The Complete version is repeatedly praised for shipping with lots of useful extras, including spare bags, filters, brushes, mop pads, and cleaning solutions.
The X60’s lifting system is a standout feature on paper and in many threshold tests, although some reviewers said it is not always refined or universally helpful in real homes.
Reviewers who commented on appearance described the X60 as sleek, modern, and premium-looking, with upscale finishes.
Design is frequently praised: the dock’s wood-look top and furniture-like footprint blend into living spaces better than many rivals. A minority dislike the faux-wood finish or find the dock less attractive in person.
Smart features are extensive, from mapping controls and automation to dirt detection and voice integrations, but not every reviewer found those advanced features equally reliable or worthwhile.
App and automation are feature-rich: schedules, zones, room-specific routines, dirt-prioritization, and voice assistant support are widely praised. Common nitpicks include occasional connectivity hiccups, confusing menu choices, and missing real-time map progress in some experiences.
Blowback and scattering are usually controlled, with some reviewers noting it avoids flinging small particles. However, the side brush can flick larger debris around, and a few tests report scattered grains on hard floors.
Area-rug handling is a weak spot in at least one review, where chassis-lift behavior hurt vacuuming on lower rugs and still did not fully protect thicker carpet.
Rug handling is usually good, especially because the retracting mop prevents wet pads from dragging onto carpets. Still, the mop arm can occasionally catch on rug edges/corners, and very thick or tricky rugs may need keep-out or no-mop zoning.
Setup was described as especially easy, with quick app connection and a smooth initial onboarding experience.
Setup is typically quick and well-guided through the app, with packaging and quick-start materials helping. Initial mapping can take multiple runs, and a few users report early hiccups aligning the robot on the dock or connecting to Wi-Fi.
The robot is described as responsive to obstructions, stopping or rerouting around people/pets and common objects. It’s not perfect in every edge case, but it tends to avoid creating bigger messes when something blocks its path.
Charging is a consistent plus thanks to roughly 80-minute fast charging, while battery performance itself ranges from solid to only average once max-power cleaning is involved.
Battery performance is generally strong for large-area runs, often finishing typical floors without intervention and returning to recharge as needed. Charging can feel slow for some users, but recharge-and-resume behavior is reliable in most accounts.
The dock bag setup is well featured, but the onboard dustbin is a recurring tradeoff: reviewers liked the bag capacity and bin design, yet several called the robot’s internal bin small.
The bagged dock system is praised for cleanliness and low-touch disposal, typically lasting weeks to around two months depending on shedding and home size. Internal bin is small but rarely needs manual emptying thanks to frequent auto-empty cycles.
One review explicitly called the build robust, pairing the slim form with a durable-feeling body.
Build quality is generally described as solid with removable, serviceable parts. Some mention cosmetic scuffing during early mapping runs from gentle bumping, but no widespread structural issues are reported in these reviews.
High-pile/shag carpets are a weak spot for the vacuum-only model in one review, with quick tangling/stalling in long fibers. For homes with lots of high-pile, expectations should be tempered or zones configured to avoid problem rugs.
Low-pile carpet pickup is generally very good, handling daily hair and debris well. Some users still notice occasional leftover strands on rugs and may choose extra passes for a more thorough finish.
On medium-pile carpet, the X60 posts clearly above-average deep-clean results in multiple tests, though exact scores vary by reviewer and setup.
No summary yet.
Debris prevention is not flawless: in one torture-style test the auto-empty process jammed under a very heavy load.
One benchmark-heavy review went so far as to place the X60 at the top of its current robot-vacuum rankings.
Comparisons usually place the j9+/Combo j9+ among the best for vacuuming and obstacle avoidance, with advantages over older Roombas. Several reviewers note that top hybrid competitors can outperform it in deep scrubbing or self-maintenance features.
App and control feedback is mixed: some reviewers found the mapping tools and redesigned app intuitive, while others called the software cluttered, confusing, or merely second-best to Roborock.
