One review says Dyson does not include spare rollers, brushes, or other ancillaries in the box.
Accessories vary by package: some reviewers got spare bags/mop parts, while others reported few or no extra consumables.
Positive reviews say it handles thresholds and floor transitions confidently.
Design is generally seen as sleek or attractive, even if it is less visually distinctive than older Dysons.
Design feedback is mixed: many like the clean white look, while others find it basic or worry the glossy finish shows marks/scratches.
AI and automation are central to the product and generally work, though real-world stain detection is not universally convincing.
The Roborock app is widely praised for deep customization, schedules, and map edits; a few mention missing/quirky workflows (e.g., open-plan room splitting).
Rugs and mixed floor transitions are a strong point in supportive reviews.
Mixed-floor homes benefit from mop-lift + carpet detection, letting it clean rugs without soaking them in many cases.
Setup is a consistent strength across written and video reviews.
Setup is repeatedly described as quick: minimal assembly, straightforward app onboarding, and fast initial mapping.
Battery life is good enough for many homes, but some tests say it still trails top rivals.
Battery life is commonly cited around 180 minutes, with reliable recharge-and-resume behavior and good efficiency.
Multiple reviews highlight the bagless bin and dock design as a standout convenience.
Bagged auto-emptying and onboard bin capacity are viewed as convenient, with reports of weeks-long bag life in typical use.
Reviews that discuss build quality largely call the robot well-made or solid.
Build quality impressions vary: some find it solid, while others say materials feel less premium than Roborock’s flagship lines.
High-pile carpet results are split sharply, with one review praising deeper-shag boost behavior and another measuring poor dense-carpet pickup.
Deep/high-pile carpet cleaning is strong for a single-roller bot, but some reviewers say dual-roller flagships still clean thicker carpets better.
Low-pile carpet pickup looks middling in the dust-mat test that measured it.
Low-pile rugs are handled very well in both tests and everyday cleaning.
Carpet performance is generally strong, though at least one test reported weaker results on medium-pile compared with low-pile or top competitors.
One lab review reports no noticeable hairballs or tangles in the brush roll.
Comparisons are mixed; Dyson beats some rivals in speed or intelligence claims, but loses to others on cleaning or value.
Comparative testing often places it near the top for overall vacuum+mop combos, with tradeoffs mainly versus pricier flagships.
App experience is mixed: some call it intuitive or fluid, while others find it feature-light, patchy, or unintuitive.
The app controls are generally clear and feature-rich; the built-in voice assistant is seen as helpful by some but limited/overly sensitive by others.
Corner cleaning is generally helped by the side systems and shifting brush behavior.
Corners remain a common limitation (round body + geometry), even though edge cleaning is strong.
One test-focused review says groove and joint pickup on hard floors remains incomplete.
Crevice pickup is generally above average, with some tests showing it can pull debris from fairly deep cracks.
One review specifically highlights Dyson's cyclone-powered dock emptying system.
The dirt-illumination feature is repeatedly framed as a useful aid for spotting debris.
Dirty-water/dirt sensing is cited as useful for triggering extra mop washing when pads are especially dirty.
Docking and auto-empty reliability are mixed: some praise the dock design, others report missed emptying or docking struggles.
The dock is a core strength (auto-empty + hot-water mop washing + drying), but it still requires water-tank service and occasional tray/plate cleaning.
Dock-related cleaning and drying noise is a common complaint.
It can remove dried-on stains, but not always in one pass and not every reviewer was impressed.
Dried-on stain results are strong (coffee/grape/sauce), sometimes ranking near the top; the most stubborn spots may need extra passes.
One reviewer explicitly says the robot is easy to set up and use.
Overall usability is high once configured, but convenience drops if you regularly need to pre-tidy cords or de-tangle long hair.
Edge cleaning is mixed; some praise wall and skirting-board performance while others say edge pickup lags.
Edge/baseboard mopping is a standout due to the extending mop, with repeated mentions of near wall-to-wall coverage.
One review says the robot traces room outlines methodically before cleaning rows.
Emptying is convenient when it works, but several reviews mention overflow or docking and evac inconsistencies.
Auto-emptying is described as clean and convenient; you still need to replace bags and manage dirty water.
Filtration is a weak point in the teardown-style reviews, which question both performance and how clearly Dyson specifies it.
HEPA-style filtration and sealed dust handling are mentioned as effective, with no major dust-containment complaints.
Mopping leaves a thin layer that dries quickly, and the dock’s pad drying helps reduce lingering dampness.
The brush and roller hardware gets praise for features like a shifting brush bar and V-shaped bristles.
One video test shows sticky liquid messes being picked up very quickly in the cleaned area.
Long-hair wrap on the side brush is a recurring complaint and can be time-consuming to clean.
Carpet hair pickup can be good, but it is not backed by as many reviews as other categories.
Carpet hair pickup is strong overall, though occasional clumps/fluff can still need a quick touch-up.
Hair pickup on hard floors is strong in the reviews that tested it.
Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently praised, including for pet hair.
Anti-tangle performance is mixed: some reviewers saw little wrapping, while others had to clear hair or use scissors.
Main-brush tangling is usually well controlled, but long hair can still wrap the side brush and needs periodic clearing.
Fine-dust results are mixed across reviews, ranging from excellent lab pickup to poor deep-dust tests.
Hard-floor fine debris pickup is consistently excellent in tests and daily use.
