Compare Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Dragon Quest I & II HD-2D Remake

Accessibility was mixed because attack QTE assists exist, but the lack of a defend option hurt accessibility.

Reviewers valued the difficulty options, markers, and other quality-of-life settings for making the old games easier to approach without fully erasing their classic feel.

One reviewer criticized the automated battle behavior, saying the AI made poor choices rather than feeling genuinely wise.

Free aiming was seen as useful for targeting weak spots, though the same reviewer wanted the system developed further.

Animation quality was split between beautiful motion and noted cutscene animation issues.

Animation quality was praised in both battle and enemy presentation, with reviewers noting smooth movement and lively spell or monster animations.

Art direction was highly praised for beauty, French-inspired style, surreal environments, and cohesive visual identity.

The HD-2D art direction was strongly praised for respecting old JRPG roots while making the worlds feel striking and modern.

Atmosphere was praised for melancholy tone, dreamlike environments, and emotional connection to the world.

Bosses were praised for evolving patterns, superboss challenges, and meaningful tests of combat mastery.

Bosses earned strong praise when they forced strategy and felt rewarding, though a few reviewers disliked specific frustrating fights.

Bug reports ranged from occasional jank and a bugged quest to a reviewer reporting almost no bugs.

Camera behavior was praised in combat for dynamic movements that enhanced counterattacks.

Character development was praised for interesting party members, growth, humanity, and introspective motivations.

Reviewers especially praised Dragon Quest II's party members for gaining stronger arcs, personalities, and interpersonal chemistry.

The party roster was praised for distinct mechanics, focused cast design, and characters reviewers bonded with.

The added Princess of Cannock and more useful party members were repeatedly praised as natural, valuable additions to Dragon Quest II.

The checkpoint system reduced frustration by preventing major progress loss after death.

Combat was the most consistently praised system, with reviewers highlighting active dodges, parries, character-specific mechanics, and satisfying turn-based depth; a few found it divisive or demanding.

Combat was widely seen as engaging and more strategic, though several reviewers noted Dragon Quest I's solo fights could become frustrating or unfair.

Reviewers praised collectibles, optional areas, bosses, secrets, and side content, with only minigames drawing a weaker reaction.

Reviewers appreciated the expanded worlds, new mechanics, and added content, especially in Dragon Quest II.

Countering and timing were praised when they worked, but one review found the input window unexpectedly tight.

One review directly called the layered combat and action elements an outstanding gameplay loop.

Crash stability was inconsistent across reviewers, from no crashes to a report of many crashes over 60 hours.

Dialogue was praised for natural conversations, believable banter, and strong character interactions.

Difficulty was respected for challenge and balance by several reviewers, but tight QTE reliance and late-game balance drew criticism.

Difficulty split reviewers: many liked the tougher, more meaningful challenge, but several criticized RNG spikes, grinding walls, or frustrating solo encounters.

Resource balance was praised for avoiding inventory tedium and excessive item hoarding.

Reviews repeatedly emphasized the story’s strong emotional effect, from grief and melancholy to catharsis and tears.

Multiple reviewers described unusually strong emotional payoffs, including poignant scenes and endings that made them stop, reflect, or cry.

Endgame content was praised as expansive and build-focused, opening into a fresh layer after the main story.

Enemy variety was broadly praised for unique patterns, designs, and combat behaviors, though one review saw repetition in late-game enemy attacks.

Environmental detail was a major strength, with reviewers praising richly detailed regions, color palettes, distinct locations, and memorable areas.

Environmental detail stood out through lighting, interiors, water, clouds, towns, and dungeons that made the world feel richer.

Exploration was generally rewarding through secrets, journals, bosses, and side areas, but several reviewers noted linearity, uneven depth, or trivial overworld movement.

Exploration was generally praised for rewarding secrets, treasure, and open-ended discovery, though one underwater segment was called slow and awkward.

Facial presentation was mixed because voice and scenes landed, but lip-sync problems appeared in minor scenes.

One preview emphasized the games' JRPG legacy as a reason to experience them, supporting their faithfulness to Dragon Quest history.

One reviewer highlighted sharing the remakes with children as a positive next-generation experience, supporting family appeal.

Fast travel convenience was one of the few quality-of-life choices criticized for reducing tension and undermining dungeon-exit magic.

Frame rate reports were mixed: one review noted Quality-mode drops, while another reported steady high performance.

Frame rate impressions were very positive on Switch 2 and handheld play, with reviewers citing stable 60 FPS or no drops.

The fun factor was high, with reviewers eagerly running into fights, calling the game a standout, and enjoying combat.

Fun factor was very high overall, with several reviewers saying the remakes were hard to stop playing or simply a great time.

Reviewers praised the systems when they cohered, especially build synergies and tactical options, though one review found the turn-based-to-QTE blend disjointed.

Reviewers praised Sigils, Scrolls, and other new mechanics for adding meaningful choices while keeping the classic JRPG foundation intact.

Graphics were widely praised as striking or phenomenal, with only minor pop-in or performance caveats elsewhere.

Graphics received near-universal praise, with reviewers repeatedly calling the HD-2D presentation brilliant, gorgeous, stunning, or full of life.

The game was praised for reducing grind through shared Picto learning and focused inventory systems, though one review still noted some padding.

Grinding remained a concern for some reviewers, but others felt difficulty modes and balancing made the grind less draining than older versions.

