Compare Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds vs OnePlus Buds 3

P1 Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
P2 OnePlus Buds 3

Comparison Takeaways

Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Ear tip size options is 4.5 vs 3.0. One review praised the four tip sizes as giving plenty of range to find a comfortable fit.
  • Software/setup simplicity is 5.0 vs 3.6. One review described initial setup as simple and fast, supporting a strong software/setup score.
  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 3.3. Codec support was praised as a strong spec highlight, especially around Bluetooth 5.2 and aptX Adaptive.
  • Battery is 5.0 vs 3.9. Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it epic, insane, best-in-class, or unusually long.

OnePlus Buds 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • Voice assistant integration is 4.5 vs 1.5. Voice assistant integration is positive in the one scored review, which says assistant commands worked well hands-free.
  • Microphone noise reduction is 4.4 vs 2.2. Microphone noise reduction is often praised for suppressing background noise and wind, though Android Central was less convinced...
  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 2.4. Portability is positive in the scored review, which highlights the compact, lightweight design of the buds and case.
  • Design and Aesthetics is 4.5 vs 2.9. Design is broadly praised for looking stylish, premium, sleek, and attractive, with only smudging treated separately as a...
Average score
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.3

ANC performance was the most divided feature: some reviewers found it strong or effective, while several called it average, mediocre, or disappointing versus leaders.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

ANC is the most divided area: several reviewers call it strong or impressive for the price, while others say it is average, weak, or below competitors.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.8

Android pairing was praised through Google Fast Pair and straightforward setup on Android devices.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.7

Android compatibility is strong because reviewers emphasize that a OnePlus phone is not necessary to access core features.

App
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

The Connect app was broadly praised as thorough, useful, and feature-rich, with repeated appreciation for customization, updates, and extra controls.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

The app is a major strength, with reviewers praising easy setup, strong feature access, stability, and broad control options.

aptX
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

aptX support was treated as a positive for higher-quality or potentially better fidelity, especially for compatible devices.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.8

Low-latency performance and video sync were a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting little to no perceptible delay.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

Audio-video sync is generally strong for video and casual gaming, with occasional gaming delay noted in demanding cases.

Bass performance
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Bass was a major strength for most reviewers, described as deep, warm, thumpy, or great, but a few noted it could obscure mids or lacked flagship-level cleanliness.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Bass is one of the strongest themes: many reviewers praise its punch, depth, and fun energy, while a few find it too much or underwhelming out of the box.

Battery
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it epic, insane, best-in-class, or unusually long.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.9

Battery life is viewed as good enough by most reviewers, but not universally impressive and vulnerable to feature drain.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Bluetooth performance was generally stable and reliable, with strong connection praise, though one reviewer reported random signal drops in some multipoint use.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Bluetooth reliability is positive where tested, with strong range and stable everyday connectivity noted by reviewers.

Build quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1

Build quality was mostly viewed positively, with reviewers praising sturdy construction or non-cheap materials, though one reviewer criticized the build as not amazing.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Build quality is generally positive, with reviewers noting durable finishes and solid construction after use.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0

Hi-res playback brings some benefits, such as lower distortion or slightly better quality, but reviewers describe the improvement as limited.

Button control usability
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.1

Button usability split reviewers sharply: some preferred responsive physical buttons, while others found them fiddly, hard to locate, or awkward to press.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Control usability is strong where volume swipes are discussed, although one review criticized the default omission of play/pause.

Cable quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
2.8

The included cable drew a mild negative note because PCMag called it short despite recognizing the signature USB-C cable.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Case quality was generally positive for sturdiness, magnets, finish, or design, although size hurt portability rather than perceived construction.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers like the compact pocketable case, but one questioned the plastic case’s toughness.

Charging
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9

Charging was mixed: fast charging drew strong praise, but multiple reviewers criticized the lack of wireless charging on the original model.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0

Charging is mixed: fast charging helps, but the repeated lack of wireless charging is one of the most common drawbacks.

Codec support
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Codec support was praised as a strong spec highlight, especially around Bluetooth 5.2 and aptX Adaptive.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.3

Codec support is useful but imperfect: LHDC support earns interest, yet limited device support and unstable high bitrates reduce its practical value.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Comfort was mostly positive despite the bulky housings, with several reviewers wearing them for long periods, though one TW2 review found the design less comfortable.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Comfort is widely praised, with many reviewers saying the earbuds are comfortable for long sessions, though one found fit only moderately comfortable.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.9

Design impressions were mixed to negative: some liked the subdued look, but many called the buds or case bulky, plain, or not especially attractive.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Design is broadly praised for looking stylish, premium, sleek, and attractive, with only smudging treated separately as a drawback.

Eartips fit
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Fit was generally secure and comfortable for some reviewers, but fit concerns remained for smaller ears or wind-noise isolation.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0

Eartip fit is mostly positive for comfort and seal, though one review notes the looser fit can let a bud slip out.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One review praised the four tip sizes as giving plenty of range to find a comfortable fit.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0

Ear tip sizing receives one mild complaint that extra-large tips would have been useful.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.4

EQ customization was one of the strongest software features, with reviewers praising the ability to tune sound and create more personalized profiles.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

EQ customization is useful and often effective, though one review found it too light-touch to correct the bass-heavy sound.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Reviewers described the overall tuning as balanced or safe, with the frequency range generally represented without harshness.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Frequency balance is often considered improved or well tuned, but reviewers frame it as consumer-friendly rather than strictly neutral.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Hinge durability is positive in the reviews that mention it, with both describing the case hinge as sturdy and not flimsy.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard transient details and individual elements clearly, but one reviewer found separation below audiophile rivals.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Instrument separation and imaging are frequently praised, with reviewers noting above-average placement, exceptional separation, and clear directional cues.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Reviewers who evaluated the built-in microphones found them useful or strong for calls in favorable conditions, though noise handling could struggle outdoors or in busy spaces.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

