee/ketchup style tests suggest it can lift set-in stains, but may require repeated passes—performance is better on fresh spills than on fully dried, sticky stains.

Day-to-day use is mostly praised (roll off the dock, press power, clean). Pain points include a tight, suction-y tank lid for some users (especially with hand strength/arthritis) and occasional learning curve around docking/self-cleaning steps.

Edge and baseboard cleaning performance is reported as strong in at least one controlled flour test, reaching tight skirting areas effectively.

Edge cleaning is a major strength: multiple reviewers call it edge-to-edge/dual-edge and show it cleaning close to baseboards. One measured the real gap at ~5–6 mm from the wall (still better than many, but not as tight as some marketing claims).

Emptying can be fiddly and sometimes dusty; several reviews recommend emptying outdoors, while others note it can be controlled with practice but remains a frequent annoyance due to bin size.

Emptying is usually straightforward and some reviews highlight solid/liquid separation that makes disposal cleaner (dump solids first, then pour liquid). The main mess risk comes from soggy mixed debris when doing wet + dry together.

Multiple reviews highlight strong dust containment with HEPA/HEPA-style filtration and a sealed system, making it appealing for allergies and fine dust.

HEPA/air filtration is referenced in multiple reviews, with filters catching noticeable pet hair and fine debris. Users emphasize keeping the filter clean/dry for best performance.

Multiple reviewers note it leaves only light moisture and floors dry quickly after a pass; water-output adjustment helps balance cleaning strength versus dry time.

The floorhead earns praise for wide coverage, strong sealing/suction-to-floor feel and surface versatility; downsides include limited swivel/flex in some designs and a tendency to snowplow larger debris on hard floors in certain tests.

Fresh spills (water, coffee, milk) are often shown being removed in one or two passes in demos/tests, with the unit automatically increasing effort in Smart mode on wetter areas.

On carpets, hair pickup is usually strong, including controlled pet-hair tests; coarse mats and some fabrics can leave stubborn strands behind.

Hard-floor hair pickup is typically strong, helped by good sealing and head design; a few scenarios still require careful passes.

Pet hair pickup on hard floors is frequently praised (dog/cat homes). Hair is often visible in the tank/filter after a pass, suggesting strong real-world performance.

Hair-wrap resistance is mixed: some reviewers report little to no tangling, while others (including lab tests) note hair wrapping and a lack of robust anti-tangle tech compared with Shark/Dyson.

Anti-tangle design and scrapers/comb features generally keep long hair from wrapping tightly. Stress tests show hair may stick temporarily, but it’s usually easy to remove and often ends up trapped in the tank filter instead.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is a highlight, with multiple reviews reporting near-total pickup in one pass on test powders like flour.

Fine debris like dust and small particles is generally collected well, but one reviewer warns that very large amounts of powder (e.g., flour) mixed with liquid can form paste and cause issues.

Large debris on hard floors is inconsistent: some testers report easy pickup of rice/cereal, while others see snowplowing or flinging that requires technique changes or switching to handheld/nozzle mode.

It handles larger debris and mixed messes (cereal, sauce, even spaghetti in one demo) better than many expect. However, very light pieces can scatter, and at least one reviewer saw eggshell not picked up in a specific mode/test.

LED lighting is considered helpful for spotting debris on hard floors and under furniture, though it’s not as revealing as Dyson’s laser systems.

Noted innovations versus peers include push-in docking, a fully washable/waterproof motor/chassis, electrolyzed-water cleaning claims, a combined dual-compartment tank, and an adjustable/swiveling handle.

The ultra-thin/flat form factor (often cited around 13.5 cm) is a standout design point and is frequently compared favorably to bulkier competitors.

Maintenance is a mix of positives and negatives: washable parts and filter-cleaning features help, but bin emptying, filter brushing and hair removal can be time-consuming for some owners.

The self-clean routine reduces hands-on scrubbing, but ownership still involves emptying/ rinsing tanks, cleaning filters, and occasionally clearing thicker debris. Reviewers mention mixed wet+dry sludge can be unpleasant to dump, and long drying beeps (in some units) add annoyance to the maintenance loop.

Handling is generally described as smooth and nimble, helped by the light weight and a flexible/swiveling handle. One reviewer notes the forward “thrust” can feel tiring over long sessions and that backward passes can smear more than some competitors.

Mopping results are consistently positive for everyday grime, muddy footprints, and mixed wet messes. Tough, dried-on spills can take multiple passes, but most reviewers still report a clean finish.

Noise is commonly described as relatively quiet for its performance, with measured results in the mid-50s to low-70s dB depending on mode and attachments.

Operating noise varies by mode—Turbo is described as noticeably louder. Several measure/describe the drying airflow as relatively quiet (low‑40 dB in one test), but repeated beeps during drying and voice prompts can be more annoying than the fan noise itself.

Odor prevention is repeatedly credited to the deodorizing rod plus heated drying; one reviewer left dirty water in the tank for ~24 hours and reported no bad smell. Heated drying is also cited as reducing mildew/mold risk.

