Included accessories are documented in unboxing/setup coverage, including cleaning solution, fragrance modules, and an extra vacuum bag.
Reviews report a complete kit—dock/ramp, side brush, mop pads, a cleaning brush/tool, manuals, and (in some cases) spare dust bags—so it’s ready to run out of the box.
Adaptive chassis lift is clearly supported by specifications and hands-on discussion, including automatic chassis lift, wheel-height adjustment, and lift behavior on carpets or transitions.
Design is repeatedly praised as sleek, premium, modern, and visually distinctive, with several reviewers calling out the translucent top, ring light, and slim or home-friendly styling.
The square-ish robot and two-tone/shiny-matte styling get favorable comments, and reviewers like the LED accents. The base station looks modern but is fairly large and visually prominent.
Smart features are a major part of the product, with CleanMind AI, floor-type detection, 3D mapping, app controls, and automation praised, though app disconnects and limited smart-home controls were also reported.
The app supports mapping, room/zone cleaning, schedules, no-go/no-mop zones, multi-floor maps, and smart behaviors like stain/spot cleaning. Reviewers praise the feature depth and automation, though it can feel like “a lot” at first.
Area-rug handling is generally strong, with evidence around avoiding tassels, preventing rug bunching, planning paths around rug edges, and adapting to different rug types.
The robot transitions well onto rugs, can lift the mop to keep fabrics dry, and is reported to pull debris from rug fibers effectively in test scenarios.
Setup is consistently described as straightforward or easy, with coverage mentioning simple setup steps, easy app-driven setup, and a base station that is mostly assembled.
Setup is generally described as straightforward: attach the ramp, fill tanks, dock the robot, pair it in the app, and let it map. Printed quick-start guides are repeatedly praised, though the number of in-app options can slow first-time configuration.
Bag-level visibility is a weakness in the critical app review, which notes no real-time access to dust bag levels.
Battery and charging evidence is mixed but concrete: one hands-on review measured a roughly 4.8-hour recharge time and noted that battery life varies significantly by suction level.
Battery is often cited around 5,200 mAh with auto recharge-and-resume. Runtime varies widely by mode (some note ~90–120 minutes typical, others quote much longer), but most reviewers find it adequate once recharge/resume is enabled.
Bin handling is supported by a hands-on note that overfilling the bin may require more than one empty cycle, so capacity and emptying behavior are good but not unlimited.
The robot collects debris in an onboard bin and auto-empties into a disposable bag in the dock. Bags are described as large and easy to access behind a front panel, supporting multi-week intervals between changes.
Build quality appears strong in the available reviews, with comments describing strong build quality, a well-made feel, and solid overall construction.
Perceived build is solid for the price—often positioned above budget models and closer to mid/high-end competitors. Long-term durability isn’t proven, but day-one fit/finish and component access (tray, tanks, bin) are well regarded.
High-pile carpet coverage is mixed. Several sources praise lift and thick-rug capability, but detailed testing found carpet performance underwhelming compared with expectations and some competitors.
It can clean thicker rugs, but very long fibers/threads (e.g., shag) can still snag and challenge the brush even with anti-tangle tools—expect more monitoring or extra passes on high-pile rugs.
Low-pile carpet evidence is limited but favorable, with one review summary calling short-pile carpet performance very good.
Medium-pile evidence is limited but positive, with one test summary calling medium-pile results solid.
No summary yet.
Child-lock support appears in dock/control discussion, where child lock limits touchscreen usefulness and one app walkthrough lists a child-lock option.
A child lock option (along with toggles like do-not-disturb) is available in the app, which reviewers appreciated for family homes.
Clogging prevention is a major claimed and observed advantage. Reviews describe filters staying cleaner, low clogging rates, and cyclonic separation preventing performance drop.
No summary yet.
Comparison evidence is extensive. Reviewers compare the S2 against the S1 Pro, E25/E28, and competing flagships, finding meaningful upgrades in some areas but weaker value or carpet performance in others.
Reviewers compare it favorably to older iRobot/entry models and say it competes with pricier flagships on suction and mopping. It’s generally viewed as a step below the very best in obstacle avoidance and some premium convenience features.
Controls are generally positive. Reviewers cite a clean, easy app, touch controls or displays, full app functionality, and 3D map controls, though one detailed test found smart-home integration limited.
UI feedback is mixed: several reviewers find the app well-designed and easy, while at least one found certain layouts confusing despite being tech-savvy. Expect a learning curve if you plan to tweak every setting.
The dock includes built-in cable routing/wrap options that reviewers found convenient for a cleaner setup.
