Compare Shokz OpenFit 2+ vs Shokz OpenFit 2

P1 Shokz OpenFit 2+
P2 Shokz OpenFit 2

Comparison Takeaways

Shokz OpenFit 2+

Where It Has the Edge

  • Spatial audio is 4.1 vs 2.0. Spatial/Dolby audio was usually praised for richer, wider, more immersive sound, but some reviewers preferred it for video...
  • Sensors is 3.3 vs 2.0. Sensor feedback was mixed: one review praised wear detection, while another wished smart sensors were included.
  • Maximum volume clarity is 4.5 vs 3.6. Most reviewers who discussed high-volume behavior heard clean playback without distortion, though one warned that very high volume...
  • Voice assistant integration is 3.3 vs 2.5. Voice assistant integration exists through limited touch or button customization, but reviewers treated it as secondary rather than...

Shokz OpenFit 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 2.5. One reviewer praises the case as compact enough for pockets or running pouches, supporting portability.
  • Bluetooth is 5.0 vs 3.3. Bluetooth performance is viewed positively, with reviewers reporting stable connections, stronger performance in busy areas, and quick reconnection.
  • Frequency response accuracy is 3.5 vs 2.0. One technical review finds the tuning tracks closely through the midrange while keeping treble restrained, suggesting fair but...
  • Touch control responsiveness is 3.7 vs 2.5. Touch controls are mixed: one reviewer found them finicky, another wanted more customization, and another reported they worked...
Average score
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.9
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.1
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.3

Reviewers consistently framed ANC as absent or unsuitable for noise-cancellation seekers, treating the product as intentionally awareness-first instead.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.0

ANC is absent or not competitive, and reviewers frame that as a limitation for commuting, isolation, and all-scenario use.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Android compatibility received one direct positive test result alongside iOS compatibility.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

One reviewer reports no issues using the earbuds with a Google Pixel, supporting Android compatibility in practice.

App
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

The app was generally considered useful, simple, or feature-rich for EQ, firmware, controls, Dolby, and tracking, though a few reviews described it as minimal or not essential.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

The app is mostly praised as helpful, clean, and customizable, though one reviewer notes it is not the most extensive.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0

One reviewer found video latency minimal and acceptable for casual gaming, while noting no dedicated gaming mode elsewhere in the review.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

One reviewer reports no visible lip-sync delay, making video watching feel accurate.

Bass performance
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Bass was often better than expected for open-ear earbuds, especially with EQ or Dolby, but several reviewers still noted limited punch and depth compared with sealed earbuds.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.1

Bass is repeatedly described as better, richer, or surprisingly strong for open-ear earbuds, but several reviewers still note limited punch versus in-ear buds.

Battery
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Battery life received strong agreement as excellent, long-lasting, or a non-issue for daily use, training, and long sessions.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.9

Battery life is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it excellent, far improved, and sufficient for long workouts or all-day use.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Bluetooth behavior was mixed: reviewers liked seamless single-bud use, but others reported earbuds staying connected in the case or draining phone battery without an off switch.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

Bluetooth performance is viewed positively, with reviewers reporting stable connections, stronger performance in busy areas, and quick reconnection.

Build quality
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Build quality was praised through flexible/durable ear hooks and robust-feeling materials.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

Build quality is praised through premium finish and sturdy hooks, supporting a strong physical-quality impression.

Button control usability
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Physical buttons were widely praised as easier, more reliable, and more comfortable than touch-only controls, though one ultrarunner wanted an on/off button.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.8

Physical button controls are one of the clearest upgrades, widely praised as easier, more precise, and better for workouts than touch-only controls.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Case quality was mixed: reviewers liked the size/design and wireless charging, but cited a pinch hazard, poor low-battery signaling, and non-waterproof case limitations.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.7

Carry case impressions are mixed: some call it compact, flat, impressive, or secure, while others criticize size or lack of water resistance.

