Compare Dirt Devil Multi-Surface Upright Vacuum vs Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752

Tool kits are decent for the price (crevice/dusting combo, extension wand, turbo brush, sometimes an upholstery tool), but content varies by SKU and some tools are criticized for being small or not very effective.

Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.

Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.

Blowback/scatter control is described positively in some marketing-style commentary and in bare-floor sealing discussions, but performance varies by model and floorhead seal quality.

Rug handling is mixed: several reviewers like the cleaning, but some say it can feel hard to push or can lose effective contact depending on the height setting and rug thickness.

Area rug handling is frequently described as challenging on smaller or lighter rugs due to strong suction, with reports of bunching, stalling, or difficulty pulling backward. Heavier rugs tend to fare better, and using the high-pile/area-rug setting improves usability but does not eliminate the issue.

Assembly experiences range from quick to frustrating. One unboxing shows awkward screw placement and parts that do not seat easily without extra fiddling.

Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.

Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.

The bin is easy to remove and empty in concept, but real-world experience varies: some call it simple, while others report stiff latches or accidental release/fit issues.

The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.

Build quality is often described as better than expected for the price, with thicker plastics and a sturdier feel, though fit/finish issues show up in some assembly/handle reports.

Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.

High-pile carpet results are inconsistent across sources; one review suggests pet hair can be collected but general debris pickup may lag behind stronger competitors.

High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally rated good to very good in the hands-on reviews, though one lab-style review found weak overall debris pickup despite decent pet-hair results.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.

On medium-pile carpets and typical rugs, reviewers report solid cleaning but note that height settings can be finicky, sometimes reducing brush contact and requiring a re-pass.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.

Clogging is most often mentioned around the turbo tool and narrow passages, especially with pet hair. Keeping the brush/tool path clear is a recurring recommendation.

Clogging reports are mixed: several reviewers note it can power through messy tests and does not easily choke on typical carpet debris, but others report hair/dirt buildup in the floorhead and occasional clogs in pet tools. Users who maintain filters and clear hair from the brush roll report smoother ongoing performance.

Comparisons are split: one review ranks it as a low performer versus other sub-$200 uprights, while other reviewers say it is a notable step up from older Dirt Devil models but still not best-in-class versus brands like Bissell.

Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.

Controls are mostly simple (power, height settings, and in some versions brush or floor-mode controls). The main complaint is less about the buttons and more about how settings translate to real contact/performance.

Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.

Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.

Cord length is commonly referenced as about 25 feet. Some reviewers consider that fine for small areas, while others call it short versus 30-foot uprights.

Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.

Cord management ranges from basic wrap hooks to models with cord rewind. Rewind versions are praised for convenience; non-rewind versions still have clips/hooks that work but feel budget.

Cord management is generally manual wrap, and side routing can get in the way for some users. Multiple reviewers specifically wish for a retractable cord or better routing to reduce tangles during use.

The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.

Cyclone separation is described as improved versus older models but still imperfect; one detailed review notes dust can bypass the cyclone and reach filters sooner than expected.

Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.

Ease of use is generally good once set up, with simple controls and straightforward mode changes. A few owners cite annoyances like finicky height settings or awkward latches.

Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.

Emptying is generally straightforward, but several reviews mention mess potential (dirty bottom hatch, stiff doors, or awkward re-seating) depending on the model.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.

Filtration is typically described as average for an unsealed bagless upright. Some reviewers note the lack of a true HEPA-style seal and report dust reaching filters/motor-side areas.

Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.

The floorhead/brush system is aggressive and carpet-focused. Reviewers mention stiff bristles, felt strips, and height setting quirks that can affect contact and ease of pushing.

The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.

At least one review highlights better sealing on hard floors that reduces debris spit-out, but others describe limited sealing and less controlled bare-floor behavior.

Carpet hair pickup is a relative strength in several reviews, especially for a lower-cost upright, though performance varies by model and test method.

Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.

Hard-floor hair pickup is less consistent, particularly if the brush is disabled or the head does not seal well; some users still report acceptable results on bare floors.

