Compare Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum

Accessories were generally viewed as a strength, with praise for the attachment set and floor-to-ceiling usefulness, though one reviewer considered the basic brush merely ordinary.

Attachments are generally useful, with praise for pet, upholstery, crevice, and broad above-floor tools, though one pillow/upholstery test found the brush only okay.

Area rug handling is mixed-to-negative: reviewers note smooth surface transitions, but shag and larger particles can require extra effort.

Assembly was mostly considered straightforward or easy, but one comparison noted this model required more assembly than several competitors.

Assembly evidence is limited but favorable, with one test saying the Shark took only a couple of minutes despite needing more assembly than others.

The bin drew mixed feedback: reviewers liked the high-capacity or bottom-empty design, but one owner felt the usable fill line made it seem small.

The dust cup/bin is usually reviewed positively for capacity, easy emptying, and a straightforward open design, with one sealed-bin test also supporting containment.

Build feedback was mixed: one test found the construction acceptable after heat checks, while two owner-style reviews described plastic parts as flimsy or cheap-feeling.

Build quality is serviceable but not premium; reviewers mention plastic construction as a drawback while also linking it to low weight and price.

High-pile carpet evidence was mixed: several reviewers praised hair or debris pickup, but some noted large debris or sand still required extra work.

High-pile carpet and shag rugs are a recurring weakness because the lack of height adjustment makes deep or tall pile harder to handle.

Low-pile carpet performance was positive in the detailed reviews that tested it, especially when adjusted to the right surface setting.

Low-pile carpet pickup is a strength, with reviewers citing strong low-pile results and best-in-test budget carpet performance.

Medium-carpet evidence was sharply mixed: one test gave it a perfect deep-clean score, while another comparison found it struggled with embedded sand.

Medium-pile/deep carpet evidence is very strong, including perfect-score and deep-clean praise for embedded sand pickup.

Clog-related evidence was favorable overall, with reviewers noting no hair clog in one test and praising the suction blockage indicator.

Hair-related clogging evidence is weak-to-negative, with one test describing embedded pet hair as prone to clumping.

One review positioned it as a more capable step above an entry-level Bissell model due to added range, tools, and motor power.

Comparative performance is generally good for the price, but named comparisons show some rivals beat it on hard-floor pickup, suction, or overall score.

Controls were a weak point in several reviews, with complaints about close-together pedals, bending to adjust height, and confusing foot buttons.

Controls are simple, with one comparison calling the Navigator simpler than newer Shark models, though fewer advanced settings are available.

The Lift-Away/portable canister design is a repeated strength, making stairs, furniture, upholstery, and above-floor cleaning easier.

Cord length was generally adequate, with owners praising the 27-foot range while one review noted it was a few feet shorter than average.

Cord length is acceptable-to-good in reviewed variants, with reviewers calling reach good or sufficient.

Cord management was praised across several reviews, especially the rewind model and cord clip, though the simple non-rewind model was also considered workable.

Crevice pickup was weak in one comparison, where the vacuum gave up after limited sand removal.

Crevice/groove pickup is a weakness, with multiple reviews reporting struggles in cracks or crevices despite strong suction elsewhere.

Cyclone performance was praised for maintaining debris separation and supporting deeper cleaning with lower maintenance costs.

Cyclone performance has limited but positive evidence, with one review praising cyclonic suction for capturing fine dust and debris.

Ease of use was positive in value-focused reviews, but one lab review found tight turns and height adjustments frustrating.

Ease of use is mostly positive because of simple operation, light handling, and Lift-Away utility, though pushing can be harder with strong suction.

Edge and baseboard cleaning drew both praise and criticism, with reviewers liking edge tools/brushes but some tests showing missed or scattered debris near walls.

Edge/baseboard cleaning is mixed: one test found no edge issues, another praised head-on edge pickup, while a third said the model struggled.

Emptying was mostly easy and hygienic according to several reviews, though one owner still found stuck hairballs and the usable capacity frustrating.

Emptying is generally easy and clean, but one comparison disliked the two-clip canister removal compared with a one-button Kenmore.

Filtration was a repeated weakness because the vacuum lacks sealed HEPA filtration, although one review liked that the bottom-empty tank reduced dust escaping during emptying.

Filtration is one of the strongest points: reviewers repeatedly praise the sealed HEPA system and dust containment for allergy-sensitive homes.

Floorhead design was mixed: one comparison praised head efficiency, while other reviews said clearance or head height caused debris-plowing and under-furniture limits.

Floorhead design is seen as a strength for budget handling and carpet agitation, though its older/simple geometry contributes to larger-debris limits elsewhere.

One technical review praised the squeegee-style seal for improving hard-floor contact and crevice pickup.

Hair-removal channel issues were a repeated complaint, especially around the non-removable brushroll and belt area where hair could clog.

Hair-removal channel evidence is negative because reviewers advise routine roller clearing to avoid hair buildup.

Carpet hair pickup was one of the most consistently praised areas, with multiple reviewers describing excellent pet-hair removal from carpets.

Carpet hair pickup is split: many sources praise pet and long-hair pickup, while one lab test found embedded pet hair mediocre.

Hard-floor hair pickup had both praise and caveats, with good pet-hair claims but lab and roundup reviews noting weaker hardwood effectiveness.

Hard-floor hair pickup receives positive evidence where a pet-focused review says the Navigator handled pet hair across carpet and hardwood floors.

Hair-wrap resistance was weak in lab and review evidence because hair accumulated on the non-removable brushroll and was difficult to clean.

