Average score
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3
Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.3
acoustics
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Reviewers repeatedly described the sound profile as subdued, cushioned, poppier, pleasing, or creamy/deep, but one review criticized heavy presses as resonant and hollow while another found it louder.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

The RT100 tends to produce a satisfying deep or pleasant sound signature when paired with non-problematic switches.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Actuation was praised for swift reset, precise per-key movement, and dialed-in settings, though one reviewer with light switches reported accidental presses and typos from sensitivity.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
2.8

One reviewer reported occasional double spaces and inconsistent actuation feel, so key triggering may not feel perfectly uniform for every user.

analog input support
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Analog-style support is only indirectly supported: reviewers noted adjustable actuation and linear-style controls that could matter in racing games, but did not deeply test analog behavior.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
No score yet
backlight brightness
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Backlighting was often described as bright, shine-through, or brighter than comparable boards, but one review said it looked uneven on larger keys.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.0

Lighting visibility is acceptable to good rather than extreme, with one review calling it plenty visible and another saying it is not especially strong.

battery life
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Battery feedback was generally strong, including one claim of two months on one charge and another saying it was hard to drain, though RGB use reduced runtime in one review.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
3.8

Battery life is serviceable but not universally excellent; reports range from roughly 1.5-2 days with heavier use to about a week or more with lighter settings.

build quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Build quality was mostly positive, with reviewers calling it solid, heavy, sturdy, well-constructed, or not cheap despite plastic construction.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Across multiple outlets, the RT100 is described as sturdy, premium-feeling, and well built for a plastic keyboard.

cable quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

The only direct cable evidence mentions a braided USB-C cable, without deeper durability or flexibility testing.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

The included cable is often singled out as unusually premium for a bundled accessory.

compatibility
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Compatibility evidence covers Mac, Windows, PC, Android, and iPad-style use, though one review noted missing Mac-specific keycaps.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.6

Mac and Windows support is repeatedly confirmed, and at least one review also notes Linux usability outside the app.

connectivity
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Connectivity was a consistent strength, with repeated support for wired USB-C, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz wireless, plus several reviewers praising quick switching or tri-mode flexibility.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Tri-mode connectivity is one of the RT100’s most widely praised strengths, with wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz support cited again and again.

customization options
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Customization was a major theme, including actuation adjustment, software controls, macros, lighting settings, VIA/QMK-style remapping, and key assignment flexibility.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.4

Beyond switches and colorways, reviewers consistently highlight the RT100 as a highly customizable board, especially around the screen, lighting, and mapping.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.7

One review specifically praised the 75% size for keeping the mouse from being pushed too far across the desk.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Several reviews praise the board for fitting a numpad into a footprint that stays relatively compact for the desk.

durability
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Durability evidence is limited to one reviewer saying it could last for a year or five; no long-term stress testing was provided.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

PBT caps and sturdy construction are treated as long-term positives, with reviewers expecting the legends and caps to hold up well.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Switch replacement evidence is positive but limited, with one reviewer saying switches can be popped out and replaced.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Where reviewers actually changed switches, they generally found the swap process easy.

ergonomics
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
3.7

Ergonomics were mixed: reviewers liked the typing angle and height feet, but one reviewer found the angled position uncomfortable for their wrists.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Comfort is helped by the compact full-size layout and adjustable angle, though wrist-rest support is not part of the package.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Extra gaming features are supported by one review mentioning DKS and SOCD support alongside the Hall Effect feature set.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

One review explicitly highlights NKRO and anti-ghosting, which strengthens the RT100’s gaming utility.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
3.7

Frame rigidity was mixed: several reviewers reported flex or plastic construction, while one said the board stayed planted while typing.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

One reviewer specifically noted no key rattle or flex, indicating a firm overall structure.

gaming performance
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Gaming performance was broadly positive, with reviewers praising quick reactions, responsive feel, casual gaming comfort, and competitive-player benefits.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

Gaming performance looks good for general play, but it is more convincing for casual and mixed use than for demanding twitch play with softer switches.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Hot-swap support is repeatedly mentioned, though one review cautioned that it applies to magnetic switches rather than traditional mechanical switches.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Hot-swap support is one of the most consistently praised features, with repeated mentions of broad socket compatibility.

keycap quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
3.9

Keycap quality was mixed: reviewers noted double-shot or shine-through PBT, but one disliked the colorway.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.4

Reviewers consistently like the thick PBT caps and profile quality, even when they differ on the taller shape.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Key responsiveness was a strength across reviews, with repeated references to swift input, instant response, snappy feel, nimble reaction, and precise input.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

Where directly tested, keys were described as fast and precise, with reviewers not noticing sluggish response in normal use.

key spacing
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Key spacing and positioning were mostly praised, especially arrow-key separation and properly positioned keys, though compact layouts required some adjustment.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Keys are generally described as well spaced and easy to navigate without feeling cramped.

key stability
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Key stability evidence is limited to one review, which found no major wobble but said the switches were not the most stable.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.0

The space bar was described as firm and in line with the rest of the keycaps, suggesting solid stability on larger keys.

latency
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Latency evidence was positive for wired and 2.4GHz use, while Bluetooth carried a higher stated latency or general wireless-latency caveat.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

Multiple reviews report no discernible wireless lag, with the board feeling close to wired during use.

layout options
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Layout options were praised around the 75% or 80% arrangement, with reviewers noting compact functionality, writer-friendly sizing, and navigation/arrow keys.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

One review notes an ISO option in addition to the standard layout, which adds some regional flexibility.

