Compare Shark NV151 Navigator Swivel Pro Complete Upright Vacuum vs Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum

The included crevice, upholstery, and pet tools are frequently praised for couch, crevice, and above-floor cleaning. Some Amazon reviewers complain specific accessories they expected (such as a wide upholstery tool or round brush) were missing or hard to find.

Reviews consistently note a useful tool set for the price, often including a crevice tool, dusting brush, extension/wand, and a pet-focused turbo tool.

Design is often described as simple and minimalist. A few owners mention a more plastic feel than older versions and occasional cosmetic marks or wear.

Aesthetics are described as typical for the category: a modern, pet-themed look with bright accents rather than a premium finish.

Several users contrast it with older vacuums that blew dust back into the room, saying this model has minimal blowback and no spit-back on hard floors. This is closely tied to sealed filtration and strong suction.

Some scattering or blowback is reported on hard floors or with certain debris, especially when height is set too high or the brush action outpaces suction.

Area rug handling is inconsistent: some users vacuum rugs successfully after adjusting suction, while others say the head sits too low, stalls, or stops on certain rugs. Shag-style rugs are specifically called out as a poor match by some owners.

Assembly is consistently described as fast and tool-free, with components clicking into place in minutes. This is one of the most universally positive aspects across reviews.

Multiple reviewers found setup straightforward, typically just attaching the handle and snapping or screwing a few parts in before cleaning.

A visible fill line or indicator on the bin is appreciated as a helpful cue for when to empty, especially for a budget model.

Bagless dust cup emptying is usually described as easy, but capacity impressions vary widely. Some call the bin large, while others find it small or note a low fill line that forces frequent emptying in hair-heavy homes.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty with a bottom-release door; some users note the fill line can feel conservative, leading to more frequent emptying.

Build quality feedback ranges from sturdy, well-snapping parts to concerns about cheaper plastic materials and belt smells. It generally feels solid for the price, but not everyone expects premium longevity.

Build quality is often described as mostly plastic and budget-grade; it feels lighter but may not inspire long-term confidence compared with pricier uprights.

Performance on plush or thicker carpet is often positive, with reports of smooth gliding and strong extraction. Still, some say it can feel too grabby or struggle unless suction is reduced, and a few recommend avoiding very thick shag.

High-pile performance ranges from very good on hair and smaller debris to weaker on larger pieces when head clearance becomes an issue.

On low-pile and standard carpet, many users see strong pickup and noticeably fuller bins after one or two passes. Some still report needing extra passes or seeing a trace of dust left near the sides of the head.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, though large debris can still require extra passes in some lab-style testing.

Medium-pile carpet performance is repeatedly strong, including at least one deep-clean test reporting excellent sand pickup.

Some users report the wand/tube can clog with hair and debris and mention a clog indicator/red light behavior; others say it stays clear when filters and brush roll are maintained. Clog complaints tend to come from hair-heavy households or heavy use.

Clogging prevention is a mix: some like the suction blockage indicator, while others warn hair and debris can build up and require frequent cleaning to avoid performance drop.

Comparisons are often favorable versus cheaper brands and even some premium vacuums for day-to-day pickup, especially on mixed flooring. Dissenting voices prefer higher-end Sharks or other brands for tangle resistance, rug performance, or long-term durability.

In comparisons, it is treated as a capable budget option, but it does not match premium uprights for power, refinement, or filtration.

Controls are simple, with hard-floor vs carpet modes and an adjustable suction slider that users like for switching surfaces. Some wish the power switch were positioned higher on the handle for convenience.

Controls are serviceable but not premium: common notes include foot-based buttons and a height dial that may require bending, plus occasional complaints about button placement.

Cord length sentiment skews mixed-to-negative: some reviewers like the reach, but many wish it were longer than older models or competitors and note there is no automatic rewind. Cord length matters more in larger rooms and multi-room runs.

Cord length is commonly reported around 27 feet, which is usable for most rooms but a bit shorter than some uprights with longer cords.

Cord management is often cited as a pain point because it must be wrapped manually and can drag or tangle while vacuuming. Positives include cord clips/hooks that help keep it out of the way once you get used to routing it.

Cord management is a strong convenience point on rewind variants, while non-rewind versions still offer clips/hooks that help keep the cord out of the way.

Crevice and groove pickup is described as decent but not class-leading; results vary by test material and technique.

Multi-cyclonic design is credited with maintaining suction reasonably well during typical cleaning, though it does not fully solve large-debris limitations.

Swivel steering is widely praised for easy turns and navigating around furniture. However, a noticeable subset says it over-swivels or feels sloppy, and handling can feel less controlled on some carpets.

