One review says Dyson does not include spare rollers, brushes, or other ancillaries in the box.
Positive reviews say it handles thresholds and floor transitions confidently.
The adaptive chassis lift/threshold capability is a standout differentiator, helping it clear taller transitions than many robots. A few reviewers suggest real-world limits can be below marketing claims, but it’s still viewed as meaningfully better than average.
Design is generally seen as sleek or attractive, even if it is less visually distinctive than older Dysons.
Its curved, modern dock and polished styling are frequently described as more living-room-friendly than boxier competitors. Overall sentiment on design is strongly positive.
AI and automation are central to the product and generally work, though real-world stain detection is not universally convincing.
The app is consistently described as feature-rich, with strong automation options (room-by-room settings, scheduling, empty frequency, remop triggers, etc.). Overall sentiment is that the software is powerful without being overly hard to use.
Rugs and mixed floor transitions are a strong point in supportive reviews.
For mixed flooring, mop lifting and carpet detection are praised for keeping rugs dry while maintaining cleaning coverage; reviewers generally see it as well-suited to homes with area rugs.
Setup is a consistent strength across written and video reviews.
Setup is described as straightforward: the dock is largely ready out of the box, pairing/mapping is quick, and most complexity comes from exploring app settings rather than assembly.
Battery life is good enough for many homes, but some tests say it still trails top rivals.
Battery life and efficiency are rated highly (including strong coverage per charge), making it a good fit for larger homes or multi-room schedules.
Multiple reviews highlight the bagless bin and dock design as a standout convenience.
Reviews commonly mention a disposable dust bag in the dock plus an onboard bin; overall feedback is that it reduces dust mess and feels appropriately sized for typical households.
Reviews that discuss build quality largely call the robot well-made or solid.
High-pile carpet results are split sharply, with one review praising deeper-shag boost behavior and another measuring poor dense-carpet pickup.
Low-pile carpet pickup looks middling in the dust-mat test that measured it.
Carpet deep-clean performance is rated very strong in testing, placing it near the top tier among vacuum+mop hybrids.
One lab review reports no noticeable hairballs or tangles in the brush roll.
Comparisons are mixed; Dyson beats some rivals in speed or intelligence claims, but loses to others on cleaning or value.
App experience is mixed: some call it intuitive or fluid, while others find it feature-light, patchy, or unintuitive.
Controls are generally praised: reviewers cite an intuitive app, useful remote-control features (e.g., pin-and-go), and broad customization. Some note competitor apps can feel more confusing, making Roborock’s UI a relative bright spot.
Corner cleaning is generally helped by the side systems and shifting brush behavior.
Corner cleaning gets frequent praise thanks to an extending side brush, improving reach into tight corners. One stress test notes the side brush can scatter debris in extreme scenarios, but overall corner performance is viewed as above average.
One test-focused review says groove and joint pickup on hard floors remains incomplete.
Crevice/groove pickup is noted as a relative weak spot: one review calls it average compared to the robot’s otherwise high-performing hard-floor and carpet results.
One review specifically highlights Dyson's cyclone-powered dock emptying system.
The dirt-illumination feature is repeatedly framed as a useful aid for spotting debris.
A dirty-water / dirt-detection sensor is credited with enabling remop/extra wash behavior, helping prevent spreading grime and improving hands-off cleaning.
Docking and auto-empty reliability are mixed: some praise the dock design, others report missed emptying or docking struggles.
Docking and auto-empty reliability are repeatedly praised: the robot returns consistently, empties well, and handles mop washing/drying and refills with little fuss.
Dock-related cleaning and drying noise is a common complaint.
Dock emptying noise is described as relatively quiet for the category, including one report around ~67 dB.
It can remove dried-on stains, but not always in one pass and not every reviewer was impressed.
In at least one standardized test, dried-on stain performance is described as more mid-pack than class-leading—good, but not the standout reason to buy.
One reviewer explicitly says the robot is easy to set up and use.
Day-to-day ownership is described as low-effort because the dock automates most chores; typical hands-on tasks are water refills/empties and occasional cleaning of the dock tray/consumables.
Edge cleaning is mixed; some praise wall and skirting-board performance while others say edge pickup lags.
Edge coverage is repeatedly highlighted: an extending mop pad and sweep arm help it clean closer to walls and baseboards than many rivals. Reviewers still wish for true baseboard scrubbing, but edge pickup is considered a strength.
One review says the robot traces room outlines methodically before cleaning rows.
Emptying is convenient when it works, but several reviews mention overflow or docking and evac inconsistencies.
The bagged emptying system is viewed as clean and convenient, with quiet emptying noted in at least one review and helpful indicators when water tanks need attention.
Filtration is a weak point in the teardown-style reviews, which question both performance and how clearly Dyson specifies it.
The brush and roller hardware gets praise for features like a shifting brush bar and V-shaped bristles.
One video test shows sticky liquid messes being picked up very quickly in the cleaned area.
Carpet hair pickup can be good, but it is not backed by as many reviews as other categories.
For carpet hair, reviews and pet-hair testing place it among the better performers, though some results suggest two passes may still be needed for the most thorough pickup.
Hair pickup on hard floors is strong in the reviews that tested it.
Hard-floor hair pickup is described as excellent in pet-focused testing, with near-perfect results reported.
Anti-tangle performance is mixed: some reviewers saw little wrapping, while others had to clear hair or use scissors.
Hair‑wrap resistance is a major highlight: the split/DuoDivide-style roller design earns perfect or near-perfect tangle-test results in multiple discussions. One reviewer still noted minor hair accumulation in certain joints, but overall sentiment remains very strong.
Fine-dust results are mixed across reviews, ranging from excellent lab pickup to poor deep-dust tests.
Testing-focused reviews describe excellent fine-dust pickup on hard floors, with strong results across small particulate debris.
