Compare Ultimea Nova S50 Soundbar vs JBL Bar 1300X Soundbar

Room calibration was usually seen as helpful and effective, but one reviewer felt it did not make meaningful tonal changes.

One reviewer liked that the passive subwoofer did not need its own power supply, calling the setup neat.

The JBL One app was usually praised as easy and useful, though one reviewer called it only good, not great.

Audio format support is limited in practice: the S50 can decode Atmos, but a reviewer said it cannot really output it with only two front speakers and a subwoofer.

Audio format support was strong where evaluated, with reviewers highlighting Dolby Atmos and DTS:X coverage and broad decoding support.

Battery-powered surrounds enable flexibility, but several reviewers called regular recharging a hassle or a faff.

Bluetooth was described as quick through Bluetooth 5.3, with no reviewer reporting instability.

Bluetooth stability was mixed: one reviewer could not pair a smartphone, while others had smooth streaming or no sync concerns.

One reviewer criticized the subwoofer cabinet, tying plastic construction to audible rattle at very low frequencies.

Presentation is mixed: one review found some TV scenes balanced, while another warned that excessive bass can overtake the sound and reduce clarity.

Cohesion was usually praised, especially the seamless bubble of sound, though one reviewer found the stage somewhat constrained.

The remote/control buttons drew praise for being tactile, even though broader control behavior was not uniformly perfect.

Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the tiny, slim, setup-friendly form, but one review said the bar itself looked cheap.

Design reactions were mostly positive for innovation and minimalism, though several comments framed the look as practical rather than striking.

Build quality receives a low mark from the most detailed written review, which describes the soundbar as visibly cheap.

Build quality was generally regarded as solid or excellent, with reviewers praising sturdy construction and premium-feeling materials.

Detail retrieval is uneven, with one review saying treble nuance was lost while another heard very good definition in Atmos test material.

Detail retrieval was a strength, with reviewers hearing subtle effects, crisp textures, and distinct elements in busy scenes.

Dialogue clarity varies by content: some reviewers heard clear centered speech, while the written review found some dialogue hazy or clipped.

Dialogue was often clear against busy soundtracks, but several reviewers found occasional difficulty, muffling, or a need for more adjustment.

Distortion performance is split: Tom's Guide heard bass peak at medium volumes, while video reviewers found it stayed clean at high volume.

High-volume control is mostly good, with two reviewers praising resistance to distortion, though one heard dialogue clarity soften when pushed louder.

Atmos height performance is the biggest caveat: reviewers found the effect virtual or misleading rather than true height-channel Atmos.

Dolby Atmos effects were widely praised as spectacular, astounding, and immersive, though a few reviews wanted clearer or stronger height projection.

High-volume headroom impressed one reviewer, who said the bar still delivered its best at high volumes.

One reviewer strongly praised dynamic range, especially smooth transitions between quiet and loud moments.

EQ customization is useful but inconsistent: reviewers liked having modes and bass adjustment, yet Music mode and bass-heavy presets drew criticism.

EQ customization was one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated complaints about limited bands, few levels, and weak preset control.

Frequency balance is a recurring weakness, with pinched treble and excess bass or midbass depending on mode and bass setting.

Frequency balance was mixed, ranging from balanced and non-fatiguing to shouty, flappy, muffled, or uneven with music.

Gaming passthrough was a weakness where discussed, with reviewers flagging missing HDMI 2.1 or 4K/120Hz support.

HDMI 2.1 gaming support was limited, with reviewers routing consoles directly to the TV for better high-refresh gaming.

HDMI ARC/eARC works well in use, with reviewers praising auto power behavior and TV remote volume control.

Reviewers who evaluated TV audio connection favored HDMI ARC/eARC, calling it the best path for Dolby Atmos playback.

As a TV-speaker upgrade, it performs well for casual viewing, but reviewers do not treat it as a serious movie-lover soundbar.

Home theater integration was a core strength, with reviewers calling it a strong all-in-one setup and a good easy alternative to separates.

Inter-speaker connectivity is a compromise: the wired subwoofer works, but reviewers disliked the non-wireless setup and tangly cable.

