Compare Google Pixel Watch 4 vs Garmin Approach S70

Reviewers found automatic and post-workout activity detection useful for walks, runs and common workouts, though several noted it often confirms activity after the fact rather than during the session.

Auto-detection is supported mainly through automatic shot tracking and measured-shot behavior, with positive convenience but some manual confirmation or sensor caveats.

The Wear OS and Fitbit/Play Store ecosystem is consistently treated as strong, with robust app support and Fitbit standing out versus several Android-watch alternatives.

The Garmin ecosystem is praised for tying golf, fitness, watch faces, and Connect IQ-style additions together.

Band feedback is mixed to negative: reviewers found the default Active Band dull or proprietary, and several disliked the limited or fiddly band system.

Band quality is mixed: reviewers like comfort and integrated looks, but several dislike the molded strap not laying flat or prefer older straps.

Battery life is a clear improvement, especially on the 45mm model, with many reviewers reporting roughly two days or more; the 41mm model drew more anxiety.

Battery life is one of the strongest positives, with reviewers reporting long smartwatch use, multiple rounds, and much better endurance than Apple Watch comparisons.

Blood oxygen tracking is repeatedly listed as part of the health suite, alongside heart rate, sleep, skin temperature and Fitbit health metrics.

Pulse ox and blood oxygen tracking are present in several reviews and treated as part of the S70’s higher-end health sensor package.

Bluetooth connectivity appears reliable for watch-to-phone bike streaming and benefits from Bluetooth 6 in one review, though detailed standalone Bluetooth testing is limited.

Bluetooth connectivity is supported through Bluetooth music and headphone pairing, though the evidence is functional rather than deeply evaluated.

Reviewers strongly agree the 3,000-nit display is bright, with repeated praise for outdoor usability and the jump over prior Pixel Watch brightness.

Brightness is repeatedly praised, with reviewers describing the screen as bright, crisp, colorful, and clear.

Build quality is praised for the repairable screen and battery, premium casing, and improved construction, though exposed glass remains a design concern.

Build quality is viewed positively, with reviewers describing a lightweight, well-designed build and confidence-inspiring construction.

Controls are mixed: crown navigation and gesture controls get praise, but manual workout laps, thin buttons and workout button behavior frustrated reviewers.

Button controls are generally praised, with reviewers liking the three-button setup and easy navigation support.

Call handling is usable but not a major strength; some reviewers heard calls or Gemini clearly, while others found the speaker too quiet or tinny in public.

Call handling is limited because reviewers say the watch can show or manage calls but cannot be used to actually speak through the watch.

Calorie tracking is not a reviewer favorite; it is present, but one review found workout calorie burn high and another called calorie tracking personally redundant.

The new side dock is widely praised for reliability, bedside/desk convenience and charging alerts, though some dislike the fixed cable or dock stability.

Charging convenience is mixed to negative, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning proprietary charging, USB-C adapter issues, and awkward face-down charging.

Charging speed is one of the strongest points, with many reviews confirming large top-ups in about 15 minutes and full charges in under an hour.

Charging speed has limited but positive support from one reviewer who says it does not take long to fully charge.

Coaching features are promising but unfinished: reviewers repeatedly mention the Gemini/Fitbit health coach, while noting availability, timing and Premium limits.

Coaching features are one of the S70’s strongest themes, with virtual caddie, PlaysLike, club suggestions, shot dispersion, and scoring advice appearing across many reviews.

Comfort is generally strong despite the domed, somewhat thick body, with most reviewers finding it easy to wear; sleep comfort is more mixed.

Comfort is a major strength, with reviewers saying the watch disappears, sits comfortably, and does not bother them during golf or sleep.

Fitbit and Watch app experiences are mostly praised for clarity and data presentation, though using two apps and Premium limits remain caveats.

Companion app quality is generally positive, especially Garmin Golf for round data, stats, and ecosystem value, with setup requirements noted.

Contactless payment support through Google Wallet is treated as reliable and part of the complete smartwatch feature set.

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but evidence is mixed because bank support and setup can be limiting in some regions.

Compatibility is Android-focused: reviewers stress that it will not work with iPhone, but most key functions work on non-Pixel Android phones.

Cross-platform compatibility is positive overall because the watch pairs with iPhone and Android, though notification controls differ by platform.

