Average score
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.4
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.0
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.0
There is no strong case for active noise canceling here; one included review flatly says the headset is not noise-canceling.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3
ANC is a major feature and often praised for blocking fans, AC, and ambient noise, but several reviewers found it imperfect or only moderately effective.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.1
Android support is explicitly listed for the CH351, making mobile pairing part of its intended use case.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Android support is present through platform compatibility and the mobile Razer Audio app, though evidence centers on compatibility rather than Android-specific performance.
App
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.2
Software support is inconsistent in the included reviews, ranging from no companion app at all to optional PC software on another Cooler Master unit.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2
The app/software ecosystem is powerful and useful for EQ, mic, ANC, and mobile/console adjustments, though Synapse can feel finicky.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Latency-related sync is very strong in the evidence, with reviewers reporting imperceptible delay or no meaningful fidelity change in low-latency mode.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.4
Bass is a recurring strength, delivering weighty explosions and energetic low end without fully burying other cues.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2
Bass is usually presented as punchy or authoritative, but not unanimously elite; several reviewers say it needs EQ or is only above average.
Battery
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3
Battery life is generally strong, with many reviews citing 70-hour claims or long use, but ultra-low latency and new features can reduce endurance.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.5
Wireless stability is the CH351's biggest weakness, with persistent static and buzzing reported even during active use.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Bluetooth support is broadly useful, with reviewers citing Bluetooth 5.3, phone/mobile use, and simultaneous wireless use as major conveniences.
Build quality
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0
Material quality looks decent for the money, though not every component feels equally premium.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
Build quality is generally praised as sturdy, improved, and well finished, with only long-term hinge durability remaining a watch item.
Button control usability
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.9
Control usability varies sharply, from simple inline buttons on one review unit to a crowded, error-prone earcup layout on the other.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8
Physical controls are appreciated by many reviewers, but button feel, mute-position clarity, and memorization are recurring usability caveats.
Cable quality
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.2
The CH331's permanently attached fabric-wrapped cable is long, practical for desk use and presented as a solid part of the package.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.4
Cable quality is mixed: one reviewer liked the braided USB-C cable, while another disliked the cable noise from the analog lead.
Charging
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3
Charging is straightforward through USB-C, and some reviews note use while charging or wired charging support.
Clamping force comfort
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3
Clamp force is mostly comfortable and not overly tight, although one review says the lighter clamp can make the seal harder to maintain.
Codec support
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.2
Codec support is basic rather than audiophile-focused, with reviewers identifying SBC and AAC rather than higher-end codecs.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.1
Long-session comfort is mixed: soft pads help, but weight and head pressure are recurring complaints.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5
Comfort over long sessions is one of the strongest consensus points, with most reviewers praising long wear despite a few fatigue concerns.
Connectivity versatility
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Connectivity versatility is excellent, combining 2.4GHz, Bluetooth, USB, and analog options across many reviews.
Console compatibility limitations
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9
Console limitations are real: Xbox/PlayStation variants, Bluetooth restrictions, USB-audio limitations, and game/chat balance behavior vary by platform.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.2
Styling lands well in both reviews, whether you prefer playful colorways or a more subdued black-on-black look.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
Design is widely liked for its sleek, aviation-style, no-nonsense look, with premium stitching and understated styling earning praise.
Detachable cable convenience
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.7
Cable convenience is mixed across the included reviews, with one headset using a removable aux cable and the other a fixed cord.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5
The included analog/USB-C cable adds useful fallback wired convenience, especially for analog compatibility and dead-battery scenarios.
Detachable microphone convenience
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.3
A detachable boom mic adds welcome flexibility for switching between gaming use and a cleaner everyday setup.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1
The detachable microphone is convenient overall, though one reviewer disliked the lack of backward microphone compatibility.
Dongle
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.0
The CH351 includes a 2.4GHz USB-C dongle, but the wireless experience is undermined by static noise.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.0
The dongle is the most repeated hardware annoyance, with cable clutter, poor grip, and less elegant setup offsetting its strong performance.
