Compare Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM vs Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum

Included tools are usually described as basic but useful (commonly crevice and a combo dusting/upholstery tool). Several reviewers want a wider or softer dusting tool, and some add aftermarket pet or specialty attachments.

Reviews consistently note a useful tool set for the price, often including a crevice tool, dusting brush, extension/wand, and a pet-focused turbo tool.

A few comments call the vacuum simple, clean, or stylish, while others dislike cosmetic choices or mention broken trim/cover parts that are mostly aesthetic.

Aesthetics are described as typical for the category: a modern, pet-themed look with bright accents rather than a premium finish.

Airflow blowback or scatter is specifically mentioned on hard floors by some users, including reports of particles being thrown back toward feet during use.

Some scattering or blowback is reported on hard floors or with certain debris, especially when height is set too high or the brush action outpaces suction.

Area rug handling depends heavily on height setting and rug type. Some owners say it works well when adjusted up; others say it can grab edges, chew bindings, or feel too aggressive on certain rugs.

Assembly is repeatedly described as simple and quick, typically sliding in the handle and attaching the hose, with minimal screws.

Multiple reviewers found setup straightforward, typically just attaching the handle and snapping or screwing a few parts in before cleaning.

The bag-full indicator is viewed as helpful when present, but at least one owner reports it failing to reset after changing bags.

A visible fill line or indicator on the bin is appreciated as a helpful cue for when to empty, especially for a budget model.

The bagged system is a major selling point: owners like cleaner disposal, consistent suction, and less dust exposure than bagless designs. Bag capacity is often praised, but replacement cost and bag consumption (especially with heavy shedding or wool rugs) are frequent notes.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty with a bottom-release door; some users note the fill line can feel conservative, leading to more frequent emptying.

Build quality feedback is polarized: some praise sturdy materials (metal brush roll, aluminum wand, rubber bumpers), while others report cheap-feeling plastics, wobble, broken handles/covers, or hose issues over time.

Build quality is often described as mostly plastic and budget-grade; it feels lighter but may not inspire long-term confidence compared with pricier uprights.

High-pile carpet performance is generally strong due to agitation and height settings, but some users find it hard to push or overly aggressive if set too low.

High-pile performance ranges from very good on hair and smaller debris to weaker on larger pieces when head clearance becomes an issue.

Low-pile carpet results are typically positive, especially for everyday pickup and pet hair, though pushing effort can increase if suction is high and height is set low.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, though large debris can still require extra passes in some lab-style testing.

Medium-pile carpet cleaning is consistently praised, with multiple reports of lifting matted carpet and pulling embedded dirt and pet hair that previous vacuums missed.

Medium-pile carpet performance is repeatedly strong, including at least one deep-clean test reporting excellent sand pickup.

Some owners mention clogs or brush/belt issues that require disassembly, while others highlight visible clog indicators and easy access to the roller area for checks.

Clogging prevention is a mix: some like the suction blockage indicator, while others warn hair and debris can build up and require frequent cleaning to avoid performance drop.

Comparisons are common: many say it out-cleans certain Sharks/Dysons on carpet and pet hair, while at least one comparison favors a premium canister for ease and deep extraction despite higher upkeep.

In comparisons, it is treated as a capable budget option, but it does not match premium uprights for power, refinement, or filtration.

Controls are usually described as straightforward, with height adjustment settings that are easy to use. The foot pedal placement is occasionally criticized for accidental shutoffs when bumping furniture.

Controls are serviceable but not premium: common notes include foot-based buttons and a height dial that may require bending, plus occasional complaints about button placement.

Cord length perception varies: several reviewers call it long enough (often cited as 30 ft), while others say it is shorter than expected and requires frequent outlet changes in larger spaces.

Cord length is commonly reported around 27 feet, which is usable for most rooms but a bit shorter than some uprights with longer cords.

Cord wrap is often praised as neat and practical, but multiple users wish for a retractable cord for convenience and to reduce cord management hassles.

Cord management is a strong convenience point on rewind variants, while non-rewind versions still offer clips/hooks that help keep the cord out of the way.

Crevice and groove pickup is described as decent but not class-leading; results vary by test material and technique.

Multi-cyclonic design is credited with maintaining suction reasonably well during typical cleaning, though it does not fully solve large-debris limitations.

Day-to-day use is often described as simple and satisfying on carpet, but usability drops for some due to weight when carrying, strong pull on thick carpet, short hose frustrations, or brush roll behavior during hose use.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is highlighted positively by some owners, while others still avoid edges on delicate rugs due to brush aggression.

No summary yet.

Emptying is generally clean and simple thanks to the bottom-drop design, though clumped hair can sometimes stick and require manual removal.

Filtration is a standout: multiple reviews highlight HEPA-style bags and filters, strong dust containment, and noticeable allergy relief versus bagless vacuums.

Filtration is the biggest downside across sources: it lacks a sealed HEPA system and some testing reports significant particle release, making it a weak fit for allergy-sensitive homes.

The floorhead/brush system is powerful but divisive. Many emphasize strong agitation and carpet grooming; many also complain the brush roll runs continuously and can be too aggressive on hard floors and some rugs.

The floorhead design is budget-focused: it can clean well when settings are right, but low clearance and brush behavior can contribute to plowing on certain debris.

A sealing flap or squeegee-like feature is cited as helping hard-floor pickup and reducing scatter when the height setting is dialed in.

Pet hair pickup on carpet is a frequent strength, with multiple reviews calling it strong for the price, though effectiveness can drop as hair accumulates.

Hair can wrap around the brush and cleaning it can be tedious; higher-end competitors manage tangles better in several comparisons.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is inconsistent: some users report very clean results, while others say the brush roll and airflow can scatter particles or require switching to other vacuums for hard floors.