The integrated mic array is praised in the scored review for supporting clear speech recognition.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

The snap-together magnetic bud design on the TW2 was strongly praised for reducing loss and battery drain outside the case.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.5

One reviewer noted that dynamics could feel slightly compressed at louder volumes, making maximum-volume clarity good but not perfect.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

Maximum-volume clarity is mixed: PCMag praised distortion-free bass at top volumes, while Scarbir warned treble can become overwhelming.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.2

Microphone noise reduction was a repeated weakness, with reviewers noting struggles against noise, exterior sounds, or wind.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4

Microphone noise reduction is often praised for suppressing background noise and wind, though Android Central was less convinced outdoors.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9

Call quality was usually acceptable to good in quiet conditions, with some strong praise, but several reviewers found it only average outside controlled environments.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Call microphone quality is usually good to excellent, with praise for loud, clear voices, though a few reviewers consider it merely adequate.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6

Midrange clarity was mixed: some reviewers heard clear vocals and lead instruments, while others said vocals or lower mids were pushed back by the bass-forward tuning.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Midrange impressions vary: some hear clear vocals and mids, while others find the mids veiled or recessed behind the stronger bass and treble.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Reviewers found phone-and-laptop use helpful, with multipoint and cross-device switching making the earbuds practical across platforms.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Multi-platform compatibility is positive in the scored review, which found audio quality consistent across several phones.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Multipoint was consistently valued for switching between phone, laptop, computer, or other devices, with reviewers describing it as useful, seamless, or reliable.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Multipoint is a consistent strength, with reviewers calling it brilliant, flawless, convenient, and useful across phones, laptops, and other devices.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Passive isolation was usually strong when the seal fit well, though one review noted fit-related wind-noise leakage.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Portability/foldability
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.4

Portability was a recurring weakness because the case was often described as bulky, clunky, hard to pocket, or inconvenient, despite battery-life tradeoffs.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Portability is positive in the scored review, which highlights the compact, lightweight design of the buds and case.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One reviewer said the Clear Vocal preset effectively fixed a vocal-detail issue, supporting a strong score for preset EQ usefulness.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Sensors
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
1.3

Sensors were a clear weakness where reviewers wanted wear detection and criticized its absence.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Sidetone was treated as useful for calls, helping users monitor their own voice or making the earbuds more office-friendly.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Smudge resistance
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
2.4

Smudge resistance is weak because reviewers repeatedly describe the glossy earbuds as fingerprint-prone.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

One review described initial setup as simple and fast, supporting a strong software/setup score.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Setup and software simplicity are mixed: several reviewers call setup or the app easy, while others report slow pairing or calibration/connectivity friction.

Sound quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Reviewers mostly found the earbuds enjoyable and capable, with repeated praise for warm, detailed, or impressive sound, though one reviewer found the sound merely okay.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3

Reviewers generally like the sound for the price, often calling it good, rich, or entertaining, though some note bass-heavy tuning and imperfect balance.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8

Soundstage depth was praised by Expert Reviews but underwhelmed one YouTube reviewer who expected more depth from the large housings.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
Soundstage width
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1

Soundstage width drew strong praise from some reviewers for wraparound or convincing staging, while one reviewer expected more width from the large earbuds.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Soundstage is viewed as respectable to impressive for the price, though one reviewer felt pricier Pro buds opened up audio more.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.4

Spatial audio opinions were divided, ranging from disappointment or superfluousness to strong immersion and impressive 360 Reality Audio effects.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6

Spatial audio divides reviewers: some call it immersive and unusually good at this price, while others find it underwhelming, fake, or unnatural.

Stability
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2

Stability ranged from excellent in workout/head-shake testing to less reassuring on the bulkier TW2 design.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Fit stability is mostly good for exercise and daily use, though some reviewers see it as better for lighter activity or dependent on eartip fit.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1

Touch controls are mostly praised for responsiveness and customization, but some reviewers report missed taps, accidental presses, or awkward use while moving.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6

Transparency/hear-through mode was useful for awareness and conversation, but reviewers disagreed on quality, ranging from invaluable to merely okay.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Transparency mode ranges from natural and useful to confusingly ineffective, with reviewer experiences varying more than for most other features.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8

Treble generally stayed clear and non-harsh, but several reviewers said highs lacked some sharpness, space, or detail compared with stronger competitors.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7

Treble receives split feedback, from clear and detailed to blown out, spicy, harsh, or insufficiently crisp depending on reviewer and volume.

Value for money
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2

Value was generally positive because of battery life, sound, and features for the price, though one reviewer argued $150 was too high.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with most reviewers praising the $100 feature set despite some tradeoffs.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
1.5

One review criticized the lack of built-in voice-assistant control, making this a weak point for hands-free assistant use.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Voice assistant integration is positive in the one scored review, which says assistant commands worked well hands-free.

Volume output
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Reviewers who commented on volume found adequate headroom and loud output, without major volume complaints.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6

Volume output is a strength for reviewers who like loud earbuds, with both scored reviews describing the Buds 3 as louder than average.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Water and sweat resistance was treated as useful for workouts, outdoor use, and peace of mind, though not as full waterproofing.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2

Water and sweat protection is treated positively for rain and sweat use, though reviewers do not frame it as suitable for submersion.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One review specifically described the earbuds as light and relatively inconspicuous, supporting a positive weight-comfort impression.

Product 2: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5

Weight comfort is a strength: reviewers describe the buds as lightweight enough to barely register or be easy to forget in the ear.