Ear cup padding quality
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.1
The ear pads are a consistent positive, described as soft faux/protein leather and generally comfortable on the ears.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
Earpad quality is broadly praised for breathable foam, comfort, and cooler wear, with only minor material or heat complaints.
Ear cup swivel/rotation range
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.0
Cup movement is limited overall; the CH331 cups pivot outward but do not offer especially generous articulation.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2
Swivel and rotation are useful improvements, but the limited range still falls short of fully flat travel-friendly rotation.
Earpad replacement ease
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.5
Earpad replacement is possible, but the cited review says the stiff plastic clips make the process less elegant than magnetic pads.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.8
EQ customization is weak overall, either missing entirely or present but not especially effective.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
EQ customization is a major strength, with 10-band controls, onboard storage, game profiles, and mic EQ repeatedly cited.
Fit/seal reliability
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9
Fit and seal are mixed: some reviewers got a comfortable firm seal, while others struggled because of yoke looseness or fabric pads.
Footstep sound level scaling feature
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8
Footstep scaling is useful in concept and praised by some, but evidence suggests it can be game-dependent or gimmicky.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.3
The drivers reproduce both heavy bass and finer ambient details well enough to sound convincing, even if the signature is not neutral.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.4
Frequency response accuracy is mixed because reviewers noted good tonal accuracy in places but also treble peaks and an egregious 2kHz scoop.
Game/Chat balance control
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
Game/chat balance control is broadly useful on PC and Xbox, with reviewers praising the physical wheel despite PlayStation limitations.
Headband adjustability
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0
The CH331 offers useful headband extension, giving it enough adjustment range for fit tuning.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9
Headband/yoke adjustment works, but the sliding-yoke design drew both functional praise and minor frustration when it shifts out of place.
Hinge durability
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Hinge durability appears improved with smoother or reinforced parts, though reviewers still frame long-term durability as something to watch.
Included accessories
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.3
The CH351 package is well equipped with a dongle, aux cable and detachable microphone.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Included accessories are strong, with reviewers noting the detachable mic, dongle, USB-C cable, and analog cable in the box.
Instrument separation
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.4
The reviews point to good layer separation, making footsteps, ambience and soundtrack elements easier to distinguish.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Instrument and detail separation are recurring positives, especially in music passages and gameworld cues where reviewers heard distinct elements clearly.
Integrated microphone
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.1
Microphone functionality is a core feature across the included reviews, even though the exact implementation differs.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
1.5
There is no true integrated Bluetooth mic according to one reviewer; the headset relies on the boom mic for voice use.
Maximum volume clarity
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.6
Maximum-volume clarity is split, with one reviewer hearing painful distortion while another could play loud without crackle or distortion.
Microphone
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.0
Microphone performance is sharply split, from clear and headset-leading to a downgrade from the V2 Pro depending on reviewer and tuning.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.7
The CH351 mic does a notably good job suppressing nearby household noise in the included test.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1
Mic noise reduction can be strong with tuning and background-noise controls, but some reviewers found noise rejection inconsistent or voice tradeoffs noticeable.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.6
On the CH351, the detachable mic is clear and loud enough for chat or streaming without sounding thin.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.6
Call and voice quality is polarizing: some reviewers found clear, warm voice capture, while others preferred the older V2 Pro mic.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.2
Midrange detail is solid for the class, with dialogue and vocal texture coming through better than a typical one-note budget tuning.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Midrange impressions are positive where mentioned, with orchestral, vocal, and mid-heavy material coming through clearly in the cited reviews.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5
The CH351 stands out for broad platform support across consoles, computers and mobile devices.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6
Multi-platform compatibility is a major strength, especially for users who game across PC, Xbox, PlayStation, Switch, and mobile.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Multipoint and simultaneous audio are among the strongest feature additions, usually working well, though one reviewer found setup clunky.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.5
Passive isolation is limited, with one review explicitly noting that room sounds still bleed through.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8
Passive isolation depends heavily on fit and pad material: some found a useful seal, while others reported weak isolation or tricky sealing.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.8
Portability is not a strength, as the included evidence points to a desk-first design rather than a travel-friendly one.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.5
Portability is limited because the dongle can dangle from handhelds and the headset does not fold or rotate flat like travel-focused models.
