Compare Roborock QV 35A Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Roborock Qrevo Edge Robot Vacuum and Mop

Unboxing coverage notes the essentials are included (robot, dock, ramp/base pieces, mop pads), with setup-focused extras rather than a large accessory bundle.

Threshold handling is a standout: reviews report it can climb around half-inch to three-quarter-inch transitions and generally adapts well to small bumps. Wheels and a floating brush/chassis design help maintain contact on uneven surfaces.

AdaptiLift-style chassis lifting is a standout feature, helping it clear taller thresholds and better handle higher-pile carpet transitions than many competitors.

Design feedback is neutral-to-positive: it looks like a modern Roborock with familiar styling, with some notes that higher-priced variants mainly differ in appearance rather than core cleaning.

The Roborock/Qrevo app experience is repeatedly described as excellent and full-featured, with routines, schedules, room/zone cleaning, no-go zones, and deep control over suction, water, and dock behavior. A few notes include needing 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi during setup and (in one review) manually setting floor types for best results.

The app and automation feature set is described as robust: detailed maps, zones/no-go areas, vacuum-then-mop routines, obstacle settings, and smart-home/voice options in some reviews.

During auto-emptying, one review highlights reduced dust puffback thanks to a more sealed, multi-layer bag/door setup. Overall, airflow-related mess during emptying is described as minimal.

Carpet and rug handling is a strength: the robot can detect carpet, lift the mops about 10 mm, and adjust behavior (including carpet boost and vacuum-first options). Some users still prefer to avoid carpets during mopping for best results.

It handles rugs by lifting the mop pads and, with the lift chassis, can traverse many transitions; very thick or shaggy rugs may still be better managed with no-go zones.

Setup is described as simple: attach the dock base/ramp, fill tanks, scan the QR code, and run quick mapping. A common note is that the robot prefers 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and docking alignment can take a bit of care.

Setup is repeatedly described as straightforward, with fast initial mapping and a smooth app onboarding process.

The robot reliably returns to dock to charge and includes app options like off-peak charging to reduce energy costs. Reviews do not provide measured runtime numbers, but charging behavior is described as standard and dependable.

Battery life is reported as strong for a premium robot, with long-run claims up to roughly three hours and above-average endurance in at least one benchmark.

The robot bin and dock bag system are considered practical: one review calls out a larger 330 ml onboard bin, while others note bag replacement roughly every 2 to 3 months depending on use (often longer in cleaner homes).

The system relies on a dock bag for auto-emptying; bag swaps are clean and easy, and reviewers expect weeks to a couple months per bag depending on home size and debris.

Build quality impressions are strong for a budget-leaning model, with reviewers calling out neat finishes, a sturdy bumper, and overall fit-and-finish similar to higher-end Roborock units.

For general carpet pickup (especially larger debris), results are described as solid, often improving with a second pass or deep-clean pattern. Hair on carpet is the more common weak point rather than food/debris pickup.

Low-pile carpet pickup is a strength, with strong results on surface debris and good overall coverage.

Medium-pile carpet performance tests come back above average, with strong deep-clean results in sand-style benchmarks.

A child lock is available in the settings, adding peace of mind for households where kids might press buttons or start a run unintentionally.

Comparisons in the reviews often favor the QV 35A on value: several reviewers say it matches or even beats more expensive siblings in basic navigation and cleaning. The main gaps versus pricier models are extra sensors, AI cameras, heated wash/dry, and edge-extending hardware.

Reviews frequently compare it with other premium robots (including close Roborock siblings), generally placing it in the top tier for features and overall capability.

Controls are straightforward with physical power/home buttons plus a feature-rich app for room selection, routines, and dock controls. Reviewers also mention adjustable robot voice volume/language and remote-control style driving modes.

Controls are mostly app-driven; reviewers call the interface clear and informative (showing dock actions like washing/drying) with enough settings to tailor cleaning behavior.

One setup review specifies the dock power cord is about 6 ft, which is generally sufficient for flexible placement near an outlet.

The dock includes basic cord storage/management, helping keep the power cord tidy behind the station.

Corner performance is described as acceptable but not class-leading. Several reviews point to the lack of extendable brushes/pads as the limiting factor, even though the robot’s perimeter passes still catch a lot along edges.

Corner reach is better than typical due to the extending side brush, but ultra-tight corners can still be missed occasionally depending on layout and avoidance settings.

Dirty-water/intelligent dirt sensing is used to trigger re-washing or targeted re-mopping, which reviewers credit for better consistency on messier zones.

Docking, auto-empty, and auto-refill functions are described as reliable in normal use and contribute to the set-and-forget experience. A few notes mention docking alignment can be a little finicky, but overall automation works as intended.

Docking and auto-empty reliability is viewed as high, with dependable returns to the base and consistent mop washing/drying and emptying behavior in most reports.

Dock operations are generally reported as not super loud, with mop washing and bin emptying described as reasonable and the drying fan often called very quiet.

Rotating pads and controlled water delivery allow the QV 35A to scrub many dried or sticky spots (e.g., coffee residue, syrup-like spills) surprisingly well. Reviews still emphasize that very large messes may require multiple passes or manual pre-cleaning.

