Compare Razer BlackShark V3 Pro vs Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset

P1 Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
P2 Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset

Comparison Takeaways

Razer BlackShark V3 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • Equalizer customization is 4.4 vs 1.0. EQ customization was a major strength, with reviewers praising onboard EQ, 10-band controls, Synapse depth, and game-specific tuning...
  • App is 4.2 vs 1.0. The companion apps and software were useful for EQ and mobile/PC control, but one reviewer found the app...
  • Bluetooth is 4.5 vs 1.5. Bluetooth was consistently valued for simultaneous or extra-device audio, with reviewers calling it a huge win or a...
  • Comfort during long use is 4.7 vs 2.0. Comfort was one of the strongest consensus positives, with many reviewers wearing it for long sessions without fatigue,...

Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset

Where It Has the Edge

  • Volume output is 4.5 vs 2.7. Volume output is strong for gameplay cues, with footsteps described as loud and clear.
  • Detachable microphone convenience is 4.5 vs 3.0. The detachable mic is treated as convenient, particularly because it can be removed for easier transport.
  • Footstep sound level scaling feature is 5.0 vs 3.6. Footstep scaling is a standout because the reviewer could judge which footsteps were closest and farthest away.
  • Microphone noise reduction is 5.0 vs 3.7. Microphone noise rejection is a strength because nearby background noise was not picked up.
Average score
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9
Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.4
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1

ANC drew strong praise from many reviewers for blocking fans, AC, transit, or household noise, but some found it weaker or dependent on seal and pad design.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
App
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2

The companion apps and software were useful for EQ and mobile/PC control, but one reviewer found the app workflow awkward in simultaneous mode.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.0

The CH351-specific review treats the missing companion app as a clear drawback because it prevents customization.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
5.0

Audio-video sync evidence was limited but excellent, with SoundGuys reporting no noticeable delay on the low-latency wireless connection.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.0

Bass was generally viewed as punchy and useful for games, though some reviewers said it was only above average, too boosted, or not a true bass-monster.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0

Game effects such as distant chatter, explosions and bangs are described as clear, supporting strong bass-impact performance in gameplay.

Battery
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1

Battery life was mostly praised as long or solid, though some reviewers noted feature use can reduce runtime and that the 70-hour claim is not always the whole story.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Bluetooth
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Bluetooth was consistently valued for simultaneous or extra-device audio, with reviewers calling it a huge win or a blessing despite some implementation quirks.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.5

Wireless connectivity is judged poorly because it did not work as intended and produced distracting static.

Build quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.8

Build quality was strongly praised across reviews, with comments on sturdiness, premium finish, improved robustness, and well-built construction.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Build quality is praised, with the headset described as high-quality plastic with a soft-touch, premium finish.

Button control usability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.7

Physical controls were generally useful and snappy, but reviewers disagreed on usability, with some loving them and others finding buttons hard to distinguish or unintuitive.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.5

Controls are criticized as cluttered and unreliable, with buttons sometimes failing to register commands.

Cable quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.0

Cable quality had one clear negative note: the USB-C-to-3.5mm cable produced distracting cable noise when brushing clothing.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Clamp comfort evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer appreciating the reduced clamp force for longer wear.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Comfort during long use
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Comfort was one of the strongest consensus positives, with many reviewers wearing it for long sessions without fatigue, pressure, or discomfort.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.0

Long-session comfort is weak because the reviewer felt pressure on the top of the head after about an hour.

Connectivity versatility
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.6

Connectivity versatility was a major selling point because reviewers valued Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, USB, analog, simultaneous audio, and broad device flexibility.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
3.0

Connectivity is mixed: the headset supports multiple connection options, but the reviewer says its strengths work best over aux.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Design and aesthetics were highly praised for the aviation-inspired look, premium finish, sleek styling, and recognizable BlackShark identity.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

The design earns praise for fun colorways, especially the macaron teal-and-pink finish.

Detachable microphone convenience
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.0

Detachable microphone convenience had limited evidence and was mildly negative because one reviewer disliked detachable mic design as a personal preference.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

The detachable mic is treated as convenient, particularly because it can be removed for easier transport.

Dongle
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.6

Dongle feedback was the clearest hardware complaint: most reviewers disliked the wired/bulky dongle, though one praised its technology and range.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Ear cup padding was praised for breathability, sweat control, and softness, though one reviewer found the pads getting warm after about an hour.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0

The earcups are a positive comfort point, with protein leather pads described as comfy.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1

The added swivel/rotation was welcomed as a comfort and fit improvement, even if the headset still does not rotate fully flat.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Earpad replacement ease
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8

Earpad replacement evidence was limited but mildly positive because removable pads support repairability, even if the clip mechanism could be better.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Equalizer customization
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4

EQ customization was a major strength, with reviewers praising onboard EQ, 10-band controls, Synapse depth, and game-specific tuning flexibility.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.0

Equalizer customization is poor because the reviewer specifically criticizes the lack of a companion app for EQ tweaking.

Fit/seal reliability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.4

Fit and seal were mixed: one reviewer liked the seal, while SoundGuys found the yoke and fabric made a reliable seal difficult.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Footstep sound level scaling feature
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.6

Footstep scaling divided reviewers: some liked it as a competitive extra, while others found it gimmicky, game-dependent, or disruptive to other sounds.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
5.0

Footstep scaling is a standout because the reviewer could judge which footsteps were closest and farthest away.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.6

Frequency response was seen as improved but imperfect, with good tonal accuracy or enjoyable tuning offset by V-shaped balance and treble/bass issues.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Frequency accuracy is praised through the reviewer’s judgment that the headset produces nearly every sound accurately.

