Compare Roborock QV 35A Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Roborock Qrevo MaxV Robot Vacuum and Mop

Unboxing coverage notes the essentials are included (robot, dock, ramp/base pieces, mop pads), with setup-focused extras rather than a large accessory bundle.

Accessories vary by package: some reviewers got spare bags/mop parts, while others reported few or no extra consumables.

Threshold handling is a standout: reviews report it can climb around half-inch to three-quarter-inch transitions and generally adapts well to small bumps. Wheels and a floating brush/chassis design help maintain contact on uneven surfaces.

Design feedback is mixed: many like the clean white look, while others find it basic or worry the glossy finish shows marks/scratches.

The Roborock/Qrevo app experience is repeatedly described as excellent and full-featured, with routines, schedules, room/zone cleaning, no-go zones, and deep control over suction, water, and dock behavior. A few notes include needing 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi during setup and (in one review) manually setting floor types for best results.

The Roborock app is widely praised for deep customization, schedules, and map edits; a few mention missing/quirky workflows (e.g., open-plan room splitting).

During auto-emptying, one review highlights reduced dust puffback thanks to a more sealed, multi-layer bag/door setup. Overall, airflow-related mess during emptying is described as minimal.

Carpet and rug handling is a strength: the robot can detect carpet, lift the mops about 10 mm, and adjust behavior (including carpet boost and vacuum-first options). Some users still prefer to avoid carpets during mopping for best results.

Mixed-floor homes benefit from mop-lift + carpet detection, letting it clean rugs without soaking them in many cases.

Setup is described as simple: attach the dock base/ramp, fill tanks, scan the QR code, and run quick mapping. A common note is that the robot prefers 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and docking alignment can take a bit of care.

Setup is repeatedly described as quick: minimal assembly, straightforward app onboarding, and fast initial mapping.

The robot reliably returns to dock to charge and includes app options like off-peak charging to reduce energy costs. Reviews do not provide measured runtime numbers, but charging behavior is described as standard and dependable.

Battery life is commonly cited around 180 minutes, with reliable recharge-and-resume behavior and good efficiency.

The robot bin and dock bag system are considered practical: one review calls out a larger 330 ml onboard bin, while others note bag replacement roughly every 2 to 3 months depending on use (often longer in cleaner homes).

Bagged auto-emptying and onboard bin capacity are viewed as convenient, with reports of weeks-long bag life in typical use.

Build quality impressions are strong for a budget-leaning model, with reviewers calling out neat finishes, a sturdy bumper, and overall fit-and-finish similar to higher-end Roborock units.

Build quality impressions vary: some find it solid, while others say materials feel less premium than Roborock’s flagship lines.

Deep/high-pile carpet cleaning is strong for a single-roller bot, but some reviewers say dual-roller flagships still clean thicker carpets better.

For general carpet pickup (especially larger debris), results are described as solid, often improving with a second pass or deep-clean pattern. Hair on carpet is the more common weak point rather than food/debris pickup.

Low-pile rugs are handled very well in both tests and everyday cleaning.

Carpet performance is generally strong, though at least one test reported weaker results on medium-pile compared with low-pile or top competitors.

A child lock is available in the settings, adding peace of mind for households where kids might press buttons or start a run unintentionally.

Comparisons in the reviews often favor the QV 35A on value: several reviewers say it matches or even beats more expensive siblings in basic navigation and cleaning. The main gaps versus pricier models are extra sensors, AI cameras, heated wash/dry, and edge-extending hardware.

Comparative testing often places it near the top for overall vacuum+mop combos, with tradeoffs mainly versus pricier flagships.

Controls are straightforward with physical power/home buttons plus a feature-rich app for room selection, routines, and dock controls. Reviewers also mention adjustable robot voice volume/language and remote-control style driving modes.

The app controls are generally clear and feature-rich; the built-in voice assistant is seen as helpful by some but limited/overly sensitive by others.

