Average score
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.9
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.8
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.3
Reviewers consistently framed ANC as absent or unsuitable for noise-cancellation seekers, treating the product as intentionally awareness-first instead.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
2.0
These are not ANC earbuds, and several reviewers frame that as a reason to skip them for flights, loud gyms, or silence-seeking use. The open design can still be a strength for people who want awareness instead of cancellation.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Android compatibility received one direct positive test result alongside iOS compatibility.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.8
Android pairing came across as easy in the hands-on test, with Google Fast Pair connecting quickly. Android-specific feedback is limited but positive.
App
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
The app was generally considered useful, simple, or feature-rich for EQ, firmware, controls, Dolby, and tracking, though a few reviews described it as minimal or not essential.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.6
The Shokz app is generally liked for keeping advanced controls accessible without making the earbuds feel complicated. Users valued battery views, Dolby, EQ, multipoint, gesture customization, and firmware options.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0
One reviewer found video latency minimal and acceptable for casual gaming, while noting no dedicated gaming mode elsewhere in the review.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.1
Video sync is sharply divided. One YouTube test found no lip-sync delay, while one customer reported obvious, variable Bluetooth latency that made editing, games, movies, and music videos frustrating.
Auracast support
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
1.5
Auracast is a clear miss for one expert reviewer. It was not widely discussed, but its absence stood out as an unfixed limitation for future-proof wireless sharing.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
Bass was often better than expected for open-ear earbuds, especially with EQ or Dolby, but several reviewers still noted limited punch and depth compared with sealed earbuds.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.3
Bass is repeatedly described as unusually punchy for open-ear earbuds, with several reviewers calling it a major upgrade. The tradeoff is that bass can overpower mids and treble for some listeners, and it still cannot match sealed in-ear bass.
Battery
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Battery life received strong agreement as excellent, long-lasting, or a non-issue for daily use, training, and long sessions.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Battery life is a consistent strength, with 10-hour buds and 40-hour case totals repeatedly matching real-world use. Even mixed reviews often still praised endurance.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Bluetooth behavior was mixed: reviewers liked seamless single-bud use, but others reported earbuds staying connected in the case or draining phone battery without an off switch.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.2
Bluetooth impressions are mostly positive for pairing and connection stability, including easy phone pairing and no disconnects. The major exception is one customer’s severe PC latency complaint, which drags down confidence for video work.
Build quality
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Build quality was praised through flexible/durable ear hooks and robust-feeling materials.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.5
Build impressions are mostly positive in expert testing, with durability upgrades and premium materials called out. One customer’s damaged arrival is the main negative durability note.
Button control usability
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Physical buttons were widely praised as easier, more reliable, and more comfortable than touch-only controls, though one ultrarunner wanted an on/off button.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.0
Controls improved over the first generation and can be customized heavily, but they remain one of the more divisive parts of the product. Pinch controls tend to fare better than taps, especially while moving.
Carry case quality
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Case quality was mixed: reviewers liked the size/design and wireless charging, but cited a pinch hazard, poor low-battery signaling, and non-waterproof case limitations.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.3
The case is usually praised as compact, pocketable, sturdy, and convenient, with strong magnets in one test. A few caveats appear around seating the buds correctly and the case lacking its own finder sound.
Charging
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Charging was praised for wireless convenience and quick top-ups, but one review reported case charging behavior that could leave earbuds undercharged.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Charging is another strong point thanks to wireless charging, quick-charge support, and a compact case. One reviewer did warn that the buds can fail to charge if they are not seated correctly.
Clamping force comfort
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
The one explicit clamping-force assessment was very positive because the reviewer felt no clamping pressure at all.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.8
The clip pressure is usually praised as soft, secure, and not too tight. That balance is central to the all-day comfort, though individual ear anatomy can still make the fit feel wrong.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
Codec support drew criticism from one reviewer because the earbuds lack high-end Bluetooth codecs.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetComfort during long use
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.9
Comfort was one of the strongest points across nearly every review, with repeated praise for long-wear softness, low fatigue, and all-day active use.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Comfort is the product’s biggest consensus strength, with many people forgetting they were wearing the buds for hours. A minority with specific ear shapes found them painful or uncomfortable, so comfort is high but not universal.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Design and aesthetics were praised as classy, understated, premium, sleek, and among the best-looking open-ear designs tested.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Design reactions skew positive, especially for the pearl white finish, jewelry-like look, and premium clip-on styling. One customer found the look subdued, so the style is polished rather than flashy for everyone.
