Compare Shark NV151 Navigator Swivel Pro Complete Upright Vacuum vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum

The included crevice, upholstery, and pet tools are frequently praised for couch, crevice, and above-floor cleaning. Some Amazon reviewers complain specific accessories they expected (such as a wide upholstery tool or round brush) were missing or hard to find.

The Extra bundle's pet-focused tools (pet groom and turbine tool) and core tools (crevice/brush, stair) are widely viewed as useful. Value depends on how often you will use the specialized pet attachments.

Design is often described as simple and minimalist. A few owners mention a more plastic feel than older versions and occasional cosmetic marks or wear.

At least one long-form review explicitly calls the vacuum stylish, and the design is generally treated as premium-looking. Color and trim differences are also noted between package variants.

Several users contrast it with older vacuums that blew dust back into the room, saying this model has minimal blowback and no spit-back on hard floors. This is closely tied to sealed filtration and strong suction.

A recurring minor complaint is blowback or scattering with certain large debris, including spitting kernels or pushing round objects. Changing the head setting or vacuuming path is often described as reducing the issue.

Area rug handling is inconsistent: some users vacuum rugs successfully after adjusting suction, while others say the head sits too low, stalls, or stops on certain rugs. Shag-style rugs are specifically called out as a poor match by some owners.

Strong suction can make small/thin rugs harder to vacuum and may drag them around, but the adjustable gates/air-bleed settings help. Homes with heavier rugs or more carpet generally report smoother handling.

Assembly is consistently described as fast and tool-free, with components clicking into place in minutes. This is one of the most universally positive aspects across reviews.

Assembly is generally described as tool-free and quick, with parts snapping into place. One reviewer found setup slightly tricky because the manual relied on photos, but still completed it in about 12 minutes.

Bagless dust cup emptying is usually described as easy, but capacity impressions vary widely. Some call the bin large, while others find it small or note a low fill line that forces frequent emptying in hair-heavy homes.

The bagless bin is repeatedly described as large (about 0.5 gallons / 1.7 liters in reviews) and easy to monitor as it fills. Capacity helps longer cleaning sessions between empties.

Build quality feedback ranges from sturdy, well-snapping parts to concerns about cheaper plastic materials and belt smells. It generally feels solid for the price, but not everyone expects premium longevity.

Reviews characterize the vacuum as dense and premium-feeling, with sturdy components and a removable brush roll design. The same build contributes to the heavier carry weight.

Performance on plush or thicker carpet is often positive, with reports of smooth gliding and strong extraction. Still, some say it can feel too grabby or struggle unless suction is reduced, and a few recommend avoiding very thick shag.

Reviewers say the head design and gate/vent settings help it work on thick or deep-pile carpet without stalling. It can still feel grabby in deeper-clean modes because of the high suction.

On low-pile and standard carpet, many users see strong pickup and noticeably fuller bins after one or two passes. Some still report needing extra passes or seeing a trace of dust left near the sides of the head.

In controlled sand tests on medium-pile carpet, the vacuum scored at or near the top, indicating excellent embedded-dirt pickup. Reviewers also note it avoids bogging on thicker carpet when the head gates are opened.

Some users report the wand/tube can clog with hair and debris and mention a clog indicator/red light behavior; others say it stays clear when filters and brush roll are maintained. Clog complaints tend to come from hair-heavy households or heavy use.

Most reviews emphasize strong clog resistance and fewer mid-clean stoppages, even with heavy pet fur. However, very large or round debris can sometimes lodge in the head until cleared.

Comparisons are often favorable versus cheaper brands and even some premium vacuums for day-to-day pickup, especially on mixed flooring. Dissenting voices prefer higher-end Sharks or other brands for tangle resistance, rug performance, or long-term durability.

Across comparative reviews, the Ball Animal 3 Extra is portrayed as outperforming cheaper uprights in deep-clean tests and improving on earlier Dyson uprights for hard floors and hair tangles. Some comparisons still highlight tradeoffs like weight, noise, and occasional large-debris scattering.

Controls are simple, with hard-floor vs carpet modes and an adjustable suction slider that users like for switching surfaces. Some wish the power switch were positioned higher on the handle for convenience.

