The Complete version is repeatedly praised for shipping with lots of useful extras, including spare bags, filters, brushes, mop pads, and cleaning solutions.
Reviews mention a well-equipped ecosystem with included consumables (bags/cleaning tools/solution) and optional accessories like a hair-cutting roller. Add-ons can improve hair handling but can also add to ownership cost.
The X60’s lifting system is a standout feature on paper and in many threshold tests, although some reviewers said it is not always refined or universally helpful in real homes.
Reviewers who commented on appearance described the X60 as sleek, modern, and premium-looking, with upscale finishes.
Design opinions are mixed: at least one reviewer says the dock looks dated or appliance-like compared with newer, more aesthetic competitors. Most other reviews focus more on function than finish.
Smart features are extensive, from mapping controls and automation to dirt detection and voice integrations, but not every reviewer found those advanced features equally reliable or worthwhile.
Automation is a major theme: reviewers cite advanced obstacle avoidance, dirt detection with extra passes, customizable schedules, no-go zones, and pet-focused modes. The tradeoff for all that power is a larger settings surface area, and some reviewers find the app experience less polished.
Area-rug handling is a weak spot in at least one review, where chassis-lift behavior hurt vacuuming on lower rugs and still did not fully protect thicker carpet.
Carpet and rug handling is often praised because the robot can lift the mops and, in some modes, leave mop pads at the dock to avoid wetting textiles. A dissenting note is that mop hardware can still catch on some carpet edges or that pad removal is not always automatic, so settings matter.
Setup was described as especially easy, with quick app connection and a smooth initial onboarding experience.
Setup is generally described as quick, with guided app onboarding and fast mapping runs. Reviewers report it is straightforward to get from unboxing to a usable map.
Charging is a consistent plus thanks to roughly 80-minute fast charging, while battery performance itself ranges from solid to only average once max-power cleaning is involved.
Battery life is described as long, with a large battery (often cited as 6,400mAh) and support for recharge-and-resume. Reviewers generally expect it to handle larger homes, though thorough mop routines can still take time.
The dock bag setup is well featured, but the onboard dustbin is a recurring tradeoff: reviewers liked the bag capacity and bin design, yet several called the robot’s internal bin small.
The dock uses a large disposable dust bag (often cited as 3.2L), reducing how often you deal with dust. However, some reviewers note bag replacement frequency and bag pricing can vary with usage and contribute to ongoing costs.
One review explicitly called the build robust, pairing the slim form with a durable-feeling body.
Only a few sources discuss durability directly, but the comments that do are positive, noting robust wearing parts and a generally well-built feel. No review in the file reports major structural failures.
At least one review notes noticeably strong performance on thicker or higher-pile carpet due to high suction. Keeping carpets dry is helped by vacuum-only modes, mop lifting, or leaving mop pads at the dock, but some testers still caution about mop height when crossing carpet edges.
On low-pile carpet, multiple sources report strong pickup and good deep-clean behavior, though stubborn pet fur may require repeat passes. Overall performance is consistently above average for a robot vacuum-mop.
On medium-pile carpet, the X60 posts clearly above-average deep-clean results in multiple tests, though exact scores vary by reviewer and setup.
For embedded debris in carpet, test-driven reviews report above-average deep-clean performance and strong suction delivery. Carpet deep-clean scores are described as near the top tier of current robot vacuums.
A child lock is mentioned as available, helping prevent accidental starts or setting changes. It is treated as a nice-to-have safety feature rather than a core performance driver.
Debris prevention is not flawless: in one torture-style test the auto-empty process jammed under a very heavy load.
Hair-cutting and brush-lifting behaviors are cited as practical ways to prevent gunk and tangles, especially when the robot encounters wet patches. Reviewers generally frame these as helpful for keeping the cleaning path cleaner and reducing manual cleanup.
One benchmark-heavy review went so far as to place the X60 at the top of its current robot-vacuum rankings.
In comparisons, the X40 Ultra is often positioned as a top performer, earning high marks for vacuuming, mopping, and obstacle avoidance versus other flagships. A few reviewers note that the very best competitors are close, so the final choice can come down to price and preferred features.
