Average score
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.8
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.9
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0
ANC is useful for taking the edge off treadmills, office chatter, and travel noise, but every detailed reviewer said it falls clearly short of premium earbuds. ANC and ambient tuning are adjustable in the app, but reviewers generally felt those sliders and sport-mode tweaks made only modest real-world differences.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.5
ANC performance ranges from average to solid-for-the-price: it reduces low-frequency rumble well but is not class-leading versus premium models. Noise control is adjustable in the app with ANC on/off and hear-through options, making it easy to tailor for different environments.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Android support looks solid thanks to Google Fast Pair support and no reported compatibility red flags, though direct Android testing was limited.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
Android support is strong thanks to features like Google Fast Pair and aptX/aptX Adaptive compatibility.
App
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
The JBL app adds meaningful tuning options, sports modes, and control customization, but several reviewers found some mode behavior inconvenient or not especially impactful.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1
The Connect app is feature-rich (EQ, noise modes, codec selection, updates, extras like soundscapes and ear-profile tools) and is generally reported as stable.
aptX
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
aptX/aptX Adaptive support makes these particularly attractive for Android users seeking higher-quality Bluetooth audio.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
Low-latency mode delivers good audio-video sync, with most reviewers reporting minimal lip-sync delay for video and casual gaming.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.7
Bass is decent and workout-friendly, but multiple reviews suggest it benefits from EQ boosting rather than sounding especially punchy on the default tuning.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
Bass is the headline: deep extension and punch are repeatedly praised, though it can sound forward on bass-heavy mixes.
Battery
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
Battery life is a standout strength, with reviewers consistently praising the long single-charge runtime and strong total endurance with the case.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0
Battery life is repeatedly described as best-in-class, commonly around 20 hours in the buds (about 15 with ANC) plus roughly 30 more from the case.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7
Connection stability was excellent in testing, with easy room-range use during workouts and no reported dropouts.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
Bluetooth stability is typically strong (including longer-range anecdotes), but a few users report occasional dropouts, especially in multipoint or obstructed scenarios.
Build quality
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
Build quality is widely seen as robust for the price, though a few note the silicone tips feel thin and may wear over time.
Button control usability
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.3
Physical buttons help avoid accidental touches, but their placement and size can be fiddly; some find multi-tap actions or locating the buttons frustrating.
Carry case quality
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3
The case is functional but not a highlight: it is on the larger side, only lightly protected against moisture, and can pick up wear in a gym bag.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6
The case is generally sturdy with clear battery indicators and secure retention, but its large footprint is a common complaint.
Charging
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4
Charging performance is strong, with quick-charge support and reasonable full-charge times repeatedly called out as practical positives.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
Charging is USB-C with strong fast-charge results (about 10 minutes for roughly 90 minutes playback); most reviews note no wireless charging on the CKS50TW.
Codec support
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
Codec support is a strength, with SBC/AAC plus aptX and aptX Adaptive mentioned often, and some app control over codec selection.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Long-session comfort is unusually good for winged sports buds, with reviewers noting they stayed comfortable through runs, workouts, and daily use.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0
Comfort is generally good once the right tips are found, but the larger housings can feel bulky or less secure for smaller ears.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9
The design is sporty and available in appealing colors, but the buds are still noticeably chunky and protrude more than slimmer everyday earbuds.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.0
Design is functional but plain, and the size is frequently called bulky compared to sleeker rivals.
Ear tip size options
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
The included three ear-tip sizes were a useful fit aid, though one reviewer still felt the overall shell size may be too large for smaller ears.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
Multiple ear tip sizes are included (often four), helping with fit and seal, even if durability concerns pop up in a few reviews.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
EQ customization is a real plus, letting users add extra bass or adjust the sound for workouts without needing third-party tools.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2
EQ customization is a highlight, offering a five-band EQ and useful adjustments to tailor bass/vocals and overall balance.
Find My
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0
One reviewer explicitly noted that there is no Find My-style locating feature, which limits convenience compared with some rivals.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0
The app includes a locate/find function for the earbuds, which is useful if you misplace them.
Frequency response accuracy
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
Tuning trends warm rather than strictly neutral, but multiple reviews call it well-balanced across the range with good overall coherence.
Included accessories
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
Accessory support is good for the class, with extra ear tips, wing options or covers, and a charging cable included in the box.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetInstrument separation
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2
Separation and imaging are strong for the class, keeping transient details in context, but it does not match higher-end audiophile flagships.
