Compare Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds vs Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

ANC is generally usable to good, but it is not the product’s strongest feature; reviewers often note rivals perform better or consistency varies.

ANC was the clearest consensus strength, repeatedly described as highly effective, above its price class, and unusually strong for budget earbuds.

Android compatibility is conditional: Snapdragon-compatible phones benefit most, while Samsung and Google users cannot access the highest-bitrate features.

Android compatibility was positive where tested, including Android pairing and no cross-platform issues.

The app is feature-rich and important for setup and customization, but reviewers also reported crashing, slow loading, and some mandatory-app friction.

The app was mostly praised for control and customization, but some reviewers wanted easier setup, more features, or fewer connection frustrations.

aptX support is valued, especially aptX Lossless, but reviewers warn that Snapdragon Sound compatibility remains niche.

aptX support was criticized as absent, especially because some cheaper or similarly priced earbuds offer it.

Audio-video sync was only directly evaluated by one reviewer, who reported no lag while watching YouTube on an iPhone.

Bass is usually described as controlled, deep, and impactful, especially after personalization, but a few reviewers found default or customized bass either light or too boosted.

Bass was one of the most praised traits, usually described as powerful, punchy, deep, or dynamic, with a minority saying it can overpower the mix or sound too heavy out of the box.

Battery life is acceptable to good for ANC earbuds, but reviewers vary from respectable and impressive to merely typical or could be better.

Battery life was usually praised as long or above average, though one reviewer fell short of Sony’s claim in mixed ANC/ambient use.

Bluetooth reliability is mostly positive, including quick connection and smooth switching, though a few reviewers reported stutter, slow app connection, or connectivity issues.

Bluetooth reliability was mixed, with several reviewers reporting no issues or stable switching, while others encountered dropouts, app reconnection problems, or buzzing.

Build quality was directly praised by one reviewer, who said both the case and earbuds felt great and flagship-like.

Build quality was mostly solid for the price, though some reviewers described the plastics as slightly plasticky.

Button/control usability is a standout because reviewers praise extensive customization, many gesture options, and easy control mapping, with only one runner disliking a gesture.

Control usability was limited by awkward volume gestures and limited customization despite some responsive touch surfaces.

Cable quality/accessories drew mild criticism because one reviewer wanted a longer USB-C-to-USB-C charging cable.

Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers praised solid construction and magnet security, while others noted bulk, difficult bud removal, or a weak case feel.

Carry case quality split reviewers, with some finding it premium or sturdy and others calling it plasticky, chunky, cheap-feeling, or less sturdy over time.

Charging is mixed: reviewers praised fast, wireless, and USB-C charging, but one reported the wireless-charged case getting extremely hot.

Charging was mixed: quick charging earned praise, but the lack of wireless charging was a repeated limitation.

Codec support is a strength for compatible devices, but reviewers also note limitations with AAC, Snapdragon compatibility, and missing LDAC.

Codec support was a recurring weakness because reviewers repeatedly criticized the earbuds for offering only AAC/SBC and lacking higher-quality options.

Long-use comfort is divisive: some reviewers found the earbuds comfortable, while others reported heat, rubbing, pressure, or discomfort from the large housings.

Comfort was a major strength, with many reviewers saying the earbuds remain comfortable for hours or even all day.

Design splits reviewers: some like the smart, elegant, distinctive look, while others strongly dislike the oversized dinner-plate appearance.

Design opinions were mixed but leaned positive, especially for the transparent Glass Blue finish; some reviewers found it toy-like or only average.

Eartip fit is highly personal: several reviewers achieved a secure, comfortable seal, while others experienced popping out or poor fit.

Eartip fit was usually secure and comfortable when the right size was found, though smaller ears and seal sensitivity remained caveats.

Ear tip size options are well received, with praise for multiple tips, foam options, and fit flexibility.

Ear tip options were limited, with one reviewer warning that three sizes and no stabilizers may not suit many users.

EQ customization is useful and often praised, especially ProEQ and immersion controls, though one reviewer wanted more targeted frequency bands.

EQ customization was useful and often appreciated, though some reviewers wanted deeper controls or found Sony’s personalization basic.

Frequency balance is improved by firmware and personalization for some reviewers, but profile differences can make the tonal result uneven for others.

Frequency balance was mostly praised as balanced or preference-aligned, though one reviewer wanted more middle and high-frequency presence.

Included accessories are a positive because reviewers appreciated the supplied fit options, wings, and foam tips.

Included accessories were adequate but not generous, with one reviewer wishing Sony supplied a better charging cable.

Instrument separation is a consistent positive, with reviewers hearing clean layering, distinct elements, and better separation after calibration.

Instrument separation was praised in several reviews, with reviewers hearing clear placement, detail, and separation across layered tracks.

The integrated microphone system is generally clear and usable, with reviewers praising voice clarity and detail for calls.

Integrated microphones were generally adequate to good for calls, with stronger indoor performance and weaker results in noisier conditions.

Independent left/right bud use was praised in one review because either earbud could play alone while the other charged.

LDAC is a weakness because multiple reviewers explicitly note that the earbuds do not support it or that LDAC competitors are easier for Android users.

LDAC support was repeatedly called out as missing, which reviewers saw as disappointing for Sony earbuds and a drawback for serious listeners.

Lossless audio support is appreciated and sounds crisp to some reviewers, but its benefit depends on compatible devices and is not always transformative.