Ease of use is a major positive: reviewers call it convenient to run, easy to set schedules and routines, and largely hands-off thanks to the dock’s washing and emptying. The biggest usability friction points are cable prep and keeping tanks/tray clean for best hygiene.

Ease of use is a major positive: reviewers emphasize set-and-forget routines, strong automation, and minimal day-to-day intervention beyond basic dock maintenance.

Edge cleaning is described as decent in normal perimeter runs, but multiple reviews note it lacks extendable side brushes or mop pads, so edge-to-edge results and tight baseboards can lag behind higher-end models.

Edge and baseboard reach is a consistent strength thanks to the extending brush/mop system, improving coverage along walls compared with typical round robots.

Edge-following accuracy is strong, with the extending mop/brush system getting close to baseboards and improving wall-line coverage.

Auto-emptying into a dock bag minimizes hands-on mess and reduces how often the onboard bin needs attention. Reviewers appreciate the cleaner emptying experience versus manual dumping.

Auto-emptying to a bag keeps mess low, but owners still need to stay on top of bag changes and basic dock upkeep to avoid overflow-type messes.

The app provides maintenance tracking for parts like the filter (remaining life and reminders). Reviewers note you may need to reset timers after cleaning to keep reminders accurate.

Filtration is viewed positively: the filter is washable and the docked system is described as good at keeping dust contained, with one review citing SGS certification for high particle capture (e.g., pollen).

Drying is a known compromise: the dock uses room-temperature air rather than hot air, so pad drying can take many hours (often cited in the 4–8 hour range, with longer options available). This is acceptable to some reviewers but a dealbreaker for others wanting faster hygiene.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as the biggest cleaning weakness, with rubber brushes struggling to lift embedded hair. Deep-clean patterns help, but some hair may remain compared with bristle-heavy rollers.

Carpet hair pickup is above average, with strong performance on flattened pet hair in at least one controlled test.

On hard floors, long hair pickup is generally reported as strong, especially when paired with straight-line cleaning and adjustable settings. Some hair can still collect on brushes, but overall pickup is praised.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally very good, though one review notes it can occasionally leave a bit of pet fluff behind in tricky spots.

The anti-tangle design (rubber main brush and redesigned side brush) reduces snarls and makes maintenance easier, but it does not eliminate hair wrap entirely. At least one hands-on test still found noticeable wrap with very long hair.

Tangle resistance is a standout theme: the split anti-tangle brush design is repeatedly praised and testing reports near-zero hair wrap.

Fine debris like coffee grounds and small crumbs are reported to be picked up very effectively on hard floors, often with little left after a pass. Reviewers attribute this to strong suction and systematic pathing.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is repeatedly strong in testing, with high scores in flour/dust-style trials.

Large debris on hard floors (rice, chips, noodles, clumps) is generally handled well, with reviewers commonly seeing most debris removed on the first pass and the rest on a second.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is also excellent, handling cereal and mixed debris well without excessive scatter.

Innovation is framed as value-focused rather than cutting-edge: reviewers highlight that it skips premium extras like AI camera object recognition, mechanical arms, hot-water washing, hot-air drying, and extendable edge tools. The upside is getting many flagship-like fundamentals at a lower price.

Innovation callouts center on the chassis-lift capability and the split anti-tangle brush, plus the edge-reaching mop/brush hardware that targets common robot-cleaning weak spots.

At roughly 3.8 inches tall, the robot is relatively low-profile, but not ultra-slim. Reviewers advise checking furniture clearance if under-sofa cleaning is a priority.

Ongoing maintenance is described as manageable but real: periodic filter washing, sensor wiping, tray rinsing, and dirty tank cleaning are recurring tasks. The removable dock base/tray and clear in-app maintenance timers make upkeep easier.

Maintenance is mostly predictable: refill water, empty dirty water, replace bags, and periodically clean brushes/filters; not zero-effort, but manageable for a premium docked robot.

Lidar-based mapping and straight-line pathing are consistently praised for neat, efficient coverage. Reviews mention quick mapping, multi-floor support, and accurate 3D-style maps, with predictable perimeter-then-grid cleaning behavior.

Mapping and pathing are widely praised: quick maps, efficient room coverage, and reliable navigation that reduces random wandering.

Mop pads can lift roughly 10 mm when carpet is detected, helping prevent wet rugs. This lift behavior is mentioned across multiple reviews and is treated as reliable and useful.

The mop-lift system reliably raises pads on carpet and rugs, reducing wet-carpet incidents and allowing mixed-surface cleaning runs.

Dual spinning mops (around 200 RPM) deliver strong scrubbing for routine grime and many stains, with adjustable water flow and the benefit of an onboard tank. For big messes, some smearing can occur and the robot may need extra passes or a manual assist because it lacks advanced dirt-detection re-mop logic.

Everyday mopping performance is rated very strong, with good results on dried stains; heavier spills may require higher settings, extra passes, or a remop cycle.

Noise is generally acceptable for daily use, with mopping noted as relatively quiet; max-power vacuuming is still noticeably loud (low-to-mid 70 dB range in one test).