Hair pickup on hard floors varies widely. Some reviewers note it struggles to pull hair in with the main head on bare floors, while others report good results when using the dedicated hard-floor tool or adjusting settings appropriately.

Hair-wrap resistance is average at best. Multiple reviewers mention hair wrapping around the brushroll and needing periodic cleaning.

Tangle resistance is inconsistent and highly hair-length dependent. Some reviewers describe acceptable real-world performance, while multiple others report long pet and human hair wrapping the brush roll and requiring scissors or manual cleaning, including a head-to-head test where it performed poorly on detangling.

Fine dust on hard floors is described as acceptable when the head is set correctly, but overall hard-floor refinement varies and depends heavily on the specific model/SKU discussed.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.

Large debris intake on hard floors ranges from poor to good. One review reports weak pickup of larger pieces, while another notes a bare-floor setup/seal that helps prevent blowback.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.

LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.

Hose reach is described as usable to solid for above-floor tasks, with some reviewers satisfied for stairs and furniture, though exact length varies across versions mentioned.

Hose length is a frequent complaint: multiple reviewers describe it as short and not very extendable, making high-reach cleaning harder without moving the base. The lift-away pod helps compensate but shifts the burden to carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Low-profile reach is limited in at least one unboxing, with the body/cyclone area preventing the head from getting truly flat. Under-furniture access depends on clearance and the specific model shape.

Maintenance is routine for a bagless upright: regular filter washing and brush/hose checks. Some designs make brush access or tool cleaning more tedious than expected.

Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.

Handling is decent for a non-swivel budget upright, but some users report it can feel hard to push on thicker rugs and does not match premium maneuverability.

Noise is described as typical to loud for a corded upright. The turbo tool is singled out as especially loud in one review.

Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.

Onboard storage is a plus in several reviews, with dedicated spots/posts for tools. Some note wasted space or a storage position for a tool that is not included.

Onboard storage is often described as limited, commonly holding only a couple of tools on the body. Several reviewers mention tools falling off or needing a separate bag/caddy for the remaining accessories.

Long-term longevity is uncertain. Reviewers like the improved design but caution that motors and sealing are not premium, and expectations should match the budget tier.

Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.

Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.

Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.

Value is a common theme: strong performance for the money around the lower price point, but the proposition weakens if priced closer to higher-performing competitors.

Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.

The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.

Stair cleaning is generally rated good when using the hose and tools; one hands-on review specifically notes reaching multiple steps without moving the unit often.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.

Storage footprint is often described as reasonable for a full-size upright, but stability is inconsistent: several users call it top-heavy and prone to tipping when using the hose or lift-away in certain configurations. Some mitigate this by using the caddy or carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Most reviews describe strong suction and improved airflow versus older Dirt Devil uprights, with a stiff brushroll that can pull embedded debris. Performance can dip if filters clog or if the brush/head loses contact at certain height settings.

Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.

Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.

Support and reliability feedback is mixed. One source notes a multi-year limited warranty, while another warns warranty handling may be frustrating and recommends purchasing from a retailer with easy proof-of-purchase.

Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.

Surface safety is a concern on delicate hard floors in some reviews due to an always-on or aggressive brushroll and inconsistent hard-floor sealing.

Tool swapping and compatibility can be a pain point. Multiple reviewers call out a proprietary fitting, which can limit use of universal attachments.

Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.

Under-furniture pickup is often limited by the head not lying fully flat and by bulk around the cyclone/body, making it harder to reach low-clearance areas.

Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

Above-floor cleaning is helped by a usable hose and included tools, and at least one reviewer reports stair reach of roughly 9-10 steps. The turbo tool can be loud and may clog with hair.

Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.

Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.

Weight is repeatedly described as manageable for an upright (mid-teens pounds in some discussions), helping with carry and room-to-room moves.

Most reviews place weight around 15 to 16 lb and call it heavy or top-heavy, particularly for users with back or wrist sensitivity. Many also note the self-propelled feel helps offset pushing effort during carpet cleaning.