Compare Schlage Encode Plus Smart Lock vs myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock

Access logs were praised by reviewers who liked being able to see lock history and how the lock was opened or closed.

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting individual pins can show who opened the door.

The built-in alarm was criticized as too quiet, even by reviewers who liked having forced-entry detection available.

The app experience was mixed because the Schlage app exposes useful settings, but Apple Home app limitations and sync quirks made access-code and HomeKit management confusing.

The app setup experience was praised as simple, with phone control presented as easy to use.

Auto-lock received positive comments as a useful safety net, especially for users who want the door to relock after a delay or when the last person leaves.

Auto-lock support was viewed as useful and configurable, though the evidence centers on one reviewer’s setup experience.

Failed-code lockout behavior was treated as a useful security deterrent because repeated wrong entries frustrate brute-force attempts.

Battery impressions were mixed: one long-term user reported jams near low battery, one called two-month life terrible, while another early reviewer projected strong life.

Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the rechargeable pack, but one noted a long initial charge time.

Bluetooth was treated as a weaker fallback than Thread because of slower response and shorter range.

Build quality received strong praise from reviewers who described the lock as solid, secure-feeling, and backed by Schlage's reputation for durable hardware.

Reviewers praised the physical construction, describing the lock as a great quality product and super well built.

Camera and doorbell evidence was positive, with praise for clear visitor video, a wide-angle view, and the integrated 2K camera-doorbell design.

Door-sense capability was criticized as absent, with a reviewer saying an open/closed door sensor would still be useful despite lock/unlock notifications.

Door-sense worked in the reviewer’s test, with the app state updating once the door closed.

Door fit mattered because reviewers warned that smart locks dislike resistance and may have battery or operation issues if the deadbolt does not move smoothly.

Door-fit evidence was limited but positive: one reviewer’s older steel door prep worked with the included jig and deadbolt drilling guidance.

Facial recognition drew some of the strongest praise, with reviewers calling it cool, incredible, and very fast.

Fingerprint unlocking was a notable missing feature, especially because reviewers compared it unfavorably with lower-priced competing locks that include it.

Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.

Geofencing and arrival automation were weaker points because one reviewer found Apple Watch confirmation prompts frustrating instead of seamless.

Guest access was praised for schedules, renter use, and easy code sharing, but one reviewer criticized the 100-code limit versus competing locks with more capacity.

Guest access was praised for service or pet-care scenarios where the owner could let someone in without sharing a key.

Reviewers liked that the lock can avoid a separate bridge, but Apple/HomeKit users still saw hub requirements as important for remote control, Thread performance, or battery life.

Reviewers liked the styling and finish options when they matched existing hardware, but some noted that the interior/exterior lock body is larger and less discreet than slimmer rivals.

The lock’s integrated design was praised for reducing separate-device clutter and for looking slick and well designed.

Reviewers consistently found the hardware installation easy, often describing setup as quick, smooth, or straightforward, though Apple/Home app setup could add complexity for some users.

Hands-on reviewers generally found installation approachable, praising complete hardware, easy installation, clear directions, and a smooth process, with one longer install still going fairly smoothly.

The hidden key backup was viewed positively, and another reviewer liked that the lock still had multiple fallback options.

Keypad feedback was split: some reviewers praised responsiveness and readability, while several complained that the numbers are hard to see or that the touch keypad feels lower quality.

Keypad evidence was mixed: one reviewer preferred physical buttons, while another confirmed the pin code worked.

Keyway quality was supported by positive rekeying comments, especially for homes with existing Schlage five-pin keys.

Locking and unlocking speed earned strong praise, with multiple reviewers describing Home Key, app, voice, or Thread responses as very quick or nearly instant.

Speed was a standout: one article cited two-second unlock latency, while a hands-on reviewer found face recognition extremely fast.

The lock motor was repeatedly praised as smooth, fast, and quieter than prior Schlage or Nest/Yale locks, making everyday locking less disruptive.

The interior locking action received strong praise from a reviewer who described it as super smooth.

Reliability was a major strength in hands-on reviews, with reviewers describing the lock as dependable, fast, and easy to live with.

A hands-on reviewer tested multiple unlock methods and found them working successfully.

Notifications were praised when they identified who unlocked the door, especially through Apple devices and Home Key alerts.

Notification evidence was mixed: one review praised context-aware alerts, while another noted unsubscribed alerts lacked detection details.

Remote access was limited in Apple Home setups without a hub, which reviewers treated as an important caveat despite the lock's built-in Wi-Fi.

Remote access was praised for letting someone enter without needing a physical key handoff.

Security handling for face scans was praised because the reviewer said scans stay on the device rather than going to the cloud.

The strongest praise centered on Apple Home Key and broad smart-home support, with reviewers calling Home Key fast and convenient, especially for iPhone and Apple Watch users.

Integration evidence was split: myQ ecosystem control was praised, but multiple reviews criticized or warned about limited popular smart-home platform support.

Touchscreen opinions were mixed to negative: reviewers liked some visual and audio cues but complained about no haptics, weak feedback, and a flawed touch keypad.

The touch-sensitive keypad divided preference, with one reviewer noting some people may prefer physical buttons instead.

Two-factor authentication was criticized as missing from the Schlage app, reducing account-security confidence compared with some rival smart-lock apps.

User access management was praised for admin keys and code toggles, but reviewers also reported Home app and Schlage app code-management limitations.

User access management was described as easy for users, PIN codes, and alerts.

Value depended heavily on Apple/HomeKit use: many reviewers called it worth the high price for Home Key, while others felt it costs more while missing some rival features.

Value depends heavily on use case: reviewers praised the feature bundle and recommendations, but flagged overkill, subscriptions, and fee concerns.

Voice control was described as fast and broadly supported across platforms, with Siri confirmation treated as an appropriate security behavior when unlocking.

Warranty coverage received strong praise, with one reviewer calling the warranty superb alongside the lock's basic feature set.

Weather resistance drew criticism from one reviewer who wanted stronger sealing and said the lock did not meet weather-resistant expectations.

Weather protection was praised through the exterior gasket, which a reviewer said sealed well to keep moisture out.

Wi-Fi performed well in the reviews that tested it, and integrated Wi-Fi was praised for reducing bridge dependence, though Apple users may still need a hub for remote features.