The strongest inter-speaker connectivity evidence was positive, with one reviewer saying the surrounds worked reliably even at distance.

One reviewer noted a short one-second restart delay after pausing video, making TV latency a minor annoyance rather than a dealbreaker.

Loudness is a consistent strength, with reviewers repeatedly surprised by how powerful and loud the small system can get.

Reviewers consistently found the bar loud and room-filling, with enough output for cinematic impact; one noted it could play at full volume without becoming unbearable.

Low-volume performance is weak in the written review, where high frequencies still pinched even at low levels.

Low-volume and quiet-scene handling was praised in one review for keeping loud and quiet sounds delicately balanced.

Magnetic attachment was mostly secure and robust, though one reviewer said the detachable speakers sometimes required force to remove.

Wireless speaker pairing was praised in the two tests that addressed it, with stable surround operation and a strong stereo Bluetooth setup.

Off-axis or omnidirectional coverage was limited in one review, which described the experience outside the central seat as lopsided.

On-device controls were described positively as discreetly placed on the side of the soundbar.

On-device controls were split: basic buttons were liked in one review, while another criticized missing direct controls for key modes.

Optical input sounded similar to HDMI ARC to one reviewer, though ARC kept the advantage for TV remote volume control.

Optical input was treated as a fallback, with reviewers warning that it gives a lesser surround experience than eARC.

Remote usability is mixed-positive: one reviewer loved the remote, while another noted the play/pause button did not work for TV playback.

Remote reactions varied from easy and well-labeled to unbacklit, mediocre, or frustratingly enigmatic.

Setup simplicity is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers describing setup as easy, fast, and nearly plug-and-play.

Setup was mostly considered simple, quick, or plug-and-play, with one reviewer finding the first controls and guide tricky.

Smart assistant integration was limited in the one opinionated assessment, with the reviewer saying there was not much in the way of smarts.

Smart and extra features were useful but uneven: reviewers liked streaming and portable-speaker tricks, while some wanted more modes and controls.

Soundstage height is limited because the soundbar lacks true height-channel capability, even if virtual effects can be spacious.

Height performance was impressive in several tests, but some reviewers found vertical projection less pronounced than rival Atmos bars.

Spotify support was generally useful, especially for streaming, though one reviewer noted Spotify was not built into the JBL app.

Status indicators are useful because the front LEDs can be turned off to avoid distraction.

Status displays and indicators were well liked, with reviewers calling the front display helpful, easy to read, and useful for battery/status feedback.

Stereo performance split reviewers: one found separation present, but several heard music as a step down, constrained, or simply not right.

Subwoofer performance is mixed: it can deliver surprising bass and depth, but it can also become too much, peak, or hurt clarity.

The subwoofer drew heavy praise for huge impact and deep bass, but some reviewers found its levels hard to control or less precise with music.

Surround simulation is stronger than expected for a tiny 2.1 system, with reviewers hearing immersive movement and voices around them.

Surround performance was a major strength, repeatedly described as immersive, precise, and competitive with strong soundbar rivals.

USB-C charging was repeatedly praised as a useful backup or major improvement for keeping the detachable speakers powered.

Value for money is the strongest point, with reviewers repeatedly calling the S50 cheap, hard to beat, or astounding value.

Value opinions were positive for movie-focused users and the all-in-one package, but some reviewers questioned the cost against strong competitors.

Video passthrough was useful thanks to multiple HDMI inputs and HDR/Dolby Vision support, but limited by 4K/120Hz shortcomings.

Voice clarity is a weakness in tougher scenes, with reports of clipped speech and muffled voices when bass dominates.

Voice reproduction was generally strong, with reviewers praising vocal clarity, natural presentation, and PureVoice performance despite limited adjustment.

Weight and footprint are advantages, with reviewers praising the tiny, lightweight form and easy placement.

Size and placement convenience were mixed to poor: the wider bar can overhang a stand, and the large subwoofer is hard to hide.

One reviewer reported the app connected the bar to the home network without fuss, supporting a positive Wi-Fi reliability score.

Wired connectivity was consistently praised for generous HDMI and input coverage, with multiple reviewers calling the ports ample or generous.