No summary yet.

Large debris intake on hard floors gets mixed feedback, including complaints about litter or particles being thrown back during use in some homes.

Large debris on hard floors is mixed: small debris is fine, but bigger pieces can be pushed, plowed, or scattered depending on height and brush behavior.

The headlight is frequently mentioned as useful for spotting debris, though at least one owner questions bulb longevity and whether the lights are true LEDs.

Several comparisons note the absence of headlights or floor illumination on the CleanView models discussed, unlike some higher-end uprights.

Reach is a frequent theme: some are happy with the wand/hose extension for corners and drapes, while others say the permanently attached hose feels too short and can tug the vacuum toward them.

Above-floor reach is mixed: some variants have a useful hose length for stairs and upholstery, while others describe the hose as short for high shelves or tall furniture.

Maintenance expectations are higher than some modern uprights: multiple owners mention periodic belt changes and watching filters/bags, and a few report recurring belt or brush issues.

Maintenance is a real requirement: regular bin emptying, filter washing, and brush/belt checks are repeatedly mentioned to keep performance and reliability stable.

Handling is mixed: some call it easy to maneuver with good wheel roll and a small footprint, while others find it awkward to lift onto steps, hard to push on thick carpet, or unstable/wobbly when parked.

Swivel steering is repeatedly highlighted as a usability win, making it easier to navigate around furniture, though some users find the swivel can make straight-line tracking a bit less precise.

Noise is a common downside. Many describe it as loud, though a few say the tone is acceptable or less irritating than other vacuums.

Noise is a recurring compromise: one test measured very loud levels, while other reviews call it slightly louder than average for an upright.

Onboard tool storage is commonly praised as convenient and secure, helping reduce lost tools and making quick transitions easier.

Onboard storage is commonly noted on pet-focused variants, keeping core tools attached and accessible, though not every accessory has a perfect home.

Ongoing costs are mostly about bags and periodic belts/filters. Many accept the trade for cleaner disposal and better dust control, but some find OEM bags or add-on tools expensive.

Ongoing costs are described as manageable, with washable filters and routine maintenance rather than expensive consumables being the main ownership burden.

Longevity reports are split: some claim many years across prior Simplicity units and expect long service due to replaceable parts, while others report failures around 1 to 2 years, frequent belt breaks, or brush/motor issues.

Longevity feedback is mixed: some owners are happy, while others cite concerns about early failure and recommend keeping up with maintenance.

Overall sentiment skews positive for budget shoppers, but more critical reviews recommend alternatives if you need better filtration or more consistent hard-floor pickup.

Pet owners frequently praise strong pickup on carpet and reduced lingering hair. A few reports note limitations for long hair on upholstery or brush/belt strain in heavy pet homes.

Pet-focused features are a core draw, including a turbo tool and brush roll designed to lift pet hair, with performance best on carpet and upholstery touch-ups.

Value is usually rated positively for a bagged HEPA-style upright, with several reviewers calling it worth the money. Some disagree when durability or repair frequency becomes an issue.

Value is a primary reason reviewers recommend it: strong cleaning and features for the money, with tradeoffs mainly in filtration and refinement.

Some users describe a powered-assist or self-propel-like feel, while others explicitly wish it were self-propelled, especially as they age or when cleaning thick carpet.

Stair cleaning is supported via hose/tools and at least one stair-focused attachment mention, but carrying weight and hose tug can make stair work more demanding for some users.

Several reviewers like the compact footprint and storage friendliness, especially for apartments and tight spaces. Upright stability is occasionally criticized due to wobble or center-of-gravity comments.

Storage is reasonable for an upright and remains stable when parked, but some designs have a higher head profile that can limit where it fits.

Suction is consistently described as strong, often the primary reason people keep the vacuum. A minority say it is good but not on par with their best prior vacuum, or that strong suction can increase push effort.

Performance is generally described as solid for a budget upright: capable pickup on carpet and smaller debris, but not a top-tier powerhouse versus premium uprights.

Support experiences are mixed but lean positive in key stories, including at least one report of a quick refund after failure. Others report difficulty reaching customer service or post-warranty parts frustration.

Reliability is a concern in at least one user report citing many complaints about early failures; routine belt and clog checks are advised.

Surface safety is generally fine, with reviewers noting it avoids scratching, but the always-on brushroll on some variants can be a concern on delicate floors if you are not careful.

Tool changes are usually straightforward, especially with the telescoping wand. Compatibility with older hoses or certain attachments is a reported pain point for some owners.

Tool changes are generally simple, but the always-on brushroll during above-floor tool use can make the workflow feel less polished.

Under-furniture cleaning can be limited by head height and how the handle tilts; several reviews note it does not reach as easily as some competitors.

Above-floor cleaning is generally strong with the wand and crevice tool, but upholstery performance is mixed, including complaints about long pet hair on couches and limited included fabric tools.

The included motorized or turbo hand tool can help on upholstery and stairs, though some users find the turbo tool loses effectiveness when pressed into fabric.

Versatility is good for a basic upright: it can handle mixed floors and switch to above-floor tools for stairs and upholstery, but it lacks higher-end conveniences like sealed HEPA filtration or advanced power controls.

Weight impressions vary but cluster around sturdy and somewhat heavy. Many say it feels fine while pushing, but heavier when carrying up stairs or doing repeated back-and-forth on thick carpet.

Several reviews describe the vacuum as easy to push and relatively light-feeling, though some tested variants are heavier than the lightest budget uprights.

Wool and delicate rug compatibility is a concern in the reviews: some users report damage to a rug or needing to avoid edges, and others note wool rugs fill bags quickly even when they like the cleaning result.