Compare Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds

P1 Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
P2 Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • Sensors is 4.3 vs 1.3. Sensor-like smart features are strong, especially voice detection, siren detection, and adaptive behavior.
  • Voice assistant integration is 4.1 vs 1.5. Voice assistant support is broad, with Bixby, Gemini, Google assistant, and built-in voice controls mentioned.
  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 2.4. Portability is strong, with the case described as small, pocketable, and easy to carry.
  • Microphone noise reduction is 4.1 vs 2.2. Microphone noise reduction is a clear strength in wind, traffic, and background-noise scenarios, though not every voice sample...

Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • aptX is 4.3 vs 1.0. aptX support was treated as a positive for higher-quality or potentially better fidelity, especially for compatible devices.
  • Multipoint connectivity reliability is 4.5 vs 2.6. Multipoint was consistently valued for switching between phone, laptop, computer, or other devices, with reviewers describing it as...
  • Android compatibility is 4.8 vs 3.1. Android pairing was praised through Google Fast Pair and straightforward setup on Android devices.
  • Battery is 5.0 vs 3.3. Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it epic, insane, best-in-class, or unusually long.
Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

ANC is generally useful to strong, with several reviewers praising it, while others note it is not always class-leading or fit-proof.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.3

ANC performance was the most divided feature: some reviewers found it strong or effective, while several called it average, mediocre, or disappointing versus leaders.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.1

Android and Samsung compatibility is useful but restrictive, since the best features require Galaxy devices and some are Android-only.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.8

Android pairing was praised through Google Fast Pair and straightforward setup on Android devices.

App
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

The app and settings experience is feature-rich, but one review called the Galaxy Wear app bare-bones and another notes a learning curve.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

The Connect app was broadly praised as thorough, useful, and feature-rich, with repeated appreciation for customization, updates, and extra controls.

aptX
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0

aptX support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with AptX hi-res formats.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

aptX support was treated as a positive for higher-quality or potentially better fidelity, especially for compatible devices.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.4

Latency evidence is mixed: common codecs are said to lag minimally, but hi-res settings and missing low-latency modes add caveats.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.8

Low-latency performance and video sync were a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting little to no perceptible delay.

Auracast support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Auracast support is clearly present and repeatedly noted as useful for public or shared broadcasts.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Bass is a consistent strength, described as deep, energetic, punchy, and extended, though one review found it too strong on some tracks.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Bass was a major strength for most reviewers, described as deep, warm, thumpy, or great, but a few noted it could obscure mids or lacked flagship-level cleanliness.

Battery
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.3

Battery life is adequate but not a standout, with repeated six-hour ANC evidence and several concerns versus rivals.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it epic, insane, best-in-class, or unusually long.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Bluetooth support is modern and generally stable, centered on Bluetooth 6.1, with one review noting some dropouts.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Bluetooth performance was generally stable and reliable, with strong connection praise, though one reviewer reported random signal drops in some multipoint use.

Build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Build quality evidence is limited but positive, including a reviewer saying the redesigned case feels more durable.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1

Build quality was mostly viewed positively, with reviewers praising sturdy construction or non-cheap materials, though one reviewer criticized the build as not amazing.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Hi-res playback is a strong Galaxy-specific feature, with repeated 24-bit/96kHz UHQ or SSC evidence.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Button control usability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Pinch and stem controls are generally effective, though one review found the pinch area somewhat painful or awkward.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.1

Button usability split reviewers sharply: some preferred responsive physical buttons, while others found them fiddly, hard to locate, or awkward to press.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

The carry case is generally praised for its clear lid, magnetic feel, easier bud placement, and visibility.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Case quality was generally positive for sturdiness, magnets, finish, or design, although size hurt portability rather than perceived construction.

Charging
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Charging is a strength because reviewers cite wireless charging plus wired USB-C case charging.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9

Charging was mixed: fast charging drew strong praise, but multiple reviewers criticized the lack of wireless charging on the original model.

