Compare Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones vs Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones

P1 Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones
P2 Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones

Comparison Takeaways

Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • LE Audio readiness is 4.1 vs 1.5. LE Audio readiness was treated as a positive future-proofing feature by multiple reviewers.
  • Bluetooth version is 4.5 vs 2.3. Bluetooth version support was tied to a stable, high-performance wireless connection in one review.
  • Streaming service integration is 5.0 vs 3.2. Streaming service integration was praised strongly for Spotify Tap, especially for starting playback without pulling out a phone.
  • Connectivity options is 3.5 vs 2.0. Connectivity options were mixed: wired and wireless playback were useful, but the lack of a built-in 3.5mm jack...

Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • 3.5mm analog input availability is 4.1 vs 2.1. Analog listening was a useful strength, enabling passive or wired use, though one reviewer disliked the nonstandard 2.5mm...
  • Audio-video sync accuracy is 4.7 vs 2.8. Audio-video sync and latency were praised, with reviewers reporting no noteworthy video latency or minimal latency when wired.
  • Active noise cancellation is 4.7 vs 3.8. Active noise cancellation was the clearest strength, with most reviewers calling it excellent, top-tier, brilliant, or world class...
  • Wind noise handling is 4.5 vs 3.7. Wind noise handling was praised repeatedly, especially Wind Block and call wind handling.
Average score
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0
Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.7
3.5mm analog input availability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.1

The lack of a built-in 3.5mm analog jack was a repeated drawback, even though USB-C-to-3.5mm wired listening is possible.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.1

Analog listening was a useful strength, enabling passive or wired use, though one reviewer disliked the nonstandard 2.5mm headphone-side connector.

Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC was usually judged good, solid, or decent for daily use, but several reviewers said it still trails Bose, Sony, or the top tier.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.7

Active noise cancellation was the clearest strength, with most reviewers calling it excellent, top-tier, brilliant, or world class despite a few caveats.

Advanced software features
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Advanced software features were considered solid and modern, but reviewers did not see them as uniquely class-leading.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.9

Advanced features were a common weakness; reviewers repeatedly said the headphones lack bells, whistles, or flagship upgrades.

Aesthetics / discreet profile
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

Aesthetics were distinctive and often praised, but some reviewers noted the retro Marshall look will not suit everyone.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.3

Aesthetics and discreetness were positive overall, with reviewers liking the color options, unobtrusive look, and flattering on-head profile.

ANC background noise level
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

ANC background noise performance was decent: one review measured strong overall noise reduction, and another said white noise was not bad.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

ANC background noise level was strong overall, with only minor hiss noted and another reviewer hearing virtually nothing with music.

ANC effect on sound signature
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC-off listening measured slightly better in one review, suggesting ANC can subtly affect the sound signature.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

ANC’s effect on sound was mixed: one reviewer improved sound by lowering ANC, while another warned pad changes could hurt ANC performance.

ANC sound impact on audio
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC slightly affects audio performance, with one review noting higher sound-quality scores when ANC is disabled.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.0

ANC sound impact on audio was mildly positive in one review, where reducing ANC strength cleared up the sound a bit.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Android compatibility was positive in one review that found the headphones sounded good on Android.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
App
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

The app was viewed positively for customization, controls, battery options, and a generally intuitive experience.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

The app was mixed: reviewers liked its clean, simple interface, but some criticized privacy friction or limited depth.

aptX
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

aptX support was criticized as absent, especially for Android or lossless-codec users.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Audio-video sync was a concern for gaming because one reviewer tied the lack of low-latency codecs to more noticeable latency.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.7

Audio-video sync and latency were praised, with reviewers reporting no noteworthy video latency or minimal latency when wired.

Auracast support
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.2

Auracast support was treated as a positive future-facing feature, especially for Android and LE Audio readiness.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Auto-play/wear detection
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.2

Auto-play and wear detection worked but was slow to react in one test.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.8

Auto-play and wear detection were weak because reviewers noted the headphones lack wear detection or automatic pause.

Award recognition
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.0

Award recognition was limited because PCMag said the headphones fell just short of its Editors’ Choice award.

Bass performance
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Bass was usually described as punchy or well-balanced, though several reviewers said it could use more impact, cleaner control, or stronger low-end weight.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.9

Bass was usually treated as a strength, often described as punchy or powerful, though some reviewers found it overemphasized or not ideal out of the box.