Hair-wrap resistance is a weakness, with multiple reviews noting long hair tangles or regular brush-roll clearing.

Fine-dust hard-floor pickup was mixed but mostly positive, with strong small-debris results in two reviews and weaker hardwood suction in another.

Hard-floor fine-debris pickup is mixed-to-positive: some reviewers praise hardwood results, while one lab review found sand left behind.

Large-debris hard-floor intake was one of the most inconsistent areas, ranging from near-perfect rice pickup to repeated complaints about cereal, Cheerios, and scattered debris.

Large-debris hard-floor pickup is mixed: some tests report strong rice/Cheerios pickup, while others say the head pushed or scattered debris.

LED/headlight evidence is limited; one comparison noted the Shark lacks a headlight, but also said it was not a major issue for that test.

Hose reach was mixed: one review liked its quality, another said the Dyson reached much farther, and others found the hose adequate but not long.

Hose and wand reach are common concerns, with several reviews saying the hose or wand is shorter than ideal.

Competitive design evidence is positive because reviewers describe sealed filtration at this price as rare and the budget design as unusually enduring.

Low-profile design was mixed: one owner liked cabinet clearance, while another test said the taller brushroll head limited under-furniture reach.

Low-profile design is mixed; it can help around furniture but can also bump into overhanging objects or struggle with taller debris.

Maintenance drew split feedback, with some reviewers calling it easy and low-cost while others criticized brushroll hair removal and belt clogging.

Maintenance is mixed: the canister and parts are easy to maintain, but hair wrap and regular upkeep remain necessary.

Maneuverability was often praised for swivel steering and easy steering around furniture, though one lab review found tight turns difficult.

Maneuverability is mostly praised for swivel steering, light weight, and easy handling, though one test found it stiffer than higher-end uprights.

Noise impressions were mixed: one comparison measured it as the least noisy in that lineup, while another review called it a little louder than average.

Noise is generally acceptable for a corded upright, with some tests calling it relatively quiet, though one comparison still described both vacuums as fairly loud.

Onboard tool storage was mixed, with one review praising easy storage and another warning an unstored corner tool would likely get lost.

Maintenance cost was viewed positively in one detailed review because the cyclone/filter design was said to prolong filter life and reduce replacement expense.

Long-term reliability was a concern in one owner review, which highlighted complaints about units dying quickly.

Long-term sentiment is strong because the NV352 is repeatedly described as having stood the test of time despite newer competitors.

Overall opinion was polarized: several reviewers were impressed by the value and pet performance, while one lab review gave a poor overall recommendation.

Overall sentiment is positive: reviewers call it a strong budget performer, an excellent deal, and a time-tested model, with some caveats.

Pet-owner positioning was a consistent strength, with multiple reviewers praising pet-hair tools and pickup, though one lab review said pet-hair benefit was limited by cleanup hassle.

Pet-hair opinions are mixed: several sources praise pet pickup and pet tools, while others report mediocre embedded fur pickup or missing powered pet attachments.

Most positive reviews framed the vacuum as strong value or budget-friendly, but one lab review argued that cheaper alternatives cleaned better.

Value is a major strength: many reviews call it affordable, a budget standout, or an excellent deal given its suction, filtration, and lift-away design.

One review said the vacuum did not scratch floors even when it underperformed on hardwood pickup.

Stair usability was supported by the extension tools and mini motorized attachment, which reviewers found useful for stairs and pet-bed cleaning.

Stair cleaning benefits from Lift-Away portability and handheld use, with several reviewers specifically praising stairs or portable above-floor reach.

Storage footprint evidence is positive because one review calls it compact and far less bulky than most upright vacuums.

Reviewers split on suction: several praised it as powerful or strong for the price, while one test found hard-floor suction mediocre and another described it as only somewhat above entry-level.

Reviewers consistently describe strong suction and airflow, especially for a budget upright, though one direct comparison measured weaker suction than a Kenmore rival.

Heavy-duty suitability looked limited, with reviewers positioning it for simple messes and cautioning against very hairy dogs or demanding cleanup.

Heavy-duty evidence is limited but positive, with one review calling it a no-frills workhorse when given extra passes and basic maintenance.

Small-space suitability is positive where reviewers call it compact and less bulky than most upright vacuums.

Support and reliability evidence is positive where reviewers note replacement-part availability and a five-year warranty adding long-term value.

Surface safety with attachments was a concern because reviewers warned that the always-spinning brush could damage floors or carpet while using tools.

One reviewer found the hose and attachment connection easy to take apart and reassemble.

Tool-change and lift-away button convenience drew criticism in a head-to-head comparison, where the controls were described as less convenient than Kenmore.

Under-furniture cleaning was a weakness because the fixed canister, high head, or handle angle limited reach.

Under-furniture pickup is limited; one review specifically noted the Navigator could not fully reach under chairs.

Above-floor and upholstery performance was mixed: some tools worked well on upholstery and stairs, but the turbo tool could stall or feel underpowered.

Above-floor and upholstery pickup are broadly positive, especially with Lift-Away and pet tools, but one test found tougher cushion cleaning required effort.

One detailed review summarized the vacuum as solid and feature-equipped enough to cover multiple cleaning jobs.

Versatility is a major consensus strength because the vacuum handles carpets, hard floors, stairs, upholstery, and handheld tasks with multiple tools.

Weight feedback was mixed: one review found handle weight lighter than average, another owner found it lightweight, and a third called it heavy and bulky.

Weight is a strength for this upright class, though one pet-hair roundup still considered a related Navigator Professional slightly heavy.