The Complete version is repeatedly praised for shipping with lots of useful extras, including spare bags, filters, brushes, mop pads, and cleaning solutions.
Included extras such as spare bags, guides, and small tools are considered adequate and helpful for getting started and maintaining the dock/robot.
The X60’s lifting system is a standout feature on paper and in many threshold tests, although some reviewers said it is not always refined or universally helpful in real homes.
Reviewers who commented on appearance described the X60 as sleek, modern, and premium-looking, with upscale finishes.
Design and finish are frequently praised as premium-looking, with a cleaner, more integrated dock aesthetic than some predecessors.
Smart features are extensive, from mapping controls and automation to dirt detection and voice integrations, but not every reviewer found those advanced features equally reliable or worthwhile.
Automation features are deep: strong scheduling, per-room customization, routines, smart remopping options, and solid voice-assistant integrations-though most advanced controls live in the Roborock app rather than third-party platforms.
Area-rug handling is a weak spot in at least one review, where chassis-lift behavior hurt vacuuming on lower rugs and still did not fully protect thicker carpet.
Setup was described as especially easy, with quick app connection and a smooth initial onboarding experience.
Setup is repeatedly described as easy: mostly assembled, quick app pairing via QR code, and fast initial mapping/quick-map routines.
Charging is a consistent plus thanks to roughly 80-minute fast charging, while battery performance itself ranges from solid to only average once max-power cleaning is involved.
Battery life is competitive for a flagship, with measured runtimes around the low-100-minute range in some testing and efficient recharge-and-resume behavior.
The dock bag setup is well featured, but the onboard dustbin is a recurring tradeoff: reviewers liked the bag capacity and bin design, yet several called the robot’s internal bin small.
The dock's disposable bag system is viewed as convenient and low-mess, but a few tests noted residual debris remaining in the robot bin after auto-empty on some runs.
One review explicitly called the build robust, pairing the slim form with a durable-feeling body.
Build quality impressions are strong, with multiple reviews describing solid materials and a well-engineered dock-and-robot system.
On medium-pile carpet, the X60 posts clearly above-average deep-clean results in multiple tests, though exact scores vary by reviewer and setup.
Carpet pickup is a consistent bright spot (including some standout results on larger debris), though performance can vary by test medium (e.g., fine sand) and carpet type.
Child lock is available (often via a long-press on a button) and is presented as a practical safety feature for homes with kids or curious pets.
Debris prevention is not flawless: in one torture-style test the auto-empty process jammed under a very heavy load.
One benchmark-heavy review went so far as to place the X60 at the top of its current robot-vacuum rankings.
App and control feedback is mixed: some reviewers found the mapping tools and redesigned app intuitive, while others called the software cluttered, confusing, or merely second-best to Roborock.
Physical controls are straightforward and the in-app controls are robust; the built-in voice assistant can be handy but tends to require exact phrasing.
Corner cleaning is a strength when the side brush and edge systems deploy correctly, though perfection is not always claimed.
Corner cleaning improves with the extending side brush and edge mop, and several sources call it better than prior generations, though not perfect in every tight-space scenario.
At least one test specifically praised the X60’s grout cleaning, suggesting good pickup from grooves and textured hard-floor gaps.
The X60’s blue or proactive light is repeatedly described as helping it spot dust, stains, or debris that cameras alone might miss.
An LED/fill light helps the front camera see in low light for object detection, though video quality and night performance are not always praised.
Docking and auto-emptying work well enough in normal conditions, but some reviews still stop short of calling the system flawless.
Auto-empty and docking are largely reliable and highly valued for hands-off cleaning; however, a few measurements found residual debris left in the robot bin after emptying, so settings and debris type matter.
Dock noise is better than average in the supporting reviews, with self-emptying described as relatively subdued rather than startling.
Dock noise is the main acoustic drawback: mop drying and certain dock cycles are described as noticeable, even if the robot itself is only moderately loud.
Stain removal is a real strength overall, with strong coffee and hot-sauce results, though one review stressed that moisture and settings matter.
Ease of use is generally good thanks to simple setup and intuitive controls, though not every reviewer agreed the deeper settings remain easy.
Day-to-day usability is widely praised: intuitive app flows, quick actions (room/zone/routines), and reliable dock automation reduce the need for babysitting.
Edge cleaning is good in the best cases, especially along baseboards, but some homes with quarter-round or similar moldings expose clear weaknesses.
Edge and baseboard coverage improves via the edge mop and extending side brush, but results vary by mess type; some tests noted sticky residue or incomplete corner cleanup in tight spaces.
