Compare JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds vs Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

P1 JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
P2 Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Software/setup simplicity is 4.5 vs 2.8. Initial setup was easy across an iPhone, laptop, and Garmin watch in one review.
  • Stability is 4.9 vs 3.6. Stability was excellent across testing, with reviewers reporting no mid-run adjustment and secure fit during hard movement.
  • Charging is 4.7 vs 3.5. Charging earned praise for the quick-charge return of roughly four hours from ten minutes.
  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.7 vs 3.6. Durability for workouts was praised, with reviewers trusting the IP68 buds for sweat, rain, dust, and even submersion...

Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Active noise cancellation is 4.8 vs 2.7. ANC was the clearest consensus strength, repeatedly described as highly effective, above its price class, and unusually strong...
  • Soundstage depth is 4.5 vs 2.9. Soundstage depth received positive comments around three-dimensional space, soundstage, and bass/soundstage impact.
  • Preset EQ profile quality is 4.3 vs 2.8. Preset EQ profiles were viewed positively when reviewers found bass boost, Excited, or Bright profiles useful for shaping...
  • Volume output is 4.0 vs 2.5. One reviewer highlighted strong volume output, describing the earbuds as loud and energetic.
Average score
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.6
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.8
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.7

ANC was useful only to a point: it cut some chatter or treadmill noise, but reviewers agreed it lagged far behind premium buds.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

ANC was the clearest consensus strength, repeatedly described as highly effective, above its price class, and unusually strong for budget earbuds.

Android compatibility
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
5.0

Android compatibility was positive where tested, including Android pairing and no cross-platform issues.

App
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.1

The app adds customization, EQ, ambient controls, and sports modes, but reviewers found some app-based controls inconvenient or gimmicky.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

The app was mostly praised for control and customization, but some reviewers wanted easier setup, more features, or fewer connection frustrations.

aptX
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.1

aptX support was criticized as absent, especially because some cheaper or similarly priced earbuds offer it.

Bass performance
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.7

Bass was adequate to strong after EQ adjustment; one reviewer wanted more stock punch while another praised the bass balance.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

Bass was one of the most praised traits, usually described as powerful, punchy, deep, or dynamic, with a minority saying it can overpower the mix or sound too heavy out of the box.

Battery
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.9

Battery life was one of the clearest strengths, consistently described as impressive or a strong point.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Battery life was usually praised as long or above average, though one reviewer fell short of Sony’s claim in mixed ANC/ambient use.

Bluetooth
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

Bluetooth reliability was strong in the tested review, with no dropouts during runs and workouts.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.7

Bluetooth reliability was mixed, with several reviewers reporting no issues or stable switching, while others encountered dropouts, app reconnection problems, or buzzing.

Build quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0

Build quality evidence centered on the case picking up scratches in normal bag use.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

Build quality was mostly solid for the price, though some reviewers described the plastics as slightly plasticky.

Button control usability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.7

Control usability was limited by awkward volume gestures and limited customization despite some responsive touch surfaces.

Cable quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.5

The included cable choice disappointed one reviewer, who wanted USB-C to USB-C instead of USB-A to USB-C.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.0

Cable quality/accessories drew mild criticism because one reviewer wanted a longer USB-C-to-USB-C charging cable.

Carry case quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.9

The case was a common compromise, criticized for size, run portability, scratches, and lower weather resistance than the earbuds.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.6

Carry case quality split reviewers, with some finding it premium or sturdy and others calling it plasticky, chunky, cheap-feeling, or less sturdy over time.

Charging
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7

Charging earned praise for the quick-charge return of roughly four hours from ten minutes.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.5

Charging was mixed: quick charging earned praise, but the lack of wireless charging was a repeated limitation.

Codec support
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.1

Codec support was a recurring weakness because reviewers repeatedly criticized the earbuds for offering only AAC/SBC and lacking higher-quality options.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7

Long-wear comfort was a major strength, with reviewers saying the wings did not irritate and the buds stayed comfortable for long sessions.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

Comfort was a major strength, with many reviewers saying the earbuds remain comfortable for hours or even all day.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.4

Design opinions were mixed: reviewers liked colors and smaller styling in one unboxing, but others found the buds bulky and protruding.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Design opinions were mixed but leaned positive, especially for the transparent Glass Blue finish; some reviewers found it toy-like or only average.

Eartips fit
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.6

Fit was a standout strength across reviews, helped by the twist-lock wing and secure in-ear seal.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

Eartip fit was usually secure and comfortable when the right size was found, though smaller ears and seal sensitivity remained caveats.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

Ear tip sizing was not ideal for smaller ears according to one reviewer, despite the included sizes.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.0

Ear tip options were limited, with one reviewer warning that three sizes and no stabilizers may not suit many users.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9

EQ customization was useful, especially for adding bass and getting a fuller sound.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

EQ customization was useful and often appreciated, though some reviewers wanted deeper controls or found Sony’s personalization basic.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

Frequency balance was mostly praised as balanced or preference-aligned, though one reviewer wanted more middle and high-frequency presence.

Included accessories
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories drew a cable complaint because one reviewer wanted USB-C to USB-C.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.0

Included accessories were adequate but not generous, with one reviewer wishing Sony supplied a better charging cable.