Battery
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Battery life had the strongest agreement: reviewers repeatedly described it as class-leading, incredible, extraordinary, or far ahead of competitors.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Battery life was adequate but not leading, generally described as serviceable, average, or enough for commutes rather than class-best.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Bluetooth performance was praised in one review as stable and high-performance.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.0

Bluetooth reliability was only directly praised once, where the headphones were recommended as reliable Bluetooth headphones.

Bluetooth version
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Bluetooth version support was tied to a stable, high-performance wireless connection in one review.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.3

Bluetooth version was a limitation, with reviewers criticizing the older Bluetooth stack and underwhelming Bluetooth support.

Build quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.6

Build quality was generally strong and rugged, with praise for durability and materials, offset by one report of creaking.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.0

Build quality was mostly positive but not universally premium, ranging from excellent and durable to merely good or somewhat plasticky.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Hi-res playback support was a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted no hi-res Bluetooth audio support.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.0

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback were weak because one reviewer said these are not high-res headphones and advised looking elsewhere for that.

Button control usability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Button controls were a standout strength, with reviewers preferring the tactile joystick and physical buttons over touch controls.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.7

Button usability was widely praised; reviewers repeatedly preferred the tactile physical controls over touch panels.

Cable quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Cable quality received praise in one review for the black cable with brass tips and premium-feeling presentation.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.8

Cable quality and usefulness were mixed: some liked the inline mic or versatility, while one reviewer disliked the 3.5mm-to-2.5mm choice.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

The carry case was usually praised as sturdy, compact, premium, or travel-friendly, though a few reviewers found it bulky or unnecessary.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

The carry case was consistently praised as compact, protective, manageable, sturdy, or well thought out.

Charging
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Charging was praised for fast top-ups, with reviewers citing up to 12 hours of playback from a short charge.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Charging was praised in the one direct usability comment, where the quick-charge result was called super helpful.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Clamping comfort was rated very highly, with reviewers reporting little to virtually zero pressure.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.6

Clamping force was praised for being secure without uncomfortable pressure, though one reviewer felt more clamp than on the Ultra.

Codec support
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Codec support was a clear weakness because reviewers noted no hi-res, lossless, or low-latency codec support.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.5

Codec support was a repeated limitation, with reviewers calling it solid enough at best but underwhelming versus newer competitors.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Comfort was one of the strongest consensus wins, with reviewers repeatedly praising all-day wear, soft fit, and low fatigue.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.8

Long-use comfort was one of the strongest consensus points, with many reviewers saying the headphones were comfortable for hours or all-day listening.

Connectivity options
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.5

Connectivity options were mixed: wired and wireless playback were useful, but the lack of a built-in 3.5mm jack and coiled cable hurt convenience.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.0

Connectivity options were criticized by SoundGuys’ short review because similarly priced or cheaper competitors do more.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Design and aesthetics were mostly praised for the distinctive Marshall look, premium detailing, and rugged styling, though taste varied.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.8

Design aesthetics were praised as understated, minimalist, and attractive, with one reviewer loving the overall look.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.8

Detachable cable convenience was useful for passive listening, but one reviewer disliked the nonstandard 2.5mm headphone-side connector.

Durability over time
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Durability over time was viewed positively because reviewers described more durable, repairable construction and long-term toughness.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.8

Durability over time was mixed: one review advised careful handling, while another praised the solid and durable feel.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Ear cup padding was widely praised as extremely soft, plush, pillow-like, and important to comfort and sealing.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.4

Ear cup padding was consistently praised as soft, spacious, pillow-like, or generously padded.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

Ear cup rotation and swivel helped portability, though one reviewer found the twisting mechanism odd on the head.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Ear cup rotation/folding was praised for helping the headphones store easily.

Earpad noise
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Earpad/body-borne noise was a notable negative for one reviewer, who heard footsteps and heartbeat-like sounds.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Ecosystem integration
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Ecosystem integration was praised by TechRadar for Bose SimpleSync with compatible Bose speakers and soundbars.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

EQ customization was broadly useful and responsive, though one reviewer wanted more precision than the five-band setup provides.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.6

EQ customization was useful but limited, with several reviewers liking basic tweaks and others wanting more granular controls.

Features at launch
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Features at launch were adequate but not standout, with one reviewer saying the standard feature set lacked a truly distinctive tool.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.6

Features at launch were generally seen as modest or incremental rather than cutting edge.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

The default frequency response was judged broadly listener-friendly, especially for casual listeners.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.0

Frequency response accuracy was mixed to negative, with reviewers noting odd response behavior, lack of accuracy, or high-frequency falloff.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Headband adjustability earned a small positive note for visible adjustment numbering.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Headband adjustability was praised in the travel roundup as widely adjustable for different wearers.

