Compare eufy Video Smart Lock E330 vs myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock

Event history is a consistent strength, with multiple reviewers highlighting detailed lock and camera logs that can identify who unlocked the door by fingerprint or code.

PINs can be assigned per person and activity/history views are referenced, enabling basic visibility into who accessed the door.

The Eufy app is broadly praised for setup, live view, quick lock controls, access management, and clear event history, with few complaints beyond battery-related settings tradeoffs.

Reviews consistently praise the myQ app for guiding setup, managing PINs/biometrics, and providing remote control; however, multiple reviewers warn that key camera/AI conveniences may be gated by a subscription or altered over time.

Auto-lock is widely described as reliable and flexible, with adjustable timers and scheduling, though it is timer-based rather than true door-position sensing.

Auto-lock can be enabled and timed in-app (example: ~90 seconds), providing set-and-forget security once the door is closed. Hands-free face access and other biometric/PIN methods make entry convenient, but at least one outlet notes face-based automations can require a paid plan, reducing the value of the feature.

Wrong-try protection appears well implemented, letting owners lock out further attempts after repeated bad fingerprints or PIN entries.

The adjustable deadbolt and removable fit pieces help it adapt to common backset and bore variations on standard doors.

Installation guidance explicitly supports common backsets (2-3/8 and 2-3/4), with the latch adjustable to match standard door prep.

Battery life is the biggest unresolved weakness: light use can be respectable, but several reviewers saw much shorter runtimes than the 8-12 month marketing claim once motion, video, and notifications were active.

Most sources cite roughly 4–6+ months per charge and like the rechargeable pack; charging can take several hours, and a swap/spare battery option is mentioned for avoiding downtime.

Bluetooth helps with setup and is mentioned by some reviewers as an available unlock path, though Wi-Fi and fingerprint are the primary day-to-day methods.

Bluetooth is mentioned as part of the internal module/antenna during installation, but Wi-Fi remains the primary path for remote control and camera features.

Build quality is generally rated highly, with reviewers calling the exterior solid, premium-looking, and well made for a lock-camera combo.

Unboxing and install videos describe the exterior unit as dense/heavy with solid materials and good fit, suggesting strong build quality for a first-gen lock.

Reviewers generally liked the sharp 2K image, usable night vision, fast live view, and subscription-free local storage, but the camera side remains more compromised than a dedicated video doorbell because field of view, package visibility, and button discoverability can vary a lot by door layout.

Reviews indicate the E330 lacks true door-open and door-closed sensing, so auto-lock relies on timers instead of confirming the door position.

A door-position sensor (magnet) can report door-ajar vs closed status and is used during calibration; installation can be adhesive or a more permanent drilled mount.

It fits standard deadbolt doors well, but compatibility gets worse with deep jambs, screen doors, unusual spacing, or layouts that block the camera's view.

Some installations reuse the existing strike plate or fit the current bore cleanly, but others require minor modification or a new strike fit.

At least one reviewer notes an initial firmware update during setup; other coverage raises concerns that Chamberlain has historically changed features or added paywalls post-launch.

Fingerprint entry is one of the product's clearest wins, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, and the preferred way to unlock.

Fingerprint access is widely described as fast and reliable after setup, with support for enrolling multiple family members.

Lineup comparisons indicate the E330 does not offer the location-based auto features found on higher-tier Eufy models.

Guest access is flexible, with permanent, temporary, scheduled, and one-time code options that reviewers found genuinely useful.

Guest access is handled via PINs and temporary passes in the app, aimed at deliveries, pet sitters, and short-term visitors without sharing a physical key.

A hub is optional rather than required: the lock works on its own, while HomeBase 3 mainly adds AI features, storage flexibility, and ecosystem extras.

Installation is usually quick and straightforward for standard doors, often landing in the 10-20 minute range, though edge cases can require minor door work.

DIY installation is considered doable with clear instructions, but some doors may require drilling or extra strike/fitment work; careful alignment and cable connections matter.