Game/Chat balance control
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Game/chat balance control was praised as an extremely welcome and practical control, especially for quickly shifting focus between chat and gameplay.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Headband adjustability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2

Headband adjustment had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer finding the sliding earcup mechanism refreshingly different and effective.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Hinge durability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.7

Hinge durability evidence was mixed: reviewers noted smoother or reinforced parts, but one still wished the earlier weak spot had been better addressed.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Included accessories had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer appreciating the included 3.5mm cable for passive use.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Instrument separation and detail were praised, especially by reviewers who heard clearer instruments, better tonal separation, and less congestion than older models.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.9

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed: one reviewer heard off-sounds at higher volume or peaks, while another heard no crackle or distortion even very loud.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0

Loud effects are reported clearly, supporting good clarity during louder in-game moments.

Microphone
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8

Microphone quality was the most divisive feature: some reviewers found it clear or excellent, while others saw it as muffled, stuffy, or a downgrade from V2 Pro.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

The microphone is praised as working very well in the CH351-specific review.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.7

Mic noise reduction was highly variable, from excellent background suppression to complaints about weak rejection or EQ/noise tools changing the voice tone.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
5.0

Microphone noise rejection is a strength because nearby background noise was not picked up.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.6

Call and chat mic quality was split: PCMag praised Discord clarity after EQ, while other reviewers found it muffled or merely usable.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Call or voice capture quality is strong, with the microphone described as loud and clear.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1

Midrange comments leaned positive, with reviewers noting natural voices, present mids, and improved accuracy compared with earlier tuning.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Midrange dialogue clarity is praised because dialogue avoids the hollow or echoing character the reviewer dislikes elsewhere.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility had limited but very positive evidence, with one reviewer saying it could cover an entire gaming ecosystem.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Multipoint and simultaneous audio reliability was mostly strong, with reviewers noting calls and dual-device mixing worked well; one found the switching implementation clunky.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.2

Passive isolation was mixed because the cloth pads and fit can leak noise, though one reviewer thought passive isolation was enough for typical gaming.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Portability/foldability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.5

Portability was weak because the headset does not fold or rotate flat and is not ideal for travel or handheld setups with the dongle.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Positional audio accuracy
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Positional audio was a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly locating footsteps, gunshots, enemies, and environmental cues accurately.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
5.0

Positional audio is excellent because the reviewer could judge footstep distance and direction while playing.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.0

Preset EQ evidence was negative from SoundGuys, especially for the Music preset, which they said worsened balance and listening quality.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.0

Preset EQ support is poor because the reviewer complains that the CH351 lacks Music, Movie or Game mode-style presets.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.5

Replaceable earpads had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer noting the pads are user-serviceable.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Replaceable ear plates
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.8

Replaceable ear plates were viewed as easy and potentially cool, but some reviewers considered them limited or not very useful out of the box.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.2

Sidetone adjustment was mixed: some reviewers found it fuzzy or unpleasant, while others liked its real-time performance and usability.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.3

Software/setup simplicity was mixed to negative: setup could be easy, but Synapse and mode switching were described as finicky, clunky, or buggy.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
1.0

Software support is weak because there is no app for customization.

Sound quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.4

Reviewers broadly praised the headset for strong gaming sound, with several calling it fantastic or greatly improved, while a few found it less convincing for music or all-around use.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.0

Core sound quality is praised, especially because games still sound great even without spatial audio enabled.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.1

Soundstage impressions were mostly positive for gaming, with reviewers hearing wider or more open presentation, though one found it narrower and another said it was not open-back wide.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Soundstage is a strength, with the reviewer crediting its width for accurate sound reproduction.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.3

Spatial audio was usually positive for immersion and positional depth, though some reviewers preferred stereo for competitive play or found ANC narrowed the presentation.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
5.0

Spatial audio is one of the clearest strengths and is described as making games sound fantastic.

Stability
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.5

Stability was mixed: one reviewer had game-audio reliability issues, while another praised the wireless range and signal performance.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.0

Transparency or ambient mode had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer valuing it for hearing surroundings while wearing the headset.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.9

Treble was the most repeated audio caveat: several reviewers found harshness, distortion, spiky peaks, or fatiguing high-end energy despite some tunability.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Value for money
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
3.7

Value was sharply split: some reviewers said the premium was justified or competitive, while others preferred cheaper V2 or non-Pro alternatives.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.0

Value is undermined because the reviewer still found it hard to recommend despite the low price.

Volume output
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
2.7

One reviewer found the available volume headroom initially disappointing until changing PC audio settings.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
4.5

Volume output is strong for gameplay cues, with footsteps described as loud and clear.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.2

Weight comfort was generally good because the headset does not feel too heavy, though a few reviewers noted lighter alternatives or extra weight from new features.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
2.0

Weight comfort is weak because the headset is described as being on the heavy side.

Wireless latency
Product 1: Razer BlackShark V3 Pro
4.7

Wireless latency was one of the strongest technical positives, repeatedly described as ultra-low, imperceptible, and among the fastest available.

Product 2: Cooler Master CH351 Gaming Headset
No score yet