Charging
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Charging was praised for wireless convenience and quick top-ups, but one review reported case charging behavior that could leave earbuds undercharged.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.2

Charging is mostly positive because of quick-charge performance and improved case contacts, but lack of wireless charging hurts some impressions.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

The one explicit clamping-force assessment was very positive because the reviewer felt no clamping pressure at all.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
No score yet
Codec support
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

Codec support drew criticism from one reviewer because the earbuds lack high-end Bluetooth codecs.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.0

Codec support is a weak point in the evidence, with one reviewer criticizing the limitation to SBC and AAC.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.9

Comfort was one of the strongest points across nearly every review, with repeated praise for long-wear softness, low fatigue, and all-day active use.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

Comfort is one of the strongest consensus areas, with many reviewers saying the buds work for long runs, workouts, glasses, and all-day wear.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Design and aesthetics were praised as classy, understated, premium, sleek, and among the best-looking open-ear designs tested.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.3

Design and aesthetics are positive overall, with praise for premium finish, stylish refinement, and glasses-friendly changes.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

EQ customization was a clear strength: reviewers liked tweaking sound, custom EQ, and personal preference controls, though one app workflow was limited.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

Equalizer customization is a plus for reviewers who want to fine-tune sound, with praise for custom EQ options and sound/control tuning.

Find My
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.9

Find My-style feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked ringing/tracking features, while others complained about missing true case Find My support or losing tracking when the battery died.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.5

Find My evidence is mixed: reviewers like earbud finding, but some criticize the inability to locate the case.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

Only SoundGuys offered an opinionated frequency-response critique, finding upper mids and treble below its preferred target.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.5

One technical review finds the tuning tracks closely through the midrange while keeping treble restrained, suggesting fair but limited response accuracy.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.7

Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard clean, distinct instruments or stereo separation without muddying vocals and guitars.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

One reviewer specifically praises improved definition in guitars and acoustics, supporting stronger instrument separation.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.0

Integrated microphone impressions are positive overall, with one reviewer calling the microphone a surprise and another rating raw recordings as only standard.

LDAC
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

LDAC was specifically missed by one reviewer who expected it on a premium open-ear product.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Most reviewers who discussed high-volume behavior heard clean playback without distortion, though one warned that very high volume could sound cranky.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.6

Maximum-volume clarity is mixed: some reviewers praise consistent sound at high volumes, while others report distortion or muddiness when pushed.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Microphone noise reduction generally handled traffic, background noise, or indoor noise well, but wind remained the recurring weak scenario.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

Microphone noise reduction receives strong praise for cutting background noise, including wind, noisy surroundings, and loud music nearby.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Call quality was mostly praised as clean, clear, or very good, with caveats around wind, crowded cafés, or heavy processing.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.7

Call quality is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting clear voices, solid calls, and strong outdoor call usability.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Midrange and vocals were generally described as clean, natural, energetic, or more forward, with the strongest praise coming from music-focused reviews.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

Midrange clarity is generally positive, with reviewers calling mids clearer, crisper, or natural, aside from occasional vocal muddiness at high volume.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positively supported by tested compatibility across Android and iOS.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

One reviewer successfully used the earbuds across phone, smartwatch, and sports-watch devices, supporting broad platform compatibility.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Multipoint was repeatedly described as smooth, seamless, convenient, or reliable for switching between phones, laptops, watches, and other devices.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.9

Multipoint is consistently praised for seamless, reliable switching between devices, especially phones, laptops, watches, and work setups.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.5

Passive isolation is essentially not the point of the design; the cited reviewer emphasized that the earbuds do not isolate the listener from the world.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.3

Passive isolation is weak by design, and reviewers warn that noisy environments can drown out podcasts or make the buds poor for focused blocking.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5

Portability had one notable criticism from an ultrarunner who found carrying the case extra weight and space during long races.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

One reviewer praises the case as compact enough for pockets or running pouches, supporting portability.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4

Preset EQ opinions were mostly positive for Bass Boost, Treble Boost, and Vocal/voice modes, with one technical review saying presets help compensate for open-ear limitations.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.7

Preset EQ quality is mixed: Standard and Default work well for some, but one reviewer says other modes can distort at lower volumes.