Edge-following behavior is typically accurate and consistent, supporting good wall-hugging coverage and reliable baseboard passes in most reports.
Emptying results are generally good in normal use, but not spotless, with leftover crumbs or maintenance caveats still appearing in some reviews.
Emptying is generally clean and convenient thanks to sealed bags, but a few reviewers observed leftover debris in the robot bin after auto-empty or the need for higher emptying settings.
The app's consumable tracking for filters/brushes is useful and helps plan upkeep, with reminders tied to estimated wear life rather than a simple calendar.
The filter clearly captures fine dust and debris, but at least one review said it still needs frequent manual cleaning after auto-emptying.
Dust containment is aided by sealed disposable bags and hands-off emptying, which reviewers with dust sensitivity appreciated compared with manual bin dumping.
Heated drying is considered effective for preventing musty mop smells, but several reviewers note the drying noise is noticeable during its multi-hour cycle.
One hands-on review explicitly said the X60 left the floor looking comfortingly shiny after mopping.
Carpet hair pickup is excellent in the supporting reviews, ranging from near-total cat-hair pickup to a perfect flattened-pet-hair score.
On carpets, hair pickup is frequently rated highly in comparative testing (especially for pet hair), though performance can depend on hair length and brush maintenance.
Hair management is a major strength. Multiple reviewers reported little to no hair wrap, and several highlighted the anti-tangle dual-brush design.
Hair-wrap resistance is mixed: dual rollers and scrapers help with routine hair, but at least one torture-test showed severe long-hair tangling that can stop the robot.
Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is strong, with reviewers calling out litter dust, coffee grounds, or similar small debris as well handled.
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is good but not class-leading in all lab tests, and some debris can be scattered outward by the long side brush depending on settings and room layout.
The X60 generally handles larger dry messes well on hard floors, from cat litter and rice to leaves, paper, sand, and other chunky debris.
Large debris intake on hard floors is generally strong, but side-brush fling can reduce efficiency and leave grains spread around in worst-case tests.
An onboard blue light or similar assist light is explicitly mentioned as part of the X60’s sensing hardware.
The heating story is mixed. Several reviews praised heated mopping or hot pad washing, while others said real on-floor heat is brief or falls short of the advertising.
The X60 is portrayed as technically ambitious, with at least one review calling its slim body plus strong threshold climbing a major engineering achievement.
One reviewer specifically framed the fast obstacle reactions as useful in homes where kids leave toys on the floor.
One ad-vs-reality test found the X60 handled peanuts and similar larger debris well enough to count as a pass, though not perfectly.
The slim body is one of the X60’s most repeated positives, especially for low-clearance spaces and homes with furniture other robots cannot reach under.
Maintenance is reduced compared with simpler robots, but not eliminated: reviewers still mention water use, dock cleanup, filter upkeep, and pad wear as ongoing chores.
Maintenance is reduced by the dock, app reminders, and washable components, but owners still need periodic tank changes, bag replacements, and occasional brush/hair cleanup.
Mapping tools can be strong, but path efficiency is inconsistent. Several reviews noted below-average navigation efficiency, occasional missed areas, repeated passes, or getting lost.
Mapping and pathing are widely praised: fast map creation, reliable localization, and strong support for no-go zones and room-level routines.
One review praised the ability to remove mop pads before carpet vacuuming, calling it a standout carpet-protection feature.
Mop lift is a major strength: multiple reviews cite high lift height that keeps carpets dry and allows confident vac-and-mop runs in mixed-floor homes.
Mopping is broadly strong, especially on everyday hard-floor cleaning and many stain tests, but a few reviews said specific messes, settings, or marketing claims keep it from being flawless.
Mopping is generally strong for a pad-based system (hot-water washing, vibration, and smart re-mopping help), but some comparison tests still place it behind the very best spinning/roller-style moppers on heavy stains.
Noise was generally described as impressively restrained for a flagship with this much suction, though it is still louder on max than lower-power cleaning modes.
Noise is generally described as reasonable for a flagship, with some sources noting mid-to-high suction is noticeable; dock drying/maintenance sounds can be more intrusive than the robot itself.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the X60’s signature strengths, with many reviews praising its reactions around cords, toys, and other objects, even if a few tests still found misses.
Obstacle avoidance ranges from excellent (avoiding pet waste and many objects) to inconsistent in some lab tests where it tried to run over smaller toys; performance appears sensitive to object type and firmware/settings.
