Compare Bissell MultiClean Vacuum vs Shark NV151 Navigator Swivel Pro Complete Upright Vacuum

Included tools like the Pet TurboEraser and combo crevice/dusting brush are generally considered useful and pet-oriented. TechGearLab found the included mini brush tool underpowered and the set less competitive than some rivals.

The included crevice, upholstery, and pet tools are frequently praised for couch, crevice, and above-floor cleaning. Some Amazon reviewers complain specific accessories they expected (such as a wide upholstery tool or round brush) were missing or hard to find.

Design is often described as simple and minimalist. A few owners mention a more plastic feel than older versions and occasional cosmetic marks or wear.

Several users contrast it with older vacuums that blew dust back into the room, saying this model has minimal blowback and no spit-back on hard floors. This is closely tied to sealed filtration and strong suction.

Suction or airflow relief and adjustment settings help it move on plush or thick rugs by reducing suction when needed. It may require tuning to balance push effort versus pickup on different piles.

Area rug handling is inconsistent: some users vacuum rugs successfully after adjusting suction, while others say the head sits too low, stalls, or stops on certain rugs. Shag-style rugs are specifically called out as a poor match by some owners.

Assembly was described as straightforward and tool-free, with pieces clicking into place easily. Setup did not require special tools or complicated steps in the first-look review.

Assembly is consistently described as fast and tool-free, with components clicking into place in minutes. This is one of the most universally positive aspects across reviews.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty, and reviewers appreciated the simple pop-off canister. Bin capacity is described as slightly below average but usually not limiting for typical cleans.

Bagless dust cup emptying is usually described as easy, but capacity impressions vary widely. Some call the bin large, while others find it small or note a low fill line that forces frequent emptying in hair-heavy homes.

Build quality feedback ranges from sturdy, well-snapping parts to concerns about cheaper plastic materials and belt smells. It generally feels solid for the price, but not everyone expects premium longevity.

High-pile and shag results are more mixed, with TechGearLab reporting weaker extraction and leftover heavy debris in fibers. It may require extra passes or may not satisfy users with thick plush rugs.

Performance on plush or thicker carpet is often positive, with reports of smooth gliding and strong extraction. Still, some say it can feel too grabby or struggle unless suction is reduced, and a few recommend avoiding very thick shag.

Generally solid on low-pile carpet, with several reviews showing good pickup on common debris and pet hair. One lab noted it works best with forward passes and can leave debris on the back stroke.

On low-pile and standard carpet, many users see strong pickup and noticeably fuller bins after one or two passes. Some still report needing extra passes or seeing a trace of dust left near the sides of the head.

In side-by-side demos, it picked up a mixed debris load from a medium-pile rug efficiently, sometimes in a single pass. Performance is generally framed as strong for a corded upright in its price class.

Some debris can build up around the brush area when the brushroll is off on hard floors, requiring occasional clearing. Otherwise, reviews do not describe frequent full clogs during normal debris pickup.

Some users report the wand/tube can clog with hair and debris and mention a clog indicator/red light behavior; others say it stays clear when filters and brush roll are maintained. Clog complaints tend to come from hair-heavy households or heavy use.

Vacuum Wars and a side-by-side comparison suggest its surface pickup competes with more expensive uprights, especially on debris pickup tests. Other testing places it mid-pack, indicating competitors may win on crevice or hardwood fine-dust priorities.

Comparisons are often favorable versus cheaper brands and even some premium vacuums for day-to-day pickup, especially on mixed flooring. Dissenting voices prefer higher-end Sharks or other brands for tangle resistance, rug performance, or long-term durability.

Controls include brushroll on/off plus suction or airflow-relief adjustments for plush versus low carpet. They are straightforward, though not as automatic as some competitors' sensor-driven modes.

Controls are simple, with hard-floor vs carpet modes and an adjustable suction slider that users like for switching surfaces. Some wish the power switch were positioned higher on the handle for convenience.

The Lift-Off canister detaches from the floorhead, enabling portable above-floor cleaning. A limitation noted is that the canister does not pair with the powered floorhead like a true canister vacuum, reducing some flexibility.