Controls include multiple cleaning modes, brush-roll control, and head gate/air-bleed adjustments that help tune performance by surface. Reviewers sometimes mention a short learning curve in figuring out the best setting.

Cord length sentiment skews mixed-to-negative: some reviewers like the reach, but many wish it were longer than older models or competitors and note there is no automatic rewind. Cord length matters more in larger rooms and multi-room runs.

Multiple reviews cite an extra-long 35-foot cord, giving a large room-to-room cleaning radius. Cord length is consistently positioned as a strength.

Cord management is often cited as a pain point because it must be wrapped manually and can drag or tangle while vacuuming. Positives include cord clips/hooks that help keep it out of the way once you get used to routing it.

Cord hooks and rear storage are mentioned as straightforward for wrapping and quickly releasing the cord. No one highlights a rewind feature, but basic cord handling is described as manageable.

Crevice testing and reviewer feedback indicate excellent groove pickup, with the Dyson scoring at or near the top for lifting sand from a deep crevice. This aligns with its high sealed suction.

Cyclone performance is generally credited for maintaining strong suction and helping prevent clogs. One reviewer felt the newer cyclone setup lets filters get dirty faster than older Dyson designs, suggesting more frequent checks.

Swivel steering is widely praised for easy turns and navigating around furniture. However, a noticeable subset says it over-swivels or feels sloppy, and handling can feel less controlled on some carpets.

Dyson's ball steering is frequently praised for tight turns and easier navigation around furniture. A few reviewers say it takes getting used to, but most find it maneuverable once familiar.

Ease of use is widely praised: quick setup, straightforward controls, and a lighter feel than many uprights. Common negatives are cord handling, occasional over-swivel behavior, and fatigue during long whole-home sessions.

Ease of use is boosted by strong cleaning performance, ball steering, and versatile attachments. The main usability negatives are the heavy body, occasional hard-to-push feel on carpet, and loud operation.

Edge results are mixed: some users report good cleaning along walls and baseboards, while others note a small gap near edges that requires switching to the hose/crevice tool for a complete pass.

Edge cleaning is generally good on the sides, but multiple tests note weaker pickup at the front edge or centerline near walls, sometimes needing an extra angle or pass. It is solid but not the strongest point.

Emptying is typically simple with an easy-release, bottom-dump style, and many describe it as low-mess. The main downside is that frequent emptying can be necessary depending on bin size and how much hair/dust you collect.

Hygienic, no-touch emptying is a consistent positive, with reviewers noting you can eject debris without handling dust or fur. This is frequently paired with praise for the large bin.

Reviews frequently highlight the HEPA filter and sealed dust containment for trapping allergens and reducing dust blowback, including positive mentions from allergy/asthma users. Long-term odor complaints show up occasionally when filters or odor components aren’t kept fresh.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and sealed dust containment are frequently praised, especially by pet owners and allergy-focused reviewers. Washable filters are seen as a plus for long-term ownership.

The floorhead earns praise for swivel maneuvering and general pickup, but complaints include limited under-furniture clearance, a narrower head that takes longer to cover rooms, and a brush/roller design that can trap hair or stall on some rugs.

The redesigned floorhead with adjustable gates is frequently credited for better large-debris pickup and improved thick-carpet glide compared to older Dyson uprights. Tradeoffs mentioned include occasional spitting/pushing of bigger pieces and less effective reach at the very front edge for some debris.

A few reviewers report that hair or round debris can snag in the hair-removal comb/vanes and may require pulling it off or opening the head. It is not constant, but it is the main tangle-related annoyance mentioned.

Many owners say it removes pet hair from carpets effectively and reveals debris their old vacuums missed. Counterpoints include reports of needing multiple passes or preferring models with a self-cleaning roller for heavy shedding.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as excellent, with pet owners reporting noticeably better results than prior vacuums. Lab-style tests show near-complete hair collection in a few passes.

Hair pickup on hard floors is generally rated highly, especially for pet fur, with many owners impressed by what it collects after prior vacuuming. Results depend more on suction and technique than on tangle resistance.