Onboard/wall storage for small tools is viewed as convenient, though some wish every tool had a dedicated onboard slot.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive: most reviewers recommend it, especially for hard-floor homes wanting a one-pass vacuum+mop workflow and minimal roller-touching cleanup.

Pet hair pickup is generally strong on hard floors and carpets, with several tests clearing visible hair well; coarse entrance matting or deep/embedded hair can still take multiple passes.

Pet households specifically like the combination of strong hair pickup, anti-tangle brush design, and odor mitigation (deodorizer + heated drying). Several reviewers explicitly recommend it for homes with shedding pets.

Value is a common pain point: performance and build are praised, but many reviewers feel the high price is hard to justify versus strong competitors.

Value is the dominant theme: many call it the best value-for-money wet/dry vacuum in its segment, often citing prices around ~$289–$320 (or sales near ~$299) while offering features found on pricier competitors.

Measured/realistic runtime varies widely by mode and attachment: low/min settings can reach roughly an hour per battery in some setups, while typical eco use is often closer to ~20–30 minutes. Boost/Max runtime is consistently short (often around ~8–15 minutes per battery), so it’s best treated as a spot-cleaning mode rather than a whole-home default.

Sanitizing claims come from electrolyzed-water/“sterilization” language and heated drying. Some reviewers run informal bacteria comparisons that look promising, but most acknowledge true disinfection levels aren’t lab-verified in these reviews.

The rinse + hot/warm-air dry routine is a headline feature and widely praised for reducing manual roller washing. Reported drying is often ~1 hour at ~60°C, leaving the roller mostly dry (sometimes not 100%). A major complaint is persistent beeping during the drying phase in at least one long-term test.

Several reviewers describe it as self-propelled or at least strongly assisted by brush traction, which reduces pushing effort. A minority find that same pull can feel a bit too forceful over long cleans.

Reviewers like the adjustable water-output options and the ability to use cleaning solution; some highlight electrolyzed-water operation as a differentiator. A common request is easier filling, and there’s no consistent mention of automatic solution dosing.

Self-standing capability in the low/comfort configuration is a standout convenience for pausing and storage; in other configurations it may require a wall mount or careful placement.

The push-in base makes parking easier than lift-on docks and reviewers like the compact footprint. Some note it’s happiest when docked against a wall and that occasional alignment/positioning habits help.

Some users report an even, streak-free finish and visibly shinier floors, while another notes that backward movement can smear more than with some competing wet/dry vacs (consistent with many floor washers being optimized for forward passes).

Reviews consistently describe very strong suction for a cordless stick, excelling on fine dust and everyday debris; some tests show it trails top Dyson models on raw suction and can become hard to push in Max mode.

Pickup power is repeatedly described as strong, especially for a budget wet/dry unit. Reviews show it handling liquids and common household debris well, though very light debris can sometimes get pushed ahead before being captured.

Its compact body, flexibility, and lay-flat reach make it easy to store and to use in tighter rooms (kitchens, entryways, around furniture legs).

Support is mentioned positively where discussed, with long warranties and service availability cited, though not all reviews address reliability long-term.

Only a small number of reviews mention after-purchase support details; one cites a 2‑year warranty and a 30‑day return policy. Broader reliability feedback is limited beyond short-term use.

Swapping rollers and converting configurations is often described as slower or more fiddly than rivals; users who rarely change modes will mind this less.

Roller removal and routine access are often tool-free and quick. The main exception is the dirty-tank lid/fit, which can require a firm pull/wiggle and may be difficult for users with limited hand strength.

Under-furniture access is one reason to reconfigure the power unit; some reviewers still find the vacuum heavy or the benefit modest versus conventional stick designs.

Lay-flat/180° cleaning is one of the most praised features, letting the head reach under tables, chairs, and some low furniture. Extremely low clearances can still be limiting, but it’s more capable than many alternatives.

Above-floor cleaning with upholstery/crevice tools is generally effective, but the unit’s weight can make extended high-reach cleaning tiring, and some embedded sofa debris (like feathers) may still resist pickup.

The 3-in-1 concept is widely appreciated for flexibility and self-standing storage, but several reviewers say the real-world benefit is smaller than expected because mode changes take time.

Versatility is strong for hard-floor households thanks to Smart/Turbo/Dry (suction-only) modes and adjustable water output. Most reviewers caution it’s not meant to be a primary carpet cleaner, though low-pile rugs/mats can work in a pinch.

The D100’s water system is often described as a dual-compartment or “two-in-one” tank that keeps clean and dirty water separated. Capacity is cited anywhere from ~650 ml fresh/~700 ml dirty to about ~1 liter total. Tanks are generally easy to remove, but filling access and the tight lid/fit draw some complaints.

Weight impressions vary: some find it heavy compared to most cordless sticks, while others find it manageable—especially with the power unit mounted low to reduce wrist strain.

Across reviews the D100 is repeatedly called lightweight and easy to lift/steer, with reported weights around ~4.1–4.3 kg.