Ease of use is widely praised: quick setup, straightforward controls, and a lighter feel than many uprights. Common negatives are cord handling, occasional over-swivel behavior, and fatigue during long whole-home sessions.

Edge results are mixed: some users report good cleaning along walls and baseboards, while others note a small gap near edges that requires switching to the hose/crevice tool for a complete pass.

No summary yet.

Emptying is typically simple with an easy-release, bottom-dump style, and many describe it as low-mess. The main downside is that frequent emptying can be necessary depending on bin size and how much hair/dust you collect.

Emptying is generally clean and simple thanks to the bottom-drop design, though clumped hair can sometimes stick and require manual removal.

Reviews frequently highlight the HEPA filter and sealed dust containment for trapping allergens and reducing dust blowback, including positive mentions from allergy/asthma users. Long-term odor complaints show up occasionally when filters or odor components aren’t kept fresh.

Filtration is the biggest downside across sources: it lacks a sealed HEPA system and some testing reports significant particle release, making it a weak fit for allergy-sensitive homes.

The floorhead earns praise for swivel maneuvering and general pickup, but complaints include limited under-furniture clearance, a narrower head that takes longer to cover rooms, and a brush/roller design that can trap hair or stall on some rugs.

The floorhead design is budget-focused: it can clean well when settings are right, but low clearance and brush behavior can contribute to plowing on certain debris.

A sealing flap or squeegee-like feature is cited as helping hard-floor pickup and reducing scatter when the height setting is dialed in.

Many owners say it removes pet hair from carpets effectively and reveals debris their old vacuums missed. Counterpoints include reports of needing multiple passes or preferring models with a self-cleaning roller for heavy shedding.

Pet hair pickup on carpet is a frequent strength, with multiple reviews calling it strong for the price, though effectiveness can drop as hair accumulates.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally rated highly, especially for pet fur, with many owners impressed by what it collects after prior vacuuming. Results depend more on suction and technique than on tangle resistance.

Hair wrap is one of the biggest recurring complaints: long hair and pet fur often wrap the brush roll and require manual cutting or regular cleanouts. Several reviewers recommend stepping up to a Shark with a self-cleaning roller if hair is a daily issue.

Hair can wrap around the brush and cleaning it can be tedious; higher-end competitors manage tangles better in several comparisons.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is frequently praised, including reports of less dust being kicked back into the air than with older vacuums. This aligns with strong suction and sealed filtration comments.

No summary yet.

Most users report it handles larger debris well on hard floors, including pet mess and gritty dirt. A few note the head can grab certain rugs or feel less smooth when transitioning over thicker surfaces.

Large debris on hard floors is mixed: small debris is fine, but bigger pieces can be pushed, plowed, or scattered depending on height and brush behavior.

A frequent complaint is the lack of a headlight or LEDs on the floorhead. Many reviewers miss this feature for seeing dust on hard floors or vacuuming in low-light areas.

Several comparisons note the absence of headlights or floor illumination on the CleanView models discussed, unlike some higher-end uprights.

The extendable hose and wand are valued for reaching ceilings, blinds, and above-floor areas. Some users dispute the advertised reach, say the wand feels too long, or note the base can tip when the hose is pulled taut.

Above-floor reach is mixed: some variants have a useful hose length for stairs and upholstery, while others describe the hose as short for high shelves or tall furniture.

Ongoing maintenance is expected: rinsing filters, clearing clogs, and cutting hair off the brush roll. Reviewers who keep up with these routines report better performance and fewer issues.

Maintenance is a real requirement: regular bin emptying, filter washing, and brush/belt checks are repeatedly mentioned to keep performance and reliability stable.

Swivel steering is repeatedly highlighted as a usability win, making it easier to navigate around furniture, though some users find the swivel can make straight-line tracking a bit less precise.

Noise feedback is mixed: several users call it relatively quiet or quieter than older Sharks, while others describe it as very noisy. Overall it trends tolerable but not silent.

Noise is a recurring compromise: one test measured very loud levels, while other reviews call it slightly louder than average for an upright.

A few reviewers say it leaves the air feeling fresher at first, but long-term owners sometimes report musty odors if filters aren’t cleaned or replaced on schedule. One reviewer also expressed caution about the odor-neutralizing component around kids/pets.

Onboard storage for the main attachments is a convenience highlight, reducing the chance of losing tools. A few reviewers still want more dedicated storage space, such as a spot for spare filters.

Onboard storage is commonly noted on pet-focused variants, keeping core tools attached and accessible, though not every accessory has a perfect home.

Washable filters are repeatedly called out as a cost saver because they can be rinsed instead of replaced frequently. Some users still buy extra filter sets so one can dry while the other is in use.

Ongoing costs are described as manageable, with washable filters and routine maintenance rather than expensive consumables being the main ownership burden.

