Compare Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM vs Kenmore Intuition Bagged Upright Vacuum

Included tools are usually described as basic but useful (commonly crevice and a combo dusting/upholstery tool). Several reviewers want a wider or softer dusting tool, and some add aftermarket pet or specialty attachments.

Accessories vary by model/package: multiple reviews highlight useful upholstery/pet tools and, in some versions, turbo tools. Value is higher when the kit includes more tools and extra bags, but quality/fit of tools is debated in at least one review.

A few comments call the vacuum simple, clean, or stylish, while others dislike cosmetic choices or mention broken trim/cover parts that are mostly aesthetic.

Design/finish gets some positive mentions (e.g., sleek styling, chrome/rose-gold accents on certain versions). At least one reviewer considers it more utilitarian/old-school or bulky in practice.

Airflow blowback or scatter is specifically mentioned on hard floors by some users, including reports of particles being thrown back toward feet during use.

Area rug handling depends heavily on height setting and rug type. Some owners say it works well when adjusted up; others say it can grab edges, chew bindings, or feel too aggressive on certain rugs.

Assembly is repeatedly described as simple and quick, typically sliding in the handle and attaching the hose, with minimal screws.

Assembly is typically described as quick and easy, with straightforward snap-in steps and minimal setup time reported by at least one hands-on review.

The bag-full indicator is viewed as helpful when present, but at least one owner reports it failing to reset after changing bags.

A bag-full/level indicator is mentioned as a helpful convenience feature that reduces guesswork and prompts timely bag replacement to keep performance steady.

The bagged system is a major selling point: owners like cleaner disposal, consistent suction, and less dust exposure than bagless designs. Bag capacity is often praised, but replacement cost and bag consumption (especially with heavy shedding or wool rugs) are frequent notes.

Bagged operation is a defining feature. Many reviewers like the cleaner disposal and note synthetic bags can maintain suction reasonably well, but bag capacity and sealing details are debated, and you must keep bags stocked.

Build quality feedback is polarized: some praise sturdy materials (metal brush roll, aluminum wand, rubber bumpers), while others report cheap-feeling plastics, wobble, broken handles/covers, or hose issues over time.

Build quality feedback is split. Some reviews describe a well-designed, feature-rich product for the price, while a technician-style review calls materials and mechanisms cheap/chintzy and not up to older Kenmore expectations.

High-pile carpet performance is generally strong due to agitation and height settings, but some users find it hard to push or overly aggressive if set too low.

High-pile/shag performance is described as strong by at least one test source, while other reviewers caution that very thick carpet can be harder to push due to no height adjustment and strong suction (mitigated by a suction release valve on some variants).

Low-pile carpet results are typically positive, especially for everyday pickup and pet hair, though pushing effort can increase if suction is high and height is set low.

Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.

Medium-pile carpet cleaning is consistently praised, with multiple reports of lifting matted carpet and pulling embedded dirt and pet hair that previous vacuums missed.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly called out as a strength, including embedded sand/debris test outcomes described as top-tier.

Some owners mention clogs or brush/belt issues that require disassembly, while others highlight visible clog indicators and easy access to the roller area for checks.

Comparisons are common: many say it out-cleans certain Sharks/Dysons on carpet and pet hair, while at least one comparison favors a premium canister for ease and deep extraction despite higher upkeep.

Controls are usually described as straightforward, with height adjustment settings that are easy to use. The foot pedal placement is occasionally criticized for accidental shutoffs when bumping furniture.

Cord length perception varies: several reviewers call it long enough (often cited as 30 ft), while others say it is shorter than expected and requires frequent outlet changes in larger spaces.

Cord length is often listed as long (commonly cited as 30 ft), though at least one review suggests a shorter effective reach depending on how the cord is routed/managed. Overall, corded coverage is viewed as adequate to strong.

Cord wrap is often praised as neat and practical, but multiple users wish for a retractable cord for convenience and to reduce cord management hassles.

Cord management gets mixed notes: some appreciate the overall reach, while others complain about hooks being stiff or the routing getting in the way of certain lift-off configurations.

Crevice/groove pickup is frequently highlighted as a strength relative to some competitors, supported by test commentary and the usefulness of the integrated wand for hard-to-reach debris.

Maneuverability is often described as better than expected for its size, helped by swivel steering and a relatively light chassis. Still, some note it can feel dense/hefty in hand or less ideal in tight, low-clearance spaces.

Day-to-day use is often described as simple and satisfying on carpet, but usability drops for some due to weight when carrying, strong pull on thick carpet, short hose frustrations, or brush roll behavior during hose use.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is highlighted positively by some owners, while others still avoid edges on delicate rugs due to brush aggression.

No-touch / low-mess disposal is frequently cited as a major advantage. Several sources describe a bag release that reduces contact with dust and makes disposal quick and hygienic.

Filtration is a standout: multiple reviews highlight HEPA-style bags and filters, strong dust containment, and noticeable allergy relief versus bagless vacuums.

Filtration and dust containment are repeatedly praised: sealed system language, HEPA-oriented bags/filters, and reduced dust exposure during disposal are common. This is positioned as a strong fit for allergy concerns.

The floorhead/brush system is powerful but divisive. Many emphasize strong agitation and carpet grooming; many also complain the brush roll runs continuously and can be too aggressive on hard floors and some rugs.

Hair pickup on carpets is good overall, but multiple reviews note that hair can remain on or wrap around the brushroll, reducing the 'clean it and forget it' experience for heavy-shedding homes.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a consistent weak spot across several sources. Even when hair-focused branding is mentioned, reviewers still report wrap and that brushroll cleaning can be tedious.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is inconsistent: some users report very clean results, while others say the brush roll and airflow can scatter particles or require switching to other vacuums for hard floors.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as decent but not class-leading; some sources report improved results with additional passes or technique, and a minority note dragging/pushing behavior in certain situations.

