Compare Black+Decker Programmable 12-Cup Coffee Maker, CM1160B vs Braun PureFlavor 14-Cup Coffee Maker, KF5650

Accessories are sparse: one reviewer found the missing scoop or starter filters odd, and another disliked having to buy a reusable metal filter separately.

Marketing accuracy is mixed: one review said the Pure Flavor name matched the coffee, while a comparative capacity test found the 14-cup claim came up short.

Programming and initial setup are consistently praised as simple, with QuickTouch controls making scheduled brewing easy even on a cheap machine.

Setup is mostly manageable, but at least one control sequence for settings was described as a little tricky.

Automation is a strength for the price, especially auto-brew and auto shutoff, though the evidence focuses on convenience rather than advanced sensors.

Programmable functions were treated positively as useful nice-to-have features for this price range.

Brewing evidence is mixed: lab-style testing found decent consistency and good-enough strength, while other reviewers reported reliable everyday results rather than refined extraction.

Most reviewers praised the Braun for hot, flavorful coffee, though one comparative extraction test found it weaker than several rivals.

Build quality is the clearest tradeoff: reviewers accept plastic at the low price, but several call out the lower-quality feel or durability limitations.

Build impressions were positive, with reviewers describing the parts as fitting well and the machine as well made.

Capacity is supported mainly by the ability to make a large shared pot, with the 12-cup format seen as useful for families, offices, or heavier coffee drinkers.

Capacity is a tradeoff: the large 14-cup format is useful, but one test measured the actual capacity short and another reviewer found the full carafe heavy.

Carafe and cup handling is generally workable, with praise for pouring and Sneak-a-Cup convenience, but some reviewers note dribbles or uneven cup strength when interrupted.

Carafe handling drew split feedback, with one test reporting a messy pour and other reviewers saying the carafe poured nicely and felt good despite its weight.

Ergonomics and footprint are mostly positive: reviewers like the front water window, compact body, and light weight, though cabinet clearance can be an issue.

Reviewers liked the look, footprint, and general styling, repeatedly describing the machine as nice looking or counter-space friendly.

Design flaws cluster around cleanup nooks, a non-flat filter basket, cabinet clearance, and minor warping, so the design is practical but not flawless.

Design concerns centered on narrow filling space, tall open-lid clearance, and concern that the touchscreen could become a failure point.

Beverage quality ranges from average to enjoyable: some reviewers call the coffee decent or even great, while one lab panel found bitterness and astringency.

Beverage quality was praised, with reviewers highlighting extra-tasty, nuanced, flavorful cups.

Filter handling is mixed: standard filters are available and the basket is easy to clean, but there are complaints about no included reusable filter and grounds reaching the pot.

The reusable filter was viewed positively, but one reviewer warned it may allow a little sediment compared with paper filters.

Heating performance is strong for the class, with high wattage and hot cups, though one review warns the hot plate can push coffee too hot and worsen taste.

Heating performance was strong, with one comparative test calling its element the most powerful at that point and another reviewer describing very hot coffee.

The over-ice function was judged capable of making iced coffee that stayed strong enough and cold enough after added ice.

Used grounds disposal is easy when using the removable basket or paper filters, with reviewers highlighting simple dumping and easier disposal.

Overall experience is strongest for low-fuss daily use: most reviewers find it easy, practical, and satisfying, while lab testing rates user-friendliness as average.

Overall user experience was positive, with reviewers calling it exceptionally easy to use, easy to clean, and a coffee maker they really liked.

Portability is limited to countertop movement, but the unit is light enough that one reviewer found it easy to move around the kitchen.

Pot function is divided: reviewers appreciate a full pot and two-hour warming, but one review found the hot plate can overheat coffee and damage flavor over time.

The keep-warm function performed well in testing, keeping coffee hot for the full two-hour test period.

Recognition evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer citing its Amazon’s Choice designation as a sign of market recognition.

The Braun received editorial recognition as the best cheap coffee maker in one reviewed guide.

Speed is context-dependent: some reviewers call it quick or efficient, while testing shows it is not among the fastest full-pot brewers.

Speed was generally strong, with one test calling it fastest at that stage and another review saying it brews quickly.

Value is the strongest consensus point, with multiple reviewers praising the low price, useful programmable features, and good-enough performance for everyday use.

Value was a major strength, with reviewers calling it budget-friendly and a best budget or best cheap coffee maker.

Warranty evidence is positive but narrow, with one reviewer pleased by the two-year limited warranty and replacement support for defects.

Maintenance is mostly easy thanks to removable parts, dishwasher-safe pieces, and visible water filling, but exterior hot-plate grime and pour-space limits remain caveats.

Water-system usability and maintenance were praised through clear tank markings and simple cleanup.