Compare Roborock QV 35A Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Roborock Qrevo Edge S5A Robot Vacuum and Mop

Unboxing coverage notes the essentials are included (robot, dock, ramp/base pieces, mop pads), with setup-focused extras rather than a large accessory bundle.

The box contents are comprehensive for an all-in-one robot: dock, ramp, mop pads, power cord, an extra dust bag, and printed guides, making it easy to get started without extra purchases.

Threshold handling is a standout: reviews report it can climb around half-inch to three-quarter-inch transitions and generally adapts well to small bumps. Wheels and a floating brush/chassis design help maintain contact on uneven surfaces.

This model does not include an adaptive lift chassis, which limits threshold climbing compared with the higher Edge model and some flagships. If your home has tall transitions, this is a notable constraint.

Design is generally viewed as modern and clean, though some reviewers prefer the more premium-looking alternatives (for example Curv or flagships). The dock can look a bit industrial, but the robot and station still fit well in most rooms.

The Roborock/Qrevo app experience is repeatedly described as excellent and full-featured, with routines, schedules, room/zone cleaning, no-go zones, and deep control over suction, water, and dock behavior. A few notes include needing 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi during setup and (in one review) manually setting floor types for best results.

Automation and smart features are a highlight: schedules, no-go/no-mop zones, multi-floor maps, granular suction and water control, assistant integrations, and dock control. Obstacle detection relies on structured-light style sensing rather than a camera on this model.

During auto-emptying, one review highlights reduced dust puffback thanks to a more sealed, multi-layer bag/door setup. Overall, airflow-related mess during emptying is described as minimal.

Carpet and rug handling is a strength: the robot can detect carpet, lift the mops about 10 mm, and adjust behavior (including carpet boost and vacuum-first options). Some users still prefer to avoid carpets during mopping for best results.

Mop pads lift when carpet/rugs are detected and many users report rugs staying dry during transitions. Very high-pile carpets may still get damp depending on settings, so vacuum-first routines can be helpful.

Setup is described as simple: attach the dock base/ramp, fill tanks, scan the QR code, and run quick mapping. A common note is that the robot prefers 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and docking alignment can take a bit of care.

Setup is described as straightforward: attach the ramp, plug in the dock, charge, pair to Wi‑Fi, and fill the clean water tank. Most reviewers report quick, hassle-free first run and mapping.

The robot reliably returns to dock to charge and includes app options like off-peak charging to reduce energy costs. Reviews do not provide measured runtime numbers, but charging behavior is described as standard and dependable.

Battery life is repeatedly called a strong point, with a large battery and long runtimes on lower suction settings. Higher suction drains faster, and some testing shows max-power coverage below average, but typical mixed use is expected to fall in between.

The robot bin and dock bag system are considered practical: one review calls out a larger 330 ml onboard bin, while others note bag replacement roughly every 2 to 3 months depending on use (often longer in cleaner homes).

Uses a dock dust-bag system that empties cleanly and is easy to swap with minimal mess. Reported replacement cadence ranges from roughly 30–60 days to about 2–3 months depending on debris load.

Build quality impressions are strong for a budget-leaning model, with reviewers calling out neat finishes, a sturdy bumper, and overall fit-and-finish similar to higher-end Roborock units.

For general carpet pickup (especially larger debris), results are described as solid, often improving with a second pass or deep-clean pattern. Hair on carpet is the more common weak point rather than food/debris pickup.

Carpet cleaning is generally rated strong for the tier, including an above-average deep-cleaning score in testing and good pickup on rugs. Performance is not positioned as flagship-level, but it is consistently described as effective.

A child lock is available in the settings, adding peace of mind for households where kids might press buttons or start a run unintentionally.

The brush and dock system handle heavy hair and mixed debris without frequent clogs, and auto-emptying is reported to work without choking on hair. Occasional checks are still advisable, but clogging is not a common complaint.

Comparisons in the reviews often favor the QV 35A on value: several reviewers say it matches or even beats more expensive siblings in basic navigation and cleaning. The main gaps versus pricier models are extra sensors, AI cameras, heated wash/dry, and edge-extending hardware.

Across comparisons, the S5A is framed as upper mid-tier: strong fundamentals and automation, but behind flagships in obstacle avoidance sophistication and premium extras. Many reviewers still consider it a sweet spot when priced well.

Controls are straightforward with physical power/home buttons plus a feature-rich app for room selection, routines, and dock controls. Reviewers also mention adjustable robot voice volume/language and remote-control style driving modes.

The Roborock app and controls are repeatedly called intuitive and customizable, with clear UI for maps, routines, suction, and water levels. Live video-style viewing is not available on this model, but core control is polished.

One setup review specifies the dock power cord is about 6 ft, which is generally sufficient for flexible placement near an outlet.