Large debris intake on hard floors gets mixed feedback, including complaints about litter or particles being thrown back during use in some homes.

Large debris intake on hard floors is generally good for the class, with some mention of larger debris handling aided by the floorhead/gate design. A few reviewers note occasional snowplow/drag or a couple pieces left behind on hard floors.

The headlight is frequently mentioned as useful for spotting debris, though at least one owner questions bulb longevity and whether the lights are true LEDs.

Headlights/LEDs are consistently noted as a helpful usability feature for spotting debris in dim areas, and reviewers generally treat them as a meaningful perk at this price level.

Reach is a frequent theme: some are happy with the wand/hose extension for corners and drapes, while others say the permanently attached hose feels too short and can tug the vacuum toward them.

Hose length/behavior is inconsistent across sources. Some mention long reach, while a technician-style review calls the hose short, stiff, and prone to tipping/pulling the unit, which can hurt real-world above-floor ergonomics.

Low-profile reach is a common limitation. Multiple sources note it can be tricky under low furniture, and the overall body shape/positioning can restrict access compared with more under-furniture-focused designs.

Maintenance expectations are higher than some modern uprights: multiple owners mention periodic belt changes and watching filters/bags, and a few report recurring belt or brush issues.

Maintenance is shaped by the bagged system (cleaner disposal) but complicated by brushroll hair wrap and, for some, finicky small mechanisms. Several reviewers flag brushroll cleaning as annoying or difficult.

Handling is mixed: some call it easy to maneuver with good wheel roll and a small footprint, while others find it awkward to lift onto steps, hard to push on thick carpet, or unstable/wobbly when parked.

Noise is a common downside. Many describe it as loud, though a few say the tone is acceptable or less irritating than other vacuums.

Noise impressions vary. Some sources call it quieter than certain competitors or surprisingly reasonable for performance, while at least one review describes it as loud during testing. Overall it lands around mid-pack rather than ultra-quiet.

Onboard tool storage is commonly praised as convenient and secure, helping reduce lost tools and making quick transitions easier.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned positively by some as convenient, but criticized by at least one reviewer who reports tools not locking well and being easy to knock off, implying variability by model and expectations.

Ongoing costs are mostly about bags and periodic belts/filters. Many accept the trade for cleaner disposal and better dust control, but some find OEM bags or add-on tools expensive.

Ongoing costs are a recurring tradeoff: bags (and some filters) add ownership expense over time. Multiple sources frame this as the main downside versus bagless convenience, even if disposal is cleaner.

Longevity reports are split: some claim many years across prior Simplicity units and expect long service due to replaceable parts, while others report failures around 1 to 2 years, frequent belt breaks, or brush/motor issues.

No summary yet.

Pet owners frequently praise strong pickup on carpet and reduced lingering hair. A few reports note limitations for long hair on upholstery or brush/belt strain in heavy pet homes.

Value is usually rated positively for a bagged HEPA-style upright, with several reviewers calling it worth the money. Some disagree when durability or repair frequency becomes an issue.

Value is generally described as strong for a bagged upright with these features, especially when priced under typical premium uprights. However, some reviewers argue the value depends heavily on sale pricing and expectations around build/tool refinement.

Some users describe a powered-assist or self-propel-like feel, while others explicitly wish it were self-propelled, especially as they age or when cleaning thick carpet.

Stair cleaning is supported via hose/tools and at least one stair-focused attachment mention, but carrying weight and hose tug can make stair work more demanding for some users.

Stair cleaning benefits from the lift-off/lift-up pod concept, and several reviewers like the idea for above-floor work. A technician-style review warns the short/stiff hose and stability can make stairs feel awkward in practice.

Several reviewers like the compact footprint and storage friendliness, especially for apartments and tight spaces. Upright stability is occasionally criticized due to wobble or center-of-gravity comments.

Suction is consistently described as strong, often the primary reason people keep the vacuum. A minority say it is good but not on par with their best prior vacuum, or that strong suction can increase push effort.

Strong suction is a recurring theme, including measured airflow/suction reporting and subjective comments about a solid carpet seal and strong pickup. Some sources note strong head performance versus similarly priced uprights, though a few mention limits on hard floors or thick carpet push resistance tied to high suction.

Support experiences are mixed but lean positive in key stories, including at least one report of a quick refund after failure. Others report difficulty reaching customer service or post-warranty parts frustration.

Tool changes are usually straightforward, especially with the telescoping wand. Compatibility with older hoses or certain attachments is a reported pain point for some owners.

Tool-change is generally described as straightforward (quick-release wand/tools), though a few sources mention a learning curve for reseating the wand/bag mechanism or frustration with attachment retention.

Above-floor cleaning is generally strong with the wand and crevice tool, but upholstery performance is mixed, including complaints about long pet hair on couches and limited included fabric tools.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally described as a strong use case thanks to included tools (e.g., upholstery brushes/turbo tools/pet tools on some kits) and the detachable pod, though tool fit/retention quality is disputed by at least one reviewer.

No summary yet.

Weight impressions vary but cluster around sturdy and somewhat heavy. Many say it feels fine while pushing, but heavier when carrying up stairs or doing repeated back-and-forth on thick carpet.

Weight is commonly reported around the mid-teens (about 14 lb) in some reviews, but other sources describe it as heavier/dense or cite higher numbers for certain variants. Perceived carrying comfort can vary, especially on stairs.

Wool and delicate rug compatibility is a concern in the reviews: some users report damage to a rug or needing to avoid edges, and others note wool rugs fill bags quickly even when they like the cleaning result.