Headband padding quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Headband comfort was praised for reducing top-of-head pressure through light weight and support-strap design.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.3

Headband padding was praised by TechRadar but criticized by RecordingNow as less plush than the Ultra.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Hinge durability was praised for being able to twist without showing signs of breaking.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Hinge durability was praised in one review that noted metal use and excellent build quality.

Immersive audio quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.6

Immersive audio quality was mixed, with some reviewers enjoying the added atmosphere and others finding the effect limited or not truly immersive.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Included accessories received praise for the attractive red-velvet case and included cables.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.9

Included accessories were generally useful, especially the case and cable, though one review missed an airplane adapter.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

Instrument separation was a consistent strength when mentioned, with reviewers noting solid layering, instrument placement, and separation across bass, mids, and highs.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Instrument separation was acceptable but not exceptional: one reviewer praised separation, while another said separation and layering were not as strong.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.9

Integrated microphone feedback was mixed, with clear/crisp quiet-room results but criticism of vocal clarity or noisy-environment performance.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.7

Integrated microphone performance was serviceable to good, with reviewers noting usable built-in or voice mic behavior for calls.

LDAC
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

LDAC was only discussed as an absent higher-quality codec, making it a codec-support weakness.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.5

LDAC support was a drawback in PCMag’s comparison, which said Sony retained an advantage because of LDAC.

LE Audio readiness
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

LE Audio readiness was treated as a positive future-proofing feature by multiple reviewers.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.5

LE Audio readiness was poor because the older Bluetooth stack does not bring LE Audio features.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Maximum-volume clarity was strong in the reviews that addressed it, with no audible or max-volume distortion reported.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Maximum-volume clarity was positive in the one direct test, with no distortion heard at max volume.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.7

Microphone noise reduction was praised for handling simulated or real wind well, despite some vocal-clarity caveats elsewhere.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Microphone noise reduction was mixed: one reviewer found noise rejection an issue, while others praised background and wind handling.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Call microphone quality received strong praise from one reviewer, especially for windy phone calls.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.7

Call microphone quality was generally serviceable to good, with reviewers saying voices were understandable or clear enough for calls.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Midrange impressions were mixed: some praised vocals and instruments, while others heard under-emphasized mids, prominent high mids, or occasional clutter.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.7

Midrange clarity was mixed: some reviewers heard clear vocals and recoverable mids with EQ, while others said mids could feel squashed or underpowered.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positive where tested on both iOS and Android.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.3

Multi-platform compatibility was positive, especially for laptop-phone use and remote work scenarios.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Multipoint reliability was strong where tested, with seamless switching or extremely reliable two-device use.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
5.0

Multipoint connectivity earned strong praise for seamless or automatic switching between phone and computer use.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Passive isolation was praised for the soft cushions and seal, which helped block noise even before ANC was considered.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Passive isolation was strong thanks to fit and seal, which reviewers said helped noise isolation and ANC performance.

Overall recommendation
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Overall recommendations were positive but caveated: reviewers liked the package, especially for travel and rock-focused listening, while noting ANC, codecs, and wired tradeoffs.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.9

Overall recommendations were mixed: many reviewers recommended them strongly, while SoundGuys considered them poor value or not worth upgrading to.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Portability and foldability were major strengths thanks to the compact folding design and small travel footprint.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.6

Portability and foldability were major strengths, with reviewers praising the compact folding design and travel-friendly storage.

Premium feel
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Premium feel was praised through richer materials, superior build impressions, and a luxurious presentation.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.8

Premium feel was mixed, with some praise for the feel and others saying the experience was not as premium as the price suggests.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

The preset EQ experience was praised in one review, especially the bass boost setting for adding dynamic sound without excess bass.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.0

Preset EQ quality was mixed: one reviewer criticized the bass boost preset, while another said the presets do what they claim.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Replaceable earpads were praised as easy to remove or replace and useful for longevity.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Replaceable earpads were a mixed ownership note: aftermarket pads were liked, but the reviewer warned they could slightly hurt ANC.

Replaceable pads/headband
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Replaceable pads and headband parts were a repairability plus where described.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Sensors
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Sensor performance was a concern because one reviewer reported random wear-sensor triggers.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.7

Sensors were a weakness because reviewers repeatedly missed wear-detection/auto-pause behavior.

Smart listening features
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

Smart listening features were mixed: adaptive volume, Spotify Tap, and battery preservation drew praise, while missing convenience features held the score down.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.4

Smart listening features were positive overall, especially adjustable ANC, custom modes, Wind Block, and ANC level control.

