Compare Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Upright Vacuum

Reviews consistently note a useful tool set for the price, often including a crevice tool, dusting brush, extension/wand, and a pet-focused turbo tool.

Included accessories depend heavily on the package: multiple reviews note the base bundle often ships with only two tools, while higher tiers add many more. Several sources also point out that building a full tool set can add meaningful cost.

Aesthetics are described as typical for the category: a modern, pet-themed look with bright accents rather than a premium finish.

Some scattering or blowback is reported on hard floors or with certain debris, especially when height is set too high or the brush action outpaces suction.

Adjustable gates can help the vacuum transition and glide on thicker rugs compared with older fixed-height Dyson uprights. Still, some testers found the low-profile head can catch on rug edges or mats, requiring odd angles or gate changes to get over lips.

Multiple reviewers found setup straightforward, typically just attaching the handle and snapping or screwing a few parts in before cleaning.

Assembly feedback ranges from very quick and straightforward (a few click-in steps) to awkward, mainly because the vacuum and floorhead are heavy and some latches are not intuitive. A couple of reviewers also mention minimal or downloaded instructions, which can add to first-time friction.

A visible fill line or indicator on the bin is appreciated as a helpful cue for when to empty, especially for a budget model.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty with a bottom-release door; some users note the fill line can feel conservative, leading to more frequent emptying.

It is a bagless vacuum with a relatively large bin for an upright in this class; some sources cite about 0.45 gal / 1.7 L and describe infrequent emptying. A few reviews also note the bin can feel smaller than certain prior Dyson variants, but overall capacity is a plus for whole-house cleans.

Build quality is often described as mostly plastic and budget-grade; it feels lighter but may not inspire long-term confidence compared with pricier uprights.

Build-quality impressions are mixed. Some reviewers describe it as solidly built and durable-feeling, while at least one user review perceived parts as flimsy plastic with many moving mechanisms that raised long-term concerns.

High-pile performance ranges from very good on hair and smaller debris to weaker on larger pieces when head clearance becomes an issue.

High-pile results are mixed: some reviews report excellent cleaning and better glide than older Dyson uprights when the gates are opened, while at least one lab test found below-average pickup of mixed debris on high pile. Expect strong suction, but plan to adjust gates and make extra passes for large, lightweight debris.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, though large debris can still require extra passes in some lab-style testing.

On low-pile carpet, most reviews report excellent pickup, including strong results on fine and medium debris. A few tests note small particles like sugar can remain without extra attention, but overall low-pile performance is a key strength.

Medium-pile carpet performance is repeatedly strong, including at least one deep-clean test reporting excellent sand pickup.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly highlighted as a strength, including a perfect-style result in a sand-embedded deep-clean test. Even when reviewers criticize ease of pushing, they still credit it with strong embedded-dirt extraction.

Clogging prevention is a mix: some like the suction blockage indicator, while others warn hair and debris can build up and require frequent cleaning to avoid performance drop.

In pet-hair and general cleaning discussions, reviewers report strong debris flow with no notable clogs during testing, including with clumps of fur. Most complaints are about plowing or scattering larger debris rather than true clogging inside the system.

In comparisons, it is treated as a capable budget option, but it does not match premium uprights for power, refinement, or filtration.

Compared with other uprights, it is often ranked near the top for raw cleaning power and carpet results, and is positioned as a meaningful upgrade over the Ball Animal 2 for usability. However, some competitors are called out as better on hard floors, easier to maneuver, or stronger value depending on your mix of flooring and need for lift-away handling.

Controls are serviceable but not premium: common notes include foot-based buttons and a height dial that may require bending, plus occasional complaints about button placement.

Controls are intentionally simple: a main power switch plus a brushroll on/off, with performance tuning handled via a slider or gates on the floorhead. The main drawback noted is that the suction/gate slider sits low on the head, requiring you to bend down to adjust between surfaces.

Cord length is commonly reported around 27 feet, which is usable for most rooms but a bit shorter than some uprights with longer cords.

Cord length is consistently described as long, usually around 33 to 35 feet, supporting wide cleaning range without frequent outlet changes. The long cord is a reach advantage but also contributes to cord management hassle.

Cord management is a strong convenience point on rewind variants, while non-rewind versions still offer clips/hooks that help keep the cord out of the way.

Cord handling is manual, with no automatic rewind, and reviewers commonly describe winding and unwinding as tedious. The benefit is reach, but the tradeoff is time and a cord that can get in the way during cleaning.

Crevice and groove pickup is described as decent but not class-leading; results vary by test material and technique.

Crevice performance is repeatedly praised, with strong suction at the head and good results in crevice-style pickup tests. It is commonly described as effective for tight gaps and grooves when used with the right setting or tool.

Multi-cyclonic design is credited with maintaining suction reasonably well during typical cleaning, though it does not fully solve large-debris limitations.