Cord length is described as slightly below average on the Slim version, but not a major issue for many. A separate cord-rewind variant integrates the cord internally for convenience.

Cord length sentiment skews mixed-to-negative: some reviewers like the reach, but many wish it were longer than older models or competitors and note there is no automatic rewind. Cord length matters more in larger rooms and multi-room runs.

The automatic cord rewind is a key convenience feature on the cord-rewind model and worked well in the demo. The same reviewer warned that rewind mechanisms can jam over time, creating uncertainty about longevity.

Cord management is often cited as a pain point because it must be wrapped manually and can drag or tangle while vacuuming. Positives include cord clips/hooks that help keep it out of the way once you get used to routing it.

Crevice performance is a recurring weakness, attributed to the large intake gates that reduce sealed suction. Reviewers note it collects less in crevice tests than peers and is not the best choice for tight gaps.

Swivel steering is widely praised for easy turns and navigating around furniture. However, a noticeable subset says it over-swivels or feels sloppy, and handling can feel less controlled on some carpets.

Opinions vary: some owners describe it as easy to maneuver, lightweight-feeling, and simple to operate. TechGearLab rated ease of use below average, citing harder pushing and turning and less seamless floor transitions.

Ease of use is widely praised: quick setup, straightforward controls, and a lighter feel than many uprights. Common negatives are cord handling, occasional over-swivel behavior, and fatigue during long whole-home sessions.

Edge cleaning is adequate when approaching head-on, but along-the-wall passes can leave material behind. Some users also noticed the floorhead rubber can drag instead of gliding smoothly against wood.

Edge results are mixed: some users report good cleaning along walls and baseboards, while others note a small gap near edges that requires switching to the hose/crevice tool for a complete pass.

Emptying is typically a one-button drop into the trash, and users describe it as straightforward and low-hassle. This simplicity is a consistent positive in owner-style reviews.

Emptying is typically simple with an easy-release, bottom-dump style, and many describe it as low-mess. The main downside is that frequent emptying can be necessary depending on bin size and how much hair/dust you collect.

Sealed HEPA filtration is a standout, passing fog/particle tests with little to no visible leakage and earning strong filtration scores. Multiple reviewers call out the allergen system as a meaningful benefit for air quality.

Reviews frequently highlight the HEPA filter and sealed dust containment for trapping allergens and reducing dust blowback, including positive mentions from allergy/asthma users. Long-term odor complaints show up occasionally when filters or odor components aren’t kept fresh.

The floorhead uses large front gates and (on some versions) a rubber squeegee or strip that improves intake of bigger debris on hard floors. The same rubber elements can affect glide or push effort on certain hard floors and plush carpets.

The floorhead earns praise for swivel maneuvering and general pickup, but complaints include limited under-furniture clearance, a narrower head that takes longer to cover rooms, and a brush/roller design that can trap hair or stall on some rugs.

A full-width squeegee behind the brushroll helps maintain contact and improve hard-floor suction for tile, laminate, and hardwood. This feature is framed as a practical upgrade for hard-floor pickup.

Pet-hair tests and user demos show above-average carpet hair pickup for the category, leaving carpets looking clean. Some long hair can still remain or wrap around the brushroll depending on hair length and pile.

Many owners say it removes pet hair from carpets effectively and reveals debris their old vacuums missed. Counterpoints include reports of needing multiple passes or preferring models with a self-cleaning roller for heavy shedding.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally rated highly, especially for pet fur, with many owners impressed by what it collects after prior vacuuming. Results depend more on suction and technique than on tangle resistance.

The tangle-free brushroll is consistently praised for reducing hair wrap compared with typical uprights. However, long-hair wrap still occurred in some testing, and one reviewer found hair removal tedious because the roller could not be removed.

Hair wrap is one of the biggest recurring complaints: long hair and pet fur often wrap the brush roll and require manual cutting or regular cleanouts. Several reviewers recommend stepping up to a Shark with a self-cleaning roller if hair is a daily issue.