Corner cleaning is improved but not perfect. Reviews praise extending brushes and corner reach, while some still want longer deployment or more aggressive behavior.
The robot’s shape and edge-focused mop extension help it reach corners better than many round bots, though some reviewers still wish for an extending side brush for even deeper corner reach.
Crevice and groove pickup is mixed. One reviewer says it can get into cracks in wood or tile, while another found grout-line grime only partly removed.
Cyclone performance is one of the strongest technical themes. Reviews discuss multi-cyclone separation, in-robot cyclone technology, and stable airflow that helps keep filters from clogging.
Dirty-water or dirt-sensing support is limited to sources describing intelligent dirt detection that can trigger an additional cleaning cycle if used water is very dirty.
Docking and auto-empty reliability are strongly supported. The station is described as handling emptying, washing, drying, refilling, maintenance cycles, dirty water, and debris with little intervention.
Docking and automatic emptying are widely seen as dependable, with the robot reliably returning for emptying and mop service. App settings let you tune emptying/washing frequency to match your routine.
The auto-empty cycle can be noisy on higher settings, but some reviewers highlight a quieter/“soft” emptying option that reduces sound at the cost of a longer cycle.
Dried-on stain evidence is mostly positive but not uniform. Reviews cite dried-on residue, sauce, and overnight spill tests, though one first-look source had not yet verified whether higher mop force made it better.
Reviews report good results on tougher or dried messes, helped by repeat passes, targeted spot cleaning, and hot-water mop-pad servicing through the dock.
Ease of use is supported by a reviewer calling the robot super easy to use in the context of common robot-vacuum challenges.
Once mapped, day-to-day use is mostly press-and-go via presets and schedules. Minor friction points include one-time toggles for max modes/hair-cutting strength and the occasional need to do simple maintenance (tray rinse, pad swap).
Edge and baseboard performance is mixed. Many sources praise the extending mop or side brush, while detailed tests report visible gaps or inconsistent edge behavior near walls, cabinets, and baseboards.
No summary yet.
Edge-following accuracy is a weakness in the critical hands-on testing, with reviewers noting the robot rides off walls and that edge behavior cannot be adjusted in the app.
Edge tracking is repeatedly described as very tight, with the extending mop pad keeping minimal distance from walls for more complete edge coverage.
Emptying and mess control are positive overall, with hands-on reviewers saying the self-emptying dock handled thick hair without clogs and the stronger dock cleared the robot bin thoroughly.
Filter or accessory tracking is supported by app evidence showing accessory wear tracking, though it is not described as a direct filter sensor.
Filtration is a standout area in the hands-on coverage. Reviewers describe clean-looking filters after use, cyclonic filtration keeping the dustbin filter clear, and fine particles being separated before air returns to the room.
Reviews note a HEPA-style filter plus mesh/foam elements that capture fine dust; filters can be tapped out and some parts rinsed, but they need periodic upkeep to stay effective.
Floorhead design centers on the DuoSpiral brush and a main brush gap intended to manage hair and improve cleaning behavior.
Floor shine evidence is limited but positive, with one hands-on review saying floors looked clean and shiny after mopping.
Fresh liquid pickup evidence comes from first-look coverage explaining that the roller mop design is especially good for processing liquid spills.
Hair-removal channel evidence points to the center-gap brush design, which channels hair into the dustbin and reduces stuck strands.
Carpet hair pickup is strong in the evidence, with reviews calling pet-hair carpet performance very strong and long-hair/pet homes a good fit.
Hard-floor hair pickup is supported by reviewers describing hair, dust, and debris handled well and fine dust or loose hair picked up during hard-floor style tests.
Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most consistent strengths. Nearly all hands-on sources praise the DuoSpiral or gap-based brush for preventing tangles and reducing manual hair removal.
FlexiRazor hair-cutting and comb detangling reduce wrap significantly and are often cited as best-in-class among comb-style systems. It’s not completely tangle-free with extremely long strands, and some “strong” settings aren’t always-on by default.
Hard-floor fine-dust pickup is strong in the available evidence, including hard-floor praise and tests involving dust or fine particles on hard surfaces.
Reviews describe effective pickup of fine dust and dirt, aided by filtration that captures small particles. Routine filter care still matters for consistent fine-dust performance.
Large hard-floor debris pickup is supported by cereal, candy, peanuts, sprinkles, and other medium debris tests, where the S2 generally picked debris up well.
Large debris (crumbs, cereal, pet food, small bits) is generally handled in one or a few passes, with smart behavior that helps avoid scattering and a strong suction/brush combo.