Codec support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Codec support is strong inside the Samsung ecosystem, but non-Samsung devices fall back to common lower codecs.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Codec support was praised as a strong spec highlight, especially around Bluetooth 5.2 and aptX Adaptive.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6

Comfort is widely praised, including long listening sessions, flights, and multi-hour use without fatigue for several reviewers.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Comfort was mostly positive despite the bulky housings, with several reviewers wearing them for long periods, though one TW2 review found the design less comfortable.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Design sentiment is positive overall, with reviewers calling the buds premium, sleek, more polished, and better differentiated.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.9

Design impressions were mixed to negative: some liked the subdued look, but many called the buds or case bulky, plain, or not especially attractive.

Eartips fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.8

Fit is polarized: several reviewers found a secure seal, while others could not get the tips to seal or stay put.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Fit was generally secure and comfortable for some reviewers, but fit concerns remained for smaller ears or wind-noise isolation.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.6

Ear-tip options are included, but proprietary tips and fit complaints reduce the practical flexibility.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One review praised the four tip sizes as giving plenty of range to find a comfortable fit.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

EQ customization is a major strength, with a nine-band EQ, custom mode, presets, and Wear app adjustment all supported.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.4

EQ customization was one of the strongest software features, with reviewers praising the ability to tune sound and create more personalized profiles.

Find My
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Find My support is clearly present through Find My Earbuds and map-based finding references.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Frequency-response evidence is mixed: detail and clarity improve, but one review notes bass/high balance issues that may need EQ.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Reviewers described the overall tuning as balanced or safe, with the frequency range generally represented without harshness.

Head gestures
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9

Head gestures are supported for calls and assistant interactions, though some reviewers had not fully tested them.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Included-accessory evidence is limited to bundled ear tips and documentation.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

Instrument separation is repeatedly praised through comments about separated instruments, centered guitars, and textural detail.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard transient details and individual elements clearly, but one reviewer found separation below audiophile rivals.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Integrated microphones are clearly present and usable, but mic impressions range from ordinary to very good.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Reviewers who evaluated the built-in microphones found them useful or strong for calls in favorable conditions, though noise handling could struggle outdoors or in busy spaces.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

The snap-together magnetic bud design on the TW2 was strongly praised for reducing loss and battery drain outside the case.

LDAC
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.5

LDAC support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with LDAC formats.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Lossless audio support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.2

Lossless support is mixed because Samsung hi-res playback is supported, but one review stresses true lossless Bluetooth is not available.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Reviewers who addressed clarity at output levels described clean, dynamic, distortion-free playback.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.5

One reviewer noted that dynamics could feel slightly compressed at louder volumes, making maximum-volume clarity good but not perfect.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Microphone noise reduction is a clear strength in wind, traffic, and background-noise scenarios, though not every voice sample was perfect.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.2

Microphone noise reduction was a repeated weakness, with reviewers noting struggles against noise, exterior sounds, or wind.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Call quality is usable to strong, but evidence is mixed because some reviewers heard fuzziness, digitization, or fit-related variability.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9

Call quality was usually acceptable to good in quiet conditions, with some strong praise, but several reviewers found it only average outside controlled environments.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Midrange clarity is generally strong, with vocals, mids, and clear signatures receiving positive notes across several reviews.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6

Midrange clarity was mixed: some reviewers heard clear vocals and lead instruments, while others said vocals or lower mids were pushed back by the bass-forward tuning.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.8

Multi-platform use is limited because non-Samsung devices can leave the product feeling incomplete.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Reviewers found phone-and-laptop use helpful, with multipoint and cross-device switching making the earbuds practical across platforms.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.6

Multipoint is a weakness outside Samsung devices, with several reviews noting no true multipoint or manual switching limitations.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

Multipoint was consistently valued for switching between phone, laptop, computer, or other devices, with reviewers describing it as useful, seamless, or reliable.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Passive isolation is strong when the tips seal well, but the benefit depends heavily on fit.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Passive isolation was usually strong when the seal fit well, though one review noted fit-related wind-noise leakage.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Portability is strong, with the case described as small, pocketable, and easy to carry.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.4

Portability was a recurring weakness because the case was often described as bulky, clunky, hard to pocket, or inconvenient, despite battery-life tradeoffs.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

Preset EQ evidence is positive, especially for Samsung's Dynamic profile, which reviewers used to add punch or emphasize strengths.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One reviewer said the Clear Vocal preset effectively fixed a vocal-detail issue, supporting a strong score for preset EQ usefulness.