Vacuum Wars reports strong surface pickup including fine debris on hard floors, helped by the floorhead design and squeegee. TechGearLab found it left sand behind (especially with the brushroll stopped), so it may underperform on heavy fine-dust loads.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is frequently praised, including reports of less dust being kicked back into the air than with older vacuums. This aligns with strong suction and sealed filtration comments.

Large front gates let it ingest larger crumbs, litter, oats, and similar debris well, with Vacuum Wars calling it rare performance for an upright. Some testing still found below-average hardwood totals, suggesting results depend on debris type and technique.

Most users report it handles larger debris well on hard floors, including pet mess and gritty dirt. A few note the head can grab certain rugs or feel less smooth when transitioning over thicker surfaces.

The Allergen Lift-Off Pet Slim versions reviewed include a bright bank of LED headlights that reviewers found more helpful than expected. A comparison video notes some lower-end Bissell variants omit lights, so availability depends on the exact model.

A frequent complaint is the lack of a headlight or LEDs on the floorhead. Many reviewers miss this feature for seeing dust on hard floors or vacuuming in low-light areas.

Reported hose length around 6 to 7 feet provides decent reach for above-floor tasks. It is generally seen as adequate rather than exceptional.

The extendable hose and wand are valued for reaching ceilings, blinds, and above-floor areas. Some users dispute the advertised reach, say the wand feels too long, or note the base can tip when the hose is pulled taut.

Routine maintenance includes rinsing pre-filters, keeping filters dry, and occasional hair or debris cleanup around the roller area. At least one tester disliked that the main roller cannot be removed, making hair removal more tedious.

Ongoing maintenance is expected: rinsing filters, clearing clogs, and cutting hair off the brush roll. Reviewers who keep up with these routines report better performance and fewer issues.

The Slim head and swivel steering are praised for quick turns and tighter spaces. Conversely, lab testing reported it can be hard to push on mats or when turning, depending on floor type and settings.

Multiple user-style reviews describe it as not super loud and relatively pleasant sounding, with a quiet brushroll. It is not described as whisper-quiet, but overall noise is viewed as reasonable for an upright.

Noise feedback is mixed: several users call it relatively quiet or quieter than older Sharks, while others describe it as very noisy. Overall it trends tolerable but not silent.

A few reviewers say it leaves the air feeling fresher at first, but long-term owners sometimes report musty odors if filters aren’t cleaned or replaced on schedule. One reviewer also expressed caution about the odor-neutralizing component around kids/pets.

Some versions include onboard storage for a crevice tool or other accessories, which users liked for convenience. Storage details vary by model version.

Onboard storage for the main attachments is a convenience highlight, reducing the chance of losing tools. A few reviewers still want more dedicated storage space, such as a spot for spare filters.

Washable filters are repeatedly called out as a cost saver because they can be rinsed instead of replaced frequently. Some users still buy extra filter sets so one can dry while the other is in use.

Longevity sentiment is split: many long-time Shark owners report years of service from older Navigators and expect similar life, while some users report early failures or worry about lighter, more plastic construction.

Most reviewers describe it as one of Bissell's strongest upright offerings and praise its all-around pickup, especially in Vacuum Wars testing. TechGearLab scored it average and highlighted weak suction and hardwood shortcomings, so impressions vary by test method and expectations.

Overall sentiment is mostly positive, driven by suction, maneuverability, and value, with many repeat Shark buyers recommending it. Negative reviews focus on missing premium features (like a headlight), hair wrap maintenance, occasional rug handling issues, and sporadic reliability complaints.

At least one reviewer noted the vacuum arrived well protected with no box damage. Packaging experience appears positive but is not widely discussed.

Repeatedly positioned as pet-friendly thanks to the Pet TurboEraser, Lift-Off above-floor cleaning, and solid pet-hair pickup. Hair wrap can still happen, but overall it is seen as a practical choice for common pet messes.

Many reviews position it as a pet-friendly upright thanks to strong suction and included pet tools, with multiple owners impressed by fur pickup on carpets and furniture. The main pet-related downside is brush-roll hair wrap, which can require frequent cleanouts in heavy-shedding homes.

Often viewed as a mid-level priced upright that can deliver debris pickup comparable to pricier models, making it a value play for many. One lab review and the cord-rewind reviewer felt the price was high relative to crevice/hardwood results or compared with other Bissell options.