Reactive tech obstacle avoidance is generally good for larger items (furniture, many toys) and can mark obstacles on the map, with adjustable sensitivity. Multiple reviews agree it struggles most with low, thin cables/wires and very small clutter, where bumps or run-overs can happen.

Reactive AI obstacle avoidance is generally effective (with camera-based recognition in some models), but reviewers still see occasional misses or conservative detours that can leave small areas untouched.

Odor risk centers on the dirty water tank and slow pad drying: several reviewers recommend emptying and rinsing the dirty tank frequently (some even add disinfectant) to prevent foul smells. Neglecting this step is repeatedly called out as a downside.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive for the price, especially around mapping accuracy, automation via the dock, and solid vacuum+mop performance. Most negatives are framed as expected tradeoffs in a cheaper model (no heated drying, limited edge reach, cable avoidance limits).

Reviewers highlight pet-friendly touches like pet-area deep cleaning settings, strong day-to-day hair control, and solid mopping for muddy paw prints. Heavy carpet hair can still take extra passes and occasional brush cleaning.

Reviewers highlight pet-friendly strengths: excellent hair handling, good pickup of pet hair, and smarter avoidance features (including pet-related options and snapshots) that help around bowls, toys, and messes.

Value is a consistent theme: most reviews frame the QV 35A as a standout buy when priced under about $500 (and especially when discounted further). Several caution it is less compelling at higher prices because it lacks premium extras like heated wash/dry and edge-extension hardware.

Value is the biggest point of debate: performance is premium, but several reviews frame it as expensive at full MSRP and much easier to justify when discounted.

Multiple reviews explicitly note there is no front-facing camera, and one comparison also states no microphone, which can be appealing for privacy-sensitive buyers. The tradeoff is less sophisticated object recognition than camera-based systems.

Camera-based features enable better object recognition and remote viewing in some configurations, but privacy-sensitive buyers may prefer variants without camera capability.

The dock’s mop washing is repeatedly praised, including agitation in the tray and the ability to remove/rinse the base for easier hygiene. Auto-emptying and tank refills add to the hands-off ownership experience.

The dock earns consistent praise for hands-off care: hot-water mop washing, warm-air drying, and self-cleaning functions that keep pads fresher between manual deep cleans.

Firmware updates are managed through the app, with options for checking or enabling auto-updates. Reviewers describe the update process as accessible and, in at least one case, already up to date out of the box.

Software support is viewed as important because some behavior (like water usage and streaking control) may improve with firmware updates, and smart-home integrations are part of the long-term appeal.

The liquid system earns praise for an onboard tank, frequent auto-refills at the dock, and a wide range of adjustable water flow levels. Tradeoffs called out include room-temperature water (no heating) and limited intelligence for automatically re-mopping heavily soiled areas.

A common limitation is the lack of an auto detergent/solution tank; if you want solution, you manually add it to the clean water tank.

Cliff/drop sensors are repeatedly mentioned and shown as effective at preventing falls near stairs and edges. Reviewers also note the sensors need occasional wiping to stay accurate.

The all-in-one dock adds a noticeable footprint and needs vertical clearance to remove tanks; one setup walkthrough recommends allowing substantial space above the dock for tank access.

A few tests show smearing can happen on muddy prints or when pads carry dirty liquid before they are washed. Users note that extra passes, better floor-direction settings, or more frequent pad washing can reduce residue.

Streaking and smearing can happen when water output is high or when tackling big wet messes; several reviews say dialing settings down helps, and it appears improved versus some close siblings.

The robot generally navigates efficiently, but low cables/wires and certain tight areas can still cause issues. Reviewers recommend picking up clutter and using no-go zones, and the app may flag problem spots over time.

Most testing suggests it navigates without frequent hang-ups, but real-world owners still report the occasional rescue when it wedges under furniture or hits an odd edge case.

Across reviews, 8,000 Pa suction is described as strong for the price and effective for day-to-day pickup on hard floors and rugs, with debris often cleared in one or two passes. Multiple reviewers say it performs similarly to pricier Roborock models in core vacuuming, but it still is not a full replacement for an upright on heavy carpet.

Across reviews, suction is consistently described as flagship-strong (around 18,000-18,500 Pa) with very high debris pickup on both hard floors and carpet.

Reviews caution that, like most robot vacuums, it is best for maintenance cleaning rather than heavy-duty deep cleaning. Homes with lots of thick carpet or extreme debris still benefit from occasional full-size vacuuming.

Customer support is described as friendly and ultimately helpful, but slower than ideal, with back-and-forth email and multi-week resolution mentioned. Day-to-day reliability is generally praised, with the usual caveats around occasional snags and maintenance.

Under-furniture access is good for typical clearances, with multiple reviews showing it can clean beneath some furniture. Its height around 3.8 inches means very low furniture may remain out of reach.

The clean/dirty tank setup is considered convenient and easy to remove, and the robot also carries an onboard water tank that gets refilled at the dock. Multiple reviews warn the dirty tank can smell if left too long, so frequent emptying/rinsing helps.

The dock manages clean and dirty water with auto-refill to the robot; owners still need to refill the clean tank and empty the dirty tank periodically.