The dock includes basic cord storage/management, helping keep the power cord tidy behind the station.

Corner performance is described as acceptable but not class-leading. Several reviews point to the lack of extendable brushes/pads as the limiting factor, even though the robot’s perimeter passes still catch a lot along edges.

Corner cleaning improves notably thanks to an extending side brush, leaving corners visibly cleaner than many robots. Some reviews still note a small amount of leftover debris in tight corners.

The dock dirt-detection and remopping concept can work well (for example, triggering a second pass after muddy paw prints). However, other testing reports it did not reliably detect certain dried stains, making the behavior inconsistent.

Docking, auto-empty, and auto-refill functions are described as reliable in normal use and contribute to the set-and-forget experience. A few notes mention docking alignment can be a little finicky, but overall automation works as intended.

Docking and automation are consistently reliable in reviews: automatic dust emptying, water refilling, mop washing, and drying generally work as expected. The tradeoff is a larger dock footprint compared with simpler stations.

Dock operations are generally reported as not super loud, with mop washing and bin emptying described as reasonable and the drying fan often called very quiet.

Rotating pads and controlled water delivery allow the QV 35A to scrub many dried or sticky spots (e.g., coffee residue, syrup-like spills) surprisingly well. Reviews still emphasize that very large messes may require multiple passes or manual pre-cleaning.

Handles common dried messes well, including muddy paw prints and dried coffee, often improving significantly on a second pass. Tougher stains like dried ketchup may require multiple passes and sometimes manual intervention.

Ease of use is a major positive: reviewers call it convenient to run, easy to set schedules and routines, and largely hands-off thanks to the dock’s washing and emptying. The biggest usability friction points are cable prep and keeping tanks/tray clean for best hygiene.

Edge cleaning is described as decent in normal perimeter runs, but multiple reviews note it lacks extendable side brushes or mop pads, so edge-to-edge results and tight baseboards can lag behind higher-end models.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is a consistent strength, helped by an extending mop pad and flex arm side brush that can reach right up to walls. It is often described as better than most robot mops, though not always perfect in tight corners.

Edge-following is strong, with the robot staying close to walls and the mop pad reaching into baseboard lines. Reviewers often show it maintaining contact better than typical robot mops.

Auto-emptying into a dock bag minimizes hands-on mess and reduces how often the onboard bin needs attention. Reviewers appreciate the cleaner emptying experience versus manual dumping.

Auto-emptying to a sealed bag keeps dust handling clean and hands off, and swapping bags is reported to be quick with minimal mess. This is a major convenience advantage for frequent cleaning.

The app provides maintenance tracking for parts like the filter (remaining life and reminders). Reviewers note you may need to reset timers after cleaning to keep reminders accurate.

Filtration is viewed positively: the filter is washable and the docked system is described as good at keeping dust contained, with one review citing SGS certification for high particle capture (e.g., pollen).

Drying is a known compromise: the dock uses room-temperature air rather than hot air, so pad drying can take many hours (often cited in the 4–8 hour range, with longer options available). This is acceptable to some reviewers but a dealbreaker for others wanting faster hygiene.

Fresh liquid pickup is reported as effective when mopping up spills like a glass of water, with the spinning pads absorbing and clearing liquid without leaving notable residue.

When hair does collect, it tends to channel toward the center of the split brush, making it quick to remove by hand. This is described as manageable rather than a major snagging problem.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as the biggest cleaning weakness, with rubber brushes struggling to lift embedded hair. Deep-clean patterns help, but some hair may remain compared with bristle-heavy rollers.

Carpet hair pickup is usually strong, especially on rugs, though a few tests still show small amounts of hair remaining after a pass. Overall performance is described as better than average for this tier.

On hard floors, long hair pickup is generally reported as strong, especially when paired with straight-line cleaning and adjustable settings. Some hair can still collect on brushes, but overall pickup is praised.

Hair pickup on hard floors is a standout, including long and even slightly damp strands, with users reporting thorough collection and minimal cleanup afterward.

The anti-tangle design (rubber main brush and redesigned side brush) reduces snarls and makes maintenance easier, but it does not eliminate hair wrap entirely. At least one hands-on test still found noticeable wrap with very long hair.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the biggest strengths: the DuoDivide brush and redesigned side brush greatly reduce tangles. In extreme stress tests, some hair may channel to the center and require a quick manual pull, but it is easy to clear.

Fine debris like coffee grounds and small crumbs are reported to be picked up very effectively on hard floors, often with little left after a pass. Reviewers attribute this to strong suction and systematic pathing.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is repeatedly described as strong, including successfully collecting very fine particles like powdery debris without leaving a visible film.

Large debris on hard floors (rice, chips, noodles, clumps) is generally handled well, with reviewers commonly seeing most debris removed on the first pass and the rest on a second.