Lossless audio support was weak because one reviewer explicitly noted the lack of aptX lossless and LDAC.

Maximum-volume clarity is a strong point, with reviewers praising clean output, crystal clarity, and low distortion even at high volume.

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed, with reviewers noting muddier mids at high volume and occasional treble distortion.

Microphone noise reduction is solid overall, with reviewers noting wind and background-noise handling that keeps voice usable.

Microphone noise reduction was often praised for wind and background suppression, but a few reviewers said voice quality suffers or becomes hard to understand in noisy settings.

Call microphone quality is generally good, with reviewers hearing clear calls and intelligible voice pickup, though not always perfect.

Call microphone quality ranged from clear and impressive to merely usable, with the best results in quiet or moderate environments.

Midrange performance is generally strong, with reviewers praising clear vocals, layered mids, and presence; one reviewer found the default tuning too mid-forward and radio-like.

Midrange clarity was generally positive, especially for vocals, but some reviewers said heavy bass or higher volumes can make mids muddy or constrained.

Multi-platform compatibility was positively tested in one review through automatic switching between a tablet and phone.

Multi-platform compatibility was positive in the one review that tested both iPhone and Android without issues.

Multipoint connectivity is one of the most consistently praised usability features, with reviewers describing seamless or perfect switching between devices.

Multipoint was valued when it worked, but one reviewer reported disruptive dual-device buzzing, making reliability context-dependent.

Passive isolation benefits from the seal, foam tips, and fit options, with reviewers describing a solid seal and better noise isolation.

Passive isolation received strong marks where tested, with reviewers crediting the ear tips and secure seal for blocking outside noise before ANC.

Portability is mixed because some reviewers found the case pocketable, while others called the case bulky and the earbuds themselves large.

Portability was mostly good because the case fits pockets, though several reviewers called it bulkier than rivals or less ideal for tight pockets.

Personalized profile quality is a defining strength: most reviewers found AAT or personalized sound dramatically better, though one reviewer disliked the profile result.

Preset EQ profiles were viewed positively when reviewers found bass boost, Excited, or Bright profiles useful for shaping the sound.

Wear-detection sensors were praised as smooth, useful, and battery-saving.

Sidetone was weak in one review because the earbuds did not feed enough of the caller’s own voice back during calls.

Smudge resistance was only directly assessed once, with the reviewer noting minimal fingerprints on the case.

Smudge resistance was mixed, with one reviewer finding the case not fingerprint-prone and another saying it attracts fingerprints and dust.

Setup and software are mixed: the hearing test can impress and work well, but some reviewers found tinkering slow or less polished than rivals.

Software/setup simplicity was mixed, with one reviewer praising guided EQ setup and others reporting frustrating app signup or connection issues.

Sound quality is the clearest strength overall: most reviewers praised clean, spacious, detailed audio, though one lab-focused review was sharply negative before firmware/tuning changes.

Reviewers broadly found the WF-C710N enjoyable and strong for the price, with praise for full, engaging sound, though a few noted merely average or bass-heavy tuning.

Soundstage depth and immersion are generally strong, with reviewers describing holographic space, a bubble of music, and studio-like presence.

Soundstage depth received positive comments around three-dimensional space, soundstage, and bass/soundstage impact.

Soundstage width earns broad praise, with multiple reviewers describing wide, open, spacious, or expansive presentation from earbuds.

One lab-based review credited the earbuds with wide, clearly defined spatial presentation.

Spatial audio is polarized, ranging from underwhelming in one review to immersive, excellent, and wide in several others.

Spatial audio support was not a major draw, with reviewers noting limited service support or calling the feature unimpressive.

Stability is generally good when the right tips or wings are used, with reviewers praising secure fit and reduced fall-out risk.

Stability was polarizing: some reviewers had no fallouts, while others found the earbuds slipped during running or were insecure for workouts.

Touch responsiveness is strongly rated, with reviewers describing responsive taps, reliable touchpads, and working commands.

Touch control responsiveness was generally good, but repeated taps and accidental triggers made the control experience uneven.

Transparency or social mode is mixed: some reviewers found it gentle, useful, or convenient, while others called it basic, artificial, or ineffective.

Transparency and ambient modes were mixed: some reviewers found them useful or excellent, while others noticed hiss, delay, or weaker high-frequency reproduction.

Treble is mostly clear and energetic, with praise for sparkle and highs, but some reviewers noted brightness, tame extension, tinny highs, or slight grain depending on profile.

Treble was often described as crisp, clear, or detailed, though several reviewers noted missing upper-treble detail or occasional distortion.

Value depends heavily on price: reviewers criticized the original premium cost, but sale pricing and sound quality made it compelling for several.

Value was one of the strongest themes: reviewers consistently saw the WF-C710N as a strong budget buy despite compromises in codecs, case feel, controls, and fit.

Volume output is strong, with reviewers calling the earbuds louder than most, not shy about volume, and clear across lower and higher volumes.

One reviewer highlighted strong volume output, describing the earbuds as loud and energetic.

Water and sweat resistance is viewed as adequate for light workouts, sweat, and light rain, but no reviewer treated it as rugged waterproofing.

Water and sweat resistance was seen as adequate for light workouts or casual use, though not all reviewers trusted the fit for exercise.

Weight and size comfort is a recurring concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the earbuds as large, awkward, or uncomfortable for smaller ears.

Low weight supported comfort, with reviewers noting the earbuds are light enough to forget they are being worn.