Hard-floor large-debris pickup is usually strong, especially in real-home crumb and oat tests.
Large-debris pickup on hard floors is a strength, though tight inside corners can still be a weak spot.
The green light and illumination feature is repeatedly mentioned as useful for spotting dirt ahead.
Headlights/LEDs are noted as helpful in low light, supporting more consistent cleaning in darker rooms.
Some reviewers see the dirt-detection approach and floor transitions as genuinely distinctive, while another says it still does not out-innovate the field.
One lab review says it can miss a few larger crumbs near bowls or thresholds.
Its height is a recurring weakness, especially under cabinets and furniture.
A relatively low body for a LiDAR robot helps it reach under more furniture, though the sensor turret still limits very low clearances.
Maintenance is not fully hands-off; some reviewers call out manual cleanup or weekly checks.
Automation reduces upkeep, but reviewers still mention periodic brush hair removal and cleaning the wash tray/plate.
Positive tests describe the robot as moving smoothly across different floor types and obstacles.
Mapping speed is a major strength, though not every map is perfect or doorway detection flawless.
Maps are detailed and coverage is efficient, but some tests note slower overall run times and occasional quirks segmenting open floor plans.
Mop lifting behavior exists, but not every reviewer finds it flexible enough in mixed-floor situations.
Mop lift height (often cited around 10 mm) is repeatedly praised for keeping carpets/rugs drier during mixed runs.
Mopping is above average overall, especially on fresh sticky messes, but some tests show misses or only partial stain removal.
Mopping is widely rated excellent for daily maintenance and coverage; a few compare it as slightly less ‘deep scrub’ than top sonic/vibrating systems.
Cleaning runs can be quiet enough for normal activity, but dock drying and self-empty cycles are notably louder.
Often described as quiet for its performance (some measurements/estimates around low‑50 dB), though max power is still noticeable.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the more consistently praised robot traits.
Obstacle avoidance is mixed: some report cable/small-item misses, while others (especially post-update) see meaningful improvement.
Heated drying and roller cleaning are described as helping prevent smells.
Bagless operation is repeatedly cited as reducing ongoing costs compared with bagged rivals.
Ongoing costs mainly come from dust bags and wear items; some reviewers explicitly flag bag replacement as a recurring expense.
Day-to-day convenience is a recurring positive theme, with reviewers describing less oversight and lower mental load.
After two months of use, one reviewer says the mop still looked brand new.
Overall sentiment skews positive, but several reviewers stop short of calling it class-leading.
Packaging is praised as well organized in at least one review, making unboxing/setup smoother.
Pet-home suitability is supported by explicit pet-home framing and by cleanup results in homes with cats or dogs.
Pet hair pickup is a frequent highlight, and some reviews mention pet-focused modes/behaviors and monitoring features.
Value is mixed; some say the performance or pricing is justified, while others say rivals undercut it or the price feels high.
Value depends heavily on sale price: several call it feature-packed for the money, but many still label it expensive at MSRP.
Privacy gets limited but notable mention: Dyson says footage stays on-device, but the app still asks for permissions.
The camera enables remote viewing/video calls; at least one reviewer flags camera-equipped robots as a privacy dealbreaker and suggests choosing camera-free if concerned.
Runtime is usually described as solid to good, with enough coverage for many homes.
Self-cleaning is a clear feature advantage, but roller washing is not flawless in every test.
Automatic mop washing/drying is strong, but some reviewers note the wash plate/board gets dirty and needs manual cleaning; periodic pad washing helps.
A documented firmware update improved obstacle avoidance in testing, suggesting active software tuning and support.
The heated-water and solution system is useful, but several reviewers complain detergent is not included or note design compromises.
Multiple reviews call out limited/no detergent dosing (or not being able to use solution), a notable gap versus some rivals.
One review explicitly says the robot still cannot tackle stairs, making it poor for that use.
Several reviews call the dock and robot bulky and space-hungry.
The dock is tall/space-hungry and needs a dedicated spot, even if it’s slimmer than some competitors’ stations.
Roller-based mopping is often praised for avoiding smear and residue.
Streaking is generally low, with settings/features that help keep finish even; deep-scrub expectations may still require tuning.
Stuck resistance is strong in some homes, but one reviewer reports it getting trapped under low furniture.
Reviews often report few rescues, with good threshold handling and less tendency to get stranded or stuck.
Reviews mostly describe suction as strong, though one test-heavy review says it falls well short of older Dyson standards.
Strong 7,000‑Pa-class suction in reviews, with solid pickup across surfaces; a few note flagships can still edge it on deepest crevices or thick carpet.
One review warns apartment dwellers and homes with limited floor space to think carefully before buying.
One review notes Dyson's Concierge option for live video support during setup.
Reliability notes are mostly positive (stable operation/connectivity), though obstacle/cable situations can still cause interruptions if floors aren’t prepped.
Under-furniture reach is a clear weakness for homes with toe-kicks, low beds, or low cabinets.
Under-furniture/toe-kick reach is highlighted as better than average in hands-on use.
At deal pricing it can make more sense, but at full price some reviewers still hesitate.
Reviewers describe it as a wet-and-dry or do-it-all robot rather than a single-purpose cleaner.
Reviews mention separate clean and dirty water tanks and straightforward tank handling.
Large dock tanks reduce refill frequency in some homes, but dirty-water emptying can be frequent if you mop often.
One hands-on video calls the robot heavy and cumbersome to lift.