Cyclone-style engineering is referenced as part of Dyson's lossless-suction approach, including mentions of radial root cyclone technology. In practice, reviewers attribute consistent suction and strong pickup to the overall airflow and head design rather than any single component.

Ease-of-use feedback splits by user expectations: some reviewers call it simple, intuitive, and highly usable, while others find it cumbersome due to weight, strong suction, cord drag, and a stiff hose. Most agree it rewards a short learning curve around head-gate settings and wand handling.

No summary yet.

Edge cleaning is a consistent bright spot, with multiple tests showing strong pickup right along walls and baseboards and near edge-to-edge suction. One review notes a small gap from the front in a specific setup, but overall edge results are strong.

Emptying is generally clean and simple thanks to the bottom-drop design, though clumped hair can sometimes stick and require manual removal.

Emptying is generally described as hygienic and easy: detach the bin and press a button to drop debris into the trash. A couple of users caution that the release mechanism can be sensitive, so careful handling helps avoid accidental disassembly.

Filtration is the biggest downside across sources: it lacks a sealed HEPA system and some testing reports significant particle release, making it a weak fit for allergy-sensitive homes.

Most reviews describe strong dust containment with a sealed system and effective filtration, sometimes even labeled HEPA whole-machine filtration. One test notes it may not be a true HEPA filter but still performed excellently at keeping fine particles from escaping.

The floorhead design is budget-focused: it can clean well when settings are right, but low clearance and brush behavior can contribute to plowing on certain debris.

The Motorbar floorhead and its adjustable gates are widely cited as the key design upgrade, improving versatility and helping the vacuum handle different debris types. Critiques focus on the head being relatively narrow and, with gates set low, sometimes pushing larger debris instead of riding over it.

A sealing flap or squeegee-like feature is cited as helping hard-floor pickup and reducing scatter when the height setting is dialed in.

Reviews repeatedly describe the head seal as both the superpower and the pain point: a tight seal boosts deep cleaning but can make the vacuum hard to push and can shove larger debris. Opening the gates or moving the slider increases airflow and clearance, improving debris intake and reducing sticking.

Pet hair pickup on carpet is a frequent strength, with multiple reviews calling it strong for the price, though effectiveness can drop as hair accumulates.

Hair pickup on carpets is a standout, with multiple tests showing strong removal of pet fur and long human hair from rugs. Reviewers often recommend it for carpet-heavy homes where hair is a constant problem.

Hair can wrap around the brush and cleaning it can be tedious; higher-end competitors manage tangles better in several comparisons.

The anti-tangle system is repeatedly called out as a major upgrade, with many tests showing little to no hair wrap. In some cases hair can briefly wrap, but reviewers note it can self-clear with continued run time, reducing the need for cutting hair off the brushroll.

No summary yet.

Fine dust performance on hard floors is generally strong in controlled tests, but real-world feedback is more mixed, including reports of flour streaks or needing extra passes. Turning the brushroll off and adjusting the head gates are commonly suggested to improve hard-floor results.

Large debris on hard floors is mixed: small debris is fine, but bigger pieces can be pushed, plowed, or scattered depending on height and brush behavior.

Large, lightweight debris like cereal or oats can be a weak spot when the head gates are set low, with several reviews describing pinging or plowing. Adjusting the gates, turning off the brushroll on hard floors, or using a hand tool can improve pickup but may add extra passes.

Several comparisons note the absence of headlights or floor illumination on the CleanView models discussed, unlike some higher-end uprights.

Above-floor reach is mixed: some variants have a useful hose length for stairs and upholstery, while others describe the hose as short for high shelves or tall furniture.

Reach is a strong point, with reviewers citing hoses and wands in the 13 to 15 foot range or multi-meter extension. Multiple users also report the stretch hose can feel stiff and pull back, so the usable reach can be less pleasant than the spec suggests.

Maintenance is a real requirement: regular bin emptying, filter washing, and brush/belt checks are repeatedly mentioned to keep performance and reliability stable.

Routine upkeep is simple but frequent: empty the bin and wash the filters on a recurring schedule, with some reviewers citing monthly cleaning and a 24-hour dry time. Brushroll access is generally good, though at least one review found the secondary filter harder to remove.

Swivel steering is repeatedly highlighted as a usability win, making it easier to navigate around furniture, though some users find the swivel can make straight-line tracking a bit less precise.

The ball steering helps it corner and pivot, and some reviewers find it easy to make tight turns. That said, the combination of weight, cord drag, and strong suction at the head often makes it feel bulky or tiring, and it can feel stiff on certain carpets.

Noise is a recurring compromise: one test measured very loud levels, while other reviews call it slightly louder than average for an upright.

Noise impressions vary: one lab-style review measured it around 59 dB and called it surprisingly quiet, while another home test recorded about 81 dB and found it loud. Expect a noticeable, power-forward sound profile that depends on test method and environment.