Hard-floor large-debris pickup is usually strong, especially in real-home crumb and oat tests.
Large-debris intake is repeatedly described as excellent in testing, handling bigger particles without major issues.
The green light and illumination feature is repeatedly mentioned as useful for spotting dirt ahead.
Hot-water mop washing and heated/warm-air drying are consistently praised for hygiene and for keeping mop pads from staying damp between runs.
Some reviewers see the dirt-detection approach and floor transitions as genuinely distinctive, while another says it still does not out-innovate the field.
One lab review says it can miss a few larger crumbs near bowls or thresholds.
Its height is a recurring weakness, especially under cabinets and furniture.
Maintenance is not fully hands-off; some reviewers call out manual cleanup or weekly checks.
Maintenance is often framed as low thanks to automation, but owners still need to refill clean water, empty dirty water, replace bags/consumables, and occasionally clean the dock tray and brushes.
Positive tests describe the robot as moving smoothly across different floor types and obstacles.
Mapping speed is a major strength, though not every map is perfect or doorway detection flawless.
Lidar mapping and route planning are described as fast and efficient, with organized straight-line coverage and solid room handling/multi-level mapping.
Mop lifting behavior exists, but not every reviewer finds it flexible enough in mixed-floor situations.
Mop lifting is frequently cited as effective (often framed around a ~17mm lift), enabling it to vacuum carpets/rugs without soaking them.
Mopping is above average overall, especially on fresh sticky messes, but some tests show misses or only partial stain removal.
Mopping is broadly praised—dual spinning pads with adjustable wetness tackle everyday grime and paw prints well, and the extending mop pad improves edge coverage. A few reviewers still give the edge to the best-in-class moppers for heavy stains, but Curv is considered an excellent all‑around performer.
Cleaning runs can be quiet enough for normal activity, but dock drying and self-empty cycles are notably louder.
Obstacle avoidance is one of the more consistently praised robot traits.
Obstacle avoidance is usually described as good for larger items and many everyday obstacles, but several reviewers call out missed small cables/cords. In cable-heavy rooms, it may snag or stop, so floor prep or no-go zones are recommended.
Heated drying and roller cleaning are described as helping prevent smells.
Bagless operation is repeatedly cited as reducing ongoing costs compared with bagged rivals.
Day-to-day convenience is a recurring positive theme, with reviewers describing less oversight and lower mental load.
After two months of use, one reviewer says the mop still looked brand new.
Overall sentiment skews positive, but several reviewers stop short of calling it class-leading.
Across the reviews, Qrevo Curv lands as a top-tier vacuum+mop with strong cleaning results, a highly automated dock, and smart navigation. Praise centers on edge/corner reach and pet-hair handling, while the most common knocks are premium pricing and imperfect cable avoidance.
Pet-home suitability is supported by explicit pet-home framing and by cleanup results in homes with cats or dogs.
Multiple reviews frame it as a great choice for pet owners thanks to strong hair pickup, anti-tangle brush design, and camera/app features (where enabled) for monitoring. Pet homes with lots of cords still need some floor prep.
Value is mixed; some say the performance or pricing is justified, while others say rivals undercut it or the price feels high.
The price is repeatedly called premium (often framed around a ~$1,600 MSRP), and several reviewers recommend waiting for discounts. When on sale, value is described as far more compelling; a few reviewers question whether camera/chassis-lift extras are worth the upcharge versus cheaper variants or rivals.
Privacy gets limited but notable mention: Dyson says footage stays on-device, but the app still asks for permissions.
Camera-based features (obstacle recognition, remote viewing/voice) bring privacy considerations. Reviews note the camera can be disabled/off by default, and a camera-free variant exists for buyers who prioritize privacy.
Runtime is usually described as solid to good, with enough coverage for many homes.
Self-cleaning is a clear feature advantage, but roller washing is not flawless in every test.
The dock’s self-cleaning base/tray features reduce manual scrubbing, though reviewers still expect periodic cleaning to keep things fresh.
The heated-water and solution system is useful, but several reviewers complain detergent is not included or note design compromises.
Most reviewers say detergent dosing is manual (add solution to the clean-water tank rather than a dedicated auto-dosing reservoir), while one review lists a detergent capacity/mixing capability. Net takeaway: plan for at least some manual solution handling.
One review explicitly says the robot still cannot tackle stairs, making it poor for that use.
Several reviews call the dock and robot bulky and space-hungry.
Roller-based mopping is often praised for avoiding smear and residue.
Stuck resistance is strong in some homes, but one reviewer reports it getting trapped under low furniture.
Adaptive lift helps it clear thresholds and some obstacles, but cable snags and occasional attempts to 'climb' awkward objects can still interrupt runs in some homes.
Reviews mostly describe suction as strong, though one test-heavy review says it falls well short of older Dyson standards.
Vacuuming performance is described as strong in real homes and on carpets, helped by high rated suction. One evaluation calls out only average airflow/bench suction and weaker performance in tight crevices compared with its overall cleaning results.
One review warns apartment dwellers and homes with limited floor space to think carefully before buying.
One review notes Dyson's Concierge option for live video support during setup.
Under-furniture reach is a clear weakness for homes with toe-kicks, low beds, or low cabinets.
At deal pricing it can make more sense, but at full price some reviewers still hesitate.
Reviewers describe it as a wet-and-dry or do-it-all robot rather than a single-purpose cleaner.
Reviews mention separate clean and dirty water tanks and straightforward tank handling.
Reviews consistently mention separate clean/dirty water tanks plus onboard water handling that keeps pads wet. Tank refills/empties are a routine task, but capacity and adjustable water use are generally seen as practical for whole-home runs.
One hands-on video calls the robot heavy and cumbersome to lift.