Ear tip size options
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
2.6
Ear-size accommodation is a weakness for a few buyers. Customers asked for bigger-ear or small-ear solutions, suggesting the one-size clip design does not fit every ear equally well.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
EQ customization was a clear strength: reviewers liked tweaking sound, custom EQ, and personal preference controls, though one app workflow was limited.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.8
EQ customization is useful and often important because tuning preferences vary widely. Custom sliders helped several listeners improve the sound, while personalized EQ disappointed others.
Find My
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.9
Find My-style feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked ringing/tracking features, while others complained about missing true case Find My support or losing tracking when the battery died.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.5
Find My is helpful for the buds themselves when it can play a loud ping. The notable gap is that one customer wanted an audio finder for the compact case too.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
Only SoundGuys offered an opinionated frequency-response critique, finding upper mids and treble below its preferred target.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetGlasses and hat compatibility
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.7
The clip-on shape worked especially well for glasses and prescription eyewear, avoiding the space conflict of earhooks. One smaller-ear customer still had slipping, so fit may depend on ear size.
Instrument separation
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.7
Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard clean, distinct instruments or stereo separation without muddying vocals and guitars.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetInterchangeable left/right bud design
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.7
The interchangeable left/right design is one of the most-loved convenience features. Reviewers liked grabbing either bud, using either ear, and letting the earbuds set stereo orientation automatically.
LDAC
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
LDAC was specifically missed by one reviewer who expected it on a premium open-ear product.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetMaximum volume clarity
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Most reviewers who discussed high-volume behavior heard clean playback without distortion, though one warned that very high volume could sound cranky.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.6
Most high-volume comments are positive, especially around improved bass clarity and reduced distortion. The main caveat is that one reviewer and one customer heard clarity fall apart or highs become shrill at upper volumes.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Microphone noise reduction generally handled traffic, background noise, or indoor noise well, but wind remained the recurring weak scenario.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.0
The added noise-reduction mic system helps voice pickup in many accounts, especially for outdoor calls. Some testers did not hear much improvement over older models, so it is helpful rather than class-leading.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
Call quality was mostly praised as clean, clear, or very good, with caveats around wind, crowded cafés, or heavy processing.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.0
Call quality is mostly serviceable to strong, with several reviewers reporting clear calls even in moderate noise. It is not a unanimous win: some experts still found voices tinny, only fine, or worse than Shokz earhook models.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Midrange and vocals were generally described as clean, natural, energetic, or more forward, with the strongest praise coming from music-focused reviews.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.5
Midrange performance lands mixed. Some listeners heard clean mids and natural voices, while others felt the prominent bass left mids veiled or too bright depending on EQ.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Multi-platform compatibility was positively supported by tested compatibility across Android and iOS.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.8
Cross-platform use worked well in the test that paired an Android phone and iPhone together. Feedback is limited, but the multipoint experience looked smooth across platforms.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Multipoint was repeatedly described as smooth, seamless, convenient, or reliable for switching between phones, laptops, watches, and other devices.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.6
Multipoint is a strong everyday feature, with smooth switching between phone and laptop or dual-phone tests. Reviewers who used it generally found it reliable and easy to manage in the app.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.5
Passive isolation is essentially not the point of the design; the cited reviewer emphasized that the earbuds do not isolate the listener from the world.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
2.6
Isolation is intentionally limited, which is great for awareness but poor for blocking trains, planes, gyms, or traffic. Buyers wanting a sealed, quiet listening bubble will likely prefer ANC or in-ear earbuds.
Overall satisfaction
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.1
Overall sentiment leans strongly positive, driven by comfort, awareness, battery life, and open-ear sound that exceeded expectations. Negative reactions cluster around price, fit mismatch, latency, and sound tuning preferences.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5
Portability had one notable criticism from an ultrarunner who found carrying the case extra weight and space during long races.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.6
The small case makes the earbuds easy to carry in a pocket, bag, or running belt. Portability was not heavily discussed, but the one detailed account was very positive.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4
Preset EQ opinions were mostly positive for Bass Boost, Treble Boost, and Vocal/voice modes, with one technical review saying presets help compensate for open-ear limitations.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.3
The built-in EQ presets give quick ways to change the sound and reduce leakage. The available feedback is positive but thin compared with the heavier discussion of custom EQ.