App and control feedback is mixed: some reviewers found the mapping tools and redesigned app intuitive, while others called the software cluttered, confusing, or merely second-best to Roborock.
The app offers deep controls (maps, zones, schedules, no-go lines, and automation toggles), and many reviewers find it powerful. A recurring downside is UI complexity: some call it clunky or overwhelming until you tune settings.
Corner cleaning is a strength when the side brush and edge systems deploy correctly, though perfection is not always claimed.
Corner cleaning is repeatedly praised thanks to an extendable side brush and edge-focused routines. Reviewers describe better corner reach than robots that rely on a fixed brush setup.
At least one test specifically praised the X60’s grout cleaning, suggesting good pickup from grooves and textured hard-floor gaps.
The X60’s blue or proactive light is repeatedly described as helping it spot dust, stains, or debris that cameras alone might miss.
Some reviews highlight a dirty-water sensing approach that can trigger extra mop-pad washing or a second cleaning pass when the system detects heavier soil. This feature is presented as a meaningful upgrade for messier kitchens and high-traffic areas.
Docking and auto-emptying work well enough in normal conditions, but some reviews still stop short of calling the system flawless.
Docking and auto-empty are generally described as reliable, with a full-service station that empties dust and maintains the mops. One review flags weaker auto-empty suction and higher bag usage than expected, so performance may vary by debris load and settings.
Dock noise is better than average in the supporting reviews, with self-emptying described as relatively subdued rather than startling.
Stain removal is a real strength overall, with strong coffee and hot-sauce results, though one review stressed that moisture and settings matter.
Dried-on mess performance is a standout: multiple reviews describe the spinning mop system and extra-pass behaviors as excellent on sticky or dried spills (such as coffee). It is frequently positioned as among the best moppers in its class.
Ease of use is generally good thanks to simple setup and intuitive controls, though not every reviewer agreed the deeper settings remain easy.
Ease of use is generally high once set up, with strong automation and helpful app guidance. The main usability complaint is that the app and feature set can feel complex at first.
Edge cleaning is good in the best cases, especially along baseboards, but some homes with quarter-round or similar moldings expose clear weaknesses.
Edge and baseboard cleaning is a consistent strength thanks to an extending mop pad and edge-reaching behaviors. Multiple reviewers highlight noticeably better along-the-wall pickup compared with robots that cannot extend to edges.
Emptying results are generally good in normal use, but not spotless, with leftover crumbs or maintenance caveats still appearing in some reviews.
The filter clearly captures fine dust and debris, but at least one review said it still needs frequent manual cleaning after auto-emptying.
One test-focused review notes that after cleaning wet spills the floor was not left overly damp, suggesting good water control. In general, the spinning mop system aims to clean effectively without soaking floors.
One hands-on review explicitly said the X60 left the floor looking comfortingly shiny after mopping.
Carpet hair pickup is excellent in the supporting reviews, ranging from near-total cat-hair pickup to a perfect flattened-pet-hair score.
Carpet hair pickup gets conflicting feedback: some coverage labels it a top option for homes with pets, but at least one lab-style test found only average fur removal in a single run. Multiple passes, higher suction, and the right brush can matter here.
Hair pickup on hard floors is mixed: some reviewers call it excellent for pet hair, while at least one test-focused review found it left a meaningful amount behind without multiple passes. Expect best results with tuned settings and the right brush configuration.
Hair management is a major strength. Multiple reviewers reported little to no hair wrap, and several highlighted the anti-tangle dual-brush design.
Tangle resistance is also mixed: long hair can still wrap around the main roller in some reports, but anti-tangle side-brush design and optional hair-cutting rollers are described as effective upgrades. Cleaning hair out is generally considered manageable.
Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is strong, with reviewers calling out litter dust, coffee grounds, or similar small debris as well handled.
Hard-floor fine debris pickup is described as excellent, with test-style reviews reporting near-perfect results on materials like sand. It is regularly characterized as thorough on hard surfaces.
The X60 generally handles larger dry messes well on hard floors, from cat litter and rice to leaves, paper, sand, and other chunky debris.
Large-debris pickup on hard floors is generally strong, with high percentages reported in testing and good real-world pickup. A minor recurring note is that a single pass can miss a few crumbs, which is solvable with extra passes or higher settings.