The hidden physical key and external USB-C emergency power option give the E330 credible backup access if the battery runs down.

A physical key is available (often hidden under a cover), and multiple videos highlight an emergency 9V contact method to power the lock long enough to get inside if the main battery is drained.

The keypad works well and supports scramble PIN entry, but several reviewers note that the button area can be hard for visitors to find in the dark.

The touch keypad is easy to use and supports PIN entry for guests; one reviewer prefers physical buttons, so tactile feedback may not suit everyone.

The physical key backup is useful, but the cylinder cannot be rekeyed, which several reviewers see as a practical downside.

Locking and unlocking are generally quick, especially by fingerprint, with several reviewers describing the response as near-instant or sub-second.

Multiple reviews repeat Chamberlain’s two-second unlock claim and hands-on videos describe face/fingerprint unlock as very quick in real use.

Limited direct commentary suggests the motor is reasonably quick and quiet, but this is not as heavily discussed as fingerprint speed or battery drain.

The lock mechanism itself is consistently dependable in reviews, with few complaints about failed locking or unlocking once properly installed and calibrated.

Locking works reliably after calibration, but one install notes initial tightness/alignment issues that required strike/door prep adjustments—typical of deadbolt installs.

Notifications are a strong point, with repeated praise for fast alerts from motion events, doorbell presses, and lock actions.

You will get basic lock and motion notifications, but richer, context-aware alerts (what triggered motion) and video-related conveniences may require a subscription.

Evidence is limited but positive, including BHMA-related claims and durability figures that suggest a sturdier-than-average smart lock build.

Remote locking, unlocking, live view, and answering the door from the app all work well and are central to the product's appeal.

Remote lock/unlock from the myQ app is described as straightforward and responsive, making it practical for letting in guests or service providers when you are away.

One walkthrough emphasizes that facial data stays on-device and references network protection settings, pointing to a privacy/security-first approach for biometrics.

Integration is good but not universal: Alexa and Google are commonly supported, HomeBase 3 adds more capability, and HomeKit support is notably absent.

Coverage repeatedly notes limited integration with major platforms (Apple Home/HomeKit, Alexa, Google) and stronger ties to the myQ ecosystem and select security partners.

The touch-sensitive keypad is responsive and modern, though nighttime discoverability is not as polished as on some dedicated doorbells.

The touchscreen/touch surface looks modern and responsive, but some users may still prefer traditional button keypads for feel and certainty.

User management is robust, supporting admins, shared users, remote passcode assignment, and sizeable limits for codes and fingerprints.

User and credential management (adding users, quick/temporary passes, PINs, faces, fingerprints) is a core strength highlighted in setup walkthroughs.

Value is mixed: the combined lock-camera-doorbell design and no-subscription local storage are appealing, but the price stings more when battery life or fit issues reduce the benefit.

At roughly $279.99 plus potential monthly fees for premium camera/AI features, reviewers frame it as a premium-priced option where total cost depends on whether you subscribe.

Voice control through Alexa or Google is commonly supported and useful for basic lock commands, though it is more of a convenience layer than a standout feature.

Voice control via mainstream assistants is called out as missing/limited, so hands-free voice unlocking routines are not a focus here.

Support and warranty coverage look adequate rather than exceptional, with a one-year warranty mentioned and at least one battery-drain support interaction that did not fully solve the issue.

Media coverage flags broader trust/support concerns based on Chamberlain’s past platform decisions, even though hands-on reviewers do not report direct support failures yet.

Weather resistance is generally viewed as solid for outdoor use, with repeated IP65 mentions and positive rain-use feedback, even if one comparison suggested a lower resistance tier than the S330.

Hardware is presented as built for outdoor use with wide operating temperatures and good sealing/gasketing to help keep moisture out.

Wi-Fi performance is typically stable once connected, with fast remote access and alerts, but setup expects a 2.4 GHz network.

Wi-Fi setup is app-driven and generally smooth, but one install walkthrough highlights 2.4GHz-only pairing and a firmware update step during onboarding.