Handles larger debris well on hard floors, such as crumbs, rice, and oatmeal, often clearing scattered mess in a single run or a couple of passes.

This model is noted as lacking built-in LED or headlight illumination, which some reviewers say would help in dim rooms and for better obstacle detection.

The dock uses heated processes (hot water mop washing and warm/hot air drying). Some testing questions whether advertised maximum water temperature is reached, but the heating still appears effective for pad cleaning and drying.

Innovation is framed as value-focused rather than cutting-edge: reviewers highlight that it skips premium extras like AI camera object recognition, mechanical arms, hot-water washing, hot-air drying, and extendable edge tools. The upside is getting many flagship-like fundamentals at a lower price.

At roughly 3.8 inches tall, the robot is relatively low-profile, but not ultra-slim. Reviewers advise checking furniture clearance if under-sofa cleaning is a priority.

The robot is relatively slim for a LiDAR-top model (around 4 inches / ~9.8 cm), helping it fit under more furniture than many competitors. It is still taller than ultra-thin flagships that remove the top LiDAR turret.

Ongoing maintenance is described as manageable but real: periodic filter washing, sensor wiping, tray rinsing, and dirty tank cleaning are recurring tasks. The removable dock base/tray and clear in-app maintenance timers make upkeep easier.

Maintenance is largely hands off thanks to the auto-empty and mop-wash dock, plus reduced hair tangling. Users still need to replace bags, rinse/clean the dock tray occasionally, and maintain filters and pads.

Lidar-based mapping and straight-line pathing are consistently praised for neat, efficient coverage. Reviews mention quick mapping, multi-floor support, and accurate 3D-style maps, with predictable perimeter-then-grid cleaning behavior.

LiDAR-based navigation earns strong marks for fast, accurate mapping and efficient room coverage. Multi-floor support and reliable pathing are repeatedly highlighted as core strengths.

Mop pads can lift roughly 10 mm when carpet is detected, helping prevent wet rugs. This lift behavior is mentioned across multiple reviews and is treated as reliable and useful.

The mop lifting system (about 10 mm) works well for most rugs and carpets and helps prevent wetting during transitions. Very plush/high-pile carpet can still be challenging without using vacuum-first settings.

Dual spinning mops (around 200 RPM) deliver strong scrubbing for routine grime and many stains, with adjustable water flow and the benefit of an onboard tank. For big messes, some smearing can occur and the robot may need extra passes or a manual assist because it lacks advanced dirt-detection re-mop logic.

Mopping performance is widely praised: dual spinning pads, adjustable water output, and frequent pad washing produce clean, refreshed hard floors. Sticky dried stains may take multiple passes, but everyday grime is handled very well.

Generally quieter than many competitors; peak loudness is cited around 70 dB on higher suction, and real-home testing reports low disruption (pets barely reacting).

Reactive tech obstacle avoidance is generally good for larger items (furniture, many toys) and can mark obstacles on the map, with adjustable sensitivity. Multiple reviews agree it struggles most with low, thin cables/wires and very small clutter, where bumps or run-overs can happen.

Obstacle avoidance is the most mixed area: some users see graceful navigation around common items, while multiple controlled tests show it can run over cables and miss smaller or low objects, especially on carpet. Camera-equipped models are consistently reported as better here.

Odor risk centers on the dirty water tank and slow pad drying: several reviewers recommend emptying and rinsing the dirty tank frequently (some even add disinfectant) to prevent foul smells. Neglecting this step is repeatedly called out as a downside.

Hot-water washing plus hot/warm air drying helps keep mop pads fresh, and at least one real-home review explicitly reports no lingering smells after repeated runs.

Consumables are typical for an auto-empty robot: dust bags and periodic filter cleaning/replacement. Reported bag life of 30–60 days (or 2–3 months) helps keep ongoing costs manageable, but you may also buy cleaning solution since it is manually dosed.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive for the price, especially around mapping accuracy, automation via the dock, and solid vacuum+mop performance. Most negatives are framed as expected tradeoffs in a cheaper model (no heated drying, limited edge reach, cable avoidance limits).

Reviewers highlight pet-friendly touches like pet-area deep cleaning settings, strong day-to-day hair control, and solid mopping for muddy paw prints. Heavy carpet hair can still take extra passes and occasional brush cleaning.

Well-suited to pet homes thanks to excellent hair pickup and anti-tangle brush design. It lacks camera-based pet recognition features found on higher models, but day-to-day pet hair cleanup is a standout.

Value is a consistent theme: most reviews frame the QV 35A as a standout buy when priced under about $500 (and especially when discounted further). Several caution it is less compelling at higher prices because it lacks premium extras like heated wash/dry and edge-extension hardware.