Instrument separation
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

Instrument separation was praised in several reviews, with reviewers hearing clear placement, detail, and separation across layered tracks.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.5

The integrated microphones handled calls clearly enough in the reviews that tested them.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Integrated microphones were generally adequate to good for calls, with stronger indoor performance and weaker results in noisier conditions.

LDAC
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.1

LDAC support was repeatedly called out as missing, which reviewers saw as disappointing for Sony earbuds and a drawback for serious listeners.

Lossless audio support
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.0

Lossless audio support was weak because one reviewer explicitly noted the lack of aptX lossless and LDAC.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

At high workout volume, one reviewer heard compression and lost detail.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.3

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed, with reviewers noting muddier mids at high volume and occasional treble distortion.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

Traffic noise reduction performed well in one outdoor call test, keeping background traffic from becoming too loud.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.8

Microphone noise reduction was often praised for wind and background suppression, but a few reviewers said voice quality suffers or becomes hard to understand in noisy settings.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.5

Call quality was acceptable to good, with clear voices but a slightly hollow character in one test.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.7

Call microphone quality ranged from clear and impressive to merely usable, with the best results in quiet or moderate environments.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

One reviewer specifically praised the mids as surprisingly clear alongside the bass.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

Midrange clarity was generally positive, especially for vocals, but some reviewers said heavy bass or higher volumes can make mids muddy or constrained.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

The buds paired easily with multiple device types in one review, including phone, laptop, and Garmin watch.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positive in the one review that tested both iPhone and Android without issues.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint switching worked seamlessly between a phone and laptop in one review.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.9

Multipoint was valued when it worked, but one reviewer reported disruptive dual-device buzzing, making reliability context-dependent.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

Passive isolation received strong marks where tested, with reviewers crediting the ear tips and secure seal for blocking outside noise before ANC.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.1

Portability was mixed: the case can work in a hydration vest, but reviewers often found it large or not pocket-friendly.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Portability was mostly good because the case fits pockets, though several reviewers called it bulkier than rivals or less ideal for tight pockets.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

Preset sports EQ modes drew mixed-to-negative feedback; reviewers liked the idea but found little difference or gimmicky execution.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ profiles were viewed positively when reviewers found bass boost, Excited, or Bright profiles useful for shaping the sound.

Sensors
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

Wear-detection sensors were praised as smooth, useful, and battery-saving.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.5

Sidetone was weak in one review because the earbuds did not feed enough of the caller’s own voice back during calls.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.3

Smudge resistance was mixed, with one reviewer finding the case not fingerprint-prone and another saying it attracts fingerprints and dust.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

Initial setup was easy across an iPhone, laptop, and Garmin watch in one review.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.8

Software/setup simplicity was mixed, with one reviewer praising guided EQ setup and others reporting frustrating app signup or connection issues.

Sound quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9

Reviewers found the sound good for the price, with enough everyday and workout quality, but not premium-level detail or clarity.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

Reviewers broadly found the WF-C710N enjoyable and strong for the price, with praise for full, engaging sound, though a few noted merely average or bass-heavy tuning.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.9

Depth was a sound weakness, with reviewers hearing less depth than higher-end earbuds.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth received positive comments around three-dimensional space, soundstage, and bass/soundstage impact.

Soundstage width
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

One lab-based review credited the earbuds with wide, clearly defined spatial presentation.

Spatial audio
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.5

Spatial audio support was not a major draw, with reviewers noting limited service support or calling the feature unimpressive.

Stability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.9

Stability was excellent across testing, with reviewers reporting no mid-run adjustment and secure fit during hard movement.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.6

Stability was polarizing: some reviewers had no fallouts, while others found the earbuds slipped during running or were insecure for workouts.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.9

Touch controls were usable outside workouts but weaker for running, sweat, gloves, and slight lag.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.5

Touch control responsiveness was generally good, but repeated taps and accidental triggers made the control experience uneven.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.7

Transparency mode was split, with one reviewer calling it natural while others said it failed to let in enough traffic sound and could be wind-heavy.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.7

Transparency and ambient modes were mixed: some reviewers found them useful or excellent, while others noticed hiss, delay, or weaker high-frequency reproduction.

Treble clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.9

Upper-range and treble clarity were a limitation, with reviewers noting reduced clarity and depth versus better earbuds.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Treble was often described as crisp, clear, or detailed, though several reviewers noted missing upper-treble detail or occasional distortion.

Value for money
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.6

Value for money was a strong consensus, with reviewers repeatedly calling the earbuds compelling for the price.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Value was one of the strongest themes: reviewers consistently saw the WF-C710N as a strong budget buy despite compromises in codecs, case feel, controls, and fit.

Volume output
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.5

Outdoor volume was a recurring weakness, with multiple reviewers saying audio could be too quiet or get lost while running.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

One reviewer highlighted strong volume output, describing the earbuds as loud and energetic.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7

Durability for workouts was praised, with reviewers trusting the IP68 buds for sweat, rain, dust, and even submersion limits.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.6

Water and sweat resistance was seen as adequate for light workouts or casual use, though not all reviewers trusted the fit for exercise.

Weight comfort
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
5.0

Low weight supported comfort, with reviewers noting the earbuds are light enough to forget they are being worn.