Compare Bissell MultiClean Vacuum vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum

Included tools like the Pet TurboEraser and combo crevice/dusting brush are generally considered useful and pet-oriented. TechGearLab found the included mini brush tool underpowered and the set less competitive than some rivals.

Commonly described as coming with a practical set of basic tools (crevice and upholstery/wide upholstery tool; some variants add pet tools). Lift-Away makes these tools more useful for stairs and above-floor cleaning.

Suction or airflow relief and adjustment settings help it move on plush or thick rugs by reducing suction when needed. It may require tuning to balance push effort versus pickup on different piles.

Assembly was described as straightforward and tool-free, with pieces clicking into place easily. Setup did not require special tools or complicated steps in the first-look review.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty, and reviewers appreciated the simple pop-off canister. Bin capacity is described as slightly below average but usually not limiting for typical cleans.

Bagless dust cup is generally considered easy to empty; some sources highlight an open/easy-to-clean canister design that supports long-term upkeep.

High-pile and shag results are more mixed, with TechGearLab reporting weaker extraction and leftover heavy debris in fibers. It may require extra passes or may not satisfy users with thick plush rugs.

High-pile/shag performance is a recurring weak spot: fixed height and head geometry can struggle to get on top of larger debris or can be harder to push on thick carpet compared with uprights with height adjustment.

Generally solid on low-pile carpet, with several reviews showing good pickup on common debris and pet hair. One lab noted it works best with forward passes and can leave debris on the back stroke.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong in testing-style writeups, often above average for the upright category at its price.

In side-by-side demos, it picked up a mixed debris load from a medium-pile rug efficiently, sometimes in a single pass. Performance is generally framed as strong for a corded upright in its price class.

Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning is often a highlight, with at least one lab-style comparison giving it top-tier embedded debris results in its price segment.

Some debris can build up around the brush area when the brushroll is off on hard floors, requiring occasional clearing. Otherwise, reviews do not describe frequent full clogs during normal debris pickup.

Vacuum Wars and a side-by-side comparison suggest its surface pickup competes with more expensive uprights, especially on debris pickup tests. Other testing places it mid-pack, indicating competitors may win on crevice or hardwood fine-dust priorities.

Often framed as outperforming many budget uprights and competing surprisingly well against pricier models in certain tests, but it generally trails modern premium heads on high-pile and specialized hard-floor pickup.

Controls include brushroll on/off plus suction or airflow-relief adjustments for plush versus low carpet. They are straightforward, though not as automatic as some competitors' sensor-driven modes.

Controls are generally simple and include a brushroll on/off (or brush control) to transition between carpet and hard floors; lack of height adjustment is a repeated limitation for thick rugs/high pile and some large-debris situations.

The Lift-Off canister detaches from the floorhead, enabling portable above-floor cleaning. A limitation noted is that the canister does not pair with the powered floorhead like a true canister vacuum, reducing some flexibility.

Cord length is described as slightly below average on the Slim version, but not a major issue for many. A separate cord-rewind variant integrates the cord internally for convenience.

Cord length is generally reported as adequate/good for the class, with some comparisons noting premium or competing models can be longer; exact length varies by variant in sources.

The automatic cord rewind is a key convenience feature on the cord-rewind model and worked well in the demo. The same reviewer warned that rewind mechanisms can jam over time, creating uncertainty about longevity.

Crevice performance is a recurring weakness, attributed to the large intake gates that reduce sealed suction. Reviewers note it collects less in crevice tests than peers and is not the best choice for tight gaps.

Crevice/crack pickup is repeatedly described as a limitation versus newer designs; some tests show below-average removal in crevice-style trials, making the wand more important for edges/cracks.

Opinions vary: some owners describe it as easy to maneuver, lightweight-feeling, and simple to operate. TechGearLab rated ease of use below average, citing harder pushing and turning and less seamless floor transitions.

Edge cleaning is adequate when approaching head-on, but along-the-wall passes can leave material behind. Some users also noticed the floorhead rubber can drag instead of gliding smoothly against wood.

Edge/baseboard performance is variable: some sources say it cleans edges well head-on, but others note it can miss a small band near edges or struggle on parallel passes along walls.

Emptying is typically a one-button drop into the trash, and users describe it as straightforward and low-hassle. This simplicity is a consistent positive in owner-style reviews.

Sealed HEPA filtration is a standout, passing fog/particle tests with little to no visible leakage and earning strong filtration scores. Multiple reviewers call out the allergen system as a meaningful benefit for air quality.

A key strength: sources describe a sealed system paired with HEPA filtration/Complete Seal-style containment, which improves dust/allergen containment compared with many budget uprights.

The floorhead uses large front gates and (on some versions) a rubber squeegee or strip that improves intake of bigger debris on hard floors. The same rubber elements can affect glide or push effort on certain hard floors and plush carpets.

A full-width squeegee behind the brushroll helps maintain contact and improve hard-floor suction for tile, laminate, and hardwood. This feature is framed as a practical upgrade for hard-floor pickup.

Pet-hair tests and user demos show above-average carpet hair pickup for the category, leaving carpets looking clean. Some long hair can still remain or wrap around the brushroll depending on hair length and pile.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally solid for typical pet hair, but some testing notes clumping and that not all hair makes it fully to the bin in tougher trials.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally described as effective for everyday pet hair, aided by strong suction and above-floor tools.

The tangle-free brushroll is consistently praised for reducing hair wrap compared with typical uprights. However, long-hair wrap still occurred in some testing, and one reviewer found hair removal tedious because the roller could not be removed.

Long-hair wrap is a consistent drawback across tests and reviews; owners should expect periodic brushroll clearing, especially with longer hair and heavy shedding households.