Longevity sentiment is split: many long-time Shark owners report years of service from older Navigators and expect similar life, while some users report early failures or worry about lighter, more plastic construction.

Longevity feedback is mixed: some owners are happy, while others cite concerns about early failure and recommend keeping up with maintenance.

Overall sentiment is mostly positive, driven by suction, maneuverability, and value, with many repeat Shark buyers recommending it. Negative reviews focus on missing premium features (like a headlight), hair wrap maintenance, occasional rug handling issues, and sporadic reliability complaints.

Overall sentiment skews positive for budget shoppers, but more critical reviews recommend alternatives if you need better filtration or more consistent hard-floor pickup.

Many reviews position it as a pet-friendly upright thanks to strong suction and included pet tools, with multiple owners impressed by fur pickup on carpets and furniture. The main pet-related downside is brush-roll hair wrap, which can require frequent cleanouts in heavy-shedding homes.

Pet-focused features are a core draw, including a turbo tool and brush roll designed to lift pet hair, with performance best on carpet and upholstery touch-ups.

Value is a consistent theme: many see it as a budget-friendly upright that competes well with more expensive vacuums. A minority feel it’s overpriced if you need more features, better rug handling, or longer-lasting build.

Value is a primary reason reviewers recommend it: strong cleaning and features for the money, with tradeoffs mainly in filtration and refinement.

Cosmetic durability is a minor but present theme, with mentions of scratches and some tools leaving marks on surfaces. These reports are not universal but suggest care is needed around delicate finishes.

Stairs are generally manageable thanks to the hose/wand and lighter feel compared with heavier uprights. The main drawback is stability, as some users say the base can tip when pulling the hose during stair work.

Several reviewers like that it stores in a closet or corner, but stability can be an issue. Multiple comments mention the vacuum can feel tipsy or tip over when using the hose/wand, requiring a hand to steady it.

Storage is reasonable for an upright and remains stable when parked, but some designs have a higher head profile that can limit where it fits.

Most reviews describe very strong suction that pulls up noticeably more dirt, dust, and hair than prior vacuums. A smaller set of owners say power feels similar to other Sharks or takes multiple passes on rugs, especially compared with higher-end models.

Performance is generally described as solid for a budget upright: capable pickup on carpet and smaller debris, but not a top-tier powerhouse versus premium uprights.

Some professional or frequent cleaners report it holds up well with routine upkeep, suggesting it can handle heavier use. Others frame it as a good home vacuum that may wear faster or be harder to repair under commercial-style abuse.

Several reviewers highlight that it fits well in apartments, condos, and small storage spaces while still offering strong suction. People in larger homes sometimes want a longer cord or bigger bin to reduce interruptions.

Reliability experiences vary from trouble-free use (including frequent cleaning) to complaints about clogs, vibration, and occasional unit failure. Some also note repair/parts availability can be limited, reinforcing a replace-rather-than-repair perception.

Reliability is a concern in at least one user report citing many complaints about early failures; routine belt and clog checks are advised.

Surface safety is generally fine, with reviewers noting it avoids scratching, but the always-on brushroll on some variants can be a concern on delicate floors if you are not careful.

Attachments are generally described as easy to swap, with parts that click into place and detach quickly. A few users still wish certain tools were included, but the change process itself is straightforward.

Tool changes are generally simple, but the always-on brushroll during above-floor tool use can make the workflow feel less polished.

Getting under low furniture is a common limitation for a standard upright design. Some users can reach under tables and chairs, but others say the head and body are too bulky for couches and low-clearance spaces.

Under-furniture cleaning can be limited by head height and how the handle tilts; several reviews note it does not reach as easily as some competitors.

Above-floor cleaning is a strength for many owners, especially using the pet tool on couches and the wand for curtains, vents, and ceiling fans. Reach is generally good, but pulling hard on the hose can make the base tip for some users.

The included motorized or turbo hand tool can help on upholstery and stairs, though some users find the turbo tool loses effectiveness when pressed into fabric.

The hose, wand, and tools make it useful for floors, furniture, and high dusting, adding versatility for a standard upright. It does not offer a Lift-Away detachable canister, which limits portability compared with other Shark lines.

Versatility is good for a basic upright: it can handle mixed floors and switch to above-floor tools for stairs and upholstery, but it lacks higher-end conveniences like sealed HEPA filtration or advanced power controls.

Many users describe it as lightweight and easy to carry, including older owners who appreciate reduced strain. Others still find it heavy to lift or feel wrist/hand fatigue during long sessions, especially when using the hose.

Several reviews describe the vacuum as easy to push and relatively light-feeling, though some tested variants are heavier than the lightest budget uprights.