Positional audio accuracy
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Positional audio accuracy is consistently strong, especially for footsteps, gunshots, racing cues, and competitive FPS awareness.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.6
Preset tuning is not a standout, with profiles either absent or too similar and bass-skewed to feel useful.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.0
Preset EQ quality is mixed: game and esports profiles help, but some presets are too aggressive or perform poorly in measurements.
Replaceable earpads
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2
Replaceable earpads support serviceability, with both removable pads and user-serviceable construction cited.
Replaceable ear plates
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2
Replaceable ear plates are easy and magnetic, mostly framed as a style or customization bonus rather than an essential feature.
RGB lighting customization
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.0
RGB lighting exists on the CH331, but control is minimal and limited to basic on or off behavior rather than real customization.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
1.0
RGB lighting customization is effectively absent; reviewers explicitly note that there is no RGB, though they do not see that as a major problem.
Sidetone adjustment quality
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1
Sidetone is configurable and often useful, though implementation quality ranges from distracting to nearly real-time depending on the reviewer.
Software/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.2
Basic setup is easy enough, but the overall experience is weakened by limited customization and, on the CH351, awkward controls.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.8
Setup simplicity is not universal; one reviewer criticized the lack of clear guidance for Bluetooth and simultaneous audio in Synapse.
Sound leakage
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.8
Sound leakage evidence is limited, but one reviewer notes the soft ear cups leak some sound and weaken isolation.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.1
The included reviews consistently praise big, immersive gaming sound, although the CH351's wireless buzzing drags down the overall experience. Both reviews paint wired operation as a strong scenario, with seamless connection and better overall sound performance.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Reviewers generally describe gaming sound as clear, detailed, immersive, and upgraded, though some note distortion or weaker all-around music performance.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5
Wide staging is one of the clearest strengths, helping worlds feel larger and positional cues easier to place.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Soundstage is often praised as wide or clearly defined, though one reviewer found it narrow and another said ANC can close the presentation in.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.6
Spatial or virtual surround performance is a real highlight, adding convincing depth and directionality in games.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4
Spatial audio is a core strength for immersion and positional cues, though some reviewers prefer stereo for competitive precision.
Stability
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.8
On-head stability is only average, with one review noting that the headset can slide around during movement.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.5
Stability is mixed: wireless range can be excellent, but isolated dropouts or audio no-output bugs appeared in some testing.
Transparency mode quality
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1
Ambient or transparency mode is described as useful for awareness, though the evidence is mostly feature-level rather than a deep quality assessment.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.1
Treble detail is good enough to keep smaller environmental sounds audible, including birds, crackling fire and distant effects.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.4
Treble is mixed: some reviewers like the high-end detail, while others report harshness, sibilance, or distortion that can become fatiguing.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0
USB-C is part of the CH351 setup, appearing in its dongle and port layout.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5
USB-C support is useful for charging, USB audio, and included cable connections, though cable sharing can create minor setup friction.
Value for money
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9
Value depends on priorities: many reviewers justify the premium through features, while others prefer cheaper alternatives or the non-Pro model.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.3
Volume output is described as lively and forceful, with enough punch to make games and music sound exciting.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.5
Volume output is adequate overall, but one reviewer found overhead disappointing and another heard strain when effects or volume peaked.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.6
Both reviews call the headset noticeably heavy, which becomes more obvious the longer you wear it.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3
Weight comfort is generally good despite the headset being heavier than prior models, though one review prefers the lighter non-Pro option.
Wireless latency
P1Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.8
Wireless latency is one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers highlighting the 10ms low-latency claim or imperceptible delay.
Xbox compatibility
P1
Product 1: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.5
Xbox support is not a strength in the included evidence, and one review specifically steers Xbox shoppers toward other models.
P2
Product 2: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7
Xbox compatibility is strong when buying the Xbox variant, which reviewers note can also work on other platforms.