Compare eufy Video Smart Lock E330 vs Yale August Smart Lock

Reviewers who evaluated event history found it useful for checking clips and seeing who came or went, especially for family awareness.

The activity log was useful in one review, but another reviewer reported a serious failure where an unlock event was not logged.

The app was consistently praised as simple, polished, and useful for setup, live view, lock control, access management, and monitoring.

The app was widely praised as intuitive, responsive, and feature-rich, though one reviewer had severe app freezing during setup.

Auto-lock drew strong praise for reliably relocking after a set time and reducing worry about whether the door was left unlocked.

Auto-lock was one of the strongest features, praised for flexibility and peace of mind, though one reviewer disabled it because it could lock them out.

The failed-attempt lockout behavior was viewed as a strong security safeguard when someone keeps entering wrong codes or fingerprints.

Battery feedback was the most divided area: some reviewers liked the removable rechargeable pack, while others reported short runtime or slow charging.

Battery life was the most consistent weakness, with repeated concern about CR123 batteries, shorter lifespan, replacement cost, and one six-to-eight-week real-world result.

Bluetooth-range control was described as responsive in one review, with the lock reacting nearly immediately when pressed.

Build quality was rated very highly, with reviewers repeatedly describing the lock as metal, sturdy, well made, durable, and high quality.

Build quality drew praise where discussed, with reviewers calling out high-quality materials and a solidly built feel.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, with sharp 2K video, good night vision, fast loading, and useful two-way features, though field of view and door placement limited some setups.

Door-sense was weakly supported because a reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door was open or closed.

DoorSense was praised when it worked and was considered worth installing, but one reviewer reported repeated calibration failures and incorrect open/closed status.

Door compatibility was a major caveat because screen doors, storm doors, deep jambs, and awkward door angles could compromise the camera or overall fit.

Reviewers valued the retrofit deadbolt fit for renters and existing-door setups, though one installation was complicated by tight door trim.

Existing hardware reuse scored well in the one clear opinionated case, where the lock worked with an existing strike plate and the reviewer called that nice.

Keeping the outside hardware and existing deadbolt was repeatedly praised, especially for renters, maintenance access, and preserving exterior appearance.

Facial recognition was mixed: HomeBase-linked identification worked in one test, while another reviewer wanted face-based unlocking added.

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, convenient, and the preferred unlock method.

Fingerprint entry was treated as a missing keyless feature rather than a strength of this lock.

Geofencing and auto-unlock were the most mixed smart feature: some reviewers found it handy or excellent, while others found it slow, inconsistent, or stopped working.

Guest access was praised when reviewers could give temporary or remote user access without handing over physical keys.

Guest access was easy and useful, with virtual keys, sharing by text, and scheduled codes highlighted positively.

Hub requirement was mixed because the lock can work without a HomeBase, but one reviewer disliked needing a separate chime when used alone.

Reviewers liked that built-in Wi-Fi removes the need for an add-on bridge or Connect module.

Industrial design was well liked, with reviewers calling the lock sleek, compact, sharp, premium-looking, and attractive.

Installation and setup were consistently praised as quick, easy, straightforward, foolproof, or among the easiest smart-lock setups reviewers had tried.

Most reviewers found setup easy, quick, and well guided by the app, with one strong dissent reporting freezes, verification issues, and calibration trouble.

Key override reliability scored well because reviewers appreciated the hidden physical key and backup power options for dead-battery situations.

The retained physical key was useful as a fallback and for renters, but one long-term tester still ended up carrying keys because smart unlocking was not fast enough.

The keypad was viewed positively for reliability, passcode flexibility, and backlighting, although one reviewer treated keypad access as less preferred than fingerprint.

The optional keypad works and can be useful, but reviewers noted it is not included and may disappoint buyers who want a built-in keypad experience.

Keyway quality was a recurring weakness because multiple reviewers noted the lock cannot be rekeyed or needs a locksmith for extra keys.

Lock and unlock speed scored strongly in the one clear opinionated review that called the lock fast and quiet.

App/manual locking was often described as instant, smooth, or quick, but one reviewer found physical keys faster than app, Siri, or watch workflows.

The locking motor was praised as smooth and responsive in hands-on use.

The motor was praised for quiet operation in PCMag testing.

Locking reliability scored highly where reviewers focused on the smart-lock half, calling it responsive and saying it worked as advertised.

Locking reliability was excellent in most formal testing and one six-month review, but one reviewer reported serious state confusion and unreliable locking status.

Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers describing alerts as nearly instant, responsive, fast, or consistent.

Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers praising flexible smart alerts, quick push alerts, and better door-status awareness.

Physical security received strong praise from TechGearLab, which highlighted the ANSI Grade 1 strength rating and intruder resistance.

Remote access was rated very highly because reviewers liked being able to view, unlock, greet visitors, or control the lock from the app remotely.

Remote access was praised as convenient for controlling the lock from elsewhere in the house or anywhere with a phone connection.

Security features such as scramble passcode and failed-attempt protections were praised as sensible, useful, and security-enhancing.

Security software features were reassuring in the CNET review, especially authentication and encryption protections around the app and account.

Smart-home integration was mixed-positive: Alexa, Google, Apple Watch, and Eufy ecosystem links were appreciated, but lack of HomeKit hurt one review.

Smart-home integration was broad and often praised, but Alexa/Google setup hitches, HomeKit offline issues, and one severe HomeKit complaint made reliability mixed.

Touchscreen visibility scored poorly in the one clear opinionated review because the keypad and doorbell button were hard to find in the dark.

The lack of a built-in outside touchpad/touchscreen was a drawback for the reviewer who preferred that style of lock.

User access management scored well where reviewers valued adding users, codes, and fingerprints with access rules.

User access management was praised for free virtual keys and scheduled access codes.

Value was mostly positive thanks to all-in-one convenience and savings versus higher-tier models, though one reviewer stressed that the lock is not cheap.

Value was mixed: several reviewers called it pricey but worthwhile, while others weighed the high price against batteries, keypad add-ons, and reliability frustrations.

Voice control was positively received, especially Alexa integration, chime support, and hands-free unlocking through assistants.

Voice control worked quickly in one test and was supported broadly, but other reviewers reported password recognition issues or slow/failing Siri and Google Assistant use.

Support was viewed positively through a resolved battery-warning bug and confidence that August/Assa Abloy support would keep software maintained.

Weather resistance scored strongly where reviewers found the lock handled rain, hot conditions, or outdoor exposure well.

Wi-Fi was mixed-positive: one reviewer saw fast alerts even on weak 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, while another warned experience depends on network strength.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for freshness, range, and eliminating a bridge, but reviewers tied it to battery drain and one reported mesh/Wi-Fi frustration.