Integrated microphone
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
The earbuds include an onboard multi-mic setup that works well enough for routine calls and general hands-free use.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetMaximum volume clarity
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
At higher volumes, clarity drops off and upper-range detail compresses, so these do not stay especially clean when pushed hard.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.5
At very loud listening levels, some note dynamics can feel slightly compressed or squashed, even if clarity remains decent.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9
Call noise handling is respectable rather than exceptional, keeping traffic and background noise fairly controlled without fully erasing it.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.0
Noise reduction on calls is inconsistent, with wind and busy-street noise sometimes bleeding through and degrading intelligibility.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Call quality is generally clear and usable, though voices can sound slightly hollow instead of especially rich or natural.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8
Call quality is mostly clear in quiet settings, with mixed results outdoors or in noisy rooms; some experiences are excellent while others report average performance.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
Midrange performance is one of the stronger parts of the tuning, with vocals and core musical content coming through clearly for the price.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.8
Midrange is generally clear, but the stock tuning can let bass mask lower mids and push vocals back; the Clear Vocal/EQ options help restore presence.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4
Compatibility looks broad, with successful use across phones, laptops, watches, and support for both Google and Microsoft quick-pair systems.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetMultipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Multipoint was a meaningful win, with seamless switching between devices highlighted as one of the more premium-feeling features at this price.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1
Multipoint is widely appreciated for switching between phone and computer, though there can be slight delays and occasional reliability quirks.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.3
The seal provides solid passive isolation, sometimes good enough to reduce noise even before ANC is enabled.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.2
Portability is only average because both the buds and especially the case are a bit bulky compared with more pocket-friendly alternatives.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.8
Portability is the main physical downside: the case is chunky and the buds are large, so jeans-pocket carry can be awkward even if bags and jacket pockets are fine.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.7
The preset sports profiles are more interesting on paper than in practice, with reviewers often describing them as gimmicky or only mildly different.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0
Preset EQ modes (such as Bass Boost and Clear Vocal) are frequently cited as helpful and can meaningfully change the listening profile.
Sensors
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
1.2
Wear-detection sensors are a notable omission in multiple reviews, so playback does not auto-pause when you remove a bud.
Sidetone adjustment quality
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0
Sidetone/side-talk features help you hear your own voice more naturally during calls, which several reviewers appreciate.
Software/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Setup is straightforward, with easy pairing and uncomplicated day-one use standing out as low-friction strengths.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetSound quality
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Overall sound quality is good for the money and enjoyable for workouts and casual listening, but it does not deliver premium detail, depth, or polish.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.2
Across reviews, sound is described as warm and engaging with strong detail for the price, especially after EQ tweaks; a minority find it merely average without tuning.
Soundstage width
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.1
Soundstage is often called convincing and well-staged for true wireless, though a few impressions place it closer to average rather than expansive.
Spatial audio
P1Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.0
Spatial audio/360 Reality Audio is a mixed bag: some find it immersive, others dismiss it, and it is limited by supported services.
Stability
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.9
Stability is one of the product's best traits, with the twist-lock wing design keeping the buds secure through running, gym work, and sweaty sessions.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.5
Stability is generally strong once fitted, with multiple workout and head-movement anecdotes indicating the buds stay put.
Touch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3
Touch controls are usable but not ideal for exercise, with some lag and reduced reliability versus physical buttons, especially with sweat or gloves.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetTransparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
Transparency mode is the most divisive feature: one reviewer found it fairly natural, but the more detailed running-focused reviews said traffic awareness was still lacking.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.6
Hear-through/transparency is generally usable and fairly natural, but it can be mild and is not on the level of the best implementations.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0
Treble and upper-range clarity are only middling, with repeated comments about limited sparkle, detail, and openness up top.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
3.7
Treble is usually smooth and non-fatiguing; some reviewers want more sparkle or sharpness, while others note it stays crisp at higher volumes.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
USB-C charging is included and treated as an expected but welcome convenience for everyday use.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
5.0
USB-C charging is consistently included and straightforward.
Value for money
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
Value is a major selling point, with every review framing the Endurance Race 2 as a feature-rich, sports-focused bargain that undercuts pricier rivals.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetVoice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0
Voice assistant support is absent according to one review, which is a notable feature gap even at a budget price.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
2.0
Voice assistant support is limited in some coverage, with at least one review noting a lack of built-in voice-assistant control compared with certain rivals.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
Maximum loudness is below average for the category, and multiple reviewers had to raise volume more than expected during outdoor runs.
P2Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
No score yetWater/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
The IP68 buds are extremely well-suited to sweaty training and rainy runs, making durability against dust and water one of the clearest strengths.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.6
Water resistance is consistently positioned as workout-friendly (commonly IPX4, with some coverage citing higher ratings on newer variants).
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.2
Even though the shells are fairly large, reviewers still described them as light enough to stay comfortable during movement and longer sessions.
P2
Product 2: Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds
4.0
Weight is noticeable for some (and a few describe the fit as unbalanced), but others find the buds comfortable for long sessions.