Odor handling is a plus, with pet-odor solution support and positive comments about the dock avoiding bad smells during routine use.
Hot-water washing and hot-air drying help keep odors down, but reviewers warn that letting dirty water sit too long can create a sewage-like smell common to this category.
Ownership-cost concerns appear in at least one review because Dreame is said to approve only its own floor-cleaning solution.
Ongoing costs are mainly bags and filters; reviewers generally see them as manageable for a premium system, but they add to the already high upfront price.
Automation and low-touch cleaning are recurring strengths, especially with self-emptying, self-maintenance, and hands-free daily upkeep.
Overall sentiment is positive: most reviewers called the X60 one of the best or most capable robots they tested, even when they also flagged tradeoffs.
Overall sentiment is positive to mixed: many call it a top-tier, low-touch flagship, while a few tests argue its performance tradeoffs and price make it harder to recommend universally.
Packaging is generally described as substantial and protective, reflecting the large dock and accessory set.
Pet-focused extras show up repeatedly, including flattened pet-hair performance, pet-odor detergent support, and app features aimed at pet zones and pet-related cleaning.
Pet-focused coverage is a strength: multiple reviewers cite effective pet hair pickup and solid pet-waste avoidance features, though real-world reliability varies with room clutter and obstacle type.
At least one critical review argued the X60’s performance does not justify its $1,700 price, despite acknowledging real strengths.
Value is the biggest sticking point: several reviewers call it expensive for the performance delta, while others argue the automation and convenience justify the flagship price if you will use the dock features.
Privacy controls are a recurring theme: on-device processing is emphasized by some, while others note optional obstacle photos/remote viewing require explicit enablement, passwords, and audible announcements during viewing.
Runtime is adequate rather than class-leading. Some reviewers reported solid coverage or long sessions, while others found square-footage-per-charge only middling at higher settings.
Scratch concerns seem improved versus some older models; at least one reviewer reported no obvious scratching during use.
Dock self-maintenance is a major strength overall, with repeated praise for hot-water pad washing, hot-air drying, and strong mop-cleaning performance.
The dock does more than empty and wash: multiple reviews mention self-cleaning elements and hot-water mop washing that reduce hands-on cleanup, though periodic manual cleaning is still needed.
Feature longevity got a qualified note in one review, which said Matter support may depend on future firmware updates.
Software support appears active (frequent app features, integrations, and ongoing updates discussed), but smart-home ecosystems can lag behind the Roborock app in capability.
The liquid system is one of the X60’s richer features, with repeated mentions of dual detergent compartments, pet formulas, and automated mixing or dispensing.
The dedicated detergent/solution system is a standout convenience feature, automatically portioning cleaner and helping reduce odors and maintenance hassle.
One reviewer specifically praised the redesigned dock for being smaller and taking up less space than the previous generation.
One review specifically praised the X60 for leaving a streak-free sheen after mopping.
Threshold handling is strong in some homes and tests, but not universally foolproof, with reports ranging from no issues to stranding or wheel-suspension errors.
Stuck events are uncommon in most accounts, with the robot often able to ride over cords/thresholds without fully halting, though hair tangles can stop cleaning in worst-case scenarios.
Across multiple tests, reviewers repeatedly highlighted the X60’s very high suction output and strong real-world pickup, even if one airflow test said raw pressure did not fully translate into the absolute best measured seal.
Reviews consistently highlight strong suction (often cited as 10,000Pa) and above-average carpet results, though one lab-style test found it did not dominate fine sand and some hard-floor debris can get pushed around by the side brush.
One negative review said the X60 did not suit a cramped, cluttered home especially well.
Early sentiment in one review was cautious rather than fully confident, citing Dreame’s mixed reputation for long-term reliability and customer support.
Under-furniture cleaning is one of the clearest X60 advantages, with several reviewers saying the low body let it reach places other robots missed.
Under-furniture reach benefits from the extending side brush and slimmer edge access, helping capture debris along toe-kicks and under some appliances.
Value is where enthusiasm cools: some reviewers liked the product overall but still questioned whether the premium price beats cheaper Dreame or rival alternatives.
The X60 is consistently described as able to vacuum or mop well, but some reviews say the result depends heavily on settings and home layout.
The water tanks are usable but not generous; one review estimated them as smaller than the previous model’s tanks.
Clean/dirty tank capacity and usage rate are viewed as competitive; some comparisons suggest it can go longer between water changes than many rivals, though frequency still depends on home size and mopping schedule.
One review called the overall unit relatively heavy, which could matter for portability.