Compare Level Lock+ Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

Access logs were useful overall, but one reviewer wanted better accuracy and detail from the activity history.

Reviewers who evaluated event history found it useful for checking clips and seeing who came or went, especially for family awareness.

The app was praised for features and access sharing, but its setup and firmware-update experience could be uneven.

The app was consistently praised as simple, polished, and useful for setup, live view, lock control, access management, and monitoring.

Auto-lock was useful but limited because it relies on timing rather than knowing with certainty that the door is closed.

Auto-lock drew strong praise for reliably relocking after a set time and reducing worry about whether the door was left unlocked.

The failed-attempt lockout behavior was viewed as a strong security safeguard when someone keeps entering wrong codes or fingerprints.

Backset fit was mixed, with one reviewer needing sanding because neither bolt length fit cleanly and another finding the longer backset adjustment easy.

Battery replacement was praised as elegant and easy, but battery reporting frustrated reviewers because it lacks precise percentage detail.

Battery feedback was the most divided area: some reviewers liked the removable rechargeable pack, while others reported short runtime or slow charging.

Bluetooth was the most inconsistent connectivity area: some reviewers found it stable, while others called it spotty or range-limited.

Build quality came across as premium and well constructed, with reviewers praising the polished hardware and overall workmanship.

Build quality was rated very highly, with reviewers repeatedly describing the lock as metal, sturdy, well made, durable, and high quality.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, with sharp 2K video, good night vision, fast loading, and useful two-way features, though field of view and door placement limited some setups.

Reviewers wanted true door-sense behavior; the repeated concern was that the lock cannot tell whether the door is actually closed.

Door-sense was weakly supported because a reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door was open or closed.

Door fit was the main setup caveat: smooth, well-aligned deadbolts worked best, while tight clearances, older doors, and imperfect alignment caused extra work.

Door compatibility was a major caveat because screen doors, storm doors, deep jambs, and awkward door angles could compromise the camera or overall fit.

Because Lock+ replaces the full deadbolt, reviewers noted less reuse of existing keyed hardware and more friction when trying to keep old keys.

Existing hardware reuse scored well in the one clear opinionated case, where the lock worked with an existing strike plate and the reviewer called that nice.

Facial recognition was mixed: HomeBase-linked identification worked in one test, while another reviewer wanted face-based unlocking added.

Future update potential was mixed: Matter/Thread promises made the lock feel future-proof to some, but delayed deployment was a concern.

Fingerprint access was viewed as a missing convenience, with one reviewer explicitly wishing the keypad included a fingerprint scanner.

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, convenient, and the preferred unlock method.

Geofencing and touch-based arrival features were useful but more context-dependent than Home Key because they rely on location and Bluetooth.

Guest access was well liked for passes, cards, and temporary sharing, though several reviewers disliked requiring guests to install the Level app.

Guest access was praised when reviewers could give temporary or remote user access without handing over physical keys.

Hub requirements were a recurring drawback, especially the nearby Connect bridge and the need for separate bridging in some ecosystems.

Hub requirement was mixed because the lock can work without a HomeBase, but one reviewer disliked needing a separate chime when used alone.

Industrial design was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers praising the stealth, minimal, ordinary-deadbolt appearance.

Industrial design was well liked, with reviewers calling the lock sleek, compact, sharp, premium-looking, and attractive.

Reviewers strongly liked the simple physical install, often calling it exceptionally easy, though one reviewer found the instructions thin and had to backtrack.

Installation and setup were consistently praised as quick, easy, straightforward, foolproof, or among the easiest smart-lock setups reviewers had tried.

Physical key fallback was treated as a useful backup, especially for battery failure or less tech-oriented household members.

Key override reliability scored well because reviewers appreciated the hidden physical key and backup power options for dead-battery situations.

The optional keypad was considered useful, especially for guests and rentals, but reviewers disliked that it costs extra and is not integrated.

The keypad was viewed positively for reliability, passcode flexibility, and backlighting, although one reviewer treated keypad access as less preferred than fingerprint.

Keyway quality drew serious criticism because reviewers felt the cylinder was too easy to pick and not robust enough for the price.

Keyway quality was a recurring weakness because multiple reviewers noted the lock cannot be rekeyed or needs a locksmith for extra keys.

Home Key and app unlocking were generally quick, with reviewers describing NFC as immediate and app responses as just a few seconds.

Lock and unlock speed scored strongly in the one clear opinionated review that called the lock fast and quiet.

Motor performance depended on door alignment; reviewers warned that resistance can keep the small motor from throwing the deadbolt properly.

The locking motor was praised as smooth and responsive in hands-on use.

Locking reliability was a major strength across testing, with reviewers repeatedly saying the lock worked reliably once installed and aligned.

Locking reliability scored highly where reviewers focused on the smart-lock half, calling it responsive and saying it worked as advertised.

Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers describing alerts as nearly instant, responsive, fast, or consistent.

Physical forced-entry strength was praised by one reviewer based on the lock's residential rating and deadbolt strength.

Pick resistance was a weak point, with reviewers citing easy picking and available-tool attacks as a meaningful security caveat.

Remote access was useful and sometimes reliable, but it depended on bridges, HomeKit hubs, or Wi-Fi Connect rather than direct lock Wi-Fi.

Remote access was rated very highly because reviewers liked being able to view, unlock, greet visitors, or control the lock from the app remotely.

Security features such as scramble passcode and failed-attempt protections were praised as sensible, useful, and security-enhancing.

Smart-home integration was strongest for Apple HomeKit and Home Key, while broader ecosystem support was more conditional or dependent on updates.

Smart-home integration was mixed-positive: Alexa, Google, Apple Watch, and Eufy ecosystem links were appreciated, but lack of HomeKit hurt one review.

Touchscreen visibility scored poorly in the one clear opinionated review because the keypad and doorbell button were hard to find in the dark.

User access management was a strength, with reviewers praising flexible control over household members, guests, cards, and shared access.

User access management scored well where reviewers valued adding users, codes, and fingerprints with access rules.

Value was mixed: reviewers liked the premium design and Apple experience but repeatedly noted the high price and security tradeoffs.

Value was mostly positive thanks to all-in-one convenience and savings versus higher-tier models, though one reviewer stressed that the lock is not cheap.

Voice control generally worked well through Siri or Alexa, though one reviewer noted occasional Siri delay.

Voice control was positively received, especially Alexa integration, chime support, and hands-free unlocking through assistants.

Weather resistance scored strongly where reviewers found the lock handled rain, hot conditions, or outdoor exposure well.

Wi-Fi was useful when included through Connect, but reviewers disliked the lack of direct Wi-Fi and the dependence on a bridge or alternate hub.

Wi-Fi was mixed-positive: one reviewer saw fast alerts even on weak 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, while another warned experience depends on network strength.