Lighting support is narrow but present: one walkthrough notes a light for dark areas and tight spaces.
Front LEDs help the camera see in dim areas and are also called out as a nice design touch. Light toggles exist in the app on some builds.
Heating evidence centers on dock functions such as hot-water mop washing, hot-air drying, and 60°C water for cleaning the mop roller.
Innovation is supported by unique-fragrance coverage, CES recognition, in-robot cyclone discussion, and reviewers calling the system advanced or distinctive.
Extending edge mop, hair-cutting detangling, and a wash/dry dock are cited as “flagship” innovations at a lower price tier. Missing features like detergent auto-dosing, extending side brush reach, or certain brush-lift systems keep it from being the most advanced option.
Kid-friendliness is supported by one reviewer emphasizing pets or kids crawling around in the context of electrolyzed-water cleaning and chemical-free sanitation claims.
When run in quieter modes, reviewers describe it as household-friendly and less disruptive for families, though max-power vacuuming will still be audible.
Large-debris handling is supported by tests with heavier or medium-sized debris, with reviewers saying the robot pulled everything in cleanly or picked up everyday debris quickly.
Low-profile evidence is limited to one review saying the robot fits under most furniture.
Maintenance is a key strength. Reviewers cite minimal maintenance, months before real attention, easier upkeep, cleaner filters, and less need to intervene.
The hands-free dock reduces daily chores (auto-empty, mop washing/drying), but you’ll still rinse the dock tray, replace bags, and occasionally swap/clean mop pads. Compared with the Pro Ultra, the Ultra is often noted as missing a truly self-cleaning dock tray and some fully-automated extras.
Maneuverability is supported by room-transition and movement evidence: reviews describe moving between rooms without help and smooth motor behavior with no jerking.
Mapping and path efficiency are well covered through 3D mapping, room routing, furniture identification, and app maps, with several reviewers saying the robot builds detailed maps quickly or accurately.
Mapping is frequently described as fast and accurate, with editable room divisions and multi-level support. Cleaning paths are generally systematic (back-and-forth/crisscross options) rather than random.
Mop lifting is strongly supported by multiple reviews, including automatic mop lift, carpet-wetness prevention, and 28 mm lift claims.
Auto mop lifting (often cited around ~12 mm) helps prevent wet carpets/rugs and enables seamless vacuum-then-mop workflows. Lift height is generally considered sufficient for common rugs and carpets.
Mopping performance is the S2’s strongest repeated theme. Reviews praise clean hard floors, active self-washing, pressure, stain handling, and no residue, though edge coverage and extreme stains remain caveats.
Two spinning pads with downward pressure create a scrubby mop action that reviewers say resembles “real mopping” more than basic drag pads. Returning to the dock to wash pads and focusing on stains improves consistency on mixed messes.
Noise was a noted tradeoff. One reviewer called it louder than recent flagship bots, while another measured about 65.5 dB on quiet and 81 dB on max; a later benchmark also flagged the 81 dB peak as above average.
Noise impressions vary: some call it very quiet in normal use, while measured max-power runs are above average and not ideal for TV/nap time in the same room. Noise is highly mode-dependent.
Obstacle avoidance is broadly capable but imperfect. Some reviewers report zero collisions or strong object avoidance, while detailed testing found a 71% obstacle score and minor bumps with everyday clutter.
Object recognition/avoidance is generally strong and can label common obstacles, but it’s not flawless—dark rooms and soft items like socks can still cause issues. Several reviewers say it’s good for the price but not quite top-tier.
Odor control is polarizing. Some reviewers liked the fragrance or odor-reduction approach, while the most critical hands-on review said the deodorizer did not make a noticeable difference during or after cleaning.
Hot-air mop drying (and frequent pad washing) helps prevent mildew and “smelly mop” issues, which reviewers see as a hygiene advantage over simpler docks.
Ownership-cost evidence is limited to fragrance refills: one reviewer liked the modules up close but said refills were not worth personally recommending because the scent was not noticeable during cleaning.
Cleaning convenience is strong in the evidence, with reviewers citing long hands-off runtime and set-it-and-forget-it use.
Longevity claims center on sustained performance: reviewers describe peak-performance maintenance for up to 365 days and consistent cleaning results over extended use.
Overall opinion is generally favorable but not unanimous. Some reviewers call it one of the best or near-perfect, while a detailed tester describes it as strong but specialized.
Packaging evidence is narrow but positive, with one unboxing noting a large, easy-to-read quick-start card and documentation.