Controls are straightforward: the app handles most functions, with a simple on-robot button for start/pause and basic status lights. Some reviewers wish for richer in-app live tracking and clearer guidance in the manual/owner docs.
Corner cleaning is a strength when the side brush and edge systems deploy correctly, though perfection is not always claimed.
Corner cleaning is a known limitation: as a round robot with a single side brush, it can miss tight corners or smear debris in corner flour-style tests. Edges and open perimeters are better than sharp corners.
At least one test specifically praised the X60’s grout cleaning, suggesting good pickup from grooves and textured hard-floor gaps.
Crevice and groove pickup is repeatedly called out as improved versus older Roombas, aided by stronger suction and the dual rubber rollers. It performs well on seams and along transitions in testing.
The X60’s blue or proactive light is repeatedly described as helping it spot dust, stains, or debris that cameras alone might miss.
Docking and auto-emptying work well enough in normal conditions, but some reviews still stop short of calling the system flawless.
Auto-empty docking is consistently reliable, with the robot returning to empty and resume without much user intervention. Bagged disposal keeps the process clean, and many users report weeks of hands-free vacuuming before needing to swap the bag.
Dock noise is better than average in the supporting reviews, with self-emptying described as relatively subdued rather than startling.
Dock emptying volume is inconsistent across reviewers: some describe it as very loud, while others find it comparatively quieter and less high-pitched than older Roombas. Either way, the empty cycle is brief and can be scheduled around quiet hours.
Stain removal is a real strength overall, with strong coffee and hot-sauce results, though one review stressed that moisture and settings matter.
For dried-on stains, SmartScrub/back-and-forth motions improve results and can remove many common spots like dried juice, litter prints, and tracked-in dirt. Very sticky food or heavy buildup may still require manual spot work or a pad change afterward.
Ease of use is generally good thanks to simple setup and intuitive controls, though not every reviewer agreed the deeper settings remain easy.
Day-to-day use is strongly praised once maps are set: scheduling, recharge-and-resume, hands-free emptying, and reliable obstacle avoidance reduce babysitting. Early learning runs can require a bit of attention, but it becomes largely set-and-forget.
Edge cleaning is good in the best cases, especially along baseboards, but some homes with quarter-round or similar moldings expose clear weaknesses.
Edge cleaning is good for a round robot but not flawless: it follows baseboards well in open areas yet can leave debris along edges and misses some grime in tight perimeter spots, especially during mopping.
Emptying results are generally good in normal use, but not spotless, with leftover crumbs or maintenance caveats still appearing in some reviews.
App-based maintenance reminders for filters help keep performance consistent, with clear prompts on when to replace. Filters still require planned replenishment since they aren’t washable.
The filter clearly captures fine dust and debris, but at least one review said it still needs frequent manual cleaning after auto-emptying.
Dust containment is generally solid, helped by a sealed, bagged dock and replaceable filters. Filters are not washable and need periodic replacement, but most reviewers report clean handling with minimal dust mess.
One hands-on review explicitly said the X60 left the floor looking comfortingly shiny after mopping.
Carpet hair pickup is excellent in the supporting reviews, ranging from near-total cat-hair pickup to a perfect flattened-pet-hair score.
Carpet hair pickup is strong in many reports, though a few users still see stray hairs on low-pile rugs and may prefer an extra pass for perfection. Overall it’s above average for daily maintenance.
Hard-floor hair pickup is a consistent strength, especially for pets and long human hair. A few mention the occasional hair clump, but overall results are strong with minimal leftover hairballs.
Hair management is a major strength. Multiple reviewers reported little to no hair wrap, and several highlighted the anti-tangle dual-brush design.
Dual rubber rollers reduce tangling compared with bristle rollers, and several reviewers report noticeably less hair wrap. Some periodic hair removal is still needed, especially in heavy-shedding homes.
Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is strong, with reviewers calling out litter dust, coffee grounds, or similar small debris as well handled.
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is consistently reported as excellent, including flour/sand-style tests in some reviews. Multiple passes can further improve results, especially on carpet fine-particle stress tests.