Hair wrap is one of the biggest recurring complaints: long hair and pet fur often wrap the brush roll and require manual cutting or regular cleanouts. Several reviewers recommend stepping up to a Shark with a self-cleaning roller if hair is a daily issue.

Detangling features (hair-removal vanes/active combing) are a standout, with multiple tests showing virtually no brush-roll wrap even with long hair. Some reviewers still mention occasional hair catching at the comb area.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is frequently praised, including reports of less dust being kicked back into the air than with older vacuums. This aligns with strong suction and sealed filtration comments.

Reviews describe strong fine-dust pickup on hard floors, helped by high suction and floorhead details intended to capture small particles. It is commonly positioned as one of the better Dyson uprights for hard floors.

Most users report it handles larger debris well on hard floors, including pet mess and gritty dirt. A few note the head can grab certain rugs or feel less smooth when transitioning over thicker surfaces.

Adjustable gates help it take in larger debris on hard floors and carpet, and many reviewers see strong pickup overall. Some tests still show it can initially spit or push items like popcorn kernels or plastic balls until the setting or approach is adjusted.

A frequent complaint is the lack of a headlight or LEDs on the floorhead. Many reviewers miss this feature for seeing dust on hard floors or vacuuming in low-light areas.

The extendable hose and wand are valued for reaching ceilings, blinds, and above-floor areas. Some users dispute the advertised reach, say the wand feels too long, or note the base can tip when the hose is pulled taut.

A long hose and wand (15 feet cited in reviews) enables above-floor cleaning and helps reach stairs and furniture. Reviewers often highlight this reach as a practical advantage versus typical uprights.

Ongoing maintenance is expected: rinsing filters, clearing clogs, and cutting hair off the brush roll. Reviewers who keep up with these routines report better performance and fewer issues.

Maintenance is often described as easy thanks to washable filters, removable brush roll, and accessible inspection points. Some users still report periodic cleaning around the comb/mesh and more frequent filter attention than expected.

Noise feedback is mixed: several users call it relatively quiet or quieter than older Sharks, while others describe it as very noisy. Overall it trends tolerable but not silent.

Noise is a common complaint, with descriptions ranging from loud to screaming if powered on while upright. Measured sound levels in one test place it on the louder side of comparable uprights.

A few reviewers say it leaves the air feeling fresher at first, but long-term owners sometimes report musty odors if filters aren’t cleaned or replaced on schedule. One reviewer also expressed caution about the odor-neutralizing component around kids/pets.

Onboard storage for the main attachments is a convenience highlight, reducing the chance of losing tools. A few reviewers still want more dedicated storage space, such as a spot for spare filters.

Core tools like the crevice/brush and stair tool are stored on the vacuum, which reviewers find convenient. Some pet accessories are not stored onboard and may need separate storage.

Washable filters are repeatedly called out as a cost saver because they can be rinsed instead of replaced frequently. Some users still buy extra filter sets so one can dry while the other is in use.

Longevity sentiment is split: many long-time Shark owners report years of service from older Navigators and expect similar life, while some users report early failures or worry about lighter, more plastic construction.

Overall sentiment is mostly positive, driven by suction, maneuverability, and value, with many repeat Shark buyers recommending it. Negative reviews focus on missing premium features (like a headlight), hair wrap maintenance, occasional rug handling issues, and sporadic reliability complaints.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with multiple reviews rating it around 9/10 or calling it a top Dyson upright, especially for pets and carpets. The recurring negatives are price, weight, and noise.

Many reviews position it as a pet-friendly upright thanks to strong suction and included pet tools, with multiple owners impressed by fur pickup on carpets and furniture. The main pet-related downside is brush-roll hair wrap, which can require frequent cleanouts in heavy-shedding homes.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight: strong hair pickup, detangling design, and HEPA filtration are repeatedly called out for reducing fur and dander. The pet grooming tool is polarizing, with one reviewer disliking the stiff bristles and others finding it intriguing or useful.

Value is a consistent theme: many see it as a budget-friendly upright that competes well with more expensive vacuums. A minority feel it’s overpriced if you need more features, better rug handling, or longer-lasting build.