Value is strongest when discounted, with multiple reviewers calling sale pricing an excellent deal versus higher models with cameras or chassis lift. At full price it sits in an upper mid-tier range and may feel expensive if you mainly want top obstacle avoidance.

Multiple reviews explicitly note there is no front-facing camera, and one comparison also states no microphone, which can be appealing for privacy-sensitive buyers. The tradeoff is less sophisticated object recognition than camera-based systems.

The absence of a front-facing camera means no live video monitoring, which many see as a privacy benefit. The tradeoff is weaker camera-assisted obstacle recognition and fewer monitoring features compared with models that include an RGB camera.

Measured low-suction runtime and coverage are impressive in testing, with the robot covering roughly 3,947 sq ft before reaching 0% battery, which is above average. Measured max-suction runtime and coverage are weaker in testing, with roughly 513 sq ft covered before depletion, which is below average. Expect significantly better results on mixed or lower suction settings.

The dock’s mop washing is repeatedly praised, including agitation in the tray and the ability to remove/rinse the base for easier hygiene. Auto-emptying and tank refills add to the hands-off ownership experience.

The dock automates mop washing, pad drying, water refills, and in some cases self-cleaning of the base tray. Reviews generally find these cycles effective and appreciate the reduced hands-on maintenance.

Firmware updates are managed through the app, with options for checking or enabling auto-updates. Reviewers describe the update process as accessible and, in at least one case, already up to date out of the box.

The liquid system earns praise for an onboard tank, frequent auto-refills at the dock, and a wide range of adjustable water flow levels. Tradeoffs called out include room-temperature water (no heating) and limited intelligence for automatically re-mopping heavily soiled areas.

There is no auto solution or detergent dispensing tank, so cleaning solution must be added manually to the clean water tank. Multiple reviews call this a missed feature at this price.

Cliff/drop sensors are repeatedly mentioned and shown as effective at preventing falls near stairs and edges. Reviewers also note the sensors need occasional wiping to stay accurate.

The all-in-one dock adds a noticeable footprint and needs vertical clearance to remove tanks; one setup walkthrough recommends allowing substantial space above the dock for tank access.

The dock is described as larger because it houses clean/dirty tanks and the auto-empty system, so it needs dedicated floor space. Some comparisons note it is narrower than certain flagship docks, but it is still a sizable station.

A few tests show smearing can happen on muddy prints or when pads carry dirty liquid before they are washed. Users note that extra passes, better floor-direction settings, or more frequent pad washing can reduce residue.

Mopping is typically reported as streak free on hard flooring, but heavy muddy messes can smear on an initial pass before pad washing and follow-up cleaning improves the result.

The robot generally navigates efficiently, but low cables/wires and certain tight areas can still cause issues. Reviewers recommend picking up clutter and using no-go zones, and the app may flag problem spots over time.

Most day-to-day runs are described as smooth with few stops, but the robot can still get caught by cables or a sock in some tests. Lack of chassis lift also limits its ability to self-recover on tall thresholds.

Across reviews, 8,000 Pa suction is described as strong for the price and effective for day-to-day pickup on hard floors and rugs, with debris often cleared in one or two passes. Multiple reviewers say it performs similarly to pricier Roborock models in core vacuuming, but it still is not a full replacement for an upright on heavy carpet.

Strong rated suction (up to 18,500 Pa) and consistently good real-world pickup, even when lab airflow/pressure measures slightly below average. Overall cleaning results on hard floors and rugs are described as above average for the price tier.

Reviews caution that, like most robot vacuums, it is best for maintenance cleaning rather than heavy-duty deep cleaning. Homes with lots of thick carpet or extreme debris still benefit from occasional full-size vacuuming.

The robot itself suits small spaces well thanks to efficient mapping, but the multifunction dock is relatively large. Homes with limited floor space near outlets may need to plan dock placement carefully.

Customer support is described as friendly and ultimately helpful, but slower than ideal, with back-and-forth email and multi-week resolution mentioned. Day-to-day reliability is generally praised, with the usual caveats around occasional snags and maintenance.

Under-furniture access is good for typical clearances, with multiple reviews showing it can clean beneath some furniture. Its height around 3.8 inches means very low furniture may remain out of reach.

Its relatively low height helps it reach under furniture and low cabinetry where many robots miss dust. At least one real-home test highlights under-cabinet cleaning as a major day-to-day benefit.

The clean/dirty tank setup is considered convenient and easy to remove, and the robot also carries an onboard water tank that gets refilled at the dock. Multiple reviews warn the dirty tank can smell if left too long, so frequent emptying/rinsing helps.

The clean/dirty water tank setup is a key convenience feature; reviewers cite large tanks (around 4 L clean and ~3.5 L dirty in one real-home test) and automatic onboard refills. This enables multiple full clean-and-mop sessions before needing attention.