Smart Pause performance
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Smart Pause performance was criticized for random triggering in one longer test.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.7

Smart Pause performance was poor because multiple reviewers noted the headphones do not auto-pause when removed.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Setup simplicity received praise from one reviewer who called pairing/setup easy.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
5.0

Software and setup simplicity were excellent in TechRadar’s review, which praised the easy setup and straightforward controls.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.2

Sound leakage was viewed positively in one review because the plush ear cups helped minimize leak.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
5.0

Sound leakage was excellent in TechRadar’s review, which found virtually no sound leaking out.

Sound quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Reviewers generally liked the sound, describing it as pleasing, energetic, balanced, or excellent, with the strongest praise for rock and instrument-driven listening.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.8

Sound quality split reviewers: several praised rich, fun, balanced audio, while SoundGuys criticized the tuning and some reviewers noted rivals sound better.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Soundstage width drew mixed reactions, from solid or opened-up presentation to narrow, cluttered, or not true-spatial enough.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.0

Soundstage was viewed positively where discussed, with reviewers noting enhanced or fairly large staging for Bluetooth ANC headphones.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.4

Spatial audio was divisive: some liked the extra space, but others found it unnatural, underwhelming, or below true Atmos-style experiences.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Stability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Connection stability was praised as stable and high-performance in one review.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Streaming service integration
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Streaming service integration was praised strongly for Spotify Tap, especially for starting playback without pulling out a phone.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.2

Streaming integration was mixed: Spotify Tap was useful or fun for some, but one non-Spotify user found the shortcut limiting.

Sustainability and repairability
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Sustainability and repairability were praised for replaceable parts and repair-minded design, with a caveat that batteries are not user-replaceable.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Sustainability materials
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Sustainability materials received a modest positive note for recycled plastic use.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
No score yet
Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

Transparency mode was considered usable and sometimes natural, but reviewers also noted hiss, limited realism, or weaker performance than the best rivals.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Transparency/Aware mode was praised as accurate and, in one review, the best transparency mode the reviewer had tested.

Travel friendliness
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Travel friendliness was a major strength due to battery life, compact folding, wired flexibility, and protective case design.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.8

Travel friendliness was a major strength due to comfort, ANC, folding design, compact case, and frequent-flyer focus.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

Treble feedback was split between clear, impressive highs and complaints about sibilance, fatigue, or sharpness on some tracks.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.1

Treble drew the most audio criticism, with some praise for detail but repeated concerns about peaks, harshness, or a lack of top-end sparkle.

USB-C
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.3

USB-C was useful for charging and wired listening, but reviewers criticized the one-port limitation and need for power in wired use.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.0

USB-C was a limitation in SoundGuys’ review because the port does not support USB-C audio.

Value for money
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.9

Value was generally fair to good, especially on sale, but reviewers noted strong cheaper or better-performing rivals.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Value was highly mixed, with sale prices making them attractive to some reviewers while others preferred cheaper or more feature-rich alternatives.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
3.5

Voice assistant integration was only mildly supported, with one reviewer noting the button can activate the assistant.

Voice prompts/feedback
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Voice prompts and feedback added personality through Marshall-style guitar sounds during power and pairing.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.3

Voice prompts were praised as handy and clear, especially for connection and battery feedback.

Volume output
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

One reviewer found the headphones plenty loud, with comfortable listening volume well below maximum.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Volume output was strong in the one review that discussed it, with the headphones described as loud.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
1.5

Water and sweat resistance was a weakness because reviewers noted the headphones are not waterproof and should avoid rain or gym use.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
2.0

Water or sweat resistance was a weakness, with TechRadar warning they are not recommended for workouts or heavy gym use.

Wear detection auto-pause
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.2

Wear detection auto-pause was only moderately successful, working but reacting slowly.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.7

Wear detection auto-pause was a repeated weakness because the headphones do not pause when removed.

Wear detection performance
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Wear detection performance was a weakness in one longer test because the sensor randomly triggered.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
1.7

Wear detection performance was poor because reviewers repeatedly said the headphones lack wear detection or do not pause when removed.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Weight comfort was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones light for the class and easy to wear.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.9

Weight comfort was consistently strong, with reviewers emphasizing the lightweight feel and easy long-session wear.

Wind noise handling
Product 1: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Wind handling was mixed: one reviewer found wind susceptibility in ANC/transparency, while another found moderate wind manageable.

Product 2: Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones
4.5

Wind noise handling was praised repeatedly, especially Wind Block and call wind handling.