Value is a consistent theme: many see it as a budget-friendly upright that competes well with more expensive vacuums. A minority feel it’s overpriced if you need more features, better rug handling, or longer-lasting build.

Cosmetic durability is a minor but present theme, with mentions of scratches and some tools leaving marks on surfaces. These reports are not universal but suggest care is needed around delicate finishes.

Lift-Off mode and the included tools make stairs and pet beds easier than with a standard upright. Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly cited as a practical use case.

Stairs are generally manageable thanks to the hose/wand and lighter feel compared with heavier uprights. The main drawback is stability, as some users say the base can tip when pulling the hose during stair work.

Several reviewers like that it stores in a closet or corner, but stability can be an issue. Multiple comments mention the vacuum can feel tipsy or tip over when using the hose/wand, requiring a hand to steady it.

Airflow at the floorhead is described as slightly above average, but sealed suction and hose metrics are often below average. The design favors open airflow for debris intake, which can reduce suction seal for crevice work.

Most reviews describe very strong suction that pulls up noticeably more dirt, dust, and hair than prior vacuums. A smaller set of owners say power feels similar to other Sharks or takes multiple passes on rugs, especially compared with higher-end models.

Some professional or frequent cleaners report it holds up well with routine upkeep, suggesting it can handle heavier use. Others frame it as a good home vacuum that may wear faster or be harder to repair under commercial-style abuse.

The Slim version's narrower cleaning path improves maneuvering in tight areas and around furniture. The tradeoff noted is a shorter cord compared with the wider-head version.

Several reviewers highlight that it fits well in apartments, condos, and small storage spaces while still offering strong suction. People in larger homes sometimes want a longer cord or bigger bin to reduce interruptions.

Long-term reliability is not extensively covered, but the cord-rewind reviewer specifically questioned how durable the rewind mechanism will be. Basic operation and components generally seemed solid in first-look impressions.

Reliability experiences vary from trouble-free use (including frequent cleaning) to complaints about clogs, vibration, and occasional unit failure. Some also note repair/parts availability can be limited, reinforcing a replace-rather-than-repair perception.

The combo dusting brush bristles were described as fairly stiff, with a caution to avoid delicate surfaces like screens or plastics. Using the appropriate tool and gentle pressure helps reduce risk.

Parts click together without tools and attachments are easy to swap for most tasks. Some reviewers wished the handle separated from the wand to make switching to hose-attached tools faster.

Attachments are generally described as easy to swap, with parts that click into place and detach quickly. A few users still wish certain tools were included, but the change process itself is straightforward.

Because Lift-Off does not connect to the powered floorhead, it cannot fully mimic a low-profile canister setup for under-furniture cleaning. The slim head and wand can still help reach some areas, but expectations should be moderate.

Getting under low furniture is a common limitation for a standard upright design. Some users can reach under tables and chairs, but others say the head and body are too bulky for couches and low-clearance spaces.

The Pet TurboEraser and wand handle upholstery and above-floor dusting reasonably well, with some tests landing around average. A few reviewers felt the turbo tool was underpowered, especially on embedded debris.

Above-floor cleaning is a strength for many owners, especially using the pet tool on couches and the wand for curtains, vents, and ceiling fans. Reach is generally good, but pulling hard on the hose can make the base tip for some users.

Overall versatility is a major theme: it can switch between upright floor cleaning and Lift-Off above-floor tasks, and it includes pet-focused tools. Weak crevice suction and some hardwood fine-dust shortcomings are the main constraints.

The hose, wand, and tools make it useful for floors, furniture, and high dusting, adding versatility for a standard upright. It does not offer a Lift-Away detachable canister, which limits portability compared with other Shark lines.

Measured and listed weight is around 15 to 16 pounds, placing it in a mid-weight range for uprights. Some users still describe it as lightweight in hand, likely due to swivel and balance.

Many users describe it as lightweight and easy to carry, including older owners who appreciate reduced strain. Others still find it heavy to lift or feel wrist/hand fatigue during long sessions, especially when using the hose.