Sensors
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Sensor feedback was mixed: one review praised wear detection, while another wished smart sensors were included.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Sensors add real convenience through wear detection, auto orientation, and drop alerts. The small smart touches were repeatedly described as useful rather than gimmicky.
Software/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Setup simplicity was supported by the convenient pairing button and the fact that app use is not required for basic functions.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.7
Setup is simple, with users reporting quick onboarding and an app that is easy to navigate. The software support helps unlock customization without much friction.
Sound leakage
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Sound leakage was generally better than expected for open-ear earbuds at reasonable volumes, but reviewers still warned that higher volumes can be heard nearby.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.6
Sound leakage is better controlled than many open-ear skeptics might expect. Private mode and directional audio earned praise, though open-ear physics means leakage is not completely eliminated.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Reviewers broadly praised the open-ear sound as unusually strong, clear, balanced, or top-tier for the category, though SoundGuys treated it as below critical-listening earbuds and one runner focused mainly on clear voice playback.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.3
Sound is the standout surprise for an open-ear design: many found it full, clear, and strong enough for music, podcasts, calls, and daily listening. A smaller group found the tuning underwhelming or uneven, especially for buyers expecting sealed-earbud performance.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Dolby and the open presentation usually expanded the stage, but SoundGuys felt the spatial positioning was more artificial than genuinely dimensional.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.1
Dolby and the open design can create a wider, more spacious presentation. That extra width is not universally loved, with one reviewer finding shifts in placement can change the soundstage noticeably.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Spatial/Dolby audio was usually praised for richer, wider, more immersive sound, but some reviewers preferred it for video or podcasts over music and one found it gimmicky.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.7
Dolby/spatial processing is polarizing. Some listeners loved the wider, room-filling presentation, while others felt it sounded artificial, metallic, or not worth using.
Stability
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Stability was strong for running, workouts, and general movement, but reviewers found caveats with helmets, buffs, high-impact jumps, or losing an earbud when removing layers.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.3
Fit stability is strong for running, walking, workouts, and daily wear when the buds are left alone. The main limitation is that clip-ons can be knocked loose or may slip for smaller ears.
Touch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5
Touch control usefulness was limited in the cited review because the touchpad was mainly restricted to voice assistant activation.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.9
Touch responsiveness is mixed. Some users found taps and pinches worked perfectly after customization, while others still preferred real buttons or noticed occasional touchiness.
Transparency mode quality
P1Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Awareness is one of the clearest strengths: runners, commuters, drivers, parents, and office users liked hearing the world while audio played. A few users felt the driver placement blocked more sound than true bone-conduction designs.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4
Treble drew mostly positive comments for crispness, sparkle, and detail, while SoundGuys found the treble weak and less detailed in busy mixes.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.1
Treble drew the most split reactions in the sound profile. A few heard crisp highs, but several complaints mention grain, sparkle, brightness, or shrillness at higher volumes.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
USB-C received one explicit positive mention for avoiding proprietary charging cables.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetValue for money
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Value was usually positive for first-time buyers because reviewers saw the $10-$20 Plus premium or category price as justified, though existing OpenFit 2 owners may not need to upgrade.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
3.0
Value is the biggest buying hesitation. Many like the polish and premium feature set, but cheaper Shokz, Soundcore, and other clip-on options make the $199 price harder to justify for budget-focused buyers.
Voice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Voice assistant integration exists through limited touch or button customization, but reviewers treated it as secondary rather than a standout feature.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
No score yetVolume output
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0
Volume was usually enough for music, calls, and outdoor use, but reviewers split on headroom in noisy places, with some wanting more output.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.1
Volume is generally strong for the category, with several reviewers saying the buds get loud enough for home, work, and outdoor use. In very loud traffic or for one dissatisfied customer, the top volume still did not leave enough headroom.
Water/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Water and sweat resistance was generally reassuring for rain, sweat, and workouts, though reviewers warned against submersion and sweat-related charging care.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.4
Durability for sweat, rain, and outdoor use is viewed positively, especially for runners and workouts. The water resistance is reassuring for normal exercise, though not treated as swimming-ready.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Weight comfort was consistently praised; reviewers repeatedly said the earbuds felt very light or nearly disappeared on-ear.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenDots 2
4.6
The low weight helps the OpenDots 2 feel barely there. Reviewers repeatedly tie the light build to long-wear comfort and easy all-day use.