Customization is good for tiles, complications and watch faces, though reviewers still wanted more control over quick settings and richer face options.

Customization is strong, with reviewers noting data fields, colors, golf settings, watch faces, and movable pin or flag controls.

The domed Actua 360 display is one of the most praised upgrades, described as gorgeous, immersive, tactile and central to the watch’s appeal.

Display quality is the strongest consensus attribute: reviewers repeatedly praise the AMOLED screen’s sharpness, clarity, color, and impact on maps.

Durability feedback is mostly positive thanks to repairability and scratch-free testing, but the exposed domed Gorilla Glass still makes some reviewers cautious.

Durability has limited direct support but is positive where mentioned, with the scratch-proof lens cited.

ECG is consistently present in the health feature suite, with reviewers mentioning ECG/AFib assessment as part of the Pixel Watch 4’s capabilities.

Fit is generally positive, especially with 41mm and 45mm choices, though the 45mm size depends on wrist preference.

Fit is positive, helped by wrist comfort, swing clearance, and the smaller 42mm option for users who found larger cases too big.

Fitness tracking accuracy is mostly praised, with strong workout, heart rate and route data, though reviewers still note sports-specific limits and edge cases.

Fitness and shot-tracking accuracy is mostly positive, with reviewers praising Garmin-level sensor accuracy and convenient data, though some note shot-tracking limitations.

GPS accuracy improves noticeably with dual-frequency support, earning strong praise in runs and cities, but DCRainmaker and others found specific cycling/walking issues.

GPS and yardage accuracy are consistently praised, including quick GPS lock, accurate yardages, and close agreement with rangefinder-style measurements.

Overall health tracking accuracy is viewed as solid, with several reviewers saying results aligned with Apple Watch, Oura, or their lived experience.

Reviewers describe broad health tracking as useful and Garmin-level accurate, especially when combining sleep, stress, heart rate, pulse ox, and fitness metrics.

Heart rate accuracy is usually strong and sometimes excellent against chest straps or rival watches, though TechRadar found it more guideline than pinpoint.

Heart rate appears as part of the S70’s fitness and wellness tracking, with reviewers treating it as a useful everyday metric rather than a golf-only add-on.

LTE is available and meaningful for phone-free use and satellite SOS, but it costs extra and satellite features require the LTE model.

Mapping and navigation are useful for Google Maps and basic route review, but reviewers criticize limited sports routing and bike-screen map integration.

Mapping and navigation are a major strength, with detailed hole maps, hazard views, pin movement, blind-shot tools, and full-color course layouts repeatedly praised.

Materials are mostly seen as premium, including aluminum casing and finished metal, but Gorilla Glass 5 drew concern versus sapphire alternatives.

Materials quality is positive in the available evidence, especially the ceramic bezel and premium-feeling build.

Menu navigation is considered easy, with swipe and crown navigation working well in the reviews that focused on everyday interaction.

Menu navigation is mixed: several reviews praise simple starts and quick menus, while touch-heavy hole navigation frustrates one reviewer.

Music controls are present but not fully polished; one reviewer noted media-control AOD support was not live, while another used a Spotify shortcut.

Music controls are present, but reviewers split between liking access and finding Garmin’s menu path less convenient than Apple Watch behavior.

Onboard music storage is a clear plus, with multiple reviewers noting downloaded songs or playlists from services such as Spotify or Amazon Music.

Wear OS 6 and Material 3 Expressive are praised as polished, playful and one of the best parts of the Pixel Watch 4 experience.

Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer finds Garmin software mostly intuitive, while another says the OS hurts enjoyment on the course.

Outdoor visibility is a strength, with reviewers repeatedly saying the display remains readable in bright sun, day conditions, or off-axis viewing.

Outdoor visibility is excellent across reviews, with several reviewers saying bright sunlight or sun glare did not prevent easy reading.

Pairing and transfer reliability are mixed: setup was straightforward for one reviewer, but another had a failed phone transfer requiring a reset.

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer calling phone pairing straightforward through Garmin’s apps.

Recovery insights such as Readiness, Cardio Load and Target Load are helpful for many reviewers, though calibration and low-score oddities appear.

Recovery insight evidence is limited but supported by HRV readiness language, tying recovery-style feedback to sleep and heart-rate variability.

Long-term reliability is promising but not flawless: one long-term review found it unchanged since unboxing, while another hit a strange software bug.