RGB lighting customization
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0

Lighting customization is not a feature here; evidence says the lighting element is gone.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Sensors
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Sensor-like smart features are strong, especially voice detection, siren detection, and adaptive behavior.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
1.3

Sensors were a clear weakness where reviewers wanted wear detection and criticized its absence.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Sidetone support is present and lets users hear their own voice in the buds.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Sidetone was treated as useful for calls, helping users monitor their own voice or making the earbuds more office-friendly.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.2

Smudge resistance is a weakness because the transparent case section shows scratches and fingerprints.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.5

Setup and software access are workable, but reviewers note a learning curve around where controls live.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0

One review described initial setup as simple and fast, supporting a strong software/setup score.

Sound quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6

Review evidence is strongly positive on overall sound, with reviewers calling the audio excellent, very good, or among Samsung's best.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3

Reviewers mostly found the earbuds enjoyable and capable, with repeated praise for warm, detailed, or impressive sound, though one reviewer found the sound merely okay.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8

Soundstage depth was praised by Expert Reviews but underwhelmed one YouTube reviewer who expected more depth from the large housings.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

The available evidence points to a wider, more expansive stage rather than a cramped in-ear presentation.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1

Soundstage width drew strong praise from some reviewers for wraparound or convincing staging, while one reviewer expected more width from the large earbuds.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Spatial audio support is clearly present through 360 audio and head tracking, though some features are Android or Samsung-focused.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.4

Spatial audio opinions were divided, ranging from disappointment or superfluousness to strong immersion and impressive 360 Reality Audio effects.

Stability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8

Stability is strong for reviewers whose ears matched the shape, with evidence of perfect fit and secure wear.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2

Stability ranged from excellent in workout/head-shake testing to less reassuring on the bulkier TW2 design.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Touch and gesture controls are mostly praised as responsive and easy to use once learned.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Transparency and ambient modes are a highlight, often described as natural, clear, or useful for conversation.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6

Transparency/hear-through mode was useful for awareness and conversation, but reviewers disagreed on quality, ranging from invaluable to merely okay.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Treble is mostly praised for crispness, clarity, and sparkle, but one lab-style review found the highs weaker than ideal.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8

Treble generally stayed clear and non-harsh, but several reviewers said highs lacked some sharpness, space, or detail compared with stronger competitors.

USB-C
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

USB-C support is consistently evidenced through case port mentions.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yet
Value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Value is context-dependent: Samsung users often get strong value, while non-Samsung users and upgraders face more caveats.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2

Value was generally positive because of battery life, sound, and features for the price, though one reviewer argued $150 was too high.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Voice assistant support is broad, with Bixby, Gemini, Google assistant, and built-in voice controls mentioned.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
1.5

One review criticized the lack of built-in voice-assistant control, making this a weak point for hands-free assistant use.

Volume output
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8

Direct evidence is limited but positive, with one review saying maximum volume is far higher than needed.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Reviewers who commented on volume found adequate headroom and loud output, without major volume complaints.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.7

Water and dust resistance is a strong point thanks to repeated IP57 evidence.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0

Water and sweat resistance was treated as useful for workouts, outdoor use, and peace of mind, though not as full waterproofing.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

The earbuds are described as light, with roughly 5g weight contributing to comfort.

Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5

One review specifically described the earbuds as light and relatively inconspicuous, supporting a positive weight-comfort impression.