Handheld suitability was mixed but workable in one review, which reported Steam Deck performance around 30 to 40 FPS on low settings.

Steam Deck play was praised as an ideal way to experience the remakes, helped by performance and save support.

HUD clarity was a minor issue for one reviewer who struggled with small menu text on a TV.

Immersion was strong, with reviewers wanting to dig deeper, feeling invested, and describing the experience as lingering after credits.

Reviewers praised the presentation, music, and environments for making the adventure feel rich, magical, and immersive.

Innovation was praised for contributing to JRPG traditions while still feeling unique and structurally distinct.

The game was considered easy enough to start yet challenging to master, though one review found some systems overwhelming at first.

Level design ranged from hard-to-navigate areas to extravagant maps with rewarding side paths.

Dungeon design drew criticism from one reviewer for feeling visually varied but structurally uninspired and light on distinctive traits.

Load times were praised in preview coverage as quick, matching the strong Switch 2 performance profile.

The loot system was viewed as simple but supportive of weapons, elements, and customization.

Lore depth was praised through expedition journals, wider history, and an intriguing world.

Navigation was the clearest recurring complaint, with reviewers repeatedly wanting more maps, minimaps, or clearer tracking.

Navigation tools were praised for streamlining play, though objective markers could make some classic item hunts feel too rudimentary.

Menu usability was a repeated drawback, especially when managing long Picto and Lumina lists.

Microtransaction impact was positive because a reviewer explicitly valued the lack of microtransactions.

Monetization was praised through the absence of microtransactions and a lower launch price.

Movement drew a mild complaint for characters catching on floor geometry during exploration.

Narrative quality was the strongest consensus point, with reviews repeatedly calling the story unique, compelling, mature, and emotionally resonant.

The expanded narrative was repeatedly praised for making the Erdrick trilogy feel richer, more cohesive, and less like a bare-bones relic.

The opening was widely praised for establishing stakes quickly and delivering unusually strong early context.

Originality was a major strength; reviewers repeatedly called it fresh, unique, and unlike anything else.

Most reviewers praised the focused pacing and lack of filler, while one found some areas padded.

Pacing was one of the more mixed areas: some found the flow excellent, while others felt added content created bloat or uneven late-game stretches.

Performance was mostly positive on tested PC hardware, but stutters and Unreal Engine issues were noted.

Performance optimization received praise from reviewers who reported smooth play and no major performance issues.

Platform-specific support drew criticism from one reviewer because the Switch version lacked a paid upgrade path to Switch 2.

Platforming was a recurring weak spot, described as awkward or very finicky despite being mostly optional.

Polish was mostly praised, especially production cohesion, but one review noted minor stutter and visual glitches.

Polish was praised where reviewers found the remake approachable, refined, and modernized.

Progression earned strong marks for build preparation, Pictos/Lumina, customization, and viable options, with only occasional complexity caveats.

Scrolls and character growth were praised for adding light customization and clearer progression without becoming overly complicated.

Gustave was singled out as a likable protagonist.

Protagonist appeal was mixed: the lone hero concept intrigued some reviewers, but silent protagonists felt bland to others beside voiced side characters.

Optional quests received praise for classic-RPG flavor and meaningful rewards.

Remake quality was the clearest strength: reviewers repeatedly called these definitive, transformative, or thoughtful updates to foundational JRPGs.

Replay value was supported by optional content and New Game Plus, though one reviewer doubted many players would replay.

Reviewer evidence supports replay value across the listed reviews.

Autosave and expanded save options were repeatedly praised for reducing frustration and supporting portable play.

A side character was praised for hiding darker motivation beneath an upbeat personality.

Side characters were praised for compensating for silent protagonists and making the expanded story feel more emotionally alive.

Skill trees and character building were praised as concise but deep, enabling strong identities without overwhelming every reviewer.

Sound design was praised in combat and timing feedback, though one review criticized mundane traversal sounds.

The soundtrack received overwhelming praise, often framed as one of the game’s defining strengths.

The orchestral soundtrack was widely praised, though one reviewer found repeated tracks tiring over long play sessions.

Tutorials for new character mechanics were praised for making complexity easier to absorb.

Weapon upgrading was described as a useful part of the broader equipment loop.

The user interface drew criticism for clutter and painful Picto/menu navigation despite stylish presentation.

Interface changes, shortcut assignments, and UI overhaul were praised for making these old games easier to play.

Value for money was strongly praised through the $50 price, Game Pass availability, production value, and overall recommendation strength.

Value was generally positive because two expanded remakes come in one package, though one reviewer wished the price were lower.

Visual effects were praised for stylish flourishes and flashy battle presentation.

Visual effects were praised for making attacks and spells feel spectacular while preserving the nostalgic tone.

Voice acting drew near-universal praise for emotional performances, natural delivery, and a strong cast.

Voice acting was usually praised for adding emotion and personality, with one reviewer finding the quality uneven but improved.

World-building was praised as distinct, rich, and central to the game’s identity.

World-building was strengthened by expanded towns, lore links, and details that made Alefgard and the trilogy feel more alive.

Mini Medals and hidden interactables were praised for encouraging players to inspect the world more carefully.

Writing was praised for maturity, comedy, thematic intelligence, and character nuance, with one review noting melodrama and messiness.

Writing and localization were praised for adding character, humor, and series-appropriate flavor to the remakes.