One setup review specifies the dock power cord is about 6 ft, which is generally sufficient for flexible placement near an outlet.

The dock includes basic cord storage/management, helping keep the power cord tidy behind the station.

Corner performance is described as acceptable but not class-leading. Several reviews point to the lack of extendable brushes/pads as the limiting factor, even though the robot’s perimeter passes still catch a lot along edges.

Corners remain a common limitation (round body + geometry), even though edge cleaning is strong.

Crevice pickup is generally above average, with some tests showing it can pull debris from fairly deep cracks.

Dirty-water/dirt sensing is cited as useful for triggering extra mop washing when pads are especially dirty.

Docking, auto-empty, and auto-refill functions are described as reliable in normal use and contribute to the set-and-forget experience. A few notes mention docking alignment can be a little finicky, but overall automation works as intended.

The dock is a core strength (auto-empty + hot-water mop washing + drying), but it still requires water-tank service and occasional tray/plate cleaning.

Dock operations are generally reported as not super loud, with mop washing and bin emptying described as reasonable and the drying fan often called very quiet.

Rotating pads and controlled water delivery allow the QV 35A to scrub many dried or sticky spots (e.g., coffee residue, syrup-like spills) surprisingly well. Reviews still emphasize that very large messes may require multiple passes or manual pre-cleaning.

Dried-on stain results are strong (coffee/grape/sauce), sometimes ranking near the top; the most stubborn spots may need extra passes.

Ease of use is a major positive: reviewers call it convenient to run, easy to set schedules and routines, and largely hands-off thanks to the dock’s washing and emptying. The biggest usability friction points are cable prep and keeping tanks/tray clean for best hygiene.

Overall usability is high once configured, but convenience drops if you regularly need to pre-tidy cords or de-tangle long hair.

Edge cleaning is described as decent in normal perimeter runs, but multiple reviews note it lacks extendable side brushes or mop pads, so edge-to-edge results and tight baseboards can lag behind higher-end models.

Edge/baseboard mopping is a standout due to the extending mop, with repeated mentions of near wall-to-wall coverage.

Auto-emptying into a dock bag minimizes hands-on mess and reduces how often the onboard bin needs attention. Reviewers appreciate the cleaner emptying experience versus manual dumping.

Auto-emptying is described as clean and convenient; you still need to replace bags and manage dirty water.

The app provides maintenance tracking for parts like the filter (remaining life and reminders). Reviewers note you may need to reset timers after cleaning to keep reminders accurate.

Filtration is viewed positively: the filter is washable and the docked system is described as good at keeping dust contained, with one review citing SGS certification for high particle capture (e.g., pollen).

HEPA-style filtration and sealed dust handling are mentioned as effective, with no major dust-containment complaints.

Drying is a known compromise: the dock uses room-temperature air rather than hot air, so pad drying can take many hours (often cited in the 4–8 hour range, with longer options available). This is acceptable to some reviewers but a dealbreaker for others wanting faster hygiene.

Mopping leaves a thin layer that dries quickly, and the dock’s pad drying helps reduce lingering dampness.

Long-hair wrap on the side brush is a recurring complaint and can be time-consuming to clean.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as the biggest cleaning weakness, with rubber brushes struggling to lift embedded hair. Deep-clean patterns help, but some hair may remain compared with bristle-heavy rollers.

Carpet hair pickup is strong overall, though occasional clumps/fluff can still need a quick touch-up.

On hard floors, long hair pickup is generally reported as strong, especially when paired with straight-line cleaning and adjustable settings. Some hair can still collect on brushes, but overall pickup is praised.

Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently praised, including for pet hair.

The anti-tangle design (rubber main brush and redesigned side brush) reduces snarls and makes maintenance easier, but it does not eliminate hair wrap entirely. At least one hands-on test still found noticeable wrap with very long hair.

Main-brush tangling is usually well controlled, but long hair can still wrap the side brush and needs periodic clearing.