Unboxing impressions are positive, with organized packaging and clearly separated parts/literature.
Pet relevance is supported by a reviewer with dogs, who discussed odor control, hair challenges, and household pet mess concerns while describing the S2 as useful in that setting.
Pet-focused touches include strong pet-hair handling, anti-tangle cutting, obstacle detection for toys, optional “pet mode” settings, and camera viewing for checking on pets.
Price is a caution point. The S2 is repeatedly tied to a high flagship price, with reviewers noting $1,599.99 or €1,599 and one saying the price was higher than expected.
Consistently framed as a strong value: many reviews call it one of the best feature-to-price options in the ~$600–$700 range, especially given hot-water mop washing and advanced edge mopping.
Privacy control support is indirect but relevant: one reviewer noted the S2 does not have video monitoring mode, framing that as good news for privacy-minded users.
Remote video/patrol features are praised for utility, and some reviews mention privacy/security certification. Others still flag general concerns about any internet-connected camera, so comfort level and opting out of camera features matter.
Runtime is mixed. Some coverage highlights long runtimes, but one detailed test found coverage varies widely by suction setting and drops sharply on max suction.
Sanitizing performance is widely mentioned through electrolyzed or ozone water claims, with multiple sources citing 99.99% sterilization or bacteria reduction; one source noted Eufy had not provided much specificity.
Self-cleaning is a core strength. Reviews describe mop self-cleaning, hot-water station washing, a mop that looks brand new, and station-based cleaning after each run.
Automated mop-pad washing with hot water and hot-air drying is consistently highlighted as a key convenience feature, keeping pads cleaner between runs and improving hygiene.
Software support is evidenced by hands-on reviewers describing frequent firmware updates and improvements, including fixes for issues observed during pre-production use.
Firmware updates are available through the app. Reviewers note updates as a plus and hope they can refine obstacle avoidance and smart behaviors over time, but there’s no guarantee of major feature expansion.
The liquid system includes clean and dirty water handling, cleaning solution, and a cleaning cartridge, with reviews describing water tanks and solution use in the dock.
Multiple reviews point out the lack of a detergent/solution tank or automatic dosing—most filling is water-only. Some also note limited fine-grain water-level controls for mopping compared with certain competitors.
The dock footprint is generally favorable, with coverage noting a relatively small footprint and a narrow base station that can fit in more places.
Residue and streaking results are positive in supported tests, with no visible streaking and surfaces left clean without visible residue.
Auto washing during/after jobs helps reduce dirty streaks on floors, but residue can accumulate on the dock tray and needs occasional rinsing to keep everything clean.
Stuck resistance is supported by threshold and carpet-lift evidence, with reviewers saying it can avoid getting stuck where other vacuums do and can clear obstacles or thresholds.
It usually navigates cleanly, but at least one review reports occasional snagging on socks in dark rooms that requires intervention. No-go zones and better obstacle avoidance tuning can reduce interruptions.
Reviews consistently point to very strong suction and airflow, including 30,000 Pa claims, 100 air-watt discussion, and reports of strong pickup across debris types. Support was broad, though some carpet tests show that suction alone did not guarantee class-leading deep carpet cleaning.
The headline 19,000 Pa suction is repeatedly praised, and reviewers report strong pickup across debris sizes. A few notes suggest performance gains don’t scale linearly with the spec and that non-max modes can feel less punchy than some rivals.
Heavy-duty suitability is supported by one extended-use review estimating over 20,000 square feet cleaned and more than 40 hours of runtime.
Small-space suitability is supported by a reviewer saying the robot fits under most furniture.
Reliability signals are mixed. One source discussed a pre-order recall or hardware issue, another flagged a conservative warranty, while a hands-on reviewer praised ongoing firmware updates to fix issues.
Under-furniture pickup is supported by one hands-on review saying the robot got into tight spaces under cabinets and under a bed.
Despite being slightly taller than some newer low-profile bots, reviewers report it routinely fits under beds, cabinets, and low overhangs to reach debris others miss.
Value-for-money is mixed; one detailed comparison said a less expensive Eufy model offers better value despite the S2’s flagship strengths.
Versatility is supported by evidence across hard floors, carpets, pet hair, rooms, and zones, including app-based cleaning by room or specific zone.
Water handling is a core part of the dock system. Reviews mention clean and dirty water tanks, water refilling, larger reservoirs, and back-side dirty water storage.
The dock’s separate clean/dirty tanks are large, lift out easily, and have clear handles/indicators. Capacity is frequently described as enough for multi-day to multi-week mopping, depending on how often you run it.