The X60 generally handles larger dry messes well on hard floors, from cat litter and rice to leaves, paper, sand, and other chunky debris.
Large debris pickup is strong overall, though a few note the side brush can flick bigger bits around before they’re captured. In most homes it handles cereal, kibble, and tracked-in debris well, with occasional stragglers in corners.
An onboard blue light or similar assist light is explicitly mentioned as part of the X60’s sensing hardware.
The heating story is mixed. Several reviews praised heated mopping or hot pad washing, while others said real on-floor heat is brief or falls short of the advertising.
The X60 is portrayed as technically ambitious, with at least one review calling its slim body plus strong threshold climbing a major engineering achievement.
The combo design is seen as meaningfully innovative: the fully retracting mop arm reduces carpet-wetting risk, and the auto-fill dock adds true hands-free mopping convenience. It’s less novel on pad washing, where competitors often do more.
One reviewer specifically framed the fast obstacle reactions as useful in homes where kids leave toys on the floor.
One ad-vs-reality test found the X60 handled peanuts and similar larger debris well enough to count as a pass, though not perfectly.
The slim body is one of the X60’s most repeated positives, especially for low-clearance spaces and homes with furniture other robots cannot reach under.
The low-profile body helps it fit under more furniture than bulkier rivals, improving coverage in real homes. Dock size is still substantial, but the robot’s height is generally a plus.
Maintenance is reduced compared with simpler robots, but not eliminated: reviewers still mention water use, dock cleanup, filter upkeep, and pad wear as ongoing chores.
Maintenance is moderate: the bagged dock reduces daily hassle, but mop pads still require manual washing/swapping and parts like filters/brushes need periodic attention. Several reviewers call the pad-care step the main ongoing chore.
Mapping tools can be strong, but path efficiency is inconsistent. Several reviews noted below-average navigation efficiency, occasional missed areas, repeated passes, or getting lost.
Mapping and pathing are generally systematic and thorough, with efficient row cleaning once the home is learned. Initial mapping is sometimes slow or clumsy compared to LiDAR bots, and a few tests note slightly longer overall run times than some competitors.
One review praised the ability to remove mop pads before carpet vacuuming, calling it a standout carpet-protection feature.
The retracting mop mechanism is a defining strength, reliably keeping carpets dry by fully lifting/stowing the pad on top of the robot. It enables true vacuum-and-mop-in-one-run behavior without worrying about damp rugs.
Mopping is broadly strong, especially on everyday hard-floor cleaning and many stain tests, but a few reviews said specific messes, settings, or marketing claims keep it from being flawless.
Mopping is generally effective for routine upkeep, with smart back-and-forth scrubbing helping on stains. It can struggle with sticky messes and heavy grime compared with spinning/vibrating pad competitors, and edges/corners remain challenging.
Noise was generally described as impressively restrained for a flagship with this much suction, though it is still louder on max than lower-power cleaning modes.
Noise is a mixed bag: in-room vacuuming is often described as noticeable but tolerable, while auto-emptying can be loud for some. A few reviewers found the empty cycle quieter than other robots, but others measured/mentioned it as disruptive.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the X60’s signature strengths, with many reviews praising its reactions around cords, toys, and other objects, even if a few tests still found misses.
Obstacle avoidance is a defining strength: the camera-based system reliably dodges cords, toys, shoes, and pet waste in most tests, and often outperforms rival bots in clutter. It’s not flawless, but it dramatically reduces stuck events and accidental messes versus non-vision robots.
Odor handling is a plus, with pet-odor solution support and positive comments about the dock avoiding bad smells during routine use.
Ownership-cost concerns appear in at least one review because Dreame is said to approve only its own floor-cleaning solution.
Ongoing costs are a real factor: bags, filters, brushes, and occasional pads add recurring spend. The upside is the bagged system is clean and parts are widely available, but budget-minded buyers should plan for replenishment.
Automation and low-touch cleaning are recurring strengths, especially with self-emptying, self-maintenance, and hands-free daily upkeep.