Onboard storage is commonly noted on pet-focused variants, keeping core tools attached and accessible, though not every accessory has a perfect home.

Some accessories can be stored directly on the vacuum so they are close at hand, and this is viewed as convenient during room-to-room cleaning. A few comments note the storage positions are not always the easiest to access in the moment.

Ongoing costs are described as manageable, with washable filters and routine maintenance rather than expensive consumables being the main ownership burden.

Ongoing costs are generally viewed as low because it is bagless and the filters are washable/rinsable. The main recurring burden is time and downtime: filter washing is recommended regularly and requires a long air-dry period, so some owners may prefer spare filters.

Longevity feedback is mixed: some owners are happy, while others cite concerns about early failure and recommend keeping up with maintenance.

Overall sentiment skews positive for budget shoppers, but more critical reviews recommend alternatives if you need better filtration or more consistent hard-floor pickup.

Packaging is praised in at least one review for secure, eco-minded materials such as recyclable cardboard rather than excessive plastic. Other reviews do not strongly dispute this, but they also do not focus on packaging.

Pet-focused features are a core draw, including a turbo tool and brush roll designed to lift pet hair, with performance best on carpet and upholstery touch-ups.

Reviewers frequently recommend it for pet owners thanks to strong fur pickup, brushroll de-tangling behavior, and filtration aimed at keeping dander contained. Upholstery tools (when included) are also highlighted as particularly effective on pet hair.

Value is a primary reason reviewers recommend it: strong cleaning and features for the money, with tradeoffs mainly in filtration and refinement.

Value is debated: some reviewers call it hard to beat for sheer cleaning performance and note it can be a relatively affordable way into a Dyson upright, especially on sale. Others feel it is expensive versus strong competitors, and the limited base tool set (or paid upgrades) can make the overall value proposition weaker.

The stair tool can help on carpeted steps, but multiple reviewers emphasize the bigger issue is carrying the unit. At roughly 17 lb and with an awkward carry approach, it is commonly described as a pain for multi-level or stair-heavy homes.

Storage is reasonable for an upright and remains stable when parked, but some designs have a higher head profile that can limit where it fits.

The vacuum stands upright but has a tall, bulky profile that some reviewers would rather store in a utility space than leave out. Stability is generally not flagged as an issue, but footprint and visual presence are.

Performance is generally described as solid for a budget upright: capable pickup on carpet and smaller debris, but not a top-tier powerhouse versus premium uprights.

Across reviews and lab-style tests, the Animal 3 is consistently described as extremely powerful, often cited around 290 air watts. That strength shows up as strong deep cleaning, but it can also make the vacuum harder to push and more likely to plow larger, lightweight debris unless the head gates are adjusted.

A narrower cleaning path can help in tighter spaces and gives more maneuvering options around furniture legs and corners. However, the overall upright body is still bulky and corded, so it is not universally praised for small or cluttered homes.

Reliability is a concern in at least one user report citing many complaints about early failures; routine belt and clog checks are advised.

Warranty and support details vary by reviewer and region: several sources cite a 5-year manufacturer warranty, while another lists a 1-year warranty. Practical support experience is not deeply covered, so expectations should be set by the retailer and your local Dyson terms.

Surface safety is generally fine, with reviewers noting it avoids scratching, but the always-on brushroll on some variants can be a concern on delicate floors if you are not careful.

Tool changes are generally simple, but the always-on brushroll during above-floor tool use can make the workflow feel less polished.

Tool swapping is generally straightforward once you learn the wand and hose release points, with attachments snapping into place. Several reviewers still found the wand/hose handling awkward or stiff at first, especially when switching frequently during a clean.

Under-furniture cleaning can be limited by head height and how the handle tilts; several reviews note it does not reach as easily as some competitors.

Multiple reviewers note the ball design and bulky body limit how far the vacuum can reach under low furniture. For frequent under-sofa or under-bed cleaning, the Animal 3 is often described as less practical than lower-profile or cordless alternatives.

The included motorized or turbo hand tool can help on upholstery and stairs, though some users find the turbo tool loses effectiveness when pressed into fabric.

Above-floor cleaning benefits from the long hose/wand reach and strong suction, and pet-oriented upholstery tools get high marks when included. Still, several reviewers found the hose stiff or retracting, which can make above-floor work more of a workout than expected.

Versatility is good for a basic upright: it can handle mixed floors and switch to above-floor tools for stairs and upholstery, but it lacks higher-end conveniences like sealed HEPA filtration or advanced power controls.

Several reviews describe the vacuum as easy to push and relatively light-feeling, though some tested variants are heavier than the lightest budget uprights.

Most sources place the weight around 17 to 17.4 lb, and it is frequently described as heavy for everyday lifting. Some users still find it manageable on flat floors, but the weight shows up in fatigue and portability complaints.