Fine debris like coffee grounds and small crumbs are reported to be picked up very effectively on hard floors, often with little left after a pass. Reviewers attribute this to strong suction and systematic pathing.

Hard-floor fine debris pickup is consistently excellent in tests and daily use.

Large debris on hard floors (rice, chips, noodles, clumps) is generally handled well, with reviewers commonly seeing most debris removed on the first pass and the rest on a second.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is a strength, though tight inside corners can still be a weak spot.

Headlights/LEDs are noted as helpful in low light, supporting more consistent cleaning in darker rooms.

Innovation is framed as value-focused rather than cutting-edge: reviewers highlight that it skips premium extras like AI camera object recognition, mechanical arms, hot-water washing, hot-air drying, and extendable edge tools. The upside is getting many flagship-like fundamentals at a lower price.

At roughly 3.8 inches tall, the robot is relatively low-profile, but not ultra-slim. Reviewers advise checking furniture clearance if under-sofa cleaning is a priority.

A relatively low body for a LiDAR robot helps it reach under more furniture, though the sensor turret still limits very low clearances.

Ongoing maintenance is described as manageable but real: periodic filter washing, sensor wiping, tray rinsing, and dirty tank cleaning are recurring tasks. The removable dock base/tray and clear in-app maintenance timers make upkeep easier.

Automation reduces upkeep, but reviewers still mention periodic brush hair removal and cleaning the wash tray/plate.

Lidar-based mapping and straight-line pathing are consistently praised for neat, efficient coverage. Reviews mention quick mapping, multi-floor support, and accurate 3D-style maps, with predictable perimeter-then-grid cleaning behavior.

Maps are detailed and coverage is efficient, but some tests note slower overall run times and occasional quirks segmenting open floor plans.

Mop pads can lift roughly 10 mm when carpet is detected, helping prevent wet rugs. This lift behavior is mentioned across multiple reviews and is treated as reliable and useful.

Mop lift height (often cited around 10 mm) is repeatedly praised for keeping carpets/rugs drier during mixed runs.

Dual spinning mops (around 200 RPM) deliver strong scrubbing for routine grime and many stains, with adjustable water flow and the benefit of an onboard tank. For big messes, some smearing can occur and the robot may need extra passes or a manual assist because it lacks advanced dirt-detection re-mop logic.

Mopping is widely rated excellent for daily maintenance and coverage; a few compare it as slightly less ‘deep scrub’ than top sonic/vibrating systems.

Often described as quiet for its performance (some measurements/estimates around low‑50 dB), though max power is still noticeable.

Reactive tech obstacle avoidance is generally good for larger items (furniture, many toys) and can mark obstacles on the map, with adjustable sensitivity. Multiple reviews agree it struggles most with low, thin cables/wires and very small clutter, where bumps or run-overs can happen.

Obstacle avoidance is mixed: some report cable/small-item misses, while others (especially post-update) see meaningful improvement.

Odor risk centers on the dirty water tank and slow pad drying: several reviewers recommend emptying and rinsing the dirty tank frequently (some even add disinfectant) to prevent foul smells. Neglecting this step is repeatedly called out as a downside.

Ongoing costs mainly come from dust bags and wear items; some reviewers explicitly flag bag replacement as a recurring expense.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive for the price, especially around mapping accuracy, automation via the dock, and solid vacuum+mop performance. Most negatives are framed as expected tradeoffs in a cheaper model (no heated drying, limited edge reach, cable avoidance limits).

Packaging is praised as well organized in at least one review, making unboxing/setup smoother.

Reviewers highlight pet-friendly touches like pet-area deep cleaning settings, strong day-to-day hair control, and solid mopping for muddy paw prints. Heavy carpet hair can still take extra passes and occasional brush cleaning.

Pet hair pickup is a frequent highlight, and some reviews mention pet-focused modes/behaviors and monitoring features.

Value is a consistent theme: most reviews frame the QV 35A as a standout buy when priced under about $500 (and especially when discounted further). Several caution it is less compelling at higher prices because it lacks premium extras like heated wash/dry and edge-extension hardware.