Sensors
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Sensor feedback was mixed: one review praised wear detection, while another wished smart sensors were included.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.0

Sensors are a weakness because reviewers repeatedly mention missing wear detection.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.3

Smudge resistance is mixed: one case color got dirty quickly, while another reviewer praised the matte, fingerprint-resistant finish.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Setup simplicity was supported by the convenient pairing button and the fact that app use is not required for basic functions.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
5.0

Setup and software simplicity are praised through quick pairing, easy firmware updates, and clear app navigation.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Sound leakage was generally better than expected for open-ear earbuds at reasonable volumes, but reviewers still warned that higher volumes can be heard nearby.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.1

Sound leakage is improved and often limited at normal volumes, but several reviewers still warn it can be audible nearby at higher volume.

Sound quality
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Reviewers broadly praised the open-ear sound as unusually strong, clear, balanced, or top-tier for the category, though SoundGuys treated it as below critical-listening earbuds and one runner focused mainly on clear voice playback.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

Reviewers broadly praise the OpenFit 2 sound as much improved and strong for open-ear earbuds, though still not equivalent to sealed in-ear models.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Dolby and the open presentation usually expanded the stage, but SoundGuys felt the spatial positioning was more artificial than genuinely dimensional.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.3

Two reviewers note a wider or more expansive open soundstage, which fits the open-ear design’s spacious presentation.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Spatial/Dolby audio was usually praised for richer, wider, more immersive sound, but some reviewers preferred it for video or podcasts over music and one found it gimmicky.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.0

Spatial audio is a limitation for the standard OpenFit 2, with one reviewer specifically noting the absence of 3D or spatial audio.

Stability
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Stability was strong for running, workouts, and general movement, but reviewers found caveats with helmets, buffs, high-impact jumps, or losing an earbud when removing layers.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.8

Stability is a major strength for most reviewers, with repeated praise for secure fit during running, workouts, and movement, despite one wobbly-ear caveat.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5

Touch control usefulness was limited in the cited review because the touchpad was mainly restricted to voice assistant activation.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.7

Touch controls are mixed: one reviewer found them finicky, another wanted more customization, and another reported they worked perfectly.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4

Treble drew mostly positive comments for crispness, sparkle, and detail, while SoundGuys found the treble weak and less detailed in busy mixes.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.3

Treble is mostly praised as clearer and crisper, though one lab-style review describes it as somewhat restrained rather than highly extended.

USB-C
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

USB-C received one explicit positive mention for avoiding proprietary charging cables.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.5

USB-C is a small convenience win because it avoids a proprietary cable.

Value for money
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Value was usually positive for first-time buyers because reviewers saw the $10-$20 Plus premium or category price as justified, though existing OpenFit 2 owners may not need to upgrade.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
3.8

Value is split: many recommend the OpenFit 2 for active users, while others call the price high or suggest waiting for a sale.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Voice assistant integration exists through limited touch or button customization, but reviewers treated it as secondary rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
2.5

Voice assistant integration is limited because one reviewer says Siri requires a button press rather than hands-free voice activation.

Volume output
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0

Volume was usually enough for music, calls, and outdoor use, but reviewers split on headroom in noisy places, with some wanting more output.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.8

Volume output is a major improvement: reviewers repeatedly say the buds get loud enough for outdoor use and often need less volume than before.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Water and sweat resistance was generally reassuring for rain, sweat, and workouts, though reviewers warned against submersion and sweat-related charging care.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.3

Water and sweat resistance are generally considered good for workouts, rain, sweat, and cleaning, though case water resistance remains a caveat elsewhere.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Weight comfort was consistently praised; reviewers repeatedly said the earbuds felt very light or nearly disappeared on-ear.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2
4.4

Weight comfort is positive; reviewers describe the buds as lightweight or well-distributed despite being heavier than tiny in-ear earbuds.