Multiple sources call it expensive, and one comparison suggests the Extra bundle is not always worth the full premium versus the base model. Reviewers who prioritize pet hair and deep cleaning are more likely to view the cost as justified, especially on sale.

Cosmetic durability is a minor but present theme, with mentions of scratches and some tools leaving marks on surfaces. These reports are not universal but suggest care is needed around delicate finishes.

Stairs are generally manageable thanks to the hose/wand and lighter feel compared with heavier uprights. The main drawback is stability, as some users say the base can tip when pulling the hose during stair work.

The long hose/wand helps with stair reach, and it can clean stairs effectively with the right attachment. However, several reviewers caution that the heavy upright body can make stair cleaning awkward, especially for limited mobility or narrow stairs.

Several reviewers like that it stores in a closet or corner, but stability can be an issue. Multiple comments mention the vacuum can feel tipsy or tip over when using the hose/wand, requiring a hand to steady it.

Despite being a full-size corded upright, reviewers describe it as relatively slim/short and easy to tuck into a corner. One note: turning it on while still upright can be jarringly loud.

Most reviews describe very strong suction that pulls up noticeably more dirt, dust, and hair than prior vacuums. A smaller set of owners say power feels similar to other Sharks or takes multiple passes on rugs, especially compared with higher-end models.

Repeated testing and reviews describe extremely strong suction and airflow, including top crevice and embedded-dirt results. The upside is deep cleaning; the downside is that the power can make it harder to push and may tug on thin rugs.

Some professional or frequent cleaners report it holds up well with routine upkeep, suggesting it can handle heavier use. Others frame it as a good home vacuum that may wear faster or be harder to repair under commercial-style abuse.

Reviewers describe it as a heavy-duty, industrial-strength option for shedding pets and embedded dirt, suited to larger or carpet-heavy homes. The heavy weight and loudness are the main heavy-duty tradeoffs.

Several reviewers highlight that it fits well in apartments, condos, and small storage spaces while still offering strong suction. People in larger homes sometimes want a longer cord or bigger bin to reduce interruptions.

A narrower cleaning path and tight turning help it maneuver in tighter rooms compared with bulkier uprights. The heavy body remains a consideration for small-space storage and carrying.

Reliability experiences vary from trouble-free use (including frequent cleaning) to complaints about clogs, vibration, and occasional unit failure. Some also note repair/parts availability can be limited, reinforcing a replace-rather-than-repair perception.

Support is referenced via a 5-year warranty and mentions of Dyson customer support. No review flags major reliability failures, though long-term durability claims are mostly implied rather than proven.

Attachments are generally described as easy to swap, with parts that click into place and detach quickly. A few users still wish certain tools were included, but the change process itself is straightforward.

Tool changes are generally described as simple, using quick-release buttons to swap between wand, hose, and attachments. Reviewers note a short learning curve, but day-to-day changes are straightforward.

Getting under low furniture is a common limitation for a standard upright design. Some users can reach under tables and chairs, but others say the head and body are too bulky for couches and low-clearance spaces.

One review notes it can reach under a bed a little and handle awkward angles thanks to ball steering. It still will not replace a low-profile design for deep under-furniture cleaning.

Above-floor cleaning is a strength for many owners, especially using the pet tool on couches and the wand for curtains, vents, and ceiling fans. Reach is generally good, but pulling hard on the hose can make the base tip for some users.

Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly praised, with turbine and upholstery tools pulling hair from couches, car seats, and pet beds. One review notes suction remains strong even when using attachments.

The hose, wand, and tools make it useful for floors, furniture, and high dusting, adding versatility for a standard upright. It does not offer a Lift-Away detachable canister, which limits portability compared with other Shark lines.

Versatility is frequently emphasized: multiple head settings, strong hard-floor and carpet performance, and long-reach above-floor tools support whole-home cleaning. Its limitations show up most on stairs, thin rugs, and edge-front pickup.

Many users describe it as lightweight and easy to carry, including older owners who appreciate reduced strain. Others still find it heavy to lift or feel wrist/hand fatigue during long sessions, especially when using the hose.

Weight is consistently flagged as a drawback at roughly 17 pounds, affecting carrying and stair use. The heft is often framed as the tradeoff for strong power and a dense build.