An onboard blue light or similar assist light is explicitly mentioned as part of the X60’s sensing hardware.
The heating story is mixed. Several reviews praised heated mopping or hot pad washing, while others said real on-floor heat is brief or falls short of the advertising.
A heated mop-wash is repeatedly mentioned, with hot water used in the dock to clean mop pads and the washboard. Reviewers connect the heating to better mop-pad cleanliness and reduced odor.
The X60 is portrayed as technically ambitious, with at least one review calling its slim body plus strong threshold climbing a major engineering achievement.
Innovation shows up in features like leaving mop pads at the dock, lifting brushes when sensing liquid, edge-extending mops and brushes, camera-assisted stain attention, and sensor-driven re-cleaning. Reviewers frequently call these capabilities differentiators versus simpler robot vacuum-mops.
One reviewer specifically framed the fast obstacle reactions as useful in homes where kids leave toys on the floor.
One ad-vs-reality test found the X60 handled peanuts and similar larger debris well enough to count as a pass, though not perfectly.
The slim body is one of the X60’s most repeated positives, especially for low-clearance spaces and homes with furniture other robots cannot reach under.
Maintenance is reduced compared with simpler robots, but not eliminated: reviewers still mention water use, dock cleanup, filter upkeep, and pad wear as ongoing chores.
Maintenance is described as low day-to-day because the dock empties dust and washes and dries mop pads automatically. Owners still need to refill clean water, empty dirty water, replace bags, and occasionally wipe sensors and check brushes.
Mapping tools can be strong, but path efficiency is inconsistent. Several reviews noted below-average navigation efficiency, occasional missed areas, repeated passes, or getting lost.
Navigation and mapping are repeatedly described as top-tier, with fast mapping and strong coverage efficiency. Some testers note occasional pattern quirks, but overall it is seen as reliable at completing whole-home cleans.
One review praised the ability to remove mop pads before carpet vacuuming, calling it a standout carpet-protection feature.
The mop system can lift during carpet detection and, in some workflows, leave mop pads at the dock to keep rugs dry. Most reviewers view this as a major advantage, though one notes the lift height may still snag on some carpet edges.
Mopping is broadly strong, especially on everyday hard-floor cleaning and many stain tests, but a few reviews said specific messes, settings, or marketing claims keep it from being flawless.
Mopping is widely rated as a top-tier strength, driven by spinning pads, edge extension, and options for extra passes on dirtier areas. Some reviewers caution that the most aggressive automated modes can be overkill on delicate finishes until tuned.
Noise was generally described as impressively restrained for a flagship with this much suction, though it is still louder on max than lower-power cleaning modes.
Noise is acceptable on lower settings but becomes noticeably loud at maximum suction, which some reviewers frame as the cost of stronger vacuuming. One lab-style test measured it as louder than average, and reviewers recommend scheduling loud runs when you are out.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the X60’s signature strengths, with many reviews praising its reactions around cords, toys, and other objects, even if a few tests still found misses.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the most consistently celebrated strengths, with multiple sources citing camera and structured-light sensing and near-perfect avoidance results. Cables can still be a challenge for any robot, but overall confidence is high.
Odor handling is a plus, with pet-odor solution support and positive comments about the dock avoiding bad smells during routine use.
Odor control is generally praised because the dock both hot-washes and hot-dries the mop pads, reducing musty smells. This is repeatedly mentioned as helpful for keeping the system from getting funky between cleanings.
Ownership-cost concerns appear in at least one review because Dreame is said to approve only its own floor-cleaning solution.
Running costs come up as a concern in some coverage, mainly around disposable dust bags and other consumables. Reviewers recommend factoring consumables into ownership cost, even if day-to-day maintenance is low.
Automation and low-touch cleaning are recurring strengths, especially with self-emptying, self-maintenance, and hands-free daily upkeep.
Overall sentiment is positive: most reviewers called the X60 one of the best or most capable robots they tested, even when they also flagged tradeoffs.
Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with several sources ranking it at or near the top among flagship robot vacuum-mops. The most common reservations are the high price, the size of the dock, and mixed reports on pet-hair pickup consistency.