Vacuum Wars reports strong surface pickup including fine debris on hard floors, helped by the floorhead design and squeegee. TechGearLab found it left sand behind (especially with the brushroll stopped), so it may underperform on heavy fine-dust loads.

Fine debris on hard floors is generally good but not best-in-class; at least one test notes it can leave fine sand behind, requiring extra passes.

Large front gates let it ingest larger crumbs, litter, oats, and similar debris well, with Vacuum Wars calling it rare performance for an upright. Some testing still found below-average hardwood totals, suggesting results depend on debris type and technique.

Large debris on hard floors/rugs can be mixed: it can handle many everyday pieces, but multiple mentions note pushing/scattering crummy or larger particles in some scenarios without height adjustment or a more modern head design.

The Allergen Lift-Off Pet Slim versions reviewed include a bright bank of LED headlights that reviewers found more helpful than expected. A comparison video notes some lower-end Bissell variants omit lights, so availability depends on the exact model.

Reported hose length around 6 to 7 feet provides decent reach for above-floor tasks. It is generally seen as adequate rather than exceptional.

Hose/wand reach is a common nit: multiple writeups mention wishing the hose were longer or the wand had more reach, which can limit above-floor range compared with some alternatives.

Routine maintenance includes rinsing pre-filters, keeping filters dry, and occasional hair or debris cleanup around the roller area. At least one tester disliked that the main roller cannot be removed, making hair removal more tedious.

Maintenance is straightforward (wash/replace filters, keep bin empty), but brushroll hair wrap and periodic clearing are repeatedly mentioned as the main ongoing chore.

The Slim head and swivel steering are praised for quick turns and tighter spaces. Conversely, lab testing reported it can be hard to push on mats or when turning, depending on floor type and settings.

Maneuverability is often a plus (notably swivel steering), though some testing notes it can feel stiffer than premium uprights and may require a bit more effort under strong suction conditions.

Multiple user-style reviews describe it as not super loud and relatively pleasant sounding, with a quiet brushroll. It is not described as whisper-quiet, but overall noise is viewed as reasonable for an upright.

Noise is frequently described as relatively quiet for an upright; at least one test set places it among the quietest in its comparison group.

Some versions include onboard storage for a crevice tool or other accessories, which users liked for convenience. Storage details vary by model version.

Most reviewers describe it as one of Bissell's strongest upright offerings and praise its all-around pickup, especially in Vacuum Wars testing. TechGearLab scored it average and highlighted weak suction and hardwood shortcomings, so impressions vary by test method and expectations.

At least one reviewer noted the vacuum arrived well protected with no box damage. Packaging experience appears positive but is not widely discussed.

Repeatedly positioned as pet-friendly thanks to the Pet TurboEraser, Lift-Off above-floor cleaning, and solid pet-hair pickup. Hair wrap can still happen, but overall it is seen as a practical choice for common pet messes.

Often viewed as a mid-level priced upright that can deliver debris pickup comparable to pricier models, making it a value play for many. One lab review and the cord-rewind reviewer felt the price was high relative to crevice/hardwood results or compared with other Bissell options.

Repeatedly positioned as a standout value in the $100–$200-ish budget upright space, with performance and sealed filtration that often beat cheaper uprights and compete well for the price.

Lift-Off mode and the included tools make stairs and pet beds easier than with a standard upright. Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly cited as a practical use case.

Lift-Away is repeatedly called out as making stair cleaning and above-floor cleaning meaningfully easier than standard uprights, though hose/wand reach can be a limiting factor depending on variant.

Airflow at the floorhead is described as slightly above average, but sealed suction and hose metrics are often below average. The design favors open airflow for debris intake, which can reduce suction seal for crevice work.

Suction and airflow are frequently described as strong for the price and consistent over time when maintained; several comparisons treat suction power as a primary reason it remains popular.

The Slim version's narrower cleaning path improves maneuvering in tight areas and around furniture. The tradeoff noted is a shorter cord compared with the wider-head version.

Long-term reliability is not extensively covered, but the cord-rewind reviewer specifically questioned how durable the rewind mechanism will be. Basic operation and components generally seemed solid in first-look impressions.

Support expectations are helped by commonly cited multi-year warranty coverage and broad parts availability; durability is often described as adequate but plastic-heavy.

The combo dusting brush bristles were described as fairly stiff, with a caution to avoid delicate surfaces like screens or plastics. Using the appropriate tool and gentle pressure helps reduce risk.

Parts click together without tools and attachments are easy to swap for most tasks. Some reviewers wished the handle separated from the wand to make switching to hose-attached tools faster.

Because Lift-Off does not connect to the powered floorhead, it cannot fully mimic a low-profile canister setup for under-furniture cleaning. The slim head and wand can still help reach some areas, but expectations should be moderate.

The Pet TurboEraser and wand handle upholstery and above-floor dusting reasonably well, with some tests landing around average. A few reviewers felt the turbo tool was underpowered, especially on embedded debris.

No summary yet.

Overall versatility is a major theme: it can switch between upright floor cleaning and Lift-Off above-floor tasks, and it includes pet-focused tools. Weak crevice suction and some hardwood fine-dust shortcomings are the main constraints.

Versatility is a defining feature due to Lift-Away mode and above-floor usability; it’s commonly recommended for stairs, upholstery, and hard-to-reach areas relative to basic uprights.

Measured and listed weight is around 15 to 16 pounds, placing it in a mid-weight range for uprights. Some users still describe it as lightweight in hand, likely due to swivel and balance.

Usually described as lightweight for an upright and easier to carry than many competitors, supporting its budget-all-purpose positioning.