Overall sentiment is positive: most reviewers called the X60 one of the best or most capable robots they tested, even when they also flagged tradeoffs.
Pet-focused extras show up repeatedly, including flattened pet-hair performance, pet-odor detergent support, and app features aimed at pet zones and pet-related cleaning.
Pet households benefit from strong poop/pet-waste avoidance, plus reliable hair pickup on hard floors and rugs. Multiple reviews highlight the pet waste guarantee as a key confidence booster in cluttered homes.
At least one critical review argued the X60’s performance does not justify its $1,700 price, despite acknowledging real strengths.
Value is polarizing: most agree performance and automation are premium, but the MSRP feels steep and many recommend waiting for sales. Those upgrading from older Roombas or prioritizing obstacle avoidance are more likely to feel it’s worth the spend.
Privacy controls are a recurring discussion point because the robot uses a camera for navigation and obstacle recognition. Reviews note opt-in options and iRobot’s stated controls/encryption, but some users may still prefer a non-camera approach depending on comfort.
Runtime is adequate rather than class-leading. Some reviewers reported solid coverage or long sessions, while others found square-footage-per-charge only middling at higher settings.
Runtime is generally strong for a premium robot, commonly around two hours in everyday use, with recharge-and-resume covering larger spaces. Expect longer total job times when both vacuuming and mopping, or when using max power/two-pass settings.
Dock self-maintenance is a major strength overall, with repeated praise for hot-water pad washing, hot-air drying, and strong mop-cleaning performance.
Feature longevity got a qualified note in one review, which said Matter support may depend on future firmware updates.
The liquid system is one of the X60’s richer features, with repeated mentions of dual detergent compartments, pet formulas, and automated mixing or dispensing.
One reviewer specifically praised the redesigned dock for being smaller and taking up less space than the previous generation.
One review specifically praised the X60 for leaving a streak-free sheen after mopping.
Residue and streaking are usually minor, but some reviewers notice occasional streaks or sticky patches after messy tests like jam/jelly. Regular pad washing and appropriate water/solution settings help reduce visible streaking.
Threshold handling is strong in some homes and tests, but not universally foolproof, with reports ranging from no issues to stranding or wheel-suspension errors.
Stuck events are infrequent once maps and keep-out zones are tuned, but the robot can still snag on bath mats, high-pile rugs, tight gaps, or situations where the mop arm can’t retract cleanly. Overall, it improves after the first few runs.
Across multiple tests, reviewers repeatedly highlighted the X60’s very high suction output and strong real-world pickup, even if one airflow test said raw pressure did not fully translate into the absolute best measured seal.
Across reviews, suction is a standout: strong pickup on hard floors and carpet, with smart boost behavior and fewer repeat passes than older Roombas. A few testers still rate raw power a step behind the most aggressive premium competitors, but most call it top-tier for daily debris.
One negative review said the X60 did not suit a cramped, cluttered home especially well.
Early sentiment in one review was cautious rather than fully confident, citing Dreame’s mixed reputation for long-term reliability and customer support.
Reliability feedback is mostly positive over weeks of use, but a few reviews mention glitches (unfinished jobs, mode misbehavior) and at least one report of a defective unit that required replacement. Keeping receipts for early runs is commonly advised.
Under-furniture cleaning is one of the clearest X60 advantages, with several reviewers saying the low body let it reach places other robots missed.
Under-furniture reach is good thanks to the low profile and persistent navigation, with multiple reviewers noting it cleans under beds, desks, and tables. Very low clearances still depend on your furniture height.
Value is where enthusiasm cools: some reviewers liked the product overall but still questioned whether the premium price beats cheaper Dreame or rival alternatives.
The X60 is consistently described as able to vacuum or mop well, but some reviews say the result depends heavily on settings and home layout.
The water tanks are usable but not generous; one review estimated them as smaller than the previous model’s tanks.
Auto-fill dock is a major convenience, with many citing weeks of mopping before refills in average use. A few find the reservoir awkward to handle/refill, but the concept and day-to-day automation score highly.
One review called the overall unit relatively heavy, which could matter for portability.