Value depends heavily on sale price: several call it feature-packed for the money, but many still label it expensive at MSRP.

Multiple reviews explicitly note there is no front-facing camera, and one comparison also states no microphone, which can be appealing for privacy-sensitive buyers. The tradeoff is less sophisticated object recognition than camera-based systems.

The camera enables remote viewing/video calls; at least one reviewer flags camera-equipped robots as a privacy dealbreaker and suggests choosing camera-free if concerned.

The dock’s mop washing is repeatedly praised, including agitation in the tray and the ability to remove/rinse the base for easier hygiene. Auto-emptying and tank refills add to the hands-off ownership experience.

Automatic mop washing/drying is strong, but some reviewers note the wash plate/board gets dirty and needs manual cleaning; periodic pad washing helps.

Firmware updates are managed through the app, with options for checking or enabling auto-updates. Reviewers describe the update process as accessible and, in at least one case, already up to date out of the box.

A documented firmware update improved obstacle avoidance in testing, suggesting active software tuning and support.

The liquid system earns praise for an onboard tank, frequent auto-refills at the dock, and a wide range of adjustable water flow levels. Tradeoffs called out include room-temperature water (no heating) and limited intelligence for automatically re-mopping heavily soiled areas.

Multiple reviews call out limited/no detergent dosing (or not being able to use solution), a notable gap versus some rivals.

Cliff/drop sensors are repeatedly mentioned and shown as effective at preventing falls near stairs and edges. Reviewers also note the sensors need occasional wiping to stay accurate.

The all-in-one dock adds a noticeable footprint and needs vertical clearance to remove tanks; one setup walkthrough recommends allowing substantial space above the dock for tank access.

The dock is tall/space-hungry and needs a dedicated spot, even if it’s slimmer than some competitors’ stations.

A few tests show smearing can happen on muddy prints or when pads carry dirty liquid before they are washed. Users note that extra passes, better floor-direction settings, or more frequent pad washing can reduce residue.

Streaking is generally low, with settings/features that help keep finish even; deep-scrub expectations may still require tuning.

The robot generally navigates efficiently, but low cables/wires and certain tight areas can still cause issues. Reviewers recommend picking up clutter and using no-go zones, and the app may flag problem spots over time.

Reviews often report few rescues, with good threshold handling and less tendency to get stranded or stuck.

Across reviews, 8,000 Pa suction is described as strong for the price and effective for day-to-day pickup on hard floors and rugs, with debris often cleared in one or two passes. Multiple reviewers say it performs similarly to pricier Roborock models in core vacuuming, but it still is not a full replacement for an upright on heavy carpet.

Strong 7,000‑Pa-class suction in reviews, with solid pickup across surfaces; a few note flagships can still edge it on deepest crevices or thick carpet.

Reviews caution that, like most robot vacuums, it is best for maintenance cleaning rather than heavy-duty deep cleaning. Homes with lots of thick carpet or extreme debris still benefit from occasional full-size vacuuming.

Customer support is described as friendly and ultimately helpful, but slower than ideal, with back-and-forth email and multi-week resolution mentioned. Day-to-day reliability is generally praised, with the usual caveats around occasional snags and maintenance.

Reliability notes are mostly positive (stable operation/connectivity), though obstacle/cable situations can still cause interruptions if floors aren’t prepped.

Under-furniture access is good for typical clearances, with multiple reviews showing it can clean beneath some furniture. Its height around 3.8 inches means very low furniture may remain out of reach.

Under-furniture/toe-kick reach is highlighted as better than average in hands-on use.

The clean/dirty tank setup is considered convenient and easy to remove, and the robot also carries an onboard water tank that gets refilled at the dock. Multiple reviews warn the dirty tank can smell if left too long, so frequent emptying/rinsing helps.

Large dock tanks reduce refill frequency in some homes, but dirty-water emptying can be frequent if you mop often.