Reliability is mixed: GPS/course lock and battery endurance are praised, but one reviewer reports missed shot detections.

Safety features are a standout, especially satellite SOS, loss-of-pulse, fall/crash detection and emergency tools, though one fall test did not trigger.

Safety features have limited support, with one guide noting an assistance/fall-detection-style safety feature.

Size options are appreciated, with 41mm and 45mm models letting reviewers match wrist size, display needs and battery expectations.

Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are limited in some reviews.

Sleep tracking accuracy is mostly praised as precise or aligned with other devices, though a few reviewers personally valued it less or wanted more depth.

Sleep tracking gets frequent attention, with reviewers noting sleep scores, deep sleep or REM data, and morning feedback, though one reviewer questions how helpful the messaging feels.

Notifications are rich and colorful, with cooldown and quick replies praised, but Google Home alerts, haptics and short display timing drew complaints.

Notifications are useful but mixed: reviewers like seeing messages and alerts, yet some call them distracting or limited for replies and conversation flow.

Core smartwatch features are strong, covering messages, calls, apps, notifications, Gemini, safety tools and everyday convenience.

Smartwatch features are strong for a golf watch, but reviewers still flag limitations compared with dedicated Apple or Android smartwatches.

Software smoothness is a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly describing the interface as snappy, smooth, fast enough or nearly lag-free.

Software smoothness is a noted weakness in limited evidence, especially around pan-and-zoom behavior on the course.

Step counting is promising but imperfect: one test was within 29 steps, while leash/stroller-like scenarios can affect step-based distance calculations.

Step counting is mentioned positively in limited evidence, mainly as an advanced counter one reviewer found useful.

Stress tracking remains one of the weaker health areas, with reviewers calling body-response logging rudimentary, hit-or-miss or less actionable than rivals.

Stress tracking is widely mentioned; some reviewers found it surprisingly accurate or habit-changing, while one reviewer considered it less valuable.

Design is mostly loved for its elegant pebble form, but one reviewer found it plain and several still want more rugged or traditional options.

Style and design are positive, with reviewers calling the S70 stylish, modern, and suitable beyond the course.

Third-party app support is represented by Strava syncing in the sports review, with broader Play Store strength covered under the app ecosystem.

Third-party app support is useful but not always seamless, with Connect IQ and downloadable apps/features appearing as the main support path.

Touch responsiveness is generally good, especially on the curved edges, but wet touch and corner touches can be inconsistent.

Touchscreen responsiveness is mixed: some reviewers find it good or responsive, while others find on-course panning and zooming fiddly.

The user interface is widely praised for Material 3 Expressive, rich colors, rounded layouts and a more fluid, cohesive watch experience.

User interface evidence is limited but negative where cited, focused on the touchscreen interface feeling fiddly during golf use.

Value is good because pricing stayed similar while features improved, but Fitbit Premium, cheaper rivals and desires for an Ultra-style model temper enthusiasm.

Value for money is mixed but generally favorable for advanced golfers: reviewers praise value if using the full feature set, while warning basic-yardage users can spend less.

Gemini and Raise to Talk are major highlights, often described as useful, fast and natural, though false positives and Fitbit integration gaps remain.

Watch face feedback is mixed: reviewers like customization and many options, but several wanted faces that better exploit the domed screen.

Watch face quality is well supported, with reviewers praising built-in faces, Connect IQ options, and the AMOLED screen making faces look better.

Water resistance is solid, with repeated mentions of 50m, IP68/5ATM support and a successful short submersion test.

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers citing 5 ATM or 50-meter ratings and shower/swim use.

Wellness insights are useful through Fitbit health metrics, readiness, recommendations and Morning Brief, though some of the best insights are still evolving.

Wellness insights are a major differentiator, especially Body Battery, sleep, stress, energy, and Garmin’s explanations of what the metrics mean.

Wi-Fi connectivity is confirmed on base models, but reviewers did not deeply test Wi-Fi performance beyond listing it as a core connection type.

Wi-Fi connectivity is lightly supported by setup/menu evidence showing the watch can connect to Wi-Fi for updates.

Workout variety is good for mainstream users, with 40-plus to 50-plus modes, bike streaming and new profiles, though triathlon/open-water depth is limited.

Workout variety is a clear strength, with reviewers citing running, cycling, swimming, yoga, skiing, pickleball, and other activity modes.