legend visibility
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Legend visibility was mixed: some found the legends clear or usable in the dark, while one review said the bottom-row typeface was hard to see.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
3.9

Legends are generally easy to read in normal lighting, though one review says the opaque caps hurt visibility in the dark.

macro customization
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Macro customization is supported through Epomaker software, macro settings, and key remapping through VIA-style programming.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.4

Macro support is a clear strength, with several reviews confirming remapping and macro creation in software.

materials quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Materials were generally seen as acceptable for the price: plastic construction was noted, but reviewers still described the product as solid or quality-feeling.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
2.9

Materials are mixed: the main board often feels solid, but the knob is repeatedly criticized for feeling cheap or plasticky.

media controls
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
2.5

Media-control evidence is limited and negative, with one review specifically noting that the keyboard has no knob.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.4

Dedicated media functions are a real plus, with the knob/button setup adding useful playback control.

noise level
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Noise level was mostly described as quieter, subdued, or pleasing, though one review found heavy presses noisy.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.8

With the right switches, especially Sea Salt, the RT100 is repeatedly described as impressively quiet.

onboard memory
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
No score yet
Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

One review explicitly says remaps and macros can be stored to onboard memory.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
No score yet
Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

One review explicitly confirms per-key RGB backlighting.

polling rate
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.9

Polling-rate evidence is strong but narrow, with reviewers citing 8000Hz polling and one saying they ran it at 8,000 hertz throughout testing.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

One reviewer said the 2.4GHz dongle matched the speed of many wired gaming keyboards, suggesting strong scan performance for its class.

portability
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Portability was generally positive thanks to compact size, light weight, easy relocation, and travel-friendly comments, though one reviewer found it somewhat hefty.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
3.8

Portability is mixed: the RT100 is not tiny, but its weight and removable screen make it manageable if you really want to move it around.

profile management
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Profile-management evidence is limited to local configuration and the ability to connect up to five devices.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

One review explicitly mentions Bluetooth support for up to three profiles, which helps multi-device use.

rapid trigger support
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.7

Rapid trigger support is explicitly mentioned in reviews, including Snap Tap-style features and extensive rapid-trigger settings.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
2.8

The only direct mention was negative: one reviewer said rapid trigger inputs felt off the table with Sea Salt switches.

reliability
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Reliability evidence is limited to one reviewer expressing confidence that the keyboard could last for a year or five.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

One review describes the connection modes as working well, suggesting dependable everyday operation.

RGB customization
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

RGB customization is supported by full RGB/off modes, software control, effect cycling, and setup-matching lighting options.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

At least one review explicitly notes software-based RGB customization, reinforcing that lighting control goes beyond presets.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

RGB quality was mostly positive for brightness, diffusion, ambience, and gaming pop, but one review criticized uneven larger-key backlighting.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

RGB is described as vibrant and full-featured, even if it is partly hidden by the non-shine-through caps.

size and form factor
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

The 75%/80% form factor was repeatedly praised as compact yet functional, with enough keys for daily use while saving space compared with larger boards.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.4

The 95%/96% style layout is frequently framed as a smart near-full-size design that keeps the numpad while trimming bulk.

software quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
3.9

Software impressions were mixed: several reviewers found it extensive, serviceable, or functional, while others cited a learning curve, Chinese default, or awkwardness.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
3.6

Software support is functional but mixed: it usually works and offers many features, yet multiple reviewers call it finicky, clunky, or less polished than major-brand alternatives.

sound dampening
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Sound dampening evidence was positive, with reviewers calling out dampened keys, spacebar foam, and internal foams shaping the sound.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Foam and internal dampening are repeatedly credited with cutting hollowness, pinging, and harsh resonance.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Stabilizer quality was positive where mentioned, with reviewers citing lubrication, no rattle, and prelubed plate-mounted stabilizers.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

Stabilizers are generally good out of the box, though at least one review still noticed minor ticking.

switch feel
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Switch feel was usually positive, with reviewers describing smooth, satisfying, good-feeling switches, though one noted some scratchiness.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Across switch variants, reviewers mostly describe the RT100 as smooth and enjoyable, though the Sea Salt option can feel mushy or unusually soft to some users.

switch options
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Switch options include Transparent, Creamy Jade, and magnetic hot-swappable switch discussion, but the choices vary by model or color.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Reviews repeatedly note that Epomaker offers several switch choices, giving buyers good flexibility across linear, tactile, and quieter preferences.

typing comfort
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Typing comfort was praised across reviews, including comfortable typing, long-session comfort, high accuracy, no discomfort, and properly positioned keys.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
3.8

Typing comfort is positive overall, but very tall keycaps may not suit everyone equally well.

typing feel
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers describing creamy, premium, smooth, easy, satisfying, and improved typing experiences.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.2

Typing feel is generally praised as soft, satisfying, and pleasant, though one review found it only solid rather than class-leading.

value for money
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Value was repeatedly praised, with reviewers citing strong features for the price, reasonable pricing, and no-brainer or worth-the-money language.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.6

Value is a major strength, with many reviews saying the RT100 delivers unusual features and strong core performance for around the $100-$120 range.

volume control
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Volume control is supported through remapping rather than a dedicated control, with one reviewer assigning keys to volume down and volume up.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.5

Volume adjustment is consistently described as tactile and pleasant to use.

wireless performance
Product 1: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Wireless performance was mixed: one review called Bluetooth rock solid, while another warned that wireless can introduce latency.

Product 2: Epomaker RT100
4.7

Wireless use is generally described as responsive and dependable enough for everyday work and gaming.