Pet-focused extras show up repeatedly, including flattened pet-hair performance, pet-odor detergent support, and app features aimed at pet zones and pet-related cleaning.
Pet-oriented features are a highlight: reviewers mention pet zones, avoidance of bowls and toys, and camera-based monitoring (including two-way video in some coverage). Performance with pet hair is more mixed, but overall the feature set is considered very pet-friendly.
At least one critical review argued the X60’s performance does not justify its $1,700 price, despite acknowledging real strengths.
Price is the most consistent negative: several reviews describe it as a premium, top-of-the-market model. Many still consider the performance and automation strong enough to justify it for the right home, especially when discounted, but value is weaker for budget shoppers.
Runtime is adequate rather than class-leading. Some reviewers reported solid coverage or long sessions, while others found square-footage-per-charge only middling at higher settings.
Sanitizing claims are tied mainly to the dock washing mop pads with very hot water (often stated around 158F). Reviews treat this as a hygiene win for the mop pads, not a guarantee of disinfecting the entire floor.
Dock self-maintenance is a major strength overall, with repeated praise for hot-water pad washing, hot-air drying, and strong mop-cleaning performance.
The dock self-cleans and maintains the mopping system by washing pads and the washboard and drying with hot air, often with scrapers and repeat-clean logic. This is repeatedly credited for reducing hands-on upkeep and improving hygiene.
Feature longevity got a qualified note in one review, which said Matter support may depend on future firmware updates.
The liquid system is one of the X60’s richer features, with repeated mentions of dual detergent compartments, pet formulas, and automated mixing or dispensing.
The solution system is frequently mentioned but described differently across sources: it can wash pads with detergent and, in some coverage, dispense floor-cleaning fluid. At least one reviewer notes detergent may be used mainly for mop-pad washing rather than being mixed into the floor water by default.
One reviewer specifically praised the redesigned dock for being smaller and taking up less space than the previous generation.
Multiple reviewers call out the dock as large and space-consuming, even if the footprint is described as relatively slim in one write-up. Plan for a dedicated spot, especially if you are in a small apartment.
One review specifically praised the X60 for leaving a streak-free sheen after mopping.
Residue and streak control depends on settings: reviewers mention choosing mopping direction or dialing back aggressive modes to avoid over-mopping certain finishes. When configured, most describe clean results without problematic streaking.
Threshold handling is strong in some homes and tests, but not universally foolproof, with reports ranging from no issues to stranding or wheel-suspension errors.
Reviewers report good stuck resistance, including handling taller thresholds (often cited around 22mm) and completing coverage without frequent rescues. As with most robots, extreme clutter can still cause interruptions, but it is rated highly here.
Across multiple tests, reviewers repeatedly highlighted the X60’s very high suction output and strong real-world pickup, even if one airflow test said raw pressure did not fully translate into the absolute best measured seal.
Across reviewers, suction is repeatedly described as flagship-level, with strong debris pickup on both hard floors and carpets. Several sources cite 12,000Pa suction and top-tier vacuuming results, though max power can be loud and auto-empty strength at the dock is not praised by everyone.
One negative review said the X60 did not suit a cramped, cluttered home especially well.
Early sentiment in one review was cautious rather than fully confident, citing Dreame’s mixed reputation for long-term reliability and customer support.
Under-furniture cleaning is one of the clearest X60 advantages, with several reviewers saying the low body let it reach places other robots missed.
Under-furniture performance is frequently highlighted, especially around the base of cabinets and appliances where hair and debris collect. Extendable side reach behaviors help it pull debris from areas many robots miss.
Value is where enthusiasm cools: some reviewers liked the product overall but still questioned whether the premium price beats cheaper Dreame or rival alternatives.
The X60 is consistently described as able to vacuum or mop well, but some reviews say the result depends heavily on settings and home layout.
The water tanks are usable but not generous; one review estimated them as smaller than the previous model’s tanks.
The system relies on clean and dirty water tanks in the dock and an internal water tank in the robot, which keeps mopping more automated than vacuum-only robots. Expect periodic refills and dirty-water emptying, and some coverage mentions a future-leaning option for auto fill and drain